ATTACHMENT D NMACC III SOURCES SOUGHT CONTRACTOR SURVEY FORM.pdf
PDF 170 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70Z04721RNMACC03
About this file
This document contains a contractor survey form and description of the US Coast Guard's National Multiple Award Construction Contract III opportunity. The survey form seeks contractor feedback on elements of IDIQ/MACC solicitations, task order evaluation methods, preferred project sizes, geographic considerations, bonding capabilities, and suggestions for future procurements. The contract opportunity is for general construction, marine construction, renovation, alteration and repair projects on a design-build or design-bid-build basis under an IDIQ vehicle. The scope includes any of the 50 U.S. states, Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands. This is a sources sought notice to identify potential small business offerors for market research purposes to determine if a partial small business set-aside is warranted.
View the file
Other files
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D
NMACC III SOURCES SOUGHT SURVEY 70Z04721RNMACC03
DHS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SILC CONSTRUCTION
FIRM NAME: _____________________________________________________
ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________
POC NAME: _____________________________________________________
BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD (SMALL OR LARGE) ______________________
POC TELEPHONE: ____________________________
EMAIL: _________________________________
Please respond to the following questions.
SOLICITATIONS/RFPS:
1. What elements to IDIQ / MACC solicitations attracts you to participate?
2. Please communicate your solicitation experiences on unique/innovative elements and/or evaluation methods.
3. What are your preferred elements to task order evaluation methods?
4. What elements to task order evaluation methods experiences are challenging and/or present obstacles for you to participate?
DHS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SILC CONSTRUCTION
5. Please identify your preferred construction project size and/or dollar threshold that maximizes your firm’s return on investment.
6. Please Identify under what dollar value threshold are you more likely not to propose on task orders?
7. Please Identify under what dollar value threshold are you more likely to propose with heavy subcontracting strategies?
8. What are other related favorable features and/or considerations that results in competing on higher percentage task orders RFPs?
BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS:
9. If you are a prospective interested party and will contemplate forming a joint venture, teaming or Mentor Protégée agreement to participate in this contract, what factors will influence your decision?
DHS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SILC CONSTRUCTION
10. What are your preferred business formation experiences on past solicitations/RFP’s resulted in successful outcomes (joint ventures, Mentor Protégée, prime/sub arrangements, etc.)?
11. Are there elements (or is there an approach) to an evaluation factor you recommend be included in the solicitation that would influence your decision to forming a joint venture, Mentor Protégée, teaming agreement? What can we do, if anything, to enable the business planning process in a manner that is a win-win (e.g. better framework for partnering and resulting in stronger partners)?
12. What are past business formation (joint ventures, teaming agreements, Mentor Protégée, prime/sub arrangements, etc.) experiences on past solicitations/RFP’s are less desired and why?
GEOGRAPHIC CONSIDERATIONS:
13. Based on your firm’s business model and/or capabilities, prioritize in order from 1 – 4 the four regions (of the United States) you prefer to physically carryout task orders?
(Insert 1 as the most preferred and 4 as the least preferred.)
� Northeast
� Southeast
� Midwest
� West
DHS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SILC CONSTRUCTION
14. Based on your firm’s business model, please identify the location of your headquarters (or home office) AND identify any additional continuous fully operational locations (off-site and/or subsidiary business locations). Be sure to include both city and state to the response(s).
15. Based on your firm’s business model and/or capabilities, prioritize the two regions identified below (includes CONUS and OCONUS), you prefer to physically carryout task orders? (Insert 1 as the most preferred and 2 as the least preferred.)
� Pacific Area (Montana, Idaho, Utah, Arizona then further west | Alaska, Hawaii then further to include Guam, etc.)
� Atlantic Area (All remaining United States then further to include the Caribbean, etc.)
16. What other geographical area(s), regions and/or states are you more likely to propose?
17. Based on your firm’s business model and/or capabilities, please define a preferred region within the United States to carry out task orders. Essentially, please identify the states that would be rolled up in your firm’s proposed region.
18. What are other related favorable features and/or considerations that results in competing on higher percentage of task orders RFPs?
DHS UNITED STATES COAST GUARD SILC CONSTRUCTION
BONDING
19. Please state your preferred and/or average bonding per project?
20. Please identify ANY Bonding limitations, constraints and/or related matters associated with proposing on single or multiple task orders.
OVERALL SURVEY
21. Use this space to share any additional comments and/or preferred trends on any of the topics identified above?
22. Use this space to provide comments and/or suggested enhancements on topics not discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements?
Thank you for completing this survey.
Please be advised that responses to this survey are non-attributional.
Furthermore, the results of this survey will not be shared with survey responders.
The purpose of this survey is for US Government market research purposes only.
| ADDRESS: |
| POC NAME: |
| undefined: |
| BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD SMALL OR LARGE: |
| POC TELEPHONE: |
| 1 What elements to IDIQ MACC solicitations attracts you to participate 1: |
| 1 What elements to IDIQ MACC solicitations attracts you to participate 2: |
| 1 What elements to IDIQ MACC solicitations attracts you to participate 3: |
| andor evaluation methods 1: |
| andor evaluation methods 2: |
| andor evaluation methods 3: |
| 3 What are your preferred elements to task order evaluation methods 1: |
| 3 What are your preferred elements to task order evaluation methods 2: |
| 3 What are your preferred elements to task order evaluation methods 3: |
| present obstacles for you to participate 1: |
| present obstacles for you to participate 2: |
| present obstacles for you to participate 3: |
| maximizes your firms return on investment 1: |
| maximizes your firms return on investment 2: |
| maximizes your firms return on investment 3: |
| on task orders 1: |
| on task orders 2: |
| on task orders 3: |
| heavy subcontracting strategies 1: |
| heavy subcontracting strategies 2: |
| heavy subcontracting strategies 3: |
| competing on higher percentage task orders RFPs 1: |
| competing on higher percentage task orders RFPs 2: |
| competing on higher percentage task orders RFPs 3: |
| will influence your decision 1: |
| will influence your decision 2: |
| will influence your decision 3: |
| arrangements etc 1: |
| arrangements etc 2: |
| arrangements etc 3: |
| framework for partnering and resulting in stronger partners 1: |
| framework for partnering and resulting in stronger partners 2: |
| framework for partnering and resulting in stronger partners 3: |
| less desired and why 1: |
| less desired and why 2: |
| less desired and why 3: |
| include both city and state to the responses 1: |
| include both city and state to the responses 2: |
| include both city and state to the responses 3: |
| propose 1: |
| propose 2: |
| propose 3: |
| the states that would be rolled up in your firms proposed region 1: |
| the states that would be rolled up in your firms proposed region 2: |
| the states that would be rolled up in your firms proposed region 3: |
| competing on higher percentage of task orders RFPs 1: |
| competing on higher percentage of task orders RFPs 2: |
| competing on higher percentage of task orders RFPs 3: |
| 19Please state your preferred andor average bonding per project 1: |
| 19Please state your preferred andor average bonding per project 2: |
| 19Please state your preferred andor average bonding per project 3: |
| associated with proposing on single or multiple task orders 1: |
| associated with proposing on single or multiple task orders 2: |
| associated with proposing on single or multiple task orders 3: |
| the topics identified above 1: |
| the topics identified above 2: |
| the topics identified above 3: |
| the topics identified above 4: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 1: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 2: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 3: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 4: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 5: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 6: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 7: |
| discussed such as way to improve future similar procurements 8: |
| FIRM NAME: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .