Attachment 9 - Past Performance Relevancy Baseline.docx

DOCX document 25 KB Posted

Attached to
Solicitation: Full and Open CLS Sustainment services for the AEWS AN/FPS-117 Radar System
Solicitation number
FA821725RB004
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 9 is a Past Performance Relevancy Baseline document that establishes evaluation criteria for contractor past performance across three key categories: Magnitude and Contract Type, Complexity Performance, and Similarity of Scope. The document defines specific thresholds for determining performance relevance, including:

Category 1 (Magnitude): Contracts valued at or above $15M are considered more relevant than those under $15M. Category 2 (Complexity): Higher relevance is assigned to performance at multiple geographical locations, involvement with PESA/AESA Radars and sub-systems, versus single-location or non-PESA/AESA radar work. Category 3 (Similarity of Scope): Relevance is determined by similarity to arctic location services, alignment with specific PWS sections 2.7 and 3.1, and performance periods of at least three years. These criteria will likely be used to evaluate potential contractors' past performance for the AN/FPS-117 Long Range Radar System sustainment services contract.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 3 - Section L Instructions Conditions and Notices to Offerors_v2.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Past Performance Information Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 10 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
PWS Attachment A - AN_FPS-117 Site Locations.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment E - Example Comment Resolution Matrix (CRM).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
PWS Attachment G - GFP Listing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation - FA821725RB004.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Instructions Conditions and Notices to Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Cross Reference Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7 - Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment C - PACAF Regional Support Center Site Arrival Request (SAR).pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Basic Contract PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - CDRLs.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment D - Customer Support Request - Third Party Support Request Form.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment F - Example T-2 Document Sections.pdf PDF
Offeror_RFP_Question_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - Pricing Matrix Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 11 - Awardable Task Order PWS.pdf PDF
PWS Attachment B - Memorandum for Alaska Radar System Support.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 9 Past Performance Relevancy Baseline

Section L: Relevancy Baseline

Section L4.3 – 4.3.3 and Table L.4
Relevant
Not Relevant

Category 1: Magnitude and Contract Type

Total Task Order/Contract Value
equal to or greater than $15M
less than $15M

Category 2: Complexity

Performance
· Performance at multiple geographical locations concurrently.

· Performance on PESA/AESA Radars and sub-systems

· Performance at only a single geographical location at any discreet period of time

· Performance on Non PESA/AESA Radar and sub-systems

Category 3: Similarity of the Scope

Type of Service
· Similarity of products developed and service/support for remote arctic locations

· Personnel with knowledge, skills and ability referenced in PWS sections 2.7 and 3.1

· Experience outside of providing direct development, service or support in arctic locations

· Experience not relevant to PWS sections 2.7 and 3.1

Performance Period
· A minimum of three-years of performance is complete.
· Less than three-years or no performance is complete

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .