Attachment E - Responsiveness Technical Questionnaire.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP DMS-2526-098 Lawn Care Services
- Solicitation number
- RFP-16572
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This is a Technical Responsiveness Assessment Scale and evaluation questionnaire for Request for Proposals (RFP) DMS-2526-098 issued by the State of Florida, Department of Management Services (DMS), Division of Real Estate Development and Management for lawn care services. The RFP seeks to establish contracts for lawn care services across multiple facilities in three regions: Pensacola, Tallahassee, and Tampa. The Department intends to award to multiple respondents in each region but reserves the right to award to a single respondent per facility group, make a single award for all regions, or make no award based on what is determined to be in the best interest of the State.
The evaluation questionnaire uses a six-point scoring scale (0-5) ranging from Inadequate to Superior to assess respondent proposals across four primary technical categories: Industry Experience, Current Contracts, Approach to the Statement of Work, and Project Team. Maximum raw points total 50, with weighted points totaling 60 after applying category-specific multipliers (weights ranging from 1 to 2). Evaluation criteria examine respondents' experience providing lawn care services to corporate and governmental entities, the scope and volume of current contracts demonstrating capability, availability of equipment and scheduling capability, and the qualifications and adequacy of staff assigned to each facility group, including training and supervision protocols. The questionnaire requires respondents to register through the Business Network within MyFloridaMarketPlace (MFMP) and comply with all solicitation terms and conditions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment C - Price Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP DMS-2526-098 - Lawn Care Tallahassee & Tampa.pdf | ||
| Attachment F - Technical Response.pdf | ||
| DMS-2526-098 Q&A.pdf | ||
| Attachment I - PUR-7801.Vendor-Certification-Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Performance Standards.pdf | ||
| Addendum No. 2 (2).pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT J - PUR 2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP DMS-2526-098 Addendum No. 1.pdf | ||
| Attachment H - Equipment List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment K - Draft Contract.pdf | ||
| Attachment G - Facility & Equipment Checklist.pdf | ||
| Attachment B - Monthly Summary Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A - Statement of Work - Lawn Care 2526-098.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Technical Responsiveness
| Assessment Scale | |
| 0 | Inadequate - The quality of the Proposal is inadequate when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal is blank, does not demonstrate the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, does not address the question, or demonstrates vendor has no experience in performing the required services. |
| 1 | Unsatisfactory - The quality of the Proposal is unsatisfactory when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal inadequately demonstrates the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, insufficiently addresses the question or demonstrates vendor has very limited experience in performing the required services. |
| 2 | Poor - The quality of the Proposal is poor when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal minimally demonstrates the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, minimally addresses the question, or demonstrates vendor has limited experience in performing the required services. |
| 3 | Adequate - The quality of the Proposal is adequate when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal adequately demonstrates the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, adequately addresses the question, or demonstrates vendor has sufficient experience in performing the required services. |
| 4 | Good - The quality of the Proposal is good when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal extensively demonstrates the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, extensively addresses the question, or demonstrates exceptional experience in performing the required service. The response indicates vendor would provide enhanced value to the State and/or to agenices. |
| 5 | Superior - The quality of the Proposal is superior when evaluated against the relevant guiding questions, as the Proposal exhaustively demonstrates the Respondent’s ability to provide the services, exhaustively addresses the question, or demonstrates vendor has extraordinary experience in performing the required services. The Proposal indicates vendor would provide exceptionally enhanced value to the State and/or to agenices. The Proposal demonstrates the ability of the vendor to exceed the State's requirement, provide outstanding quality of service levels, provide cost savings or cost avoidance to the State, and/or implement innovative ideas. |
| INSERT COMPANY NAME | Portfolio Page Number | Maximum Raw Points Possible | Raw Points Awarded | Weight | ||||
| (Raw Score multiplied by X) | Maximum Weighted Points Possible | Total Weighted Points Awarded | ||||||
| Technical Questions | ||||||||
| A. | Industry Experience | |||||||
| 1 | How well does the Technical Response clearly demonstrate that the Respondent has sufficient experience providing Lawn Care Services for Corporate and/or Governmental entities to meet the requirements specified in Attachment A – Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 60 | ||
| B. | Current Contracts | |||||||
| 1 | How well does the scope of services provided by the Respondent regarding current contracts demonstrate the company’s ability to provide Lawn Care Services as detailed in Attachment A – Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||
| 2 | How well does the volume of services provided in the listed contracts demonstrate the Respondent is capable of providing the services required in the Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||
| C. | Approach to the Statement of Work | |||||||
| 1 | How well does the Technical Response demonstrate the Respondent’s capability to effectively provide the services required in the Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |||
| 2 | How well does the Technical Response demonstrate the availability of equipment to effectively provide the services required in the Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |||
| 3 | How well does the Technical Response demonstrate the Respondent anticipates scheduling Facilities in a manner to effectively provide the services required in the Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||
| D. | Project Team | |||||||
| 1 | How effectively do the collective and individual resumes and narrative of the Respondent’s Team demonstrate Respondent’s ability to provide the services detailed in the Statement of Work for each Facility Group? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||
| 2 | How well has the Respondent demonstrated it will provide an adequate number of staff at each Facility Group to meet the requirements in Attachment A – Statement of Work? | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||
| 3 | How well has the Respondent demonstrated it will provide adequate staff training and supervision at each Facility Group to meet the requirements in Attachment A – Statement of Work? | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Maximum Raw Points Possible | Total Raw Points Awarded | Maximum Weighted Points Possible | Total Weighted Points Awarded | |
| Evaluation Total: | 50 | 50 | 60 | 60 |
&"-,Bold"ATTACHMENT E - RESPONSIVENESS TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE
ITB No.: DMS-25/26-098 &P of &N Attachment E
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .