Attachment Z- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM26R0343
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed for evaluators of the Consolidated Receiving Point (CRP) Services contract opportunity for the Seattle/Tacoma, Washington area. The questionnaire serves as an evaluation tool to assess contractor qualifications and previous relevant experience rather than a substantive requirement document. As a template, it does not contain specific past performance criteria, scoring methodologies, or evaluation factors, but rather provides the structural framework that the Government will use during the source selection process to collect and evaluate information about offerors' prior performance on similar logistics, warehousing, and freight forwarding contracts.
The questionnaire is intended to support the Department of State Office of Acquisition Management's evaluation of contractor capability to perform consolidated receiving point services, including receipt, inspection, inventorying, hazardous material identification, consolidation, deconsolidation, export packing, temporary storage, and delivery services for government-owned and personally owned items destined for Foreign Service Posts and U.S. Government employee household effects at the Seattle/Tacoma Commercial Port Area.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM26R0343_0002_AMENDMENT.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_19AQMM26R0343.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM26R0343_0001_AMENDMENT.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-Section B Pricing REV 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment Y- Business Management Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment U-Performance AQL Deductions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment X-CRP Seattle Receipt Data 2015-2025.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment V-MRPT Procedures.pdf | ||
| Attachment W-CRP Receipt Label.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment T - WD 2015-5535 Rev 28.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM26R0343 CRP.pdf | ||
| Attachments F-P.pdf | ||
| Attachment Q- U.S. Bank trading partner agreement.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment C-CRP Receipt Process.pdf | ||
| Attachment B-Section B Pricing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this Questionnaire and email to:
Department of State – Office of Acquisition Management
A/OPE/AQM/WWD/FBSB
ATTN: Sarah Cass, Contracting Officer CassSL@state.gov (this is preferable method of receipt) Desired Response Date: August 17, 2026
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options): $
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION: DVIDS Director
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
O = Outstanding E = Excellent A = Adequate M = Marginal P = Poor N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
O E A M P N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
O E A M P N/O
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
O E A M P N/O
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
O E A M P N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
O E A M P N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”.
O E A M P N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
O E A M P N/O
If an Award Fee contract, what was the average Award Fee % earned?
SBU - CONTRACTING AND ACQUISITIONS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .