ATV-Snowmobile Bridge Design Calcs_100.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 69056721B000015
About this file
This document contains bridge design calculations for an ATV/Snowmobile bridge on the Yale-Kilgore Road as part of federal contract opportunity ID CLARK 6805(1) and ID FREMONT 6805(1). The calculations cover the superstructure design, including girder design, bearing pad design, and substructure design such as abutment, wingwall, and pier analysis. The document provides detailed technical information on the design loads, material properties, and structural analysis for this federal highway project. The related federal contract solicitation is for the construction of improvements to the Yale-Kilgore Road from mile post 9 to 30.8, which is being procured by the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
June 2021 djanda.com
Bridge Design Calculations –
ATV/Snowmobile Bridge
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration
ATV/Snowmobile Bridge
Yale-Kilgore Road
Prepared By: DJ&A, P.C.
2000 Maple Street Missoula, MT 59808 T 406.721.4320 F 406.549.6371
Structural Design Calculations
Design Loads
Idaho Ground Snow Loads
Seismic Parameters from USGS
Snow Groomer (Basis of Design)
Superstructure Design
Girder Design
Visual Analysis Results – 70’ Span
Bearing Pad Design
Substructure Design
Abutment Design
Backwall Design
Wingwall Design
Wingwall Base Connection & Development Length
Pile Analysis
Pile Cap Design
Pile Cap Reinforcement
Live Load Distribution for Strut & Tie Model
Strut & Tie Model
Pier
Pile Analysis
Pile Cap Design
Pile Cap Reinforcement
Strut & Tie Model
Lateral Analysis
Lateral Pile Load Summary
Seismic Analysis
Wind Analysis
Design Loads
��'�'(�����)*�+��,-.�/0))123�043561�-/�12�65789.*�9-023.*�12��-.�:;<=�0��)1>.4�?5827061.*��,-.�)65789��5���-.:;<=�027�.4.@0�152�0���-1*�4590�152�)65@17.*�0�365827�*25A�4507�5���B��4?+��(��C4.0*.�).68*.�044:;<=�12��-.�@19121�D�5���-.�4590�152�5��12�.6.*��027�12�.6)540�.�?.�A..2�@048.*�12�07E09.2��)1>.4*��5099582���56��-.*.�9-023.*��F4*5�25�.�.>9.)�152*�12�G02259H�027�I55�.201�J582�1.*��K.�.6��5��-.('�B�K.)56���56�/56.�7.�014.7�12�56/0�152�
��� �L603��5�J-023.�M0)�N)091�D�O�'��PPQPRRSTPUVWWWQPXXSTW YZ[\]̂
| ��& | '� | |
| ((��� | &���)����*��*�+(,�(���-*���'�(���& | �� |
| %� | - | ���0������ | ||
| ��1%��*- | ���0������2�2�$1�- | �3%���031 | - | %�04-%%�3���)�5�-�*���� |
�������2�2�$��
��������- �3%���� ��3���
��4-%%�3���)�5�-�*��
����6�
��6��
���2 2��
�����2��
���2����
��3���
�����2��
������� ,�7��-�����-*�!'�� ���� �8
��������8�
������������2 2�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
��������9��
��������8�
������������2��
USGS Seismic Design Parameters
Technical data PistenBully 400 / 400 W
Engine 400 400 W
Type Cummins QSL 9
No. of cylinders 6
Displacement 8.9 l / 2.4 gal 8,900 ccm / 543 cu.in
Power output (ECE) 272 kW / 370 hp
Exhaust emissions standard Euro 3A, EPA TIER 3
Max. torque 1,519 Nm / 1,120 ft lbs at 1,500 rpm
Tank capacity 260 l / 69 gal
Tank capacity from 19 l/h / 5 gal
Drive pump 140 ccm / 8.5 cu.in
Driving characteristics 400 400 W
Speed 0 – 23 km/h / 0 – 14 mph continuously variable
0 – 20 km/h / 0 – 12 mph continuously variable
Speed with winch in action 0 – 17 km/h / 0 – 11 mph
Gradeability up to 100 %
Turning radius on-the-spot
Electrics 400 400 W
Low-voltage system 24 V
Alternator 24 V / 140 A
Batteries 2 x 12 V / 135 Ah
Cold start rating 900 A
Lightning 400 400 W
Front 2 H7 front-headlights and 2 H11 working headlight
Rear 2 H11 rear-headlights
Lateral optional
Search headlight Twin searchlights
Additional headlight – 2 x LED 2,200 lm on winch boom
Cabin 400 400 W
ROPS certificat yes
Driver’s seat adjustable
Operating elements display with touchscreen
Glazing Front, rear and side windows heated
Rear mirrors heated
Wipers cooling-water heated
Options 400 400 W
Hydraulically foldable sideflaps optional
Front high pressure connection optional
Xenon set optional
Solid tires optional series
Magnum sprocket optional
Hydraulic oil pre-heating optional
Trailer hitch optional
Cableway emergency operation optional
Foldable galery optional
Rear camera optional series
Harness belt optional series
Winch superstructure 400 W
Rope pull continuously variable 40 kN / 4,080 kp
Rope diameter 11 mm / 0.4"
Rope length 1,050 m / 1,148 yd
Usable rope length 1,000 m / 1,094 yd
Rope breaking strain 130 kN / 13,256 kp
Drive rating at 40 kN pull 110 kW / 150 PS
Weight (winch, rope and superstructure) 1,900 kg / 4,189 lbs
Weights 400 400 W
Tare weight with combined tracks 7,340 kg / 16,182 lbs
9,270 kg / 20,437 lbs with steel tracks 8,020 kg / 17,681 lbs
9,950 kg / 21,936 lbs
Gross weight limit 11,800 kg / 26,015 lbs
11,800 kg / 26,015 lbs
Payload on platform 1,500 kg / 3,307 lbs
2,500 kg / 5,512 lbs
Dimensions 400 / 400 W
Width without tracks 2,500 mm / 98.4" over combined tracks / steel tracks 4,206 mm / 165.6" over tiller with intermediate flaps 5,500 mm / 216.5" over tiller and foldable sideflaps 6,400 mm / 252"
Blade width open 5,260 mm / 207" width wide 4,420 mm / 174"
Height 1,000 mm / 39.4"
Height above everything 2,830 mm / 111.4"
400 W above winch ready for operation
3,280 mm / 129.1" when driver’s cabin tilted 3,250 mm / 128"
Ground clearance 350 mm / 13.8"
Length with blade and tiller 9,010 mm / 354.7" with blade, tiller and track-setters 10,310 mm / 405.9"
Load area Length 2,120 mm / 83.5"
Width 1,920 mm / 75.6"
Suggested garage dimensions
Length 11,000 mm / 433"
Width 6,000 mm / 236"
Height 3,500 mm / 138"
Superstructure Design
STEEL GIRDER DESIGN & LOAD RATING Steel Trail Bridge
Calculations are in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Ed. & AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd Ed.
References to the Design Specifications are shown in [ ] brackets, references to the
Bridge Evaluation Manual are shown in { } brackets.
GENERAL COMMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS
LRFD Bridge Design methodology is used. USFS Manual for Trail Bridge Design referenced for loads and live load factors (FSH 7709.56b, Chapter 80).
Load Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) methodology is used.
Load rating calculations are completed for superstructure elements only.
Live load distribution by approximate method.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The following unit weights are used:
Concrete, γc 150 pcf:= pcf = pounds per cubic foot
Asphalt, γws 140 pcf:= [Table 3.5.1-1]
Steel, γs 490 pcf:=
Wood, γw 50 pcf:=
Load Modifiers are as follows:
Ductility ηD 1.0:= For Conventional Designs [1.3.3]
Redundancy ηR 1.0:= For Conventional Redundancy [1.3.4]
Importance ηI 1.0:= For Typical Bridges [1.3.5] ηi = ηD ηR ηI 0.95 [1.3.2.1] therefore, ηi max ηD ηR ηI 0.95, ( ) 1.00=:= (maximum load factors)
Load Factors are as follows:
STRENGTH SERVICE
DC: γDC 1.25:= γDCS 1.00:= Dead Load of Components
DW: γDW 1.50:= γDWS 1.00:= Dead Load of Wearing Surface {6A.4.2.2-1 Notes}
Pedestrian LL: γPL 1.75:= γPLS 1.30:= Pedestrian Live Load
Load Combinations per
USFS Manual:
[FSH 7709.56b, Chapter 80]
Snow: γSLmax 1.75:= γSLmax.S 1.30:= Dead + Snow Load Cases Only γSLmin 0.50:= Snow in Combination with Live Load
Snowmobile: γSmax 1.75:= γSmax.S 1.30:= Dead + Live Load Cases Only γSmin 1.0:= Dead + Snow + Live Load Case (Skiier or Over-Snow Vehicle)
Design LL: γLL 1.75:= γLLS 1.30:= H10 & Snow Groomer Design Vehicle
Wind: γWSIII 1.0:= Wind Load on Structure - STRENGTH III
Resistance Factors are as follows:
Resistance Factor: ϕf 1.0:= Steel Flexure or Shear [6.5.4.2] ϕv 1.0:=
Condition Factor: ϕc 1.0:= ** New Construction ** {Table 6A.4.2.3-1}
System Factor: ϕsf 0.85:= For 4 Girder Bridge {Table 6A.4.2.4-1} ϕsv 1.0:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 1 of 32 Designed: ASG Checked: MJ
BRIDGE GEOMETRY:
Note: Plans show timber running planks. Asphalt conservatively used for possible future paving.
Roadway Width, Wr 16 ft:= Skew, Skew 0 deg:=
Out-to-Out Deck Width, Wd 16.5 ft:= Girder Span, Span 70 ft:= CL Brg. to
CL Brg.
Exterior Girder Spacing, Sext 4.3333 ft:= Number of Lanes, NL 1:=
Interior Girder Spacing, Sint 4.3333 ft:= Number of Girders, N 4:=
Overhang, Sover
Wd N 2-( ) Sext- Sint-
1.750 ft=:=
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Corrugated Steel Deck: 4-1/4 x 12 Corrugated Steel Deck Panel dD 4.25 in:= Deck Depth
Steel Girder: W30x108
Tension Flange bfT.G 10.50 in= Flange Width Ag.G 31.7 in
= Gross Area tfT.G 0.760 in= Flange Thickness Ix.G 4470 in
= Moment of Inertia
At.G bfT.G tfT.G 7.98 in
Sxc.G 299 in
= Section Modulus - Top
Sxt.G Sxc.G:= Section Modulus - Bottom
Iyt.G tfT.G bfT.G
73.32 in rx.G
Ix.G
Ag.G
11.87 in=:= Radius of Gyration
Compression Flange bfC.G bfT.G:= Flange Width E 29000 ksi:= Modulus of Elasticity tfC.G tfT.G:= Flange Thickness Fy.G 50 ksi:= Yield Stress - A588 Steel
Ac.G bfC.G tfC.G 7.98 in
=:= Fyt.G Fy.G:= Fyc.G Fy.G:= Fyw.G Fy.G:=
Rh.G 1:= Girder is homogeneous
Iyc.G tfC.G bfC.G
73.32 in
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 2 of 32 Designed: ASG
Web Lu.G 1 ft:= Unbraced Length dG 29.8 in= Girder Depth ** Top Flange Supported by Metal Deck ** tw.G 0.545 in= Web Thickness
DG dG tfT.G- tfC.G- 28.28 in=:=
Aw.G DG tw.G 15.41 in
Neutral Axis Location with respect to bottom of Girder Yb.G
At.G 0.5 tfT.G Ac.G tfT.G DG+ 0.5 tfC.G+( )+ Aw.G tfT.G 0.5 DG+( )+ At.G Ac.G+ Aw.G+( )
14.90 in=:=
Torsional Constant
J DG tw.G bfC.G tfC.G
1 0.63 tfC.G bfC.G bfT.G tfT.G
1 0.63 tfT.G bfT.G
+ 4.46 in
=:= [A6.3.3]
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 3 of 32 Designed: ASG
STEEL GIRDER DESIGN:
GIRDER CROSS-SECTION PROPORTION LIMITS: [6.10.2]
Web Proportion Limits:
For Webs Without Longitudinal Stiffeners:
Limit Web_checkG "OK"
DG
tw.G
150if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=DG
tw.G
51.89= < 150
Flange Proportion Limits:
Limit Flange_check1G "OK" bfC.G
2 min tfT.G tfC.G, ( ) 12if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=bfT.G
2 tfT.G 6.91= bfC.G
2 tfC.G 6.91= < 12.0
Minimum bfT.G 10.50 in= Flange_check2G "OK" min bfT.G bfC.G, ( )
DG
if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
DG
4.71 in= bfC.G 10.50 in=
Minimum tfT.G 0.76 in= Flange_check3G "OK" min tfT.G tfC.G, ( ) 1.1 tw.Gif
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
> 1.1 tw.G 0.60 in= tfC.G 0.76 in=
0.1 < Iyc.G
Iyt.G
1.00= < 10 Iy_check "OK" 0.1 Iyc.G
Iyt.G
10if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
GIRDER COMPACT SECTION REQUIREMENTS: [6.10.6.2.3]
Appendix A6 is only applicable to sections in straight bridges whose supports are not skewed more than 20 degrees, with intermediate diaphragms or cross-frames placed in contiguous lines parallel to the supports, and meet the following criteria.
Dc = Web depth in compression Dc.G dG tfC.G- Yb.G- 14.14 in=:=
IF Fyt & Fyc < 70 ksi slender "Web is Not Slender" 2 Dc.G tw.G
5.7 E
Fyc.G
<if
"Web is Slender" otherwise
:=2 Dc.G tw.G
51.89= < 5.7 E
Fyc.G
137.27=
AND
AND
Iyc.G
Iyt.G
1.00= >= 0.3 slender "Web is Not Slender"=
If all conditions are met, design per Section 6, Appendix A Non-composite I-Section with compact or noncompact webs. IF NOT, design per Section 6.10.8.
Code "Design per SECTION 6.10.8" Fyt.G 70 ksi>
Fyc.G 70 ksi>
Iyc.G
Iyt.G
0.3<
2 Dc.G tw.G
5.7 E
Fyc.G if
"Design per SECTION 6 APPENDIX A" otherwise
Code "Design per SECTION 6 APPENDIX A"=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 4 of 32 Designed: ASG
COMPACT SECTION CRITERIA
Web is Compact if: [A6.2.1] λpwDcp = Limiting slenderness ratio for compact web sections2Dcp tw < λpwDcp < λrw
Dcp
Dc λrw = Limiting slenderness ratio for a non-compact web λrw.G 5.7
E
Fyc.G
Dcp for Non-Composite Sections:
Dcp = Web depth in compression at plastic moment IF Fyw.G Aw.G 771 kip= > Fyc.G Ac.G Fyt.G At.G- 0.00 kip=
Dcp
DG
2 Aw.G Fyw.G Fyt.G At.G Fyw.G Aw.G+ Fyc.G Ac.G-( ) Fyw.G Aw.G Fyc.G Ac.G Fyt.G At.G->if
DG otherwise
14.14 in=:=
[D6.3.2]
Plastic Moment, Mp for Non-composite Section: [Table D6.1-1]
Pw Fyw.G DG tw.G 771 kip=:= Web P = Plastic force
Pc Fyc.G bfC.G tfC.G 399 kip=:= Compression flange
Pt Fyt.G bfT.G tfT.G 399 kip=:= Tension flange
Pcheck "OK" Pc Pt Pw+if
"No GOOD" otherwise
:= Pcheck "OK"= [Table D6.1-1 condition]
Y = Dist. from N.A. to bottom of top flange Y
DG
Pt Pc-
Pw 1+
14.14 in=:= d = Dist. from N.A. to center of compression or tension flange dc Y tfC.G
+ 14.52 in=:= dt DG Y-tfT.G
+ 14.52 in=:=
Mp Pw
2DG
Y
DG Y-( )2
Pc dc Pt dt+( )+ 1420 kip ft=:= Plastic Moment
Yield Moment, My
Myc Fyc.G Sxc.G 14950 kip in=:= with respect to compression flange
Myt Fyt.G Sxt.G 14950 kip in=:= with respect to tension flange
My min Myc Myt, ( ) 14950 kip in=:=
Compactness Check:
[A6.2.1] λpwDcp
E
Fyc.G
0.54 Mp
Rh.G My 0.09-
87.3=:= λw
2 Dc.G tw.G
51.89=:=
Web is Compact if the conditions are met:
Compact1 "Compact" Fyc.G 70 ksi<
Fyt.G 70 ksi<
DG
tw.G if
"Non-Compact" otherwise
"Compact"=:=
D tw limit for unstiffened webs
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 5 of 32 Designed: ASG
Web is Compact if the conditions are met:
Compact2 "Compact"
2Dcp tw.G λpwDcpif
"Non-Compact" otherwise
Compact2 "Compact"=
SL_limit "Web not Slender" λpwDcp λrw.G
Dcp
Dc.G if
"Slender Web" otherwise
SL_limit "Web not Slender"=
Web Plastification Factor Compression Flange, Rpc
Rpc Mp
Myc
2Dcp tw.G λpwDcpif
1 1 Rh.G Myc
Mp λw λpwDcp-λrw.G λpwDcp-
Myc otherwise
:= For Compact
For Non-Compact Rpc 1.14=
Web Plastification Factor Tension Flange, Rpt
Rpt Mp
Myt
2Dcp tw.G λpwDcpif
1 1 Rh.G Myt λw λpwDcp-λrw.G λpwDcp-
Myt otherwise
For Non-Compact Rpt 1.14=
GIRDER FLEXURAL RESISTANCE
COMPRESSION FLANGE [A6.3]
The nominal flexural resistance is the smaller of the local bucking resistance and the lateral torsional buckling resistance [A6.3.1] Mnc = minimum of Mnc_local and Mnc_LTB
Local Buckling Resistance [A6.3.2]
IF λf λpf< Mnc_local = Rpc Myc otherwise Mnc_local = 1 1 Fyr Sxc
Rpc Myc λf λpf-λrf λpf-λf = compression flange slenderness ratio λrf = limiting slenderness ratio for non-compact flangeλpf = limiting slenderness ratio for compact flange
D tw kc = flange local buckling coeff. = for built-up sections
OR kc 0.76:= for rolled shapes
Fyr max 0.5 Fyc.G min 0.7 Fyc.G Rh.G Fyt.G Sxt.G
Sxc.G
, Fyw.G,
35.00 ksi=:= compression flange stress at onset of nominal yielding λf bfC.G
2tfC.G
6.91=:= λpf 0.38 E
Fyc.G
9.15=:= λrf 0.95 E kc
Fyr 23.84=:=
Mnc_local 0 λpf λrf>if
Rpc Myc( ) λf λpf<if
1 1 Fyr Sxc.G λf λpf-λrf λpf-
Rpc Myc otherwise
Mnc_local 1420 kip ft=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 6 of 32 Designed: ASG
Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance [A6.3.3]
IF Lb Lp Mnc= Rpc Myc
Lp Lb< Lr Mnc= Cb 1 1 Fyr Sxc
Lb Lp-
Lr Lp-
Rpc Myc < Rpc Myc
Lb Lr> Mnc= Fcr Sxc < Rpc Myc
Lb Lu.G 12 in=:= = unbraced length Lr= limiting unbraced length for yielding
Lp = limiting unbraced length for nom. flexural resistance rt bfC.G
12 1 Dc.G tw.G
3 bfC.G tfC.G
2.64 in=:= = effective radius of gyration for lat. tors.
buckling Lp 1.0 rt
E
Fyc.G
63.5 in=:= h = depth between centerline flanges h dG 0.5 tfC.G- 0.5 tfT.G- 29.04 in=:= Lr 1.95 rt
E
Fyr
J
Sxc.G h 1 1 6.76
Fyr Sxc.G h
E J
++ 259 in=:=
Cb = moment gradient modifier = 1.0 for members where Mmid/M2 > 1 USE: Cb 1:= [C6.4.10]
If the Lb > Lr is met, Fcr needs to be defined, otherwise, Fcr Cb π
E
Lb rt
1 0.078
J
Sxc.G h
Lb rt
+ 13820.19 ksi=:=
Lp 5.29 ft= Lb 1.00 ft= Lr 21.57 ft= Rpc Myc 1420 kip ft=
Mnc_LTB Rpc Myc Lb Lpif min Cb 1 1 Fyr Sxc.G
Lb Lp-
Lr Lp-
Rpc Myc Rpc Myc, Lp Lb< Lrif min Fcr Sxc.G Rpc Myc, ( ) otherwise
Mnc_LTB 1420 kip ft=
Mnc.G min Mnc_local Mnc_LTB, ( ):= Mnc.G 1420 kip ft= Compression Flange Moment Resistance
TENSION FLANGE [A6.4]
Mnt.G Rpt Myt:= Mnt.G 1420 kip ft= Tension Flange Moment Resistance
CONTROLLING MOMENT RESISTANCE
Mn.G min Mnc.G Mnt.G, ( ):= Mn.G 1420 kip ft= Girder Moment Resistance
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 7 of 32 Designed: ASG
GIRDER SHEAR RESISTANCE: [6.10.9.2]
kG 5:= Shear-Buckling Coefficient for Unstiffened Sections
Ratio of Shear-Buckling Resistance to the Shear Yield Strength
CG 1.0
DG
tw.G
1.12 E kG
Fyw.G if
1.12
DG
tw.G
E kG
Fyw.G
1.12
< 1.40 E kG
Fyw.G if
1.57 otherwise
1.00=:= [6.10.9.3.2-4]
[6.10.9.3.2-5]
[6.10.9.3.2-6]
Vp.G 0.58 Fy.G DG tw.G 446.97 kip=:= [6.10.9.2-2]
Vn.G CG Vp.G 446.97 kip=:= [6.10.9.2-1]
DEAD LOADS
Component Dead Load, DC:
Railing, Each Side of Deck
(Distribute Equally to All Girders)wrail 75 plf:= DCRail.G
2 wrail
N
0.038 klf=:=
Corrugated Steel Deck Self Weight, dD.DL 11.5 psf:= DCD.G dD.DL Wd
N
0.047 klf=:=
Diaphragms, wdia 20 plf:= DCDia wdia 0.020 klf=:=
Girder Self Weight, DCGirder Ag.G γs 0.108 klf=:=
Total:
DCG DCRail.G DCD.G+ DCDia+ DCGirder+ 0.213 klf=:=
Wearing Surface Dead Load, DW:
Asphalt Wearing Surface, Note: Conservatively used for potential future paving.
tws dD
2 in+ 4.13 in=:= Avg. Thickness DWG tws Wd γws
N
0.199 klf=:=
LIVE LOADS
Multiple Presence
Factor:
Multiple Presence Factor for live loads is included per [3.6.1.1.2].
Multiple Presence Factor may be reduced to 95% of given value for ADTT 1000 m1 1.2:= Multiple Presence Factor for Single Lane Bridge [Table 3.6.1.1.2-1]
Adjust m for Low ADTT? Adjust_m1 1:= 1 for "Yes", 0 for "No" m1adjusted 0.95 m1( ) Adjust_m1 1=if m1 Adjust_m1 0=if m1adjusted 1.14=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 8 of 32 Designed: ASG
Add Dynamic Load Allowance per {6A.4.4.3} IMG 0.33:=
Pedestrian Load:
wPL 90 psf:= LLPL wPL Wr
N
0.360 klf=:=
Snow Load:
Ground (Uniform Snow Load at Full Snow Load), wSL 157 psf:= Ground Snow Load - From
Idaho Ground Snow Load
Finder
LLSL
wSL Wd
N
0.648 klf=:=
Snow Depth (Uniform Snow Load at Depth), γsnow min 0.13 wSL psf 14+ 30, pcf 30.00 pcf=:= (ASCE 7-16, 7.7-1) dSL 2 ft:= Snow Depth - Used in
Combination with
Snowmobile or Snow
Groomer
LLSL.2
dSL Wd γsnow
N
0.248 klf=:=
Snowmobile:
wmobile 500 lbf:= Weight of Snowmobile wperson 300 lbf:= Weight of Person
NS 12:= Assumed Number of
Snowmobiles on Span wMobile
NS wmobile wperson+( )
Wr Span
0.009 ksf=:=
LLS
wMobile Wr
N
0.034 klf=:=
MOMENT SHEAR
DC MDC
DCG Span
130.34 kip ft=:= VDC
DCG Span
7.45 kip=:=
DW MDW
DWG Span
121.59 kip ft=:= VDW
DWG Span
6.95 kip=:=
Pedestrian MPL
LLPL Span
220.50 kip ft=:= VPL
LLPL Span
12.60 kip=:=
Snow MSL
LLSL Span
396.67 kip ft=:= VSL
LLSL Span
22.67 kip=:=
Snow -
Depth
MSL2
LLSL.2 Span
151.59 kip ft=:= VSL2
LLSL.2 Span
8.66 kip=:=
Snowmobile MS
LLS Span
21.00 kip ft=:= VS
LLS Span
1.20 kip=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 9 of 32 Designed: ASG
Vehicle Loads:
Vehicle live loads were calculated in Visual Analysis.
H10 MH10 321 kip ft:= VH10 19 kip:=
Snow
Groomer
MUnit.Groomer 16 kip ft:= VUnit.Groomer 0.93 kip:= Unit Truck - 7' Long
Track with a 10.5'
Track Gauge WGroomer 26 kip:= Total Load of Groomer
MG MUnit.Groomer
WGroomer
1 kip
416.00 kip ft=:= VG VUnit.Groomer
WGroomer
1 kip
24.18 kip=:=
LIVE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTORS:
Lane Live Load distribution per [3.6.1.1.2]
Live Load Distribution for 6' Wheel Gauge (For H10):
Distribution Factor for Interior Girders:
Moment: DFint.M
Sint
9.2 ft m1adjusted m1
Sint 5.5 ft dD 2 inif
0.5 max 0 0.5 Sint 6 ft-
Sint m1adjusted otherwise
:= [Table 4.6.2.2.2c-1]
DFint.M 0.45=
Shear: DFintV 0.5 max 0 0.5 Sint 6 ft-m1adjusted 0.57=:= Lever Rule
Distribution Factor for Exterior Girders:
Lever Rule:
Moment & Shear xO= Distance from wheel line 2' off rail face to exterior girder per [3.6.1.3.1] xO 6- in:= (negative number indicates wheel on interior of girder)
Distribution by lever rule with 6' axle spacing DFExtLR
Sext xO+
Sext
0.5 m1adjusted:=
DFExtLR 0.50=
Rigid X-section:
Moment & Shear
[4.6.2.2.2d] x1 78 in:= x2 26 in:= Dist. From CL Structure to CL of Each Girder
Xext x1 6.50 ft=:= Dist. From Centerline Structure to Exterior Girder
Σx_sq 2x1
2 x2
+ 94 ft
=:= Sum of x2 * Number of Girders At Ea. Location
Dist. From Centerline Structure to Center of Gravity of Design Truck e1
Wr
2 ft- 3 ft- 3.00 ft=:=
DFRigid
NL
N
Xext e1
Σx_sq m1adjusted 0.52=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 10 of 32 Designed: ASG
Final Distribution Factors:
Interior Girder: DFIntM DFint.M 0.45=:=
DFIntV DFintV 0.57=:=
Exterior Girder: DFextM max DFExtLR DFRigid, ( ) 0.52=:=
DFextV max DFExtLR DFRigid, ( ) 0.52=:=
Final Factor: DFM max DFIntM DFextM, ( ) 0.52=:=
DFV max DFIntV DFextV, ( ) 0.57=:=
Live Load Distribution for 10.5' Wheel Gauge (For Snow Groomer):
Distribution Factor for Interior Girders:
Moment: DFint.M2 0.5 max 0 0.5 Sint 10.5 ft-m1adjusted:= Lever Rule
DFint.M2 0.57=
Shear: DFint.V2 DFint.M2 0.57=:=
Distribution Factor for Exterior Girders:
Lever Rule:
Moment & Shear xO= Distance from wheel line 2' off rail face to exterior girder per [3.6.1.3.1] xO 6.00- in= (negative number indicates wheel on interior of girder)
Distribution by lever rule with 10.5' axle spacing DFExtLR.2
Sext xO+
Sext
0.5 m1adjusted:=
DFExtLR.2 0.50=
Rigid X-section:
Moment & Shear
[4.6.2.2.2d] x1 78.00 in= x2 26.00 in= Dist. From CL Structure to CL of Each Girder
Xext 78.00 in= Dist. From Centerline Structure to Exterior Girder
Σx_sq 94 ft
= Sum of x2 * Number of Girders At Ea. Location
Dist. From Centerline Structure to Center of Gravity of Design Truck e1.2
Wr
2 ft- 5.25 ft- 0.75 ft=:=
DFRigid.2
NL
N
Xext e1.2
Σx_sq m1adjusted 0.34=:=
Final Distribution Factors:
Interior Girder: DFIntM2 DFint.M2 0.57=:=
DFIntV2 DFint.V2 0.57=:=
Exterior Girder: DFextM2 max DFExtLR.2 DFRigid.2, ( ) 0.50=:=
DFextV2 max DFExtLR.2 DFRigid.2, ( ) 0.50=:=
Final Factor: DFM2 max DFIntM2 DFextM2, ( ) 0.57=:=
DFV2 max DFIntV2 DFextV2, ( ) 0.57=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 11 of 32 Designed: ASG
DESIGN LOADS
STRENGTH Factored Force Effects:
Dead
Load
Mu.DL.G ηi γDC MDC γDW MDW+( ) 345.32 kip ft=:=
Vu.DL.G ηi γDC VDC γDW VDW+( ) 19.73 kip=:=
Pedestrian Mu.PL ηi γPL MPL 385.88 kip ft=:=
Vu.PL ηi γPL VPL 22.05 kip=:=
Snow Mu.SL.max ηi γSLmax MSL 694.17 kip ft=:=
Vu.SL.max ηi γSLmax VSL 39.67 kip=:=
Mu.SL.min ηi γSLmin MSL 198.34 kip ft=:=
Vu.SL.min ηi γSLmin VSL 11.33 kip=:=
Mu.SL.G ηi γSLmax MSL2 265.29 kip ft=:= Snow -
Depth Vu.SL.G ηi γSLmax VSL2 15.16 kip=:=
Snowmobile Mu.S.max ηi γSmax MS 36.75 kip ft=:=
Vu.S.max ηi γSmax VS 2.10 kip=:=
Mu.S.min ηi γSmin MS 21.00 kip ft=:=
Vu.S.min ηi γSmin VS 1.20 kip=:=
H10 Mu.H10 ηi γLL DFM 1 IMG+( ) MH10 389.83 kip ft=:=
Vu.H10 ηi γLL DFV 1 IMG+( ) VH10 25.21 kip=:=
Mu.Groomer ηi γLL DFM2 1 IMG+( ) MG 551.90 kip ft=:= Snow
Groomer Vu.Groomer ηi γLL DFV2 1 IMG+( ) VG 32.08 kip=:=
SERVICE II Factored Force Effects:
η ηi is equal to 1.0 for the Service Limit State. All values are equal to 1.0. [1.3.2.1]
Dead
Load fDL.C.G γDCS MDC γDWS MDW+
Sxc.G
10.11 ksi=:= Compression Flange - Top fDL.T.G γDCS MDC γDWS MDW+
Sxt.G
10.11 ksi=:= Tension Flange - Bottom
Pedestrian fPL.C.G γPLS MPL
Sxc.G
11.50 ksi=:= fPL.T.G γPLS MPL
Sxt.G
11.50 ksi=:=
Snow fSL.C.G γSLmax.S MSL
Sxc.G
20.70 ksi=:= fSL.T.G γSLmax.S MSL
Sxt.G
20.70 ksi=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 12 of 32 Designed: ASG
Snow -
Depth fSL2.C.G γSLmax.S MSL2
Sxc.G
7.91 ksi=:= fSL2.T.G γSLmax.S MSL2
Sxt.G
7.91 ksi=:=
Snowmobile fS.C.G γSmax.S MS
Sxc.G
1.10 ksi=:= fS.T.G γSmax.S MS
Sxt.G
1.10 ksi=:=
H10 fH10.C.G γLLS DFM 1 IMG+( ) MH10
Sxc.G
11.62 ksi=:= fH10.T.G γLLS DFM 1 IMG+( ) MH10
Sxt.G
11.62 ksi=:=
Snow
Groomer fGroom.C.G γLLS DFM2 1 IMG+( ) MG
Sxc.G
16.45 ksi=:= fGroom.T.G γLLS DFM2 1 IMG+( ) MG
Sxt.G
16.45 ksi=:=
WIND LOADS
Wind Loads calculated per [3.8.1.1] & [3.8.1.2]. Analysis perfomed for Strength III & V Cases.
VIII 115:= mph Design 3-Second gust Wind Speed [Figure 3.8.1.1.2-1]
Wind Exposure Category Shall be Determined Perpendicular to Bridge [3.8.1.1.3]
Exposure "C":= Wind Exposure Category [3.8.1.1.4 & 5]
ZActual 8:= ft Assumed Maxium Height of Bridge [3.8.1.2.1]
ZEffective 33 ZActual 33<if
ZActual otherwise
33.00=:= Maximum Effective Height of Bridge
Pressure Exposure & Elevation Coefficient, Kz:
Kz.III
2.5 ln ZEffective
0.9834
6.87+
345.6 Exposure "B"=if
2.5 ln
0.0984
7.35+
478.4 Exposure "C"=if
2.5 ln
0.0164
7.65+
616.1 otherwise
1.00=:= [3.8.1.2.1-2]
[3.8.1.2.1-3]
[3.8.1.2.1-4]
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 13 of 32 Designed: ASG
GIII 1.0:= Gust Effect Factor - Strength III [Table 3.8.1.2.1-1]
CD 1.3:= Drag Coefficient [Table 3.8.1.2.1-2]
Wind Pressures:
Pz.III 2.56 10 6-
VIII
Kz.III GIII CD ksf 0.044 ksf=:= [3.8.1.2.1-1]
Apply Wind Load on Superstructure per [3.8.1.2.2], Transverse Wind Event Controls.
Contributory Area:
Hrail 21 in:= From Top of Deck
Hcontrib Hrail dD+ tws+ dG+ 4.93 ft=:= Contributing Height
Applied Uniform Wind Loads:
WSIII Hcontrib Pz.III 0.217 klf=:=
Flange Section Modulus:
Syc tfC.G bfC.G
13.96 in
=:= Compression Flange
Syt tfT.G bfT.G
13.96 in
=:= Tension Flange
Sy Syc Syt+ DG tw.G
+ 29.33 in
=:= Girder
Wind Force to Flange:
WSCIII
Syc
Sy
WSIII 0.10 klf=:= Wind Load Proportioned to Flanges
Based on Relative Lateral Stiffness.
WSTIII
Syt
Sy
WSIII 0.10 klf=:=
Calculate the wind force based on fixed-fixed condition for entire span. The girders will be braced at the abutments and piers to create the fixed condition. Moment in each girder flange will be total moment divided by the number of girders.
Span.wind Span:= Design Span for Wind Calculations is from Braced End Bay to Braced End Bay
Wind Moments:
MwindC.III
WSCIII Span.wind
N 24
5.28 kip ft=:= Compression (Top) Flange
MwindT.III
WSTIII Span.wind
N 24
5.28 kip ft=:= Tension (Bottom) Flange
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 14 of 32 Designed: ASG
MEMBER ADEQUACY:
VERTICAL LOADS
The lateral bending stresses in discretely braced flanges must satisfy: fL 0.6 Fyf [Eq. 6.10.1.6-1]
For Discretely Braced Flanges in Compression, fbu fL+ ϕf Fnc [Eq. 6.10.8.1.1-1 & A6.1.1-1]
Mu fL Sxc+ ϕf Mnc fbu fL+ ϕf Rh Fyc [Eq. 6.10.3.2.1-1] fbu ϕf Fcrw [Eq. 6.10.3.2.1-3]
For Discretely Braced Flanges in Tension, fbu fL+ .ϕf Fnt [Eq. 6.10.8.1.2-1 & A6.1.2-1]
Mu fL Sxt+ ϕf Mnt fbu fL+ ϕf Rh Fyt [Eq. 6.10.3.2.2-1] fbu = flange bending stress calculated w/o consideration of flange lateral bending fL = flange lateral bending stressed as determined by [6.10.1.6]
Fnc = nominal flexural resistance of the compression flange
Fnt = nominal flexural resistance of the tension flange
Fcrw = nominal bend-buckling resistance for webs
Fnc Rh.G
Mnc.G
Sxc.G
56.97 ksi=:=
Fnt Rh.G
Mnt.G
Sxt.G
56.97 ksi=:=
Web Bend Buckling Resistance, {6A.6.4.2.2}
For Webs Without Longitudinal Stiffeners kG.S
Dc.G
36.00=:=
[6.10.1.9.1-2]
Fcrw.G min
0.9 E kG.S
Rh.G Fyc.G, Fyw.G
0.7
50.00 ksi=:= [6.10.1.9.1-1]
Note: The SERVICE II checks are done in the load rating portion of the design.
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 15 of 32 Designed: ASG
DESIGN CHECK:
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 PL+( ) Pedestrian
Mu.G1 Mu.DL.G Mu.PL+ 731.19 kip ft=:=
Vu.G1 Vu.DL.G Vu.PL+ 41.78 kip=:=
FlexureG1 "OK" Mu.G1 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG1 "OK"= Mu.G1 ϕf Mn.G 0.52=
ShearG1 "OK" Vu.G1 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG1 "OK"= Vu.G1 ϕv Vn.G 0.09=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu1.C
Mu.G1
Sxc.G
29.35 ksi=:= fbu1.T
Mu.G1
Sxt.G
29.35 ksi=:= fL1 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat1 "OK" fL1 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat1 "OK"= fbu1.C fL1+ 29.35 ksi=
Flex1a "OK" fbu1.C fL1+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex1a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu1.C fL1+ 29.35 ksi= Flex1b "OK" fbu1.C fL1+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex1b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex1c "OK" fbu1.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex1c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu1.T fL1+ 29.35 ksi= Flex1d "OK" fbu1.T fL1+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
Flex1d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu1.T fL1+ 29.35 ksi= Flex1e "OK" fbu1.T fL1+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
Flex1e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 16 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 SL+( ) Uniform Snow Load Snow
Mu.G2 Mu.DL.G Mu.SL.max+ 1039.49 kip ft=:=
Vu.G2 Vu.DL.G Vu.SL.max+ 59.40 kip=:=
FlexureG2 "OK" Mu.G2 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG2 "OK"= Mu.G2 ϕf Mn.G 0.73=
ShearG2 "OK" Vu.G2 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG2 "OK"= Vu.G2 ϕv Vn.G 0.13=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu2.C
Mu.G2
Sxc.G
41.72 ksi=:= fbu2.T
Mu.G2
Sxt.G
41.72 ksi=:= fL2 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat2 "OK" fL2 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat2 "OK"= fbu2.C fL2+ 41.72 ksi=
Flex2a "OK" fbu2.C fL2+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex2a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu2.C fL2+ 41.72 ksi= Flex2b "OK" fbu2.C fL2+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex2b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex2c "OK" fbu2.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex2c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu2.T fL2+ 41.72 ksi=
Flex2d "OK" fbu2.T fL2+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex2d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu2.T fL2+ 41.72 ksi= Flex2e "OK" fbu2.T fL2+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex2e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 17 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 S+( ) Snowmobile
Mu.G3 Mu.DL.G Mu.S.max+ 382.07 kip ft=:=
Vu.G3 Vu.DL.G Vu.S.max+ 21.83 kip=:=
FlexureG3 "OK" Mu.G3 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG3 "OK"= Mu.G3 ϕf Mn.G 0.27=
ShearG3 "OK" Vu.G3 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG3 "OK"= Vu.G3 ϕv Vn.G 0.05=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu3.C
Mu.G3
Sxc.G
15.33 ksi=:= fbu3.T
Mu.G3
Sxt.G
15.33 ksi=:= fL3 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat3 "OK" fL3 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat3 "OK"= fbu3.C fL3+ 15.33 ksi=
Flex3a "OK" fbu3.C fL3+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex3a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu3.C fL3+ 15.33 ksi= Flex3b "OK" fbu3.C fL3+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex3b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex3c "OK" fbu3.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex3c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu3.T fL3+ 15.33 ksi=
Flex3d "OK" fbu3.T fL3+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex3d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu3.T fL3+ 15.33 ksi= Flex3e "OK" fbu3.T fL3+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex3e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 18 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 LL+( ) H10
Mu.G4 Mu.DL.G Mu.H10+ 735.14 kip ft=:=
Vu.G4 Vu.DL.G Vu.H10+ 44.94 kip=:=
FlexureG4 "OK" Mu.G4 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG4 "OK"= Mu.G4 ϕf Mn.G 0.52=
ShearG4 "OK" Vu.G4 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG4 "OK"= Vu.G4 ϕv Vn.G 0.10=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu4.C
Mu.G4
Sxc.G
29.50 ksi=:= fbu4.T
Mu.G4
Sxt.G
29.50 ksi=:= fL4 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat4 "OK" fL4 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat4 "OK"= fbu4.C fL4+ 29.50 ksi=
Flex4a "OK" fbu4.C fL4+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex4a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu4.C fL4+ 29.50 ksi= Flex4b "OK" fbu4.C fL4+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex4b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex4c "OK" fbu4.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex4c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu4.T fL4+ 29.50 ksi=
Flex4d "OK" fbu4.T fL4+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex4d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu4.T fL4+ 29.50 ksi= Flex4e "OK" fbu4.T fL4+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex4e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 19 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 LL+( ) Snow Groomer
Mu.G5 Mu.DL.G Mu.Groomer+ 897.21 kip ft=:=
Vu.G5 Vu.DL.G Vu.Groomer+ 51.81 kip=:=
FlexureG5 "OK" Mu.G5 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG5 "OK"= Mu.G5 ϕf Mn.G 0.63=
ShearG5 "OK" Vu.G5 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG5 "OK"= Vu.G5 ϕv Vn.G 0.12=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu5.C
Mu.G5
Sxc.G
36.01 ksi=:= fbu5.T
Mu.G5
Sxt.G
36.01 ksi=:= fL5 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat5 "OK" fL5 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat5 "OK"= fbu5.C fL5+ 36.01 ksi=
Flex5a "OK" fbu5.C fL5+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex5a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu5.C fL5+ 36.01 ksi= Flex5b "OK" fbu5.C fL5+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex5b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex5c "OK" fbu5.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex5c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu5.T fL5+ 36.01 ksi=
Flex5d "OK" fbu5.T fL5+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex5d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu5.T fL5+ 36.01 ksi= Flex5e "OK" fbu5.T fL5+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex5e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 20 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: Snowmobile With Uniform Snow Load Snow & Snowmobile
Mu.G6a Mu.DL.G Mu.S.max+ Mu.SL.min+ 580.40 kip ft=:= ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 S+ 0.5 SL+( )
Vu.G6a Vu.DL.G Vu.S.max+ Vu.SL.min+ 33.17 kip=:=
Mu.G6b Mu.DL.G Mu.S.min+ Mu.SL.max+ 1060.49 kip ft=:= ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.0 S+ 1.75 SL+( )
Vu.G6b Vu.DL.G Vu.S.min+ Vu.SL.max+ 60.60 kip=:=
Mu.G6 max Mu.G6a Mu.G6b, ( ) 1060.49 kip ft=:=
Vu.G6 max Vu.G6a Vu.G6b, ( ) 60.60 kip=:=
FlexureG6 "OK" Mu.G6 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG6 "OK"= Mu.G6 ϕf Mn.G 0.75=
ShearG6 "OK" Vu.G6 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG6 "OK"= Vu.G6 ϕv Vn.G 0.14=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu6.C
Mu.G6
Sxc.G
42.56 ksi=:= fbu6.T
Mu.G6
Sxt.G
42.56 ksi=:= fL6 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat6 "OK" fL6 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat6 "OK"= fbu6.C fL6+ 42.56 ksi=
Flex6a "OK" fbu6.C fL6+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex6a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu6.C fL6+ 42.56 ksi= Flex6b "OK" fbu6.C fL6+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex6b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex6c "OK" fbu6.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex6c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu6.T fL6+ 42.56 ksi=
Flex6d "OK" fbu6.T fL6+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex6d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu6.T fL6+ 42.56 ksi= Flex6e "OK" fbu6.T fL6+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex6e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 21 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH I Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.75 LL+ 1.75 SL+( ) Snow & Snow Groomer
Mu.G7 Mu.DL.G Mu.Groomer+ Mu.SL.G+ 1162.50 kip ft=:= Snow Groomer with Uniform Snow Load at 2' Depth Vu.G7 Vu.DL.G Vu.Groomer+ Vu.SL.G+ 66.97 kip=:=
FlexureG7 "OK" Mu.G7 ϕf Mn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FlexureG7 "OK"= Mu.G7 ϕf Mn.G 0.82=
ShearG7 "OK" Vu.G7 ϕv Vn.G 1.0if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShearG7 "OK"= Vu.G7 ϕv Vn.G 0.15=
Compression Flange: Tension Flange:
Flange Stresses: fbu7.C
Mu.G7
Sxc.G
46.66 ksi=:= fbu7.T
Mu.G7
Sxt.G
46.66 ksi=:= fL7 0:= No lateral loads during for
STRENGTH I Case Lat7 "OK" fL7 0.6 min Fyc.G Fyt.G, ( )if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat7 "OK"= fbu7.C fL7+ 46.66 ksi=
Flex7a "OK" fbu7.C fL7+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex7a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu7.C fL7+ 46.66 ksi= Flex7b "OK" fbu7.C fL7+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex7b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex7c "OK" fbu7.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex7c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu7.T fL7+ 46.66 ksi=
Flex7d "OK" fbu7.T fL7+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex7d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu7.T fL7+ 46.66 ksi= Flex7e "OK" fbu7.T fL7+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex7e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 22 of 32 Designed: ASG
STRENGTH III Limit State: ηi 1.25 DC 1.50 DW+ 1.0 WS+( ) Wind
Mu8.C Mu.DL.G ηi γWSIII MwindC.III+ 350.60 kip ft=:= Compression (Top) Flange
Mu8.T Mu.DL.G ηi γWSIII MwindT.III+ 350.60 kip ft=:= Tension (Bottom) Flange
Use Amplified Flange Bending Stresses Per [Eq. 6.10.1.6-4]
Web Load-Shedding Factor, Rb: Rb 1.0:= For Section 6, Appendix A designs
COMPRESSION FLANGE STRESS TENSION FLANGE STRESS
Vertical Loads: fbu8.C
Mu8.C
Sxc.G
14.07 ksi=:= fbu8.T
Mu8.T
Sxt.G
14.07 ksi=:=
Lateral Loads: fL8.C γWSIII
MwindC.III
Syc
4.54 ksi=:= fL8.T γWSIII
MwindT.III
Syt
4.54 ksi=:=
FINAL LATERAL BENDING STRESSES
fL8.C1 fL8.C Lb 1.2 Lp Cb Rb fbu8.C
Fyc.G if
0.85 fbu8.C
Fcr fL8.C otherwise
:= fL8.T1 fL8.T Lb 1.2 Lp Cb Rb fbu8.T
Fyt.G if
0.85 fbu8.T
Fcr fL8.C otherwise
4.54 ksi=:= fL8.C1 4.54 ksi= fL8.T1 4.54 ksi=
Lat8a "OK" fL8.C1 0.6 Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat8a "OK"=
Lat8b "OK" fL8.T1 0.6 Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Lat8b "OK"= fbu8.C fL8.C1+ 15.58 ksi=
Flex8a "OK" fbu8.C fL8.C1+ ϕf Fncif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex8a "OK"= ϕf Fnc 56.97 ksi= fbu8.C fL8.C1+ 18.61 ksi= Flex8b "OK" fbu8.C fL8.C1+ ϕf Rh.G Fyc.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
Flex8b "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyc.G 50.00 ksi=
Flex8c "OK" fbu8.C ϕf Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex8c "OK"= ϕf Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= fbu8.T fL8.T1+ 15.58 ksi=
Flex8d "OK" fbu8.T fL8.T1+ ϕf Fntif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex8d "OK"= ϕf Fnt 56.97 ksi= fbu8.T fL8.T1+ 18.61 ksi= Flex8e "OK" fbu8.T fL8.T1+ ϕf Rh.G Fyt.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Flex8e "OK"= ϕf Rh.G Fyt.G 50.00 ksi=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 23 of 32 Designed: ASG
SERVICE LIMIT STATE DESIGN CHECKS:
Member Live Load Deflection checked for SERVICE I Limit State
When investigating absolute maximum deflection, all design lanes are loaded and all supporting elements are considered to deflect equally. For multiple girder bridges, the distribution factor for deflection is therefore the number of lanes divided by the number of girders. The dynamic load allowance and multiple presence factor must be included.
[2.5.2.6.2]
SERVICE I Limit State
Distribution Factor for Deflection:
DF∆
N m1adjusted 0.29=:= For Single Lane Bridge [2.5.2.6.2]
Maximum Live Load Deflection:
IM∆ 1.33:= Use 33% dynamic load allowance for deflection calcs.
Pedestrian ∆PL
5 LLPL( ) Span
384 E Ix.G
1.50 in=:=
Snow ∆SL
5 LLSL( ) Span
2.70 in=:=
Snow -
Depth
∆SL.2
5 LLSL.2( ) Span
1.03 in=:=
Snowmobile ∆S
5 LLS( ) Span
0.14 in=:=
Deflections calculated by structural analysis program with vehicle loads applied to a single girder.
H10 ∆H10.truck 1.8 in:= Two Truck Axles
∆H10 DF∆ IM∆ ∆H10.truck 0.68 in=:=
Deflections calculated by structural analysis program with vehicle loads applied to a single girder.
Snow
Groomer
∆Groomer.truck 0.09 in:= Two Truck Axles
∆Groomer DF∆ IM∆ ∆Groomer.truck WGroomer
1 kip
0.89 in=:= [3.6.1.3.2]
Deflection Span Ratios are shown below for the various loading conditions. Deflection criteria taken from
AASHTO and ASCE if not defined in AASHTO.
Pedestrian Snow Snow - Depth Snowmobile H10 Snow Groomer
Span
∆PL
560= Span
∆SL
311= Span
∆SL.2
814= Span
∆S
5879= Span
∆H10
1231= Span
∆Groomer
947=
Snow + Snowmobile Snow + Snow Groomer
Span
0.75 ∆SL ∆S+( )
394=
Span
0.75 ∆SL ∆Groomer+( ) 312=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 24 of 32 Designed: ASG
∆Ped "OK" Span
∆PL
360if
"No GOOD" otherwise
∆Ped "OK"=
∆Snow "OK" Span
∆SL
240if
"No GOOD" otherwise
∆Snow "OK"=
∆Snowmobile "OK" Span
∆S
360if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
∆Snowmobile "OK"=
∆H10.Truck "OK" Span
∆H10
800if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
∆H10.Truck "OK"=
∆Groomer.Truck "OK" Span
∆Groomer
800if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
∆Groomer.Truck "OK"=
∆Snow.Snowmobile "OK" Span
0.75 ∆SL ∆S+( )
240if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
∆Snow.Snowmobile "OK"=
∆Snow.Groomer "OK" Span
0.75 ∆SL ∆Groomer+( ) 240if
"No GOOD" otherwise
"OK"=:=
∆Snow.Groomer "OK"=
CAMBER REQUIREMENTS Provide camber equal to 1.5*DL deflection at service limit state u= distance from support u 0.1 Span 0.2 Span, 0.5 Span..:= u
Span
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
DCG DWG+( ) u
24 E Ix.G Span( )
2 Span( ) u
- u
+ 1.5
0.8072
1.5271
2.0907
2.4486
2.5712 in u
7.00
14.00
21.00
28.00
35.00 ft
Points along Span
Span fraction
DL deflection
(inches)
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 25 of 32 Designed: ASG
SERVICE II Limit State:
Both Steel Flanges of Non-Composite Sections, [6.10.4.2.2] fR.G 0.8 Rh.G Fy.G 40.00 ksi=:= Top Flange & Bottom Flanges [6.10.4.2.2-3]
Web, {6A.6.4.2.2}
For Webs Without Longitudinal Stiffeners kG.S 36.00= [6.10.1.9.1-2]
Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi= [6.10.1.9.1-1] fR.Web.G Fcrw.G 50.00 ksi=:= [6.10.4.2.2-4]
SERVICE II Checks:
Vertical Load Stress:
ffC.G max fPL.C.G fSL.C.G, fS.C.G, fH10.C.G, fGroom.C.G, fSL.C.G fS.C.G+, fSL2.C.G fGroom.C.G+, ( ) 24.36 ksi=:= ffT.G max fPL.T.G fSL.T.G, fS.T.G, fH10.T.G, fGroom.T.G, fSL.T.G fS.T.G+, fSL2.T.G fGroom.T.G+, ( ) 24.36 ksi=:= fL.G 0 ksi:= Lateral Load Stress
CompFlangeStress.G "OK" ffC.G fL.G
+ 0.8 Rh.G Fy.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= CompFlangeStress.G "OK"= [6.10.4.2.2-3]
TenFlangeStress.G "OK" ffT.G fL.G
+ 0.8 Rh.G Fy.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= TenFlangeStress.G "OK"= [6.10.4.2.2-3]
WebStress.G "OK" ffC.G Fcrw.Gif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= WebStress.G "OK"= [6.10.4.2.2-4]
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 26 of 32 Designed: ASG
STEEL GIRDER RATING FACTOR ANALYSIS:
The girders are rated for moment and shear.
RATING FACTOR GENERAL EQUATION
Member Capacity - Factored DL effects {6A.4.2.1}
{Eq. 6A.4.2.1-1} Rating Factor, RF =
Factored LL effects
Member Capacity, C = Nominal_Capacity ϕc ϕs ϕ {Eq. 6A.4.2.1-2} ϕc 1.00= ϕsf 0.85= ϕc ϕsf 0.85=
Girder Capacities: ϕsv 1.00= ϕc ϕsv 1.00= {Table 6A.4.2.2-1}
STRENGTH I:
CM.G max ϕc ϕsf 0.85, ( ) ϕf Mn.G 1206.67 kip ft=:=
CV.G max ϕc ϕsv 0.85, ( ) ϕv Vn.G 446.97 kip=:=
SERVICE II Limit State:
Both Steel Flanges of Non-Composite Sections, [6.10.4.2.2] fR.G 40.00 ksi= Top Flange & Bottom Flanges [6.10.4.2.2-3]
GIRDER RATING FACTORS
Pedestrian RFPL.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.PL
2.23=:=
RFPL.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.PL
19.38=:=
RFPL.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fPL.C.G
2.60=:=
RFPL.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fPL.T.G
2.60=:=
RFPL.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fPL.C.G
3.47=:=
Snow RFSL.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.SL.max
1.24=:=
RFSL.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.SL.max
10.77=:=
RFSL.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fSL.C.G
1.44=:=
RFSL.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fSL.T.G
1.44=:=
RFSL.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fSL.C.G
1.93=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 27 of 32 Designed: ASG
Snowmobile RFS.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.S.max
23.44=:=
RFS.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.S.max
203.44=:=
RFS.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fS.C.G
27.28=:=
RFS.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fS.T.G
27.28=:=
RFS.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fS.C.G
36.41=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 28 of 32 Designed: ASG
H10 RFH10.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.H10
2.21=:=
RFH10.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.H10
16.95=:=
RFH10.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fH10.C.G
2.57=:=
RFH10.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fH10.T.G
2.57=:=
RFH10.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fH10.C.G
3.43=:=
Snow
Groomer RFGroomer.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.Groomer
1.56=:=
RFGroomer.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.Groomer
13.32=:=
RFGroomer.CFL.G fR.G fDL.C.G-fGroom.C.G
1.82=:=
RFGroomer.TFL.G fR.G fDL.T.G-fGroom.T.G
1.82=:=
RFGroomer.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fGroom.C.G
2.42=:=
Snow &
Snowmobile
RFSS.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-max Mu.S.max Mu.SL.min+ Mu.S.min Mu.SL.max+, ( ) 1.20=:=
RFSS.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-max Vu.S.max Vu.SL.min+ Vu.S.min Vu.SL.max+, ( ) 10.45=:=
RFSS.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fSL.C.G fS.C.G+ 1.37=:=
RFSS.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fSL.T.G fS.T.G+ 1.37=:=
RFSS.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fSL.C.G fS.C.G+ 1.83=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 29 of 32 Designed: ASG
Snow &
Snow
Groomer
RFSG.M.G
CM.G Mu.DL.G-
Mu.Groomer Mu.SL.G+ 1.05=:=
RFSG.V.G
CV.G Vu.DL.G-
Vu.Groomer Vu.SL.G+ 9.04=:=
RFSG.CFL.G
fR.G fDL.C.G-fGroom.C.G fSL2.C.G+ 1.23=:=
RFSG.TFL.G
fR.G fDL.T.G-fGroom.T.G fSL2.T.G+ 1.23=:=
RFSG.Web.G fR.Web.G fDL.C.G-fGroom.C.G fSL2.C.G+ 1.64=:=
GIRDER RATING FACTOR SUMMARY:
Pedestrian RFPL.G min RFPL.M.G RFPL.V.G, RFPL.CFL.G, RFPL.TFL.G, RFPL.Web.G, ( ) 2.23=:=
Snow RFSL.G min RFSL.M.G RFSL.V.G, RFSL.CFL.G, RFSL.TFL.G, RFSL.Web.G, ( ) 1.24=:=
Snowmobile RFS.G min RFS.M.G RFS.V.G, RFS.CFL.G, RFS.TFL.G, RFS.Web.G, ( ) 23.44=:=
H10 RFH10.G min RFH10.M.G RFH10.V.G, RFH10.CFL.G, RFH10.TFL.G, RFH10.Web.G, ( ) 2.21=:=
Snow
Groomer RFGroomer.G min RFGroomer.M.G RFGroomer.V.G, RFGroomer.CFL.G, RFGroomer.TFL.G, RFGroomer.Web.G, ( ) 1.56=:=
Snow &
Snowmobile
RFSS.G min RFSS.M.G RFSS.V.G, RFSS.CFL.G, RFSS.TFL.G, RFSS.Web.G, ( ) 1.20=:=
Snow &
Snow
Groomer
RFSG.G min RFSG.M.G RFSG.V.G, RFSG.CFL.G, RFSG.TFL.G, RFSG.Web.G, ( ) 1.05=:=
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 30 of 32 Designed: ASG
BRIDGE DESIGN SUMMARY:
A summary of the design parameters is shown below.
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.52 0.09 560 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.73 0.13 311 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.27 0.05 5879 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.52 0.10 1231 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.63 0.12 947 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.75 0.14 394 OK OK OK OK OK OK
M V Deflection Lat Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
0.82 0.15 312 OK OK OK OK OK OK
Lata Latb Flexa Flexb Flexc Flexd Flexe
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
C. Flange T. Flange Web
OK OK OK
SERVICE II
Steel Girder
STRENGTH I: Pedestrian
STRENGTH III
STRENGTH I: Snow
STRENGTH I: Snowmobile
STRENGTH I: H10
STRENGTH I: Snow Groomer
STRENGTH I: Snow & Snowmobile
STRENGTH I: Snow & Snow Groomer
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 31 of 32 Designed: ASG
BRIDGE RATING FACTOR SUMMARY:
A summary of the rating factors for each superstructure element evaluated is shown below. The safe load capacity is given in tons. If the vehicle rating factor is greater than 1.0, then the vehicle weight rating is
GVW*RF. If that condition is not satisfied, safe posting loads are calculated using equation {6A.8.3-1} from the Manual for Bridge Evaluation.{6A.8.3}
M V C. Flange T. Flange Web
Pedestrian 2.23 19.38 2.60 2.60 3.47
Snow 1.24 10.77 1.44 1.44 1.93
Snowmoblie 23.44 203.44 27.28 27.28 36.41
H10 2.21 16.95 2.57 2.57 3.43
Snow Groomer 1.56 13.32 1.82 1.82 2.42
Snow & Snowmobile 1.20 10.45 1.37 1.37 1.83
Snow & Snow Groomer 1.05 9.04 1.23 1.23 1.64
Summary
Pedestrian 2.23 - -
Snow 1.24 - -
Snowmoblie 23.44 - -
H10 2.21 20 44.2
Snow Groomer 1.56 13 20.3
Snow & Snowmobile 1.20 - -
Snow & Snow Groomer 1.05 - -
Safe Load
Capacity
Vehicle
Vehicle
STRENGTH I & II SERVICE II
Steel Girder
RF
GVW
(tons)
Safe Load Capacity: {6A.8.3-1}
RF GVW RF 1.0if
GVW
0.7 RF 0.3-( ) RF 1.0<if
W30x108_70' Span.xmcd 32 of 32 Designed: ASG
DJ & A, P.C.
Ammon Groesbeck
F:\6839.002 WFLHD - Yale-Kilgore Road 30% Design\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Friday, April 24, 2020 1:51 PM
VisualAnalysis 18.00.0009, Advanced www.iesweb.com
F:\6839.002 WFLHD - Yale-Kilgore Road 30% Design\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Friday, April 24, 2020 1:51 PM
VisualAnalysis 18.00.0009, Advanced
F:\6839.002 WFLHD - Yale-Kilgore Road 30% Design\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Friday, April 24, 2020 1:51 PM
VisualAnalysis 18.00.0009, Advanced
F:\6839.002 WFLHD - Yale-Kilgore Road 30% Design\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Friday, April 24, 2020 1:51 PM
VisualAnalysis 18.00.0009, Advanced
DJ&A
F:\...\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Monday, June 14, 2021 4:07 PM
VisualAnalysis 20.00.0001, Advanced www.iesweb.com Page 1 of 2
F:\...\Design\Bridge\Live Load - 70' Span.vap Monday, June 14, 2021 4:07 PM
VisualAnalysis 20.00.0001, Advanced www.iesweb.com Page 2 of 2
ELASTOMERIC BEARING DESIGN Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Bearing Pad
Calculations are in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Ed. & AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 3rd Ed.
References to the Design Specifications are shown in [ ] brackets, references to the
Bridge Evaluation Manual are shown in { } brackets.
GENERAL COMMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS
LRFD Bridge Design methodology is used.
Bearing pad design Method A used.
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Pad:
L 8 in:= Pad Length
W 11 in:= Pad Width hc 0.25 in:= Cover Pad Thickness - Per Layer hri 0.5 in:= Internal Pad Thickness - Per Layer n 1:= Number of Internal Pad Layers hs 0.0625 in:= Steel Thickness - 16 gauge
Fy 36 ksi:= Yield Stress of Steel
Covercheck "OK" hc 0.7 hriif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Covercheck "OK"= [14.7.6.1]
Temp Zone = D [Table 14.7.5.2-1]
Hardness 60:= Elastomer Hardness (Duro - Shore A) [Table 14.7.6.2-1] aCR 0.35:= Creep Deflection @ 25 Years Divided by Initial Deflection [Table 14.7.6.2-1]
G 0.150 ksi:= Elastomer Shear Modulus [Table 14.7.6.2-1]
Sc
L W
2 hc L W+( ) 9.26=:= Si
L W
2 hri L W+( ) 4.63=:= Shape Factors [14.7.5.1-1]
ShapeInt "OK" Si n 22<if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ShapeInt "OK"=Si n 21.45= [14.7.6.1]
Bridge Properties:
L∆ 70 ft:= Thermal Expansion Length
TempMax 120:= deg F Steel Structure, Cold Climate [Table 3.12.2.1-1]
TempMin 45:= deg F Assumed Set Temperature = 45o F αs 0.0000065:= Coefficient of Thermal Expansion - Steel
Bearing Pad Design - Reinforced_Steel Girder_70' Span.xmcd
1 of 4 Designed: ASG
DESIGN LOADS
All reactions are maximum service loads applied to the bearing pad. Loads are SERVICE I
(Load Factors = 1.0).
DL 7.45 6.95+( ) kip 14.40 kip=:= Dead Load Reaction (From Girder Design)
Snow 22.67 kip:= Uniform Snow Load (From Girder Design)
GroomerandSnow 24.18 8.66+( ) kip 32.84 kip=:= Snow Groomer + Snow Depth (From Girder Design)
IM 1.33:= Dynamic Load Allowance - Impact [Table 3.6.2.1-1]
LL max Snow GroomerandSnow, ( ) 32.84 kip=:= Live Load Reaction with Impact
BEARING PAD DESIGN
Plain Elastomeric Bearing Pads are designed using Method A outlined in 14.7.6. The sections below are the required design checks.
14.7.6.3.2 - Compressive Stress
14.7.6.3.3 - Compressive Deflection
14.7.6.3.4 - Shear
14.7.6.3.5 - Rotation
14.7.6.3.6 - Stability
14.7.6.3.7 - Reinforcement
14.7.6.3.8 - Seismic & Other Extreme Event Provisions
COMPRESSIVE STRESS - 14.7.6.3.2
Compressive Stresses:
σDL
DL
L W
0.16 ksi=:= Compressive Stress Due to Dead Load σLL
LL
L W
0.37 ksi=:= Compressive Stress Due to Live Load with Impact σLL.2
LL
IM L W
0.28 ksi=:= Compressive Stress Due to Live Load without Impact
For Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Pads:
σs.MAX.c min 1.25 G Sc 1.25 ksi, ( ) 1.25 ksi=:= [14.7.6.3.2-7 & 8] σs.MAX.i min 1.25 G Si 1.25 ksi, ( ) 0.87 ksi=:= σs σDL σLL+ 0.54 ksi=:=
PadComp.c "OK" σs σs.MAX.cif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= PadComp.c "OK"= σs σs.MAX.c
0.43=
PadComp.i "OK" σs σs.MAX.iif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= PadComp.i "OK"= σs σs.MAX.i
0.62=
Bearing Pad Design - Reinforced_Steel Girder_70' Span.xmcd
2 of 4 Designed: ASG
COMPRESSIVE DEFLECTION - 14.7.6.3.3
Compressive Strains:
εDL.c σDL
4.8 G Sc
0.00265=:= εDL.i σDL
4.8 G Si
0.01059=:= [C14.7.5.3.6-1] εLL.c σLL
0.00604=:= εLL.i σLL
0.02416=:= [C14.7.5.3.6-1] εLL.2.c σLL.2
0.00454=:= εLL.2.i σLL.2
0.01817=:= [C14.7.5.3.6-1]
Instantaneous Deflections:
δLL 2 εLL.c hc n εLL.i hri+ 0.0151 in=:= [14.7.5.3.6-1] δDL 2 εDL.c hc n εDL.i hri+ 0.00662 in=:= [14.7.5.3.6-2] δinitial 2 εLL.2.c εDL.c+( ) hc n εLL.2.i εDL.i+( ) hri+ 0.01798 in=:= [14.7.6.3.3]
Long-Term DL Deflection:
Long-Term DL Deflection
(Including Creep) δLT δDL aCR δDL+ 0.00894 in=:= [14.7.5.3.6-3]
Limit Live Load Deflection to 1/8" max. (Suggested)
Padδ1 "OK" δLL 0.125 inif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Padδ1 "OK"= [C14.7.5.3.6]
Padδ2 "OK" δinitial 0.09 hriif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Padδ2 "OK"= [14.7.6.3.3]
SHEAR DEFORMATION - 14.7.6.3.4
Bridge Thermal Movement:
γTU 1.2:= Max Thermal Expansion Factor [C3.4.1]
∆T TempMax TempMin- 75.00=:= deg F [3.12.2.3-1]
∆s γTU L∆ ∆T αs 0.49 in=:= Maximum Total Shear Deformation
Assumes Infinitely Stiff Abutment
(Conservative for Bearing Design) hrt 2 hc hri n+ 1.000 in=:= hrt.min 2 ∆s 0.98 in=:= Minimum Elastomer Thickness [14.7.6.3.4-1]
Pad∆ "OK" hrt hrt.minif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= Pad∆ "OK"=
Bearing Pad Design - Reinforced_Steel Girder_70' Span.xmcd
3 of 4 Designed: ASG
ROTATION - 14.7.6.3.5
Uplift is accounted for in the geometric and stress limits given for Method A for elastomeric bearing pads.
[C14.7.6.3.5a]
STABILITY - 14.7.6.3.6
Pad is considered stable if the total pad thickness is less than L/3 and W/3. [14.7.6.3.6] hpad 2 hc hri n+ n 1+( ) hs+ 1.125 in=:=
PadStability "OK" hpad min L W, ( ) if
"FAIL" otherwise
PadStability "OK"=
REINFORCEMENT - 14.7.6.3.7
hs 0.0625 in= Steel Thickness hmax max hc hri, ( ) 0.500 in=:=
∆FTH 24 ksi:= Fatigue Threshold - Category A [Table 6.6.1.2.3-1]
MinThickness "OK" 0.0625 in hsif
"FAIL" otherwise
:= MinThickness "OK"= [14.7.5.3.5]
ServiceThickness "OK" hs
3 hmax σs
Fy if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= ServiceThickness "OK"= [14.7.5.3.5-1]
FatigueThickness "OK" hs
2 hmax σLL
∆FTH
if
"FAIL" otherwise
:= FatigueThickness "OK"= [14.7.5.3.5-2]
SEISMIC & OTHER EXTREME EVENT PROVISIONS - 14.7.6.3.8
Anchorage is designed to resist all applicable seismic and extreme event forces.
BEARING PAD DESIGN SUMMARY:
A summary of the design parameters is shown below.
Cover Internal
0.43 0.62 OK OK OK N/A OK
Min t Service t Fatigue t
OK OK OK N/A
Seismic Reinforcement
Steel Reinforced Elastomeric Pad
Compression δ1 δ2 Shear Rotation Stability
Bearing Pad Design - Reinforced_Steel Girder_70' Span.xmcd
4 of 4 Designed: ASG
Substructure Design
SUBJECT Yale Kilgore - Trail Bridge
JOB NO. 6839.002 SHEET
BY A. Groesbeck DATE 6/9/2021
BRIDGE ABUTMENT DESIGN Backwall
Design in Accordance with AASHTO LRFD, 8th Ed.
Assumed Soil Properties
Backfill F= 30 deg. Ka= 0.333 (1-sinF)/(1+sinF)
Ko= 0.500 1-sinF
Kp= 3.000 1/Ka
Fill Soil Weight= 120 pcf
Passive Soil Weight= 120 pcf
Load and Resistance Factors [Tables 3.4.1-1 and 3.4.1-2]
MAX MIN
Load Factors: hi= 1.00 1.00 Typical structure gp: DC= 1.25 0.90 DL Components
LL= 1.75 1.75 Live Load
LS= 1.75 1.75 Live Load Surcharge
EV= 1.35 1.00 Vertical Earth
EHa= 1.50 0.90 Horizontal Earth, active pressure
EHo= 1.35 0.90 Horizontal Earth, at-rest pressure
ES= 1.50 0.75 Earth Surcharge
Concrete Resist. Factors: Fb= 0.90 Flexure
Fv= 0.90 Shear
Wall Data Concrete Density= 150 pcf
Wall Height= 3.333 ft
Wall Thickness= 0.833 ft
Depth & Top of Wall = 0.00 ft From FG
Depth & Bottom of Wall = 3.33 ft From FG
Unsupported Span = 4.33 ft
Unsupported Cantilever = 1.50 ft
HORIZ Forces…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .