Attch 06 Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT RFP: Gunnery Training Systems
Solicitation number
W900KK21R0055
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a performance assessment questionnaire to be completed by offerors and respondents for a federal contract opportunity. The draft request for proposal is for a Gunnery Training Systems single-source indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract valued at an estimated $104.5 million over five years. The contract will provide for tech refresh upgrades, current system production, concurrency upgrades and Risk Management Framework recertification for multiple gunnery trainer programs for both the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps. Responses to the performance assessment questionnaire will be used in awarding the contract and are to be returned to the identified contracting officer by the stated deadline. The contract is anticipated to be awarded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021 and have a two year period of performance beyond the five year ordering period.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
20210114 Updated Responses to Industry Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20210112 Updated Responses to Industry Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20201030 Responses to Industry Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20201030 Question 12 Response.zip ZIP file
Attch 04 QASP_07012020.docx DOCX document
Attch 12 DO 01 US Army M1A1 C-AGTS SS Rev F (80D-CAM1A1-E001).docx DOCX document
Attch 11 DO 01 US Army M1A2 SEP PIDS Rev P (139053-3).docx DOCX document
Attch 16 DO 02 PIDS Stryker MGS AGTS Rev K (74D-STMGS-B001).docx DOCX document
Attch 22 DO 04 CDRLs_LAV-25_20200715.pdf PDF
Attch 17 DO 03 SOW_Bradley_202000817.docx DOCX document
Attch 01_IQID SOW_20200817.docx DOCX document
Attch 09 DO 01 CDRLs_Abrams_20200709.pdf PDF
Exhibits A-C CDRLs_IDIQ_20200901.pdf PDF
Attch 07 Solicitation Question and Comment Form.docx DOCX document
Attch 10 DO 01 Section F_ Abrams_20200702.docx DOCX document
Attch 24 DO 04 USMC LAV-25 PIDS Rev F (23D-MCLAV25-A007).docx DOCX document
Attch 23 DO 04 Section F_LAV-25_20200728.docx DOCX document
Attch 15 DO 02 Section F_Stryker_20200616.docx DOCX document
Attch 03 GFP List_20200709.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attch 19 DO 03 Section F_Bradley_20200702.docx DOCX document
Attch 14 DO 02 CDRLs_Stryker_20200709.pdf PDF
Attch 20 DO 03 Bradley-COFT System Spec Rev J (PRF-PT-00514).docx DOCX document
Attch 18 DO 03 CDRLs_Bradley_20200709.pdf PDF
Attch 13 DO 02 SOW_Stryker_20200817.docx DOCX document
Attch 02 DD 254.pdf PDF
GTS Draft RFP_W900KK-21-R-0055_20200915.docx DOCX document
Attch 21 DO 04 SOW_LAV-25_2020017.docx DOCX document
Attch 08 DO 01 SOW_Abrams_20200817.docx DOCX document
Attch 05 Proposed Prices Spreadsheet 20200911.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only)

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .