B08_Attach 3 Report 2_Hazmat Survey.pdf

Final

TASK ORDER NO. 140P2018F0117

National Park Service (NPS) Contract No. P14PC00005

Document No.: 106/144026

CRLA 198641

CORRECT STRUCTURAL DEFICIENCIES & STABILIZE STEEL VISITOR CENTER

CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK

HAZMAT SURVEY

October 25, 2018

Prepared by:

ATC Group Services LLC 383 Industrial Way, Ste 300 Anchorage, AK 99501 Phone: 907-258-8661

Prepared for:

Rim Architects 645 G Street

383 Industrial Way Suite 300 www.atcgroupservices.com

907 258 8661

October 25, 2018

Mr. Bryce Klug 645 G Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501

Re: Hazmat Survey Steel Visitor Center - Crater Lake National Park

CRLA 198641

ATC Project Number: 212-18

Dear Mr. Klug, ATC Group Services LLC (ATC) is pleased to submit the attached Hazmat Survey conducted at the above-referenced site. This report includes procedures, methodologies and analytical laboratory results.

ATC appreciates the opportunity to perform these services for the National Park Service, and we look forward to working with you in the future. If you need any assistance with the implementation of the recommendations contained in this report, please contact us at (907) 258-8661 and ATC will respond promptly to your needs.

Sincerely, ATC GROUP SERVICES LLC

Matt White PE CIH

Senior Industrial Hygienist http://www.atcgroupservices.com/ iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

3.0 HAZMAT SURVEY REPORT

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

3.2 Sampling Strategy

3.3 Hazard Assessment Matrix

3.4 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

3.5 Suspect Lead Containing Paint

3.6 Suspect PCB Containing Equipment……………………………………………………………………...3

3.7 Rodent Feces

4.0 CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………………………………..4

5.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A BUILDING SCHEMATIC

APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

APPENDIX C INSPECTOR ACCREDITATION

HAZMAT SURVEY REPORT

Steel Visitors Center

Crater Lake National Park

ATC Project Number: 212-18

1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The purpose of this project was to perform a Hazmat Survey at the above referenced property.

ATC provided a representative hazmat survey as outlined below:

Identify accessible suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA's) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).

Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect materials.

Collect and analyze paint samples.

Inspect electrical equipment for PCBs.

Submit a Hazmat Survey report to describe the type and location of all hazardous materials that will impact scheduled structural and building system upgrades.

2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

The survey was conducted at the Steel Visitor Center located in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon.

The Steel Visitor Center was constructed between 1932 and 1936 as a ranger dormitory.

This project will replace the 2011 temporary shoring, provide a permanent solution to correct structural deficiencies in the 5,000 square feet (sf), one and a half story VC; and provide appropriate code and sustainability related elements to the fire suppression, electrical and mechanical systems, and building envelope. In 2011 an emergency steel shoring system was installed to underpin the first floor ceiling of the Steel Visitor Center (VC).

The rehabilitation will strengthen 250 linear feet (lf) of rubble stone footing with reinforced concrete;

strengthen the 4,200 sf roof structure, 10 dormers, and 250 lf exterior stone walls to withstand snow fall of greater than 500 inches/yr and provide seismic and wind restraints for life safety; add additional insulation in the exterior walls and roof; provide 31 storm windows to improve the building’s thermal performance; rodent-proof the attic and crawlspace; and remove mold, mildew and hazardous materials.

3.0 HAZMAT SURVEY REPORT

On 07/20/2018, the Steel Visitor Center located at Crater Lake National Park, Klamath County, Oregon was inspected for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead containing paint, and PCBs by inspector Matthew White of ATC. Matthew White has completed the requisite training for this work. Mr. White's AHERA accreditation and/or inspector license is provided in Appendix D.

The site was visually inspected for the presence of suspect hazardous materials. Materials that were hidden, not accessible, or when sampled would damage the integrity of the structure, were not sampled as part of this survey. Materials visibly identified as non-asbestos (fibrous glass, foam, rubber, wood, etc.) were not sampled. The hazmat survey consisted of three basic steps:

1) a visual inspection of the proposed site;

2) a determination of homogeneous areas with suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and

3) sampling accessible suspect materials.

3.1 Homogeneous Areas

Prior to sampling, homogeneous areas were identified in order to facilitate a sampling strategy. A homogeneous sampling area can be described as one or more areas with suspect material similar in appearance and texture that have the same installation date and function. For the purpose of this survey, the Facility was inspected as one functional area. The actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area may vary, dependent upon material type and the professional judgment of the inspector.

3.2 Sampling Strategy

The sampling strategy incorporated OSHA requirements, quantities of suspect material, and the inspector's judgment to aid in the identification of suspect asbestos containing materials. ATC's sampling strategy was to identify and collect accessible suspect asbestos containing materials and suspect lead containing paint.

Materials which were visually determined to be non-asbestos (i.e. fibrous glass, foam, rubber, etc.)

by the accredited inspector were not required to be sampled. Actual collection of a bulk asbestos sample involves physically removing approximately one square inch (1 in2) of material and placing it in an airtight sample container. Sample containers were marked with a unique identification number, which was documented in the field notes.

3.3 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials

The following table contains a list of 28 sampled accessible building materials suspected of containing asbestos:

TABLE 1: SUSPECT BUILDING MATERIALS

Sample Number Material Material Sample Location

1 Wall texture Bookstore lobby at existing damage

2 Wall texture Bookstore near fireplace

3 Wall texture Visitor information

4 Smooth plaster wall finish h

Visitor information

5 Ceiling plaster Theater at fireplace

6 Vinyl tile Trash room

7 Plaster Trash room

8 Plaster Library ceiling

9 Floor tile and mastic Library

10 Plaster Museum storage

11 Covebase mastic Janitors closet

12 Floor tile Janitors closet

13 Duct tape / sealant Attic space

14 Floor leveling compound Associate office – under carpet

15 Floor tile & mastic Associate office – under carpet

16 Sink coating Work shop

17 Floor tile and mastic Work shop

18 Floor leveling compound Work shop

19 Sheet vinyl Janitors closet

20 Floor leveling compound / mastic Crawlspace

21 Sheet vinyl Under water heater

22 Sheet vinyl Under water heater

23 Plaster Basement mechanical room

24 Joint Compound Basement ceiling

25 Duct tape Basement mechanical room

26 Glazing compound Exterior window

27 Roof felt Under cedar shakes

The following table is a summary of the suspect asbestos-containing materials that have been determined, through laboratory analysis, to contain asbestos:

TABLE 2: ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

Sample

Number

Material

Description &

Type (T, S, M)

Location Friability Quantity Condition Hazard

Rank

Asbestos

Content

15 Floor tile Associate office under carpet

Non-friable

40 ft2 Good One 3%

Chrysotile

All floor tiles and mastic there were reported as non-detect by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) were re-analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). This is performed since PLM resolution may not be able to detect the finest and smallest asbestos fibers that were known to be used as fillers in vinyl tile manufacturing process. The results from the TEM analysis did indicate that two of the tile types that were reported as non-detect by PLM were found to contain significant concentrations of asbestos. The results were sent to yet another lab to confirm the results. The 3rd round of analysis confirmed the second and drawings have been updated to reflect the increased scope of asbestos work.

The following table is a summary of the TEM analysis performed by AMA Analytical Services, which have been determined to contain asbestos.

TABLE 3: ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS Using TEM Analysis

Number

Material

Description &

Type (T, S, M)

Location Friability Quantity Condition Hazard

Rank

Asbestos

Content

09 Floor tile Library Non-friable

Good One 10.6%

Chrysotile

17 Floor tile Work Shop Non- Friable

Good One 10.4%

The following table is a summary of the TEM analysis performed by SAI, which have been determined to contain asbestos.

TABLE 4: ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS Using TEM Analysis

Number

Material

Description &

Type (T, S, M)

Location Friability Quantity Condition Hazard

Rank

Asbestos

Content

09 Floor tile and

Mastic

Library Non-friable

Good One 23%, 2.6%

Chrysotile

17 Floor tile Work Shop Non- Friable

Good One 24%

3.4 Laboratory Analytical Results Asbestos

Bulk samples were analyzed using the Environmental Protection Agency's Test Method: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116.July, 1993) by ATC in Anchorage, Alaska. ATC is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP No. 200124-0). ATC was requested to conduct further TEM analysis.

Any material that contains greater than one percent asbestos is considered an ACM and must be handled according to OSHA, EPA, and all applicable state and local regulations.

Details of sample analysis are included in Appendix B, which contains a listing of all analyzed samples, sample locations, and analytical results relating to the site. Asbestos analytical results are reported as percentage and type. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted in the analytical report.

3.5 Suspect Lead Containing Paint

Three samples of paint were collected. The majority of the interior finish was plaster/gypsum walls with a very thin layer of paint. The remainder of the interior finishes was stained wood. The exterior paint was limited to white paint on windows. In the basement mechanical room there was some painted concrete and brickwork.

TABLE 3: Lead Containing Materials

Number

Material

Description

Location Color Quantity Condition Level of

Detection

Lead

Content

(ppm)

L01 Paint Basement brickwork White 140 ft2 Good 110 <110

L02 Paint Exterior windows White 32 Good 110 8,900

L03 Paint Interior plaster/gypsum walls

White Throughout Good 120 <120

Details of sample analysis are included in Appendix B, which contains a listing of all analyzed samples, sample locations, and analytical results relating to the site. Lead analytical results are reported as parts per million (ppm).

3.6 Suspect PCB Containing Equipment

Only one fluorescent light fixture was noted at the facility. The fixture ballast was labeled “PCB free.”

3.7 Rodent Feces

Rodent feces was visible in the attic at the access hatch and in the basement mechanical space.

For the purpose of worker protection is should be assumed that rodent feces is present throughout the attic area and all areas of the basement and below floor crawl spaces.

4.0 Conclusions

1. Asbestos containing materials are limited to floor tile and mastic found on the second floor in the associates’ office, workshop/office/media studio/distance learning area, and the park library room.

2. Lead containing paint is limited to the exterior windows

3. No PCBs were noted within the building.

5.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The results, findings and recommendations expressed in this report are based solely on conditions noted during the 07/20/2018 ATC inspection of the site.

Additional ACM may be present at the site in inaccessible or concealed spaces. These spaces include, but are not limited to, pipe chases, spaces between wall/ceiling/door/floor cavities, interior of mechanical components such as boiler cavities, interior ducts, beneath foundation pads, etc. If future renovation or demolition activities make these areas accessible, ATC recommends that a thorough assessment of these spaces be conducted at that time to identify and confirm the presence or absence of additional ACMs. Until then, all such unidentified materials should be treated as Presumed ACM (PACM) in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 and 1910.1001. ATC did not conduct any destructive investigation of doors in the building to determine if the doors were insulated for fire-rating purposes.

ATC typically investigates for flooring beneath carpeting by lifting small corner sections of carpet.

If tiles were seen, they have been identified in the report. If tiles were not seen at corners under the carpet, it does not imply that there are no tiles beneath the carpeted floor. ATC did not conduct any destructive investigation on floors to identify multi-layered tile/underlayment systems/concealed paper, equipment, floor tiles/mastics under wood floor systems.

Any concealed building materials discovered during renovation or demolition activities, which are suspected to contain asbestos, should be sampled and analyzed to confirm the presence of asbestos prior to disturbing such materials. All outside contractors and subcontractors should be made aware of the location of known ACMs and possibility of concealed suspect ACMs that could be encountered during renovation/demolition activities. Contractors should be advised in advance, in writing, to not disturb the ACMs or PACMs.

The EPA has not prohibited the manufacture and import of miscellaneous materials, such as vinyl floorings, mastics, roofing materials, etc. As a result, any future replacement materials should be checked for the presence of asbestos prior to installation.

The report is designed to aid the building owner, architect, construction manager, general contractor, and potential asbestos abatement contractor in locating ACM. Under no circumstances is the report to be utilized as a bidding document or as a project specification document since it does not have all the components required to serve as an Asbestos Project Design document or an Abatement Work plan.

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

APPENDIX A

BUILDING SCHEMATIC

2 3 4 5

B

C

D

E

G

F

A

E

D

C

B

G

A

F

2 3 4 5 61

HH

B.1

B.1

B.2 B.2

D.1D.1

D.2D.2

(E) LOAD BEARING

PONY WALL

ALIGNMENT

(E) LOAD BEARING PONY

WALL ALIGNMENT

TRASH

TERRACE

VISITOR

LOBBY

ENTRY

ASSOC. SALES

VISITOR

INFO.

PROJ.

STOR.

STAIR

AUDITORIUM

MAIL

ROOM

OFFICE

WOMEN'S

ROOM

MEN'S

ROOM

HALL

UTILITY

STOR.

ROOM

SCALE

04 4 8

SCALE OF FEET

REVIEW BY:

FIGURE

PROJECT NUMBER: 212-18

M. WHITE

PHASE:

DRAWN BY: DAW

HA 1.01

FILE:

W:\Anchorage Office\Crater Lake National Park\Crater Lake NP_HA 1.01_1St Floor Plan.dwg Aug 09, 2018

1ST FLOOR PLAN

CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK

STEEL VISITOR CENTER

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL

BUILDING SCIENCES MATERIALS TESTING

383 INDUSTRIAL WAY, SUITE 300

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501

Ph: (907) 258-8661 www.atcgroupservices.com

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INSPECTION

A06

A07

A01

LEGEND:

- SAMPLE LOCATION

- FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE, NO PCBs

A##

A03 A04

A02

A05

A27

(WOOD FLOOR)

(USED UNDER

CARPET)

A21

A22

212-19

212-20

A26

2 3 4 5

B

C

D

E

G

F

A

E

D

C

B

G

A

F

2 3 4 5 61

HH

B.1

B.1

B.2 B.2

D.1D.1

D.2D.2

(N) ATTIC ACCESS HATCH ABOVE.

(E) LOAD BEARING

PONY WALL

ALIGNMENT

(E) LOAD BEARING PONY

WALL ALIGNMENT

PARK

LIBRARY

OFFICE

LAV.

JANITOR

CORRIDOR

ASSOC.

OFFICE

WORKSHOP/OFFICE/

MEDIA STUDIO/

DISTANCE LEARNING

INTERP.

WORKSHOP

EDUCATION OFFICE

INTERACTIVE WORK SPACE - SUMMER

SCALE C

04 4 8

SCALE OF FEET

REVIEW BY:

FIGURE

PROJECT NUMBER: 212-18

M. WHITE

PHASE:

DRAWN BY: DAW

HA 1.02

FILE:

W:\Anchorage Office\Crater Lake National Park\Crater Lake NP_HA 1.02_2nd Floor Plan.dwg Aug 16, 2018

2ND FLOOR PLAN

CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK

STEEL VISITOR CENTER

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL

BUILDING SCIENCES MATERIALS TESTING

383 INDUSTRIAL WAY, SUITE 300

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501

Ph: (907) 258-8661 www.atcgroupservices.com

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INSPECTION

A14

A15

LEGEND:

- SAMPLE LOCATION

- CARPET

- FLOOR TILE

- FLOOR TILE UNDER CARPET

- ASBESTOS CONTAINING FLOOR TILE AND MASTIC

A##

(GRAY GREEN FT UNDER CARPET)

(CARPET ON WOOD

NO TILE)

A16

(FT/CP)

A17

A18 A12

(FT)

(FT)

A11 A13

A08

(CP)

(FT/CP)

A09

A10

CP

FT

FT/CP

(CP)

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY RESULTS

Chain of Custody: 609518

Client: ATC Group Services (formerly White Environmental Consultants)

Address: 383 Industrial Way Anchorage, AK 99501

Attention: Joel Hicklin

Job Name: ATC-Rim Architects/Steel Visitor Center

Job Location: Not Provided

Job Number: 212-18

P.O. Number: AK-1067

Date Submitted: 08/14/2018

Date Analyzed: 08/15/2018

Report Date: 08/15/2018

Date Sampled: Not Provided

Person Submitting: Joel Hicklin

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Summary of Asbestos Analysis of Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) Bulk Samples

AMA

Sample

Client Sample

Sample Type *

% Total Asbestos

Asbestos by PLM

Asbestos by TEM

Type(s) of Asbestos

Organics

% Acid Soluble

Other

Material Type

Sample Color

Comments

609518-1 212-A06 Whole NAD N/A NAD 31.6 29.3 39.1 FT Gray

609518-2 212-A09a Whole 10.6% N/A 10.6% Chrysotile 27.3 46.2 15.9 FT Green

609518- 2A

212-A09a Whole TR N/A TR Chrysotile 91.4 5 3.6 MS Black Asbestos observed may be possible contamination from associated positive floor tile.

609518-3 212-A09b Whole 11% N/A 11% Chrysotile 27.8 42.9 18.4 FT Gray

609518-4 212-AA12 Whole NAD N/A NAD 30.9 28.3 40.9 FT Gray

609518-5 212-AA17 Whole 10.4% N/A 10.4% Chrysotile 34.4 37.8 17.4 FT Tan

* Whole = Whole sample submitted and gravimetric reduction performed by AMA Analytical Services, Residue = Gravimetric reduction of sample performed by client and residue only submitted for analysis.

** NAD = "No Asbestos Detected" TR = "Trace equals less than 1% of this component"

*** PLM = Polarized Light Microscopy after gravimetric reduction (NY ELAP Method 198.6) TEM = Transmission Electron Microscopy after gravimetric reduction (NY ELAP Method 198.4)

All results are to be considered preliminary and subject to change unless signed by the Technical Director or Deputy.

Analyst(s): Michael Greenberg

Technical Director G. Edward Carney

This report applies only to the sample, or samples, investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients, the public, and these Laboratories, this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used, in whole or in part, in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from us. Sample types, locations, and collection protocols are based upon the information provided by the persons submitting them and, unless collected by personnel of these Laboratories, we expressly disclaim any knowledge and liability for the accuracy and completeness of this information. Residual sample material will be discarded in accordance with the appropriate regulatory guidelines, unless otherwise requested by the client. This report must not be used to claim, and does not imply product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA or any agency of the Federal Government. All rights reserved. AMA Analytical Services, Inc.

4475 Forbes Blvd. · Lanham, MD, 20706 · (301) 459-2640 · Toll Free (800) 346-0961 · Fax (301) 459-2643 1/1

8/8/2018 Project: ATC - Rim Arch/ Steel Visiter Center

Lab Order ID: 51820173

Lab Notes

Description

Lab Sample ID

Sample ID

Semi-Quantitative Chatfield SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1

Asbestos LCL-UCL

(Wt. %)

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Date Received:

8/9/2018Date Reported:

8/13/2018

ATC Group Services LLC 383 Industrial Way Ste 300 Anchorage, AK 99508

Customer:

Analysis ID: 51820173_TB

Attn: Joel Hicklin Matt White

Date Amended:

Acid Sol.

Organic

(Wt. %)(Wt. %) (Wt. %)

None Detected0.72%29%

212-A06 - A

51820173TBS_1 tile

None Detected-52%

212-A06 - B

51820173TBS_6 mastic

41%27%

212-A09A - A

51820173TBS_2 tile

21% - 25%Chrysotile23 %

-74%

212-A09A - B

51820173TBS_7 mastic

2.3% - 2.9%Chrysotile2.6 %

43%27%

212-A09B - A

51820173TBS_3 tile

19% - 23%Chrysotile21 %

None Detected-86%

212-A09B - B

51820173TBS_8 mastic

Russell Shelton (10)

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Approved Signatory

Page 1 of 2tem_2.2.001

Analyst

Disclaimer: This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government.

T-F-010 r15 1/15/2018

8/8/2018 Project: ATC - Rim Arch/ Steel Visiter Center

Lab Order ID: 51820173

Lab Notes

Description

Lab Sample ID

Sample ID

Semi-Quantitative Chatfield SOP 1988-02 Rev. 1

Asbestos LCL-UCL

(Wt. %)

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy

Date Received:

8/9/2018Date Reported:

8/13/2018

ATC Group Services LLC 383 Industrial Way Ste 300 Anchorage, AK 99508

Customer:

Analysis ID: 51820173_TB

Attn: Joel Hicklin Matt White

Date Amended:

Acid Sol.

Organic

(Wt. %)(Wt. %) (Wt. %)

None Detected5.0%31%

212-A12 - A

51820173TBS_4 tile

None Detected-45%

212-A12 - B

51820173TBS_9 mastic

32%34%

212-A17 - A

51820173TBS_5 tile

21% - 26%Chrysotile24 %

None Detected-99%

212-A17 - B

51820173TBS_10 mastic

Russell Shelton (10)

Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

Approved Signatory

Page 2 of 2tem_2.2.001

Analyst

Disclaimer: This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government.

T-F-010 r15 1/15/2018

APPENDIX C

INSPECTOR ACCREDITATIONS