Attachment_J8_PastPerformanceQuestionaire.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12363N21R4001
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation requesting restoration services on the Crooked River Valley in the Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests. Offerors are required to provide references who will receive and complete the past performance questionnaire by the date offers are due. The questionnaire asks references to rate the offeror's past performance on a scale of Excellent, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Unacceptable for quality of work, timeliness, contract management, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and likelihood of recommending the offeror for future work. Responses will be kept confidential between the reference and contracting officer during evaluation. The related federal contract opportunity provides additional context, seeking restoration services to address impacts from historical dredge mining through relocating the Crooked River into a new channel, constructing floodplains, and installing instream habitat features and riparian plantings.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment1_Attachment_J9_SiteVisitNotes.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment1_Attachment_J10_QA.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment1_SF30.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_J2_Crooked River Phase 4 Drawings_Sheets1Thru4.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J2_Crooked River Phase 4 Drawings_Sheets4.1Thru5.3.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J3_TempBridgeDrawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J4_DrawingAddendum.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J6_TechSpecs.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_J1_WageDecision.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J2_Crooked River Phase 4 Drawings_Sheets6.0Thru7.3.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J5_PlantingDesign.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J7_SWPPP_Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Final_RFP.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation 12363N21R4001
Crooked River Valley Rehabilitation Phase 4
Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forests
ATTACHMENT J-8: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Project/Contract: __________________ Name of Offeror: __________________________________ Name and Title of Person Completing Questionnaire: ________________________________________ Reference Contact Information (phone # & email address):___________________________________ Company/Organization: __________________________________ Briefly describe the nature and size in dollars of your contract with the Offeror and types of work completed. (If more space is needed, please use the “Additional Comments” block on the second page):
Please return this Past Performance Questionnaire to Karen Ruklic at the following email address: karen.ruklic@usda.gov no later than the date offers are due. Email questions to karen.ruklic@usda.gov.
ADJECTIVAL RATING DEFINITIONS
| “E” |
| Excellent: Performance greatly exceeded contract requirements resulting in overall benefits to the customer with no significant weaknesses or complaints. |
| “G” |
| Good: Performance consistently met and often exceeded many of the contract requirements with very few weaknesses or complaints. |
| “A” |
| Acceptable: Performance consistently met contract requirements with noted weaknesses or complaints adequately corrected. |
| “M” |
| Marginal: Performance often failed to meet minimum contract requirements with numerous noted weaknesses or complaints usually corrected. |
| “U” |
| Unacceptable: Performance consistently failed to meet contract requirements with numerous significant weaknesses or complaints left uncorrected. |
| Past Performance Question |
| Rating (Circle answer) |
1. Describe the quality of work performed. Did the contractor meet or exceed contract requirements?
Comments:
E G A M U
2. Describe the timeliness of performance.
Comments:
E G A M U
3. Rate the quality of contract management including paperwork processing and quality control effectiveness. How responsive was the contractor in resolving quality, schedule, or other contract issues?
Comments:
E G A M U
4. How effective was the contractor in addressing specific customer needs including cost control, oversight of subcontractors/suppliers, and compliance with regulatory/labor/safety standards?
Comments:
E G A M U
5. How satisfied were you with the contractor’s overall performance?
E G A M U
6. Would you award another contract to this contractor?
Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
PLEASE NOTE: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations, contractors may be advised of adverse remarks and given an opportunity to respond. However, the contracting officer will not provide your name or copies of this questionnaire to the contractor or any other party not directly involved in the evaluation of the contractor’s proposal.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .