B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0003 - Performance Assessment Questionnaire _Final.docx

DOCX document 58 KB Posted

Attached to
System Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) Support for Public Safety Communications (PSC)
Solicitation number
W15P7T-27-R-A001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire template issued by the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground to obtain past performance evaluations of offerors responding to RFP W15P7T-27-R-A001 for Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) Support for Public Safety Communications (PSC).

The questionnaire requests responses from identified points of contact regarding contractor performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts classified under NAICS 541330 (Engineering Services). Respondents are asked to rate contractors across five evaluation criteria: compliance of products, services, and deliverables to specification requirements; effectiveness of project management including subcontractor control; timeliness of performance; effectiveness in forecasting and controlling estimated costs (applicable to cost-reimbursement contracts); and commitment to customer satisfaction and business-like concern for customer interests. Each criterion uses a five-point rating scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with required rationale for each response. Responses must be submitted to Contracting Officer Katia Lacoste and Contract Specialist Rosa Acevedo no later than 15 days after receipt or by 30 September 2026, whichever occurs first. The questionnaire template includes sections for contractor identification, offeror representative information, evaluation ratings with rationale, general comments, identification of other relevant past efforts, and respondent identification. Responses are treated as source selection information and protected from public disclosure, though summary ratings will be provided to offerors in accordance with FAR 15.503(b).

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0006- Cost Price Proposal Workbook_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 0007-RFP Industry- BECS Q_A Sheet_Rev16Sep26.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W15P7T-27-R-A001- FINAL RFP - SETA PSC_20Aug2026_ Rev01.docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026__Rev01.pdf PDF
W15P7T-26-R-SETA - Attachment 0007-RFP Industry- BECS Q_A Sheet_04Sep2026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - Draft PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026_Tracked_Rev01.docx DOCX document
W15P7T-27-R-A001- DRAFT RFP - SETA PSC_20Aug2026_ Rev01.docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0005 - Corporate Experience Information Form_Rev01.docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - Draft PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026_Final..docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - Draft PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026_Final.pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - Draft PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026_Final.docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 -Attachment 0001 -PWS - SETA PSC_19Aug2026_Final..pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0006- Cost Price Proposal Workbook_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0001 - PWS - SETA PSC _19Aug2026_Final.pdf PDF
A03-CDRL G002_Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL E001 Asset Database Entries_ BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL B002 System Design Documents_ BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL A002_POAMs_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0004 - Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)_Final.docx DOCX document
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0003 - Performance Assessment Questionnaire _Signature Page.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL G001_Contractor Travel_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL E003 Asset Database Synchronization_SETA for PSC.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL B003 Architectural Modernization Plan_ SETA for PSC.pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0007- RFP Industry Question Sheet_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0002 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan_Final.pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001- DRAFT RFP - SETA PSC_20Aug2026_ Final.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL E002 Asset Database Updates_ BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL F001_Monthly Invoice_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL D002 Cybersecurity Assessment Reports_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL D001 Integration and Testing Plans_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL B001 ECPs_SETA for PSC.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL A004_Quarterly Program Management Reviews (QPMRs)_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL A003_Risk Management Plan (RMP)_BECS SETA.pdf PDF
B08-CDRL A001_Monthly Progress Report_SETA for PSC.pdf PDF
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0006- Cost Price Proposal Workbook_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08 - W15P7T-27-R-A001 - Attachment 0005 - Corporate Experience Information Form_Final.docx DOCX document
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI//SP-PROCURE//FEDCON

Performance Assesment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

6590 Reconnaissance Street, Building 6010

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013

20 August 2026

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W15P7T-27-R-A001, Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) Support for Public Safety Communications (PSC).

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The United States Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Engineering Services 541330. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Your response(s) will be treated as source selection information and will be protected from public disclosure in accordance with (IAW) RFO FAR 3.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor bid or proposal information and source selection information. The offeror will not have access to your individual response; however, summary past performance ratings will be provided to the offeror in accordance with RFO FAR 41.11 Contractor Performance Information. Please complete the enclosure and return to the point of contacts listed below, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or by 30 September 2026, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Contracting Officer Katia Lacoste, katia.lacoste.civ@army.mil & Contract Specialist Rosa Acevedo, rosa.m.acevedomedina.civ@army.mil .

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed in writing to the Contracting Officer & Contract Specialist.

Sincerely, Katia Lacoste

ACC-APG

Contracting Officer

Performance Assesment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the POCs identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit Government. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the Government. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Exceptional

· Very Good

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory

Rationale: __________________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Satisfactory

· Marginal

· Unsatisfactory Rationale: __________________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comment(s): ________________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

DISCLAIMER

The information provided in this questionnaire will be used as one factor in the Government's evaluation of past performance under the subject RFP. Past performance information is not the sole basis for contract award; the Government will also evaluate technical capability, pricing, and other factors specified in the RFP. The Government reserves the right to request clarification or additional information from respondents. By submitting this questionnaire, you acknowledge that:

• Your responses are based on your personal knowledge and recollection and may not reflect all relevant facts.

• The Government may contact you for follow-up questions or clarification.

• Your responses may be disclosed to the offeror in summary form (without attribution) in accordance with FAR 15.503(b).

• You are not liable for any consequences arising from the Government's use of this information in its source selection decision.

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

CUI//SP-PROCURE//FEDCON

JUL 2026

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .