Attachment J6 - Past-Performance Questionnaire.docx

Attachment J6 – 030ADV26R0011

PAST-PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The purpose of this questionnaire is to gather information on the contractor named below to determine their suitability to provide services for the Library of Congress (Library). Your prompt completion of this questionnaire is sincerely appreciated as it is critical to the completion of the proposal-evaluation process.

Contractor: [Name of Contractor]

1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

a) Handwritten responses are acceptable.

b) Using the ratings below, please assess the contractor’s performance on the project identified in the email. The assessment should reflect only performance for which the contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:

2. Please provide narrative explanations for any Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or N/A ratings. If possible, please supplement your evaluation of the contractor’s performance with the feedback of others in your organization.

3. The Contractor submitted a proposal to the Library for the provision of [PERFORMANCE AREA]. Past performance is of considerable importance to this acquisition. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the contractor is very important.

We greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and return via email to Contract Specialist Nikolas Wellstead (nwellstead@loc.gov), with a copy to Contracting Officer Jennifer Zwahlen (jzwa@loc.gov), no later than 12:00pm ET on 02/13/2026.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Please provide the following information for your company:

Name:

Point of Contact Name and Title:

Telephone Number.

Contract Number if applicable:

Contract Type:

Period of Performance:

Approximate dollar value for the contract:

Contract Description:

QUESTIONS

The following correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:

1. How would you rate the overall management of the contract?

2. How would you rate the quality of the products and services provided by the contractor?

3. How effective was the contractor in managing all phases the project?

4. How would you rate the Contractor’s timeliness and compliance with the project schedule?

5. How timely was the contractor in submitting required reports?

6. How would you rate the Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? (If applicable)

7. How competent were key personnel and personnel provided for the project?

8. How well did key personnel communicate with Government/company personnel?

9. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform the services within contract costs?

10. Were any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? If yes, please explain.

Comments:

Comments continued— 4/14/17 09/12/2022 1