Attachment C- Building 2-3-4-5-13-14- ACM Inspection Report.pdf

LIMITED ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL INSPECTION

VA MEDICAL CENTER

BUILDING # 2

781 SMYTH ROAD

MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03104

PREPARED FOR:

PREPARED BY:

ATC ASSOCIATES, INC.

150 ZACHARY ROAD

MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03109

ATC PROJECT 059.78014.0002

May 29, 2009

VA Medical Center Limited ACM Inspection Building # 2 May 29, 2009 Manchester, NH

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Certification of Results

2.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

2.2 Material Assessment Methodology

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

2.4 Analytical Method

2.5 Consideration for Hidden Materials

2.6 Recommendations

APPENDIX A SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING

MATERIALS

APPENDIX B ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS BY PLM

APPENDIX C SAMPLE LOCATION PHOTOGRAPHS

APPENDIX D DRAWINGS

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 1

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ATC Associates Inc. (ATC) of Manchester, New Hampshire was retained by the VA Medical Center of Manchester, New Hampshire (VAMC) to perform a limited Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) inspection in Building # 2 (Subject Site).

This survey included an inspection of accessible interior and exterior areas of the Subject Site.

Exploratory demolition to inspect enclosed area such as within wall voids, plumbing chases, and concealed flooring materials was not performed during this survey. Assumptions have been made in this report about suspect ACM materials that may be encountered in inaccessible areas, based on limited observations at available access locations to enclosed areas. Exterior and roof top areas were included in the scope of work. However, roofing materials inspection and sampling was not included in the scope of work.

The asbestos survey was performed by EPA accredited Asbestos Inspectors, Mr. Bryan Thompson and Ms. Christine Whetstone on December 11, 2008. A total of fifty-three (53) samples of suspect ACM were colleted, with fifty (50) analyzed to determine asbestos content. The ATC inspector performed both the visual inspection and bulk sampling in the building according to methods outlined in the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance document titled, “Guidance for Controlling Asbestos- Containing Materials in Buildings” (Document No. 560/5-85-024). Please find the ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) bulk sample results included as Appendix B.

ATC identified and assumed ACM to be associated with Building # 2.

Section 2.0 discusses the ACM survey and sampling methodology. This survey involved a visual inspection, bulk sampling and inventory of suspect ACMs, including locating and quantifying the identified ACM. Table 1 contains a listing of the identified or assumed suspect ACM.

Appendix C contains photographs of suspect ACM sample location. Appendix D contains site drawings noting sample location and identified ACM.

Limitations

Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained and our recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the field of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

Environmental evaluations are limited in the sense that conclusions and recommendations are developed and information obtained from limited research and secondary sources. Except as set forth in this report, ATC has made independent investigations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived from the secondary sources and personal interviews and has presumed that such information was accurate and complete.

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 2

This report is intended for the sole use of the VA Medical Center. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at risk of said user.

1.1 Certification of Results

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the VA Medical Center. Photocopying of this document by parties other than those designated by the Client, or use of this document for purposes other than it is intended, is prohibited.

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of May 2009.

Bryan Thompson Assistant Project Manager

Michael McCarter Senior Project Manager, Building Sciences

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 3

2.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

The survey was performed by EPA-accredited Asbestos Inspectors on December 11, 2008. Bulk samples, representing individual homogenous areas (HA) of suspect materials, were collected in a randomly distributed manner, in accordance with the methods outlined below.

Building materials exist in the form of thermal systems insulation (TSI), surfacing materials and miscellaneous materials.

The following generally illustrates the sampling strategy employed by ATC:

(a) Surfacing materials – In a randomly distributed manner, collect bulk samples of surfacing materials, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM.

(1) Collect at least three bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is less than or equal to 1,000 ft2.

(2) Collect at least five bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2, but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

(3) Collect at least seven bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 ft2.

(b) Thermal systems insulation.

(1) In a randomly distributed manner, collect at a minimum, three bulk samples of thermal systems insulation material, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM.

(2) Collect, at a minimum, one bulk sample of patched thermal systems insulation, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM, providing the section of patch was less than 6 linear or square feet.

(3) Collect, at a minimum, three representative bulk samples of each insulated mechanical system not assumed to be ACM, including, but not limited to cementitious material used on pipe fittings such as tees, elbows or valves.

Representative sampling was conducted in a manner sufficient as to identify whether each homogeneous area is either asbestos or non-asbestos containing.

(4) Bulk samples are not required to be collected from any homogeneous area where the accredited asbestos inspector has determined that the thermal systems insulation is a non-suspect material (i.e. fiberglass, foam glass, rubber or any other non-ACM).

(c) Miscellaneous materials – Collect, at a minimum, two representative bulk samples of each miscellaneous material not assumed to be ACM, including but not limited to ceiling tiles, floor tiles, associated floor mastic, etc. Representative sampling was conducted in a manner sufficient as to identify whether each homogeneous area is either asbestos or non-asbestos containing.

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 4

2.2 Material Assessment Methodology

During the survey, each material was assessed with a Physical Hazard assessment and Response Action based on the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) ranking system as follows.

PHYSICAL HAZARD ASSESSMENT:

1. Damaged or significantly damaged TSI.

2. Damaged friable surfacing material.

3. Significantly damaged friable surfacing material.

4. Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous material.

5. ACM with potential for damage.

6. ACM with potential for significant damage.

7. Any remaining friable known or suspect ACM.

8. Damaged or significantly damaged non-friable ACMB. Note that this category is not listed in the AHERA regulations but is provided for reference in this report.

RESPONSE ACTION:

1. Removal

Removal means the complete removal and disposal of designated asbestos-containing material of any kind. If ACM debris is present, the area must be isolated and the debris cleaned up immediately.

2. Repair

Repair means to restore a damaged area to its original intact condition. This includes making the damaged area airtight to prevent the release of fibers into the air. If ACM debris is present, the area must be isolated and the debris cleaned up immediately. Place all repaired ACM in the O&M Program.

3. Encapsulation

Encapsulation means the application of a material with a bonding or sealing property to prevent the release of airborne fibers. If ACM debris is present, the area must be isolated and the debris cleaned up immediately. Place encapsulated ACM in the O&M Program.

4. Enclosure

Enclosure means creating an airtight structure around an affected area to prevent the release of airborne fibers and significantly reduce the possibility of future physical disturbance or damage to the ACM. Any damaged ACM must be repaired prior to

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 5 enclosure. If ACM debris is present the area must be isolated and the debris cleaned up immediately. Place the enclosed area in the O&M Program.

5. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Program

An O&M program describes a structured plan of action to maintain ACM in a condition that protects the health and safety of the occupants in a building and provides for remedial action in the event that ACM is disturbed.

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ATC conducted the asbestos survey of all accessible areas of the Subject Site. Appropriate efforts were made in representative areas of the building to identify suspect materials located below carpeting or above suspended ceiling systems. Note that ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear that may have suspect ACM internal components. Please refer to Section 2.5 for considerations for potentially hidden or concealed suspect ACM.

Appendix A presents a list of all identified suspect ACM that were identified or assumed to be ACM.

Materials identified as ACM are presented first, followed by the listing of materials identified as non- ACM. Each suspect ACM is also identified by its homogeneous area number that corresponds to the representative sample number. Each identified or assumed ACM has been assessed with a physical hazard assessment and response action based on the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) ranking system (See Section 2.2 for explanation of ranking system).

An ACM is defined by the US EPA as any material or product containing more than one percent asbestos by weight. The Table in Appendix A identifies materials reported to contain less than one percent ACM, unless otherwise noted.

Based on inspection observation, analytical results, and assumption, ATC notes the following:

• ATC inspected under carpeting and single layers of floor covering materials (i.e. vinyl floor tiles and sheet flooring) for suspect ACM in representative locations. At the representative locations that were inspected and sampled, asbestos-containing floor covering materials were not identified. Based on these observations and findings, it is not likely that asbestos-containing floor covering materials are located under carpeting. However, ATC recommends additional inspection and sampling be performed prior to disturbance of carpeting.

• At locations where visual observation was not conclusive (i.e. visual and physical barriers such as hardwood or plywood floors where exploratory demolition would be required), ATC has assumed suspect flooring materials to be present and are indicated as such in Table 1 and noted on the Drawing(s).

• ATC has assumed specific materials (pipe insulation, radiator enclosures) to be enclosed behind and/or above solid walls and ceilings where present. This assumption is based on site history indicating that these materials have been found in these locations throughout the VAMC.

Additional suspect ACM may also be present in these areas. Please refer to Section 2.5 Considerations for Hidden Materials.

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 6

2.4 Analytical Method

Bulk samples of suspect materials were analyzed by ProScience Analytical Services, Inc., of Woburn, Massachusetts (ProScience) using the EPA approved method (EPA/600R-93/116) for polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS), using the visual estimation technique for asbestos quantification. By using the PLM/DS method, a trained microscopist is able to identify and distinguish between asbestos group minerals and other fibrous materials such as cellulose (paper), mineral (rock), wood or glass fiber. The quantity of each of these substances is estimated on a weight basis and recorded as a percentage. Only the asbestos content, if any, is recorded in the bulk sample ‘Report of Analysis’ (Appendix B). If a material contains greater than 1% asbestos, it is considered to be asbestos-containing material. Upon client request, or at the recommendation of the analyst, the ‘Point Counting Method’ may be used to verify the presence/absence of asbestos when a sample contains less than 10% asbestos by visual estimate.

ProScience, is accredited by the EPA National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and meets the criteria for asbestos bulk sample analytical standards required by the State of New Hampshire. The PLM/DS analytical method is modeled after 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A:

“Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples.”

2.5 Consideration for Hidden Materials

ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases, plenums, or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear or below grade on the foundation, etc. in an attempt to identify hidden ACM. ATC did not identify any asbestos-containing materials under carpeting. Due to the limited access under the carpeting, ATC recommends that additional investigations be performed prior to removal of the carpet. Additional suspect materials may be present in these or other inaccessible areas that were not included in this inspection.

ATC recommends that if a suspect material has not been positively identified, but is similar in mode of occurrence or physical properties as other identified ACM, it should be considered asbestos-containing.

Only through further sampling and analysis should a suspect material be identified as non-asbestos.

2.6 Recommendations

ATC identified and/or assumed ACM are located within Building # 2. ATC recommends that the finding of this inspection be included an Operations and Maintenance Plan.

ATC recommends additional inspection and bulk sampling, including limited exploratory demolition if future maintenance, renovation, or demolition will affect areas that were not included in ATC’s scope of work.

ATC recommends that all ACM that will be disturbed by maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities be removed prior to or in conjunction with the activities. ATC recommends that a properly licensed Asbestos Contractor perform all asbestos abatement.

ATC Project No. 059.78014.0002 Page 7

In preparation for maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, ATC recommends the following:

1. ATC recommends that this survey report including all bulk sample results and attached lab reports be provided to all contractors/personnel that will be performing any work in the areas that would impact and/or disturb any of the building materials noted in this report. ATC also recommends that such contractors/personnel comply with all Federal, State, and local regulations regarding abatement, demolition and disposal of the building materials noted in this report.

2. Although the asbestos abatement contractor is required to follow the requirements outlined in

Federal, State, and local regulations regarding asbestos during any abatement project, ATC recommends the development of a project specification and the use of project oversight to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations as well as protect the interest of the client for all abatement work performed at the site. The project specification shall reference the regulations pertinent to each project, including those work procedures that shall be followed by all asbestos abatement personnel.

3. ATC recommends that the project specification be developed a reviewed by an accredited

Asbestos Project Designer.

4. As part of each abatement contractor bidding process, a unit price schedule for the abatement of asbestos-containing materials, not identified within this report and uncovered during renovation/demolition activities, should also be established. Included should be unit prices for the removal of asbestos-containing materials (i.e., pipe/pipe fitting insulation, e.g.), as well as those non-asbestos-containing materials which may be asbestos contaminated (i.e., plaster, gypsum wall board, etc.)

5. Project oversight will provide the VAMC with on-site technical expertise during all phases of the abatement work. Project oversight provides a constant management of each abatement project to ensure that all asbestos-containing materials are removed in accordance with all applicable regulations and to prevent an asbestos fiber release. Tasks performed during project oversight should include periodic work inspections to ensure that all procedures employed by the abatement contractor are acceptable, and air monitoring around each work area to detect elevated asbestos fiber levels.

APPENDIX A

SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

APPENDIX B

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS BY PLM

APPENDIX C

SAMPLE LOCATION PHOTOGRAPHS

Photograph Log Building 2 Project No. 59.78014.0002 VA Medical Center Manchester, New Hampshire

Room B-7 Room B-6

Room B-9 Room A-5

Room A-10 Room M-2

Room M-2 Room A-5

Room A-5 Room A-10

Room A-5 Room M-2

Room A-7 Room A-8

Room A-6 Room A-8

Room A-8 Room A-1

Room A-1 Room A-1

Room A-1 Room A-1

Room B-7 Room B-7

Room B-7 Room B-7

Room B-8 Room A-7

Front Door Rear Door

Room A-3 Room A-9

Garage Garage

Garage Garage

Garage

APPENDIX D

DRAWINGS

A sbestos\C lients\V A

M C

\Building 2\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 5/29/09

N

TS

M M2-1M

059.78014.0002 R

M

M A

N C

H

ESTER

, N

EW

H A

M

PSH

IRE

V

A M

ED

IA

C L C

EN

TER

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

BU

ILD

IN

G

TW

O

A

SBESTO

S-C O

N

TA

IN

G

IN

G

M A

TERIA

LS

LEG

EN

D

A

SBESTO

S-C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G

BLA

C K

SIN

K

C O

A

TIN

G

A

SBESTO

S-C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G

2"-4" PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

N O

TES:

1) REFER TO

A

PPEN

D

IX A

FO

R

LISTIN

G O

F A

SSU

M

ED

A

SBESTO

S - C

O N

TA

IN

IN

G

M A

TERIA

LS.

2) REFER TO

R

EPO

R

T FO

R A

D D

ITIO

N

A

L IN

FO

RM

A

TIO

N R

EG

A

R D

IN

G

SC

O

PE A

N

D

LIM

ITA

TIO

N S O

F TH

IS IN

SPEC

TIO

N

# = LIN

EA

R FEET O

F PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

5 LN

FT

1 EA

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com http://www.pdffactory.com lients\V A

M C

\Building 2\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 5/29/09

N

TS

M M2-1S

059.78014.0002 R

M

M A

N C

H

ESTER

, N

EW

H A

M

PSH

IRE

V

A M

ED

IA

C L C

EN

TER

BU

ILD

IN

G

TW

O

A

SBESTO

S SA

M

PLE LO

C

A

TIO

N S

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

LEG

EN

D

A

PPRO

XIM

A

TE SA

M

PLE LO

C

A

TIO

N

2-01F 2-02F2-05A

2-01G 2-02G

2-01B 2-02B

2-01C 2-02C

2-01A 2-02A

2-12A /B

2-13A /B

2-14A /B2-15A

2-17A

2-11A /B

2-09A /B/C

2-10A /B/C

2-16B

2-01D 2-02D

2-03A 2-03B

2-04A /B/C

2-05B 2-15B

2-01E 2-02E 2-03C

2-17B

2-06B 2-07B

2-19A

2-19B

2-19C

2-18A /B

2-16A

2-06A 2-07A

2-08A 2-08B

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

BUILDING # 3

Building # 3 May 29, 2009

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Certification of Results

2.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

2.2 Material Assessment Methodology

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

2.4 Analytical Method

2.5 Consideration for Hidden Materials

2.6 Recommendations

APPENDIX B ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS BY PLM

Building # 3 January 19, 2009

Manchester, New Hampshire (VAMC) to perform a limited Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) inspection in Building # 3 (Subject Site).

This survey included an inspection of accessible interior and exterior areas of the Subject Site.

Exploratory demolition to inspect enclosed area such as within wall voids, plumbing chases, and concealed flooring materials was not performed during this survey. Assumptions have been made in this report about suspect ACM materials that may be encountered in inaccessible areas, based on limited observations at available access locations to enclosed areas. Exterior and roof top areas were included in the scope of work. However, roofing materials inspection and sampling was not included in the scope of work.

The asbestos survey was performed by EPA accredited Asbestos Inspectors, Mr. Bryan Thompson and Ms. Christine Whetstone. A total of sixty (60) samples of suspect ACM were colleted, with fifty-seven

(57) analyzed to determine asbestos content. The ATC inspector performed both the visual inspection and bulk sampling in the building according to methods outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance document titled, “Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings” (Document No. 560/5-85-024). Please find the ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) bulk sample results included as Appendix B.

ATC identified and assumed ACM to be associated with Building # 3.

Section 2.0 discusses the ACM survey and sampling methodology. This survey involved a visual inspection, bulk sampling and inventory of suspect ACMs, including locating and quantifying the identified ACM. Appendix A contains a listing of the identified or assumed suspect ACM.

prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the field of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

Environmental evaluations are limited in the sense that conclusions and recommendations are developed and information obtained from limited research and secondary sources. Except as set forth in this report, ATC has made independent investigations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived

This report is intended for the sole use of the VA Medical Center. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use document by parties other than those designated by the Client, or use of this document for purposes other

The survey was performed by New Hampshire DES licensed and EPA-accredited Asbestos Inspectors.

Bulk samples, representing individual homogenous areas of suspect materials, were collected in a randomly distributed manner, in accordance with the methods outlined below.

Building materials exist in the form of thermal systems insulation (TSI), surfacing materials and

(2) Collect at least five bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2, but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

thermal systems insulation material, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM.

(2) Collect, at a minimum, one bulk sample of patched thermal systems insulation, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM, providing the section of patch was less than 6 linear or square feet.

(3) Collect, at a minimum, three representative bulk samples of each insulated mechanical system not assumed to be ACM, including, but not limited to cementitious material used on pipe fittings such as tees, elbows or valves.

Representative sampling was conducted in a manner sufficient as to identify whether each homogeneous area is either asbestos or non-asbestos containing.

(4) Bulk samples are not required to be collected from any homogeneous area where the accredited asbestos inspector has determined that the thermal systems tiles, floor tiles, associated floor mastic, etc. Representative sampling was conducted in a

During the survey, each material was assessed with a Physical Hazard assessment and Response Action making the damaged area airtight to prevent the release of fibers into the air. If ACM prevent the release of airborne fibers. If ACM debris is present, the area must be that protects the health and safety of the occupants in a building and provides for remedial action in the event that ACM is disturbed.

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ATC conducted the asbestos survey of all accessible areas of the Subject Site. Appropriate efforts were made in representative areas of the building to identify suspect materials located below carpeting or above suspended ceiling systems. Note that ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear that may have suspect ACM internal components. Please refer to Section 2.5 for considerations for potentially hidden or concealed suspect ACM.

Appendix A presents a list of all identified suspect ACM that were identified or assumed to be ACM.

Materials identified as ACM are presented first, followed by the listing of materials identified as non- ACM. Each suspect ACM is also identified by its homogeneous area number that corresponds to the representative sample number. Each identified or assumed ACM has been assessed with a physical hazard assessment and response action based on the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) ranking system (See Section 2.2 for explanation of ranking system).

An ACM is defined by the US EPA as any material or product containing more than one percent asbestos by weight. The Table in Appendix A identifies materials reported to contain less than one percent ACM.

• ATC inspected under carpeting and multiple layers of flooring materials for suspect ACM in representative locations. At the locations inspected where a suspect ACM was identified, and reported to be ACM, the material has been identified in Table 1 and on the Drawing(s). In locations where visual observation was not conclusive (i.e. visual and physical barriers such as hardwood floors where exploratory demolition would be required), ATC has assumed suspect flooring materials to be present and are indicated as such in Table 1 and noted on the Drawing(s).

indicating that these materials have been found in these locations throughout the VAMC.

• The crawlspace areas appeared to have been abated. ATC did not observe suspect ACM in the

Crawl Space Areas. ATC observed that plastic sheeting had been placed over the dirt floor and was secured to concrete foundation and columns with duct tape. ATC did not observe suspect ACM debris on the plastic sheeting. ATC observed debris on top of the plastic sheeting. This debris appeared to be concrete, saw dust, fiberglass insulation, plaster debris or other environmental dust/debris that has settled in the area. ATC inspected under the plastic sheeting in representative areas where small openings/holes were present in the plastic sheeting. At these locations, ATC did not observe suspect ACM debris. ATC has assumed ACM debris to be located under the plastic sheeting based on the likelihood that previously existing ACM insulation debris may be concealed/hidden by the plastic sheeting.

Massachusetts (ProScience) using the EPA approved method (EPA/600R-93/116) for polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS), using the visual estimation technique for asbestos quantification. By using the PLM/DS method, a trained microscopist is able to identify and distinguish between asbestos group minerals and other fibrous materials such as cellulose (paper), mineral (rock), wood or glass fiber. The quantity of each of these substances is estimated on a weight basis and recorded as a percentage. Only the asbestos content, if any, is recorded in the bulk sample ‘Report of Analysis’ (Appendix A). If a material contains greater than 1% asbestos, it is considered to be asbestos-containing material. Upon client request, or at the recommendation of the analyst, the ‘Point Counting Method’ may be used to verify the presence/absence of asbestos when a sample contains less than 10% asbestos by visual estimate.

ProScience, is accredited by the EPA National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and meets the criteria for asbestos bulk sample analytical standards required by the State of New

ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases, plenums, or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear or below grade on the foundation, etc. in an attempt to identify hidden ACM. Additional suspect materials may be present in these or other inaccessible areas that were not included in this inspection.

ATC recommends that if a suspect material has not been positively identified, but is similar in mode of occurrence or physical properties as other identified ACM, it should be considered asbestos-containing.

ATC has identified and assumed ACM to be located within Building # 3. ATC recommends that the finding of this inspection be included an Operations and Maintenance Plan.

ATC recommends additional inspection and bulk sampling, including limited exploratory demolition if future maintenance, renovation, or demolition will affect areas that were not included in ATC’s scope of work.

ATC recommends that all ACM that will be disturbed by maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities be removed prior to or in conjunction with the activities. ATC recommends that a properly licensed Asbestos Contractor perform all asbestos abatement.

In preparation for maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, ATC recommends the following:

1. ATC recommends that this survey report including all bulk sample results and attached lab reports be provided to all contractors/personnel that will be performing any work in the areas that would impact and/or disturb any of the building materials noted in this report. ATC also recommends the development of a project specification and the use of project oversight to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations as well as protect the interest of the client for all abatement work performed at the site. The project specification shall reference the regulations

4. As part of each abatement contractor bidding process, a unit price schedule for the abatement of asbestos-containing materials, not identified within this report and uncovered during renovation/demolition activities, should also be established. Included should be unit prices for the removal of asbestos-containing materials (i.e., pipe/pipe fitting insulation, e.g.), as well as ensure that all asbestos-containing materials are removed in accordance with all applicable regulations and to prevent an asbestos fiber release. Tasks performed during project oversight should include periodic work inspections to ensure that all procedures employed by the abatement

Photograph Log Building 3

Room S-23 Room S-14

Room S-22 Room S-22

Room S-22 Room N-25

Room N-13 Room S-22

Room S-25 Room N-13

Room S-28 Room N-28

Room S-28 Room S-17

Room S-11 Room S-13

Room S-14 Room N-26

Room N-13 Room S-10

Room S-10 Room S-11

Room N-26 Room S-11

Room S-12 Room N-12

Room S-13 Room S-14

Room N-13 Room S-14

Room N-23 Room N-23

Room NS-01 Room NS-01

Room M-3 Room S-10 lients\V A

M C

\Building 5\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 5/29/09

N

TS

M M3-1M

059.78014.0002

RM

M A

N C

H

ESTER, N

EW

H

A M

PSH

IRE

V A

M

ED

IA

C

L C

EN

TER

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

A S S O

C I A

T E S I N C

Tel.(603)647-7077 Fax.(603)647-5347

M anchester, N ew H am pshire 03109

150 Zachary Road

BU

ILD

IN

G

TH

REE

A

SBESTO

S-C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G M

A

TERIA

LS

LEG

EN

D

A

SBESTO

S - C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G

BLA

C K

M A

STIC

A

SSO

C

IA

TED

W

ITH

12"X12" BRO

W

N M

O

TTLED

FLO

O

R TILE

A

SBESTO

S - C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G 2"-4" A

IRC

ELL PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

# = LIN

EA

R FEET O

F PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

N O

TES:

1) REFER TO

A

PPEN

D

IX A

FO

R LISTIN

G

O F A

SSU

M

ED

A

SBESTO

S -

C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G M

A

TERIA

LS.

2) REFER TO

REPO

RT FO

R A

D D

ITIO

N

A

L IN

FO

RM

A

TIO

N

REG

A

RD

IN

G

SC

O

PE A

N

D

LIM

ITA

TIO

N S O

F TH

IS IN

SPEC

TIO

N lients\V A

M C

\Building 5\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 5/29/09

N

TS

M M3-1S

059.78014.0002 R

M

M A

N C

H

ESTER

, N

EW

H A

M

PSH

IRE

V

A M

ED

IA

C L C

EN

TER

BU

ILD

IN

G

TH

REE

A

SBESTO

S SA

M

PLE LO

C

A

TIO

N S

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

LEG

EN

D

A

PPRO

XIM

A

TE SA

M

PLE LO

C

A

TIO

N

3-23A

3-12B

3-13C

3-06G 3-07G

3-04C 3-03C

3-01A

3-02A ,B

3-03A 3-04A

3-06A 3-07A

3-05A

3-05B

3-16A ,B

3-17A ,B

3-18A ,B

3-03B 3-04B

3-06F 3-07F

3-10B

3-21A ,B

3-22A ,B

3-19A ,B

3-20A ,B 3-23B

3-08A 3-08B 3-09A 3-09B

3-06B 3-07B

3-11A 3-11B 3-11C

3-06C 3-07C

3-10A

3-12A

3-13A

3-06D 3-07D

3-06E 3-07E

3-13B

3-14A ,B

3-15A ,B

3-01B

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

BUILDING # 4

Building # 4 May 29, 2009

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Certification of Results

2.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

2.2 Material Assessment Methodology

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

2.4 Analytical Method

2.5 Consideration for Hidden Materials

2.6 Recommendations

APPENDIX B ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS BY PLM

Manchester, New Hampshire (VAMC) to perform a limited Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) inspection in Building # 4 (Subject Site).

This survey included an inspection of accessible interior and exterior areas of the Subject Site.

Exploratory demolition to inspect enclosed area such as within wall voids, plumbing chases, and concealed flooring materials was not performed during this survey. Assumptions have been made in this report about suspect ACM materials that may be encountered in inaccessible areas, based on limited observations at available access locations to enclosed areas. Exterior and roof top areas were included in the scope of work. However, roofing materials inspection and sampling was not included in the scope of work.

The asbestos survey was performed by EPA accredited Asbestos Inspectors, Mr. Bryan Thompson and Ms. Christine Whetstone. A total of sixty-four (64) samples of suspect ACM were colleted, with fifty-nine (59) analyzed to determine asbestos content. The ATC inspector performed both the visual inspection and bulk sampling in the building according to methods outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance document titled, “Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Materials in Buildings” (Document No. 560/5-85-024). Please find the ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) bulk sample results included as Appendix B.

ATC identified and assumed ACM to be associated with Building # 4.

Section 2.0 discusses the ACM survey and sampling methodology. This survey involved a visual inspection, bulk sampling and inventory of suspect ACMs, including locating and quantifying the identified ACM. Appendix A contains a listing of the identified or assumed suspect ACM.

prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the field of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

Environmental evaluations are limited in the sense that conclusions and recommendations are developed and information obtained from limited research and secondary sources. Except as set forth in this report, ATC has made independent investigations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived

This report is intended for the sole use of the VA Medical Center. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use document by parties other than those designated by the Client, or use of this document for purposes other

The survey was performed by New Hampshire DES licensed and EPA-accredited Asbestos Inspectors.

Bulk samples, representing individual homogenous areas of suspect materials, were collected in a randomly distributed manner, in accordance with the methods outlined below.

Building materials exist in the form of thermal systems insulation (TSI), surfacing materials and

(2) Collect at least five bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2, but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

thermal systems insulation material, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM.

(2) Collect, at a minimum, one bulk sample of patched thermal systems insulation, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM, providing the section of patch was less than 6 linear or square feet.

(3) Collect, at a minimum, three representative bulk samples of each insulated mechanical system not assumed to be ACM, including, but not limited to cementitious material used on pipe fittings such as tees, elbows or valves.

Representative sampling was conducted in a manner sufficient as to identify whether each homogeneous area is either asbestos or non-asbestos containing.

(4) Bulk samples are not required to be collected from any homogeneous area where the accredited asbestos inspector has determined that the thermal systems tiles, floor tiles, associated floor mastic, etc. Representative sampling was conducted in a

During the survey, each material was assessed with a Physical Hazard assessment and Response Action making the damaged area airtight to prevent the release of fibers into the air. If ACM prevent the release of airborne fibers. If ACM debris is present, the area must be that protects the health and safety of the occupants in a building and provides for remedial action in the event that ACM is disturbed.

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ATC conducted the asbestos survey of all accessible areas of the Subject Site. Appropriate efforts were made in representative areas of the building to identify suspect materials located below carpeting or above suspended ceiling systems. Note that ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear that may have suspect ACM internal components. Please refer to Section 2.5 for considerations for potentially hidden or concealed suspect ACM.

Appendix A presents a list of all identified suspect ACM that were identified or assumed to be ACM.

Materials identified as ACM are presented first, followed by the listing of materials identified as non- ACM. Each suspect ACM is also identified by its homogeneous area number that corresponds to the representative sample number. Each identified or assumed ACM has been assessed with a physical hazard assessment and response action based on the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) ranking system (See Section 2.2 for explanation of ranking system).

An ACM is defined by the US EPA as any material or product containing more than one percent asbestos by weight. The Table in Appendix A identifies materials reported to contain less than one percent ACM.

• ATC inspected under carpeting and multiple layers of flooring materials for suspect ACM in representative locations. At the locations inspected where a suspect ACM was identified, and reported to be ACM, the material has been identified in Table 1 and on the Drawing(s). In locations where visual observation was not conclusive (i.e. visual and physical barriers such as plywood over the original hardwood floors where exploratory demolition would be required), ATC has assumed suspect flooring materials to be present and are indicated as such in Table 1 and noted on the Drawing(s).

indicating that these materials have been found in these locations throughout the VAMC.

was secured to concrete foundation and columns with duct tape. ATC did not observe suspect ACM debris on the plastic sheeting. ATC observed debris on top of the plastic sheeting. This debris appeared to be concrete, saw dust, fiberglass insulation, plaster debris or other environmental dust/debris that has settled in the area. ATC inspected under the plastic sheeting in representative areas where small openings/holes were present in the plastic sheeting. At these locations, ATC did not observe suspect ACM debris. ATC has assumed ACM debris to be

Massachusetts (ProScience) using the EPA approved method (EPA/600R-93/116) for polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS), using the visual estimation technique for asbestos quantification. By using the PLM/DS method, a trained microscopist is able to identify and distinguish between asbestos group minerals and other fibrous materials such as cellulose (paper), mineral (rock), wood or glass fiber. The quantity of each of these substances is estimated on a weight basis and recorded as a percentage. Only the asbestos content, if any, is recorded in the bulk sample ‘Report of Analysis’ (Appendix B). If a material contains greater than 1% asbestos, it is considered to be asbestos-containing material. Upon client request, or at the recommendation of the analyst, the ‘Point Counting Method’ may be used to verify the presence/absence of asbestos when a sample contains less than 10% asbestos by visual estimate.

ProScience, is accredited by the EPA National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and meets the criteria for asbestos bulk sample analytical standards required by the State of New Hampshire. The PLM/DS analytical method is modeled after 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix B:

ATC did not perform exploratory demolition to identify suspect materials located in concealed areas such as under fixed equipment, cabinetry, partition walls, within wall cavities or chases, plenums, or disassemble mechanical equipment or electrical gear or below grade on the foundation, etc. in an attempt to identify hidden ACM. Additional suspect materials may be present in these or other inaccessible areas that were not included in this inspection.

ATC recommends that if a suspect material has not been positively identified, but is similar in mode of occurrence or physical properties as other identified ACM, it should be considered asbestos-containing.

ATC has identified and assumed ACM to be located within Building # 4. ATC recommends that the finding of this inspection be included an Operations and Maintenance Plan.

ATC recommends additional inspection and bulk sampling, including limited exploratory demolition if future maintenance, renovation, or demolition will affect areas that were not included in ATC’s scope of work.

ATC recommends that all ACM that will be disturbed by maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities be removed prior to or in conjunction with the activities. ATC recommends that a properly licensed Asbestos Contractor perform all asbestos abatement.

In preparation for maintenance, renovation, or demolition activities, ATC recommends the following:

1. ATC recommends that this survey report including all bulk sample results and attached lab reports be provided to all contractors/personnel that will be performing any work in the areas that would impact and/or disturb any of the building materials noted in this report. ATC also recommends the development of a project specification and the use of project oversight to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations as well as protect the interest of the client for all abatement work performed at the site. The project specification shall reference the regulations

4. As part of each abatement contractor bidding process, a unit price schedule for the abatement of asbestos-containing materials, not identified within this report and uncovered during renovation/demolition activities, should also be established. Included should be unit prices for the removal of asbestos-containing materials (i.e., pipe/pipe fitting insulation, e.g.), as well as ensure that all asbestos-containing materials are removed in accordance with all applicable regulations and to prevent an asbestos fiber release. Tasks performed during project oversight should include periodic work inspections to ensure that all procedures employed by the abatement

Photograph Log Building 4

Attic Room W-20

Room W-16 Room W-23A

Room W-15 Room E-27

Room E-20 Room E-11

Room W-11 Room W-23A

Room W-23A Room W-16

Room W-23A Room W-16

Room W-20 Room W-22

Room E-20 Room W-22

Room E-22 Room W-22

Room W-15 Room E-27

Room W-22 Room W-15

Room E-27 Room W-20

Room E-11 Room W-25

Room W-15 Room W-25

Room W-25 Room W-25

Room W-16A Room W-28

Room E-28 Room E-10

Room E-10 Room E-10

Room E-10 Room E-10

Room E-10 Mechanical Room

Outside Room E-16 lients\V A

M C

\Building 5\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 5/29/09

N

TS

M M4-1M

059.78014.0002 R

M

M A

N C

H

ESTER

, N

EW

H A

M

PSH

IRE

V

A M

ED

IA

C L C

EN

TER

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

BU

ILD

IN

G

FO

U

R A

SBESTO

S-C

O N

TA

IN

IN

G

M A

TERIA

LS

LEG

EN

D

A

SBESTO

S - C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G

EXTER

IO

R D

O O

R

FRA

M E

C A

U

LK

A

SBESTO

S - C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G 2"-4" A

IR

C

ELL PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

# = LIN

EA

R FEET O

F PIPE IN

SU

LA

TIO

N

N O

TES:

1) REFER TO

A

PPEN

D

IX A

FO

R LISTIN

G

O F A

SSU

M

ED

A

SBESTO

S -

C O

N

TA

IN

IN

G M

A

TERIA

LS.

2) REFER TO

R

EPO

R

T FO

R A

D D

ITIO

N

A

L IN

FO

RM

A

TIO

N R

EG

A

R D

IN

G

SC

O

PE A

N

D

LIM

ITA

TIO

N S O

F TH

IS IN

SPEC

TIO

N

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com lients\V A

M C

\Building 5\FLO O

R PLA

N

S 1/16/09

N

TS

M M4-1S

059.78014.0002 R

M

M A

N C

H

ESTER

, N

EW

H A

M

PSH

IRE

V

A M

ED

IA

C L C

EN

TER

BU

ILD

IN

G

FO

U

R A

SBESTO

S SA

M

PLE LO

C A

TIO

N

S

V A

M

ED

IC

A

L C

EN

TER

LEG

EN

D

A

PPRO

XIM

A

TE SA

M

PLE LO

C

A

TIO

N

4-01A

4-24A

4-24B

4-11B 4-02F 4-03F

4-17A ,B

4-18A ,B

4-16B 4-16A

4-19A ,B,C

4-20A ,B,C

4-21A ,B

4-22A 4-23A

4-14B 4-15B

4-02G 4-03G

4-01C

4-02B 4-03B

4-06B

4-04C 4-05C

4-12B

4-09B 4-10B4-02C

4-03C

4-14A 4-15A

4-12A

4-13A ,B

4-11A 4-07A

4-01B

4-04A ,B

4-05A ,B

4-02A 4-03A

4-06A

4-07B

4-09A 4-10A

4-08A

4-09C 4-10C

4-02D 4-03D

4-07C

4-02E 4-03E

4-08B

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

BUILDING # 5

Building # 5 May 29, 2009

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Certification of Results

2.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

2.1 Sampling Methodology

2.2 Material Assessment Methodology

2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials

2.4 Analytical Method

2.5 Consideration for Hidden Materials

2.6 Recommendations

MATERIAL

APPENDIX B ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS BY PLM

Manchester, New Hampshire (VAMC) to perform a limited Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) inspection in Building # 5 (Subject Site).

This survey included an inspection of accessible interior and exterior areas of the Subject Site.

Exploratory demolition to inspect enclosed area such as within wall voids, plumbing chases, and concealed flooring materials was not performed during this survey. Assumptions have been made in this report about suspect ACM materials that may be encountered in inaccessible areas, based on limited observations at available access locations to enclosed areas. Exterior and roof top areas were included in the scope of work. However, roofing materials inspection and sampling was not included in the scope of work.

The asbestos survey was performed by EPA accredited Asbestos Inspectors, Mr. Bryan Thompson and Ms. Christine Whetstone on October 21, 2008. A total of fifty-seven (56) samples of suspect ACM were colleted, with fifty-five (55) analyzed to determine asbestos content. The ATC inspector performed both the visual inspection and bulk sampling in the building according to methods outlined in the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance document titled, “Guidance for Controlling Asbestos- Containing Materials in Buildings” (Document No. 560/5-85-024). Please find the ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) bulk sample results included as Appendix B.

ATC identified and assumed ACM to be associated with Building # 5.

Section 2.0 discusses the ACM survey and sampling methodology. This survey involved a visual inspection, bulk sampling and inventory of suspect ACMs, including locating and quantifying the identified ACM. Appendix A contains a listing of the identified suspect or assumed ACM.

prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the field of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.

Environmental evaluations are limited in the sense that conclusions and recommendations are developed and information obtained from limited research and secondary sources. Except as set forth in this report, ATC has made independent investigations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived

This report is intended for the sole use of the VA Medical Center. The scope of services performed in execution of this evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and use or re-use document by parties other than those designated by the Client, or use of this document for purposes other

The survey was performed by New Hampshire DES licensed and EPA-accredited Asbestos Inspectors on October 19, 2008. Bulk samples, representing individual homogenous areas of suspect materials, were collected in a randomly distributed manner, in accordance with the methods outlined below.

Building materials exist in the form of thermal systems insulation (TSI), surfacing materials and

(2) Collect at least five bulk samples from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2, but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

thermal systems insulation material, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM.

(2) Collect, at a minimum, one bulk sample of patched thermal systems insulation, representative of each homogeneous area, and not assumed to be ACM, providing the section of patch was less than 6 linear or square feet.

(3) Collect, at a minimum, three representative bulk samples of each insulated mechanical system not assumed to be ACM, including, but not limited to cementitious material used on pipe fittings such as tees, elbows or valves.

Representative sampling was conducted in a manner sufficient as to identify whether each homogeneous area is either asbestos or non-asbestos containing.

(4) Bulk samples are not required to be…