Attachment 6 - Asbestos Recert Ltr B1384 Wiring Upgrade.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

56TH FIGHTER WING (AETC)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE AZ 85309-1629

9 Dec 2024

MEMORANDUM FOR 56 CES/CEN

FROM: 56 CES/CEIE

SUBJECT: Asbestos Recertification Building 1384

1. A review was performed of the available asbestos reports. The review was performed to ensure the accuracy of this survey for the Inside Plant Wiring Upgrade.

2. The asbestos survey completed on 19 April 1999 by Environomics, Inc., indicates there is Non-friable but no Friable asbestos containing material (ACM) were observed in the building.

Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Results

NON-FRIABLE ACM

Adhesive 5% Chrysotile Floor Tile – Tan 5% Chrysotile Ceramic Tile Underlayment Assumed

FRIABLE ACM

None

3. Based on the Statement of Work, the area to be disturbed WILL NOT require asbestos abatement in accordance with local Maricopa County Air Quality and Luke Air Force Base specifications.

4. A copy of this memorandum and the asbestos report must be on hand during the renovation/demolition. Failure to have these documents can trigger a NESHAP Notice of Violation from the Maricopa County Air Quality Division.

5. If there is a change in the scope of work or you have any additional questions regarding this survey, please contact me at 856-4569.

CARL F. MOSER JR., Civ, DAF Toxic Program Manager

Attachment:

1. Asbestos Survey Report, TECH TNG CLASSROOM (ID:1384), dated 19 April 1999

2. 56 CES Personnel Certifications

ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (ID: 1384)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Prepared for:

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

Prepared by:

Environomics, Inc.

April 19, 1999

Project Number: 1629

Prepared By:

Barry Burrows an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector c 1876

Reviewed By:

Rick Barth an AHERA accredited ManagemenUPlanner

B 9116

Section:

Appendices:

A

B c

D

E

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

Description of Building Construction and Systems

Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials

Material Information Tables

Removal Cost Estimate Summary

Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Laboratory Bulk Sampling Reports

Summary of Regulatory Requirements

Drawings Indicating Asbestos Sample Locations

Executive Summary

Environomics, Inc. (Environomics) was retained by MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION to perform an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)/ National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) style asbestos survey of the TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Building ID: 1384), to determine the locations of accessible and to the extent feasible, inaccessible friable and non-friable asbestos containing building materials (ACBM).

Friable materials are materials that can be reduced to powder with hand pressure such as fireproofing, sprayed-on acoustic ceilings, pipe and thermal system insulation. All other materials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable materials. Friable materials are of greatest concern from a health and safety point of view because of their ease of fiber release.

No friable asbestos-containing materials were observed in the building.

Asbestos was detected or assumed in the following non-friable materials:

Adhesive Ceramic Tile Underlayment Floor Tile

Site 10· LUKE BASE Building ID: 1384 TECH TNG CLASSROOM Asbestos Survey Report

Executive Summary Page 1

Section 1 Introduction

Environomics, Inc. (Environomics) performed an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)/ National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) style asbestos survey of the TECH TNG CLASSROOM located at Luke Air Force Base, AZ to identify ACBM. This report identifies the locations and asbestos content of friable and non-friable ACBM, provides assessment of the friable ACBM in relation to the material's hazard potential to building occupants and provides removal cost estimates.

Friable materials are materials that can be reduced to powder with hand pressure such as fireproofing, sprayed-on acoustic ceilings, pipe and thermal system insulation.

All other materials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable materials. Friable materials are of greatest concern from a health and safety point of view because of their ease of fiber release.

All identified suspect asbestos-containing materials are summarized in Section 3.

Materials testing positive for asbestos including material assessments, recommended response actions, and quantities are described in Section 4. Removal cost estimates for asbestos-containing materials are included in Section 5.

It is not our recommendation to remove these materials unless they are beyond repair, or planned demolition or renovation activities will disturb the materials. Estimates are based on recent pricing we have received from contractors performing similar work and may vary from actual costs obtained due to the scope of work, prevailing wage, quantity of material removed, control measures specified and contractor work loads.

On Tuesday, January 5, 1999 Barry Burrows ( C 1876 ) , an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector, from Environomics, performed an asbestos survey of the building in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1987

(AHERA).

DISCLAIMER

This report is prepared for the express use and benefit of MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION, its agents and employees. The information in this report or portions thereof may be required to be included in notifications to employees, contractors or other visitors to the building(s). This report is not intended to be used by the Owner or its agents as a specification contract document or work plan for any of the work suggested or recommended in the report.

This report is based upon conditions and practices observed at the property and information made available to the surveyor. This report does not intend to identify all hazards or unsafe practices, nor to indicate that other hazards or unsafe practices do not exist at the premises.

Environomics has performed this survey in accordance with industry standards and

Sile ID: LUKE BASE Building: TECH TNG CLASSROOM

Section 1 Page 1 has used best efforts to determine the location of inaccessible ACBM. Environomics shall not be responsible for identifying all ACBM located behind walls and or columns, beneath flooring, above solid ceiling, underground or any other inaccesssible areas.

Site ID: LUKE BASE Building; TECH TNG CLASSROOM

Section 1 Page 2

Section 2 Description of Building Construction and Systems

Number of Floors: 1 Year Built: 1978

Structural components consist of:

Total Square Footage: 10,000

Concrete Foundation Steel Beams Steel Columns

Exterior Wall construction components consist of: Stucco Other:

Brick

Interior Wall construction components consist of: Drywall

Interior ceiling components consist of: Ceiling Tile Drywall

Roofing construction components consist of: Metal

Heating and mechancial systems include: Air Handling Units Ducted Supply Domestic Hot Water Heater Closed HVAC Supply Closed HVAC Return

Site ID: LUKE BASE Section 2 Page 1

Building: TECH TNG CLASSROOM

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials

The following table is a list of all materials at this building which were tested for the presence of asbestos along with overall sample results. Complete information on asbestos containing materials is included in Section 4 of this report.

Materials are listed by Homogeneous Sampling Area (HM). Each unique material within the building is assigned a unique HM number by the surveyor at the time the survey is performed.

Section 3 and Section 4 are organized by building, surfacing, thermal systems insulation, flooring, walls, ceilings, roofing and miscellaneous materials.

Site Information TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Survey Performed By Environomics, Inc.

Suspect Material

DUCT TAPE

HVAC VIBRATION CLOTH

(BLACK)

BASEBOARD ADHESIVE

Category

TSI

TSI

Flooring

Inspector Barry Burrows

HM Number

DT-6

VC-10

BA-3

Client Information

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

Inspection Date Tuesday. January 5, 1999

Job Number

Material Location(s) Floor Asbestos Present?

Mechanical Room

Mechanical Room

Hallway

Office 1

Office 2 & 3

Office 4

Classroom 1

Storage

Conference Room

Office 6

Room117

Room 114,115,116

Room 109,111,112

Room 110 Hallway (add-on)

No

No

No

Communication Computer Support

Vault

EastNVest Hallway

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 1 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix. AZ, 85016

Site Information

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Suspect Material Category HM Number

CARPET ADHESIVE Flooring CA-1

(YELLOW/BLACK)

UNDER CARPET FLOOR TILE Flooring FT-2

(TAN)

CERAMIC TILE Flooring/Walls CU-14

UNDERLAYMENT

DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND Walls DC-8

(WHITE)

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Material Location(s)

Hallway Office 1

Office 2 & 3

Office 4

Classroom 1

Storage

Conference Room

Office 6

Room117

Room 114,115,116

Room 109,111,112

Room110

Hallway (add-on) Communication Computer Support

Vault

East/West Hallway

Classroom 1

Storage

Hallway (add-on)

Restrooms

Hallway

Office 1

Office 2 & 3

Office 4

Classroom 1

Storage

Mechanical Room

Restrooms

Conference Room

Office 6

Room117

Room 114,115,116

Room 109,111,112

Room110

Hallway (add-on) Communlcation Computer Support

Vault

East/West Hallway

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Floor Asbestos Present?

No

Yes

Yes (assumed)

No

Se(.'\ion 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 2 licensed to· Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Suspect Material Category HM Number

GYPSUM WALLBOARD (WHITE) Walls JW-7

TEXTURING COMPOUND Walls TC-9

(WHITE)

WALL COVERING (TAN) Walls WC-13

ADD-ON CEILING TILE (WHITE) Ceilings CT-5

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Material Location(s)

Hallway Office 1 Office2&3

Office 4 Classroom 1

Storage Mechanical Room

Restrooms

Conference Room

Office 6

Room117 Room 114,115,116 Room 109,111,112 Room110 Hallway (add-on) Communication Computer Support

Vault East/West Hallway

Hallway

Office 1 Office 2 & 3

Office 4 Classroom 1

Storage

Mechanical Room

Restrooms

Conference Room

Office 6

Room117

Room 114,115,116 Room 109,111,112 Room 110 Hallway (add-on) Communication Computer Support

Vault

East/West Hallway

Classroom 1

Room 117

Room 114,115,116

Room 109,111,112

Room 110

Hallway (add-on)

Communication Computer Support

Vault

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Floor Asbestos Present?

No

No

No

No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 3 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, PZ, 85016

Suspect Material Category HM Number

CEILING TILE (WHITE) Ceilings CT-4

ADHESIVE Miscellaneous AD-15

EXTERIOR STUCCO (TAN) Miscellaneous ES-11

WINDOW/DOOR CAULKING Miscellaneous WP-12

EXTERIOR WINDOW GLAZING

COMPOUND

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Material Location(s)

Hallway

Office 1

Office 2 & 3

Office4

Classroom 1

Storage

Conference Room

Office 6

East/West Hallway

Classroom 1

Storage

Hallway (add-on)

Exterior

Exterior

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Floor Asbestos Present?

No

Yes

No

No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 4 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ., 85016

Section 4 Material Information Tables

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Luke Air Force Base, AZ. 85309

Survey Perfonned By Environomlcs, Inc.

Mafetial Description

DUCT TAPE

Materi8/ Category

[TSI ..

Ftiable Classification

,!Friable

Inspector Barry Burrows

General Condih'on Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

[Good ..

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!Mechanical Room

Sample ID(s)

IDT-6-1

I jDT-6-2

!DT-6-3

Material Description

I

Sample Loca/ion(s)

Mechanics Room

Mechanics Room

Mechanics Room

Floor

Floor

HVAC VIBRATION CLOTH (BLACK)

Material Category

!TSI

Friable Classification

!Non-Friable

Location Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!Mechanical Room

Sample ID(s)

[C-10-1

1vc-10-2

L_~

IVC-10-3

Sample Location(s)

Mechanics Room

Mechanics Room

Mechanics Room

Floor Location Quantity

Floor Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Client Information

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

EPA Category l~-~-i~~~=

Inspection Date Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Material Number ldt-6

Total Quantity

[30

Recommended Response

Job Number

Asbestos Present?

I~--~ Unit of Measure

~i~_ear ~-:_e_t_

[~owww~es?_o~se Re~-~lred, No Asbestos __ ~etecte~---

Locabon Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by l.ab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

'Category 2

Results by I.ayer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

jvc-10 !No

Total Quantity Unit of Measure j1 l~ach __ _

Recommended Response

_ l~_o Response R_~quire_d, No Asbestos_?etecte_~

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Pflge 1 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description lflASEBOARD ADHESIVE

Material Category

[~I.oaring

Friable Classification

[Non-F_riable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Eoo~ _ l - General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

/Hallway

!Office 1

,IOffice 2 & 3

!Office 4 iCJassroom 1

!Storage

1Conference Room

;Room 117

!Room 114,115,116

!Room 109, 111, 112

!Room 110 fHallway (add-on)

!Communication Computer Support

1vault

IEasUWest Hallway

Sample ID(s)

IBA-3-1

BA-3-2

BA-3-3

Sample Location(s)

Class Room #1

Hallway

Office #1 Entrance

Floor Location Quantity

Floor Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

EPA Category

!Category I

Inspection D.ate

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Material Number lba-3

Total Quantity

Recommended Response

Asbestos Present?

!No Unit of Measure

[Linear Feet.

[~~ ~==ponse_ Re~uire~~o Asb~st~~--?-~t~ct~~-

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result LByer(s) Reported by Lab

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 2 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description

I CARP~TADHESIVE (YELLOW/BLACK)

Material Category

~oring Fn'able Classification

[Non-~~~ab!e _

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

L I L __

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!Hallway !Office 1

[Office 2 & 3

[Office 4

!Classroom 1

!Storage

!Conference Room iOffice 6 fRoom 117

!Room 114,115,116 iRoorn 109,111,112

IRoom 110 I

!Hallway (add-on) iCommunication Computer Support

[Vault

!East/West Hallway _____ ,,_ --

Sample ID(s)

!CA-1-1

L. -

ICA-1-2

I

ICA-1-3

Sample Location(s)

Classroom#1 Entrance

West Entrance

North Entrance

_L

Floor Location Quantity

Yes

Yes

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

EPA Category

[Category 1

Inspection Dale

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Material Number Asbestos Present?

1ca~1 [No Total Quantity Unit of Measure

[8,138 !Square_~=~-- Recommended Response

[No Response Required, No.Asbestos ~etected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Be!ow limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 3 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc, Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description

[U~~ER(;ARPET FLOOR TILE (TAf>j) __

Material Category

[F~~~-~fng __

Friable Classification

I Non-Friable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

[~ood -·

General Material Comments

Material Location(s) jClassroom 1

!Storage

[Hallway (add-on)

Sample ID(s) iFT-2-1 iFT-2-2

!FT-2-3

Material Description

I L ____ _

Sample Location(s)

Class Room #1

Hallway (Add-on)

Hallway (Add-on)

Floor

Floor i CERAMIC TILE UNDERLAYMENT

Material Category

!Flooring/Walls L ...

Friable Classification

!Non-Friable L

Location Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

!Good

General Material Comments

Material Localion(s)

!Restrooms

Sample ID(s)

Material Description

I

Sample Location(s)

Floor Location Quantity

Floor Analyzed

DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND (WHITE)

Material Category

~alls

General Condition

!Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!Hallway

[Office 1

Friable Classification

INon-Friabl"_

Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

_i

Floor Location Quantity

1,480

1,580

Inspection Date Survey Performed By

Envfronomics, Inc. Tuesday, January 5, 1999

EPA Category

[Category I

Material Number

[~~2

Total Quantity l1,252

Recommended Response

IManag_: in Place

Location Condition Mafen·a1 Comments (by Location)

Asbestos Present?

Unit of Measure

[Square Feet

Ovemll Result

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

Results by Layer

5 % Chrysotile 2) 3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

E"tegory I

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number

[cuM14

Total Quantity

:400

Recommended Response

IManage Jn Place

Asbestos Present?

iYes (assumed)

Unit of Measure

[S~-~-are Fee~

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

EPA Category

[C~:goryll_

Material Number

!dc~S

Tola/ Quantity

123, 100 L

Recommended Response

Asbestos Present?

l~_o_··· Unit of Measure lSquare Feet

[No R~spo~_se Required, _No As_bestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 4 Licensed to: Environornics, lnc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE) jOffice 2 & 3

!Office 4 I

1c1assroom 1 jStorage jMechanical Room

!Restrooms iConference Room jOffice 6

1Room 117 jRoom 114,115,116 jRoom 109,111,112

IRoom 110 jHallway (add-on)

!Communication Computer Support

(Vault

IEast!West Hallway

Sample IO{s) jDC-8-1

L_

IDC-8-2

i

I DC-8-3

Material Description

Sample Localion{s)

Janitors Closet

North Hallway

Womens Restroom

! GYPSUM WALLBOARD (WHITE)

I

Floor

Material Category

IWalls F1iable Classification

1'Non-Frlable

1,120

1,100

2,000

2,040

2,520

1,340

4,200

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage C8tegory Overall Material Assessment jGood __

General Material Comments

I L_

Material Location(s) jHallway

!Office 1 I

!Office 2 & 3 I jOffice 4

Floor Location Quanllty

1,480

1,580

1, 120

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

!Category II L ----

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below !imit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

~w-7

Total Quantity

,23,100

I~ Unit of Measure jSquare Feet

Recommended Response

'No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition M8te1iaf Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 5 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc_, Phoenix, Af, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

!Classroom 1

!Storage

!Mechanical Room jRestrooms

!Conference Room

!Office 6

!Room 117

!Room 114,115,116

!Room 109,111,112

!Room 110

,Hallway (add-on)

Communication Computer Support

!Vault jEast/West Hallway

Sample ID(s)

!JW-7-1

1JW-7-2

i iJW-7-3

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

Janitors Closet

North Hallway

Womens Restroom

! TEXTURING COMPOUND (WHITE)

Floor

Material Category

:Walls Friable C/assiffcafion

L_ INo_~~~riable __ _

1, 100

2,000

2,040

2,520

1,340

4,200

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition

!Good Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

General Material Comments

Material Location(&')

!Hallway

~Office 1

!Office 2 & 3

!Office 4

[Classroom 1 I

!Storage

Floor l.ocalion Quantity

1,480

1,580

1,120

1,100

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Overall Result LByer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

!Category II

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number itc-9

Total Quantity

123,100

Recommended Response

Asbestos Present?

INo Unit of Measure iSquare Feet

:No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 6 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc_, Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE) jMechanical Room

!Restrooms

1conference Room

!Office 6

IRoom 117

!Room 114,115,116

)Room 109,111,112

!Room 110

.!Hallway {add~on)

!Communication Computer Support

!Vault

!EasUWest Hallway

Sample ID(s) S8mple Location(s) Floor

!TC-9-1 Janitor Closet

TC-9-2 North Hallway

TC-9-3 Womens Restroom

Material Description

'WALL COVERING (TAN)

Material Category

;Walls Friabfe Classification

;Non-Friable

2,000

2,040

2,520

1,340

4,200

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition

:Good Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

' i_ General Material Comments

Material Location(s) Floor Location Quantity

:classroom 1 1, 100

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s) Floor Analyzed

:WC-13-1 Classroom 1 Yes

'WC-13-2 Classroom 1 Yes

)WC-13-3 Classroom 1 Yes

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

;category II

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

jwc~13

Told/ Quantity

!1,100 iNo

Unit of Measure

:square Feet

Recommended Response

'No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected l ·--- -· ···-- --

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reporled by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 7 licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description

~DD-ON CEIL~G TILE (WHITE)

Material Category Friable Classification l~ellings

Ei_able

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

I

General Material Comments

Material Location(s) Floor

!Room 117

!Room 114,115,116

!Room 109, 111, 112

!Room 110

!Hallway (add-on)

:communication Computer Support

;Vault

Sample /D(s)

CT-5-1

.CT-5-2

CT-5-3

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

Room 114

Room 112

Room 116 i CEILING TILE (WHITE)

Material Category

]Ceilings

Floor

Friable Classification

Eriable_

Location Quantity

1,320

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition

:Good Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

General Material Comments

Material Localion(s)

I Hallway

!Office 1 jOffice 2 & 3

)Office 4

!Classroom 1

)Storage

!Conference Room

L ___ _

Floor Location Quantity

1,350

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

EPA Category

I Friable

Inspection Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Material Number Asbestos Present?

lct-5 !No

Tola/ Quantity Unit of Measure l3,342 l~-~-~are Feet

Recommended Response jNo_~esponse Required, N_o As~~-~~~:te~~~-

Location Condition Mi.lterial Comments (by Location)

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

Friable

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number 1ct-4 I ~ Total Quantity

14,796

Recommended Response

Asbestos Present?

-No

Unit of Measure

~~uar_:_ Fee~ jNo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 8 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix. AZ, 85016

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

1omce 6

IEast/West Hallway

Sample ID(s)

!CT-4-1

l _____ -

!CT-4-2

I l __ _

[CT-4-3

i 1------~-

Material Description

ADHESIVE

Material Category

:Miscellaneous

General Condition

:Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

:Classroom 1 iStorage

)Hallway (add-on)

Sample IO(s) iAD-15-1

.AD-15-2

,AD-15-3

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

Hallway

Vault

Floor

Conference Room

Friable Classification

INon-Friable I

1,000

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Sample Location(s)

Classroom #1 Entrance

Hallway (add-on)

Hallway (add-on)

Floor

Floor

Location Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

• EXTERIOR STUCCO (TAN)

Material Category

:Miscellaneous

General Condition iGood

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!Exterior

Friable Classifie<ition

!Non~Friable

Damage Category

I

Overall Material Assessment

Floor Location Quantity

9,500

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

lnspec/ion Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Overall Result

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection 2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLO 1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

.category I

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number

!ad~15 i ___ _ Total Quantity

1,252

Recommended Response

:Manage in Place

Asbestos Present?

~Yes

Unit of Measure jSquare Feet

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

5 1)

2)

3)

5 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

Category II

5 % Chrysotile

5 % Chrysotile

Below limit of detection

Material Number

1 es~11

Total Quantity

:9,500

Recommended Response

Asbestos Present?

iNo

Unit of Measure

!Square Feet iNo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 9

TECH TNG CLASSROOM (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Sample ID(s) Sample Location(s} Floor Analyzed jES-11-1 Exterior Yes

I ES-11-2 Exterior 2 Yes

Exterior 3 Yes

Material Description

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3) lnspecbOn Date

Tuesday, January 5, 1999

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

rlNDOW/DOOR CAlJLK~NG_J=_XTERI~ WINDOW GLAZ~NG COM_F'OUND_ l"""-12 - [N"_ Material Category

!Miscellaneous

General Condition eoo~ General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

,!Exterior

Sample ID(s)

:wP-12-1

WP-12-2

IWP-12-3

I

L

Friable Classification

_ l~_?n-_Friable

Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

Sample Location(s)

Exterior North Entrance

Exterior West Entrance

Exterior Mechanics Room/Door

Floor

Floor

Loctition Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

EPA Category jCategory 11 Total Quantity Unit of Measure

115 [Lin~arFe~

Recommended Response

!No Res~onse Req_~~d, No~_sbesto~etect~~

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Below llmit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 1 O

Appendix D Summary of Regulatory Requirements

Appendix D Summary of Regulatory Requirements

This appendix provides a summary of building owner and manager requirements under various asbestos regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect building occupants and employees from exposure to asbestos.

Survey Requirements

Prior to any renovation activity, OSHA and EPA regulations require that a complete asbestos survey be performed to determine if asbestos is present in any suspect asbestos containing material that will be present in the construction or work area. This survey report addresses accessible materials. It is recommended that prior to renovation activites, inaccessible areas that could contain asbestos materials be inspected.

Notification and Posting Requirements

Regulatory agencies feel that the building owner or manager should be responsible for knowing and communicating the locations of asbestos in their buildings to building employees, outside contractors and tenants to prevent exposure to asbestos.

OSHA requires building employees, outside contractors, vendors and construction contractors bidding on or performing work in buildings to be provided with notification regarding asbestos containing materials in their work areas. OSHA also requires that asbestos warning signs be posted in mechanical rooms.

Removal Requirements

Under EPA regulations, asbestos containing materials must be properly removed by licensed asbestos abatement contractors prior to renovation or demolition activities that would disturb friable materials or cause non-friable materials to become friable and a regulated material.

Repair of Damaged Materials and Cleanup of Debris

OSHA requires that asbestos containing debris be immediately cleaned up. It is recommended that damaged materials that may release fibers be repaired as soon as possible to prevent fiber release and potential exposures.

Training Requirements

OSHA requires employers whose employees are likely to or required to disturb asbestos to receive an asbestos training course. Refresher training is required to be provided annually.

Appendix E Drawings Indicating Asbestos Sample Locations

Section 5 Removal Cost Estimate Summary

It is not our recommendation to remove these materials unless they are beyond repair, or planned demolition or renovation activities will disturb the materials. Estimates are based on recent pricing we have received from contractors performing similar work and may vary from actual costs due to the scope of work, prevailing wage, quantity of material removed, control measures specified and contractor work loads, etc.

Building TECH TNG CLASSROOM

CLASSROOM 1

EPA Category

[Catego,YT - Suspect Material

UNDER CAR"l'ET-FLOllRllLF(TAN)-

HM

--2 r I

QTY. Units

"75() squareFeet

Removal Costs (low to high)

$1125 to $1406.25 I

I ! L - Fategory'-1 - WWW[ ADHESIVF

_L -

HALLWAY (ADD-ON)

L 15 750 Square F-eet $750 to $937.5

Space Removal Costs: $1:875 to $2;344

EPA Category

!CategofYI

Suspect Material HM

1UNDER-CARPETFLOORllLF(TAN)_ l _2 -Ji QTY. Units

Removal Costs (low to high)

$500 to $581 .25

L fategoryT

I

_l-15_Jl_ -Square Feet $500

_J

Space Removal Costs: $fooo to$(os1

RESTROOMS

EPA Category falegoryT

Suspect Material i CERAMICll LFUNIJEROWrvlENI

QTY. Units

- 406

Removal Costs (low to high)

$500

Building ID: TECH TNG CLASSROOM Asbestos Survey Report

Space Removal Costs: $500 fc) $500-

Section 5 Page 1

___ I

Appendix A Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

This survey report organizes information on each suspect ACBM identified in tables located in Section 4. This section describes how to interpret the data found on materials listed in Section 4.

Material description contains the description of the suspect homogeneous asbestos containing building material.

Material Serial Number is used to reference the material for reinspections, etc ..

Asbestos type and content describes the type of asbestos and its percentage in the material.

Asbestos Results for positive materials are shown as a percentage. Samples having less than 1 % asbestos are reported as containing "Trace" amounts of asbestos and samples with no detected asbestos are reported as "BLD" or below limit of detection.

Sample number(s) identifies a particular material sample obtained from a specific sample location. Sample numbers are used primarily for laboratory identification.

Sample Location identifies where the samples of this material were obtained.

Material Category categorizes each material as surfacing, TSI or miscellaneous.

Surfacing Materials -Asbestos containing materials that are sprayed-on, trowled-on or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.

Thermal Systems Insulation (TS/) - Asbestos containing materials applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breaching, tanks, ducts or other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain or water condensation.

Miscellaneous Materials - Asbestos containing materials applied to or a part of building components that are not classified as surfacing materials or thermal systems insulation.

Quantity & Units reports approximate total quantity per unit of measure for each material.

Building(s) & Floor(s) specifies where a material is located.

Material Location describes where the material is found throughout the building.

Material Condition identifies the material as Friable, Non-friable or Jacketed (for thermal systems insulation only) if asbestos is present.

Friable An asbestos containing material that can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder, when dry, by hand pressure, such as spray applied fireproofing on structural steel members, spray applied acoustical ceiling materials or damaged thermal systems insulation. Friable materials are of greatest concern due to their potential fiber release.

Non-Friable - An asbestos containing material where the asbestos is bound tightly in a matrix or sealed by a protective layer.

Non-friable materials can become friable by being rendered to a crumbled, pulverized or powdered state, when dry, by crushing, sanding, sawing, shot-blasting, severe weathering or by other mechanically induced means. Common examples of non-friable materials are adhesives, floor tiles, transite and roofing materials.

Jacketed - An asbestos containing material applied to thermal systems insulation and "jacketed" with a protective outer layer such as canvas or metal to keep the material in good condition. Undamaged jacketed ACBM is considered non-friable. If the jacketing is damaged, the material is considered friable.

Damage Category describes the type of damage, if any, to the material. The following damage categories are used: None, Physical, Air, and Water.

Material Assessment identifies the condition of the material in relation to physical and water damage, delamination of the material from its substrate, the extent of the damage and the potential for damage from building conditions, such as, accessibility by building occupants, influence of vibration, etc. The six standard assessment categories ranked by hazard potential, with the first being the lowest hazard are as follows: 1) Potential for Damage, 2) Potential for Significant Damage, 3) Damaged, 4) Damaged with Potential for Damage, 5) Damaged with Potential for Significant Damage, and 6) Significantly Damaged. Only friable materials are assessed under AHERA regulations. Non-friable materials, unless damaged, are not assessed and can be assumed to be in good condition.

Damaged - The damage or deterioration of the material results in inadequate cohesion or adhesion with crumbling, blistering, water stains, marring or otheiwise abraded over less than on-tenth (1/10) of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed or one-fourth (1/4) ifthe damage is localized.

Significant Damage - The damage or deterioration of the material results in inadequate adhesion or cohesion and the damage is extensive and severe with one or more of the following characteristics: 1) Crumbling or blistering over at least one-tenth (1/10) of the surface if evenly distributed, one-fourth (1 /4) if the damage is localized; 2) Areas of the material hanging from the surface, delaminated, or showing adhesive failure; 3) Water stains, gouges or marred.

Recommended Response suggests the appropriate options for controlling or maintaining ACBM in a safe manner. There are four options used:

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) - A program designed to "manage" asbestos in-place. As long as asbestos containing materials remain in a building, an O&M program should be instituted to alert maintenance personnel, custodial workers and outside vendors of the existence and location of these materials and to set a policy for the maintenance of these materials. The material is usually only required to be removed if it is significantly damaged, prior to demolition of the building or if it will be disturbed by renovation activities.

Repair- The restoration of damaged or deteriorated asbestos containing building materials to an intact condition. Once the intact condition is established, the material should be included in an O&M program. The material is usually only required to be removed if it is significantly damaged, prior to demolition of the building or if it will be disturbed by renovation activities.

Abate Due to Condition - This material is significantly damaged and is unsafe in its current condition. The access to the area should be restricted to personnel equipped with appropriate personal protection. This material should be properly removed by a licensed contractor using workers trained in the safe removal of asbestos.

Abate Prior to Renovation This material should be properly removed prior to planned renovation activities by a licensed contractor using workers trained in the safe removal of asbestos. This recommendation is usually made only on survey reports prepared prior to planned renovation activities.

Comments & Damage Description contains any additional information and or specific details of material damage are noted here.

EPA Category provides the appropriate material category as outlined in the NESHAPS regulation. The four options are friable, Category 1, Category 2, and needs determination.

Friable - Materials containing greater than 1% asbestos are always considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) that require removal prior to building renovation or demolition activities that impact the material.

Category 1 - Materials that are bituminous non-friable and contain more than 1 % asbestos that become RACM and require removal only when will be subject to grinding, cutting, sanding or abrading.

Category 2 Materials that are non-friable and contain more than 1 % asbestos that will have a high probability of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by the demolition or renovation activity. These material usually become RACM and will require removaL

Needs Determination - Materials that the individual designing the abatement and demolition project needs to inspect and evaluate to determine the potential for the material to become RACM and/or evaluate the asbestos content for the composite and individual layers of the material. For sheet rock with mudding compounds only, the EPA allows using the composite sample result. If the composite result by Point Counting the sample is below 1 % asbestos, the material is not RACM.

Appendix B Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were obtained using standard industrial hygiene techniques including wetting the material to minimize fiber release. Our personnel wore half-face air purifying respirators equipped with high efficiency particulate (HEPA) filters while obtaining samples.

Our sampling strategy for suspect friable surfacing materials was based on the guidelines outlined in the EPA publication Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials, and the procedures outlined in 40 CFR 763, Subpart E (AHERA). For non-friable suspect materials, AHERA requires the building inspector to determine the appropriate number of samples to obtain and analyze.

Usually one to three samples of non-friable materials are collected.

For each homogeneous material identified by visual inspection as suspect material, random samples are obtained. There were three samples collected randomly from each homogeneous area and submitted to laboratory for analysis.

The bulk samples were delivered to an independent laboratory that participates in the bulk sample proficiency analysis program conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Program (NVLAP). The samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining to estimate the percent of asbestos composition by volume. Samples with no observable asbestiform minerals or with asbestiform in concentration of less than 1 % are designated as None-Detected. All other samples are designated as asbestos containing with the appropriate percent of asbestos noted.

Appendix C Laboratory Bulk Sampling Reports

....-~~~~~~~~"'.""-~~~~~~-:---~~~~~~...,..,"""'".,,...~7:-t,,.-!'I:'.'!,..,..,""""~~~~~~~~~ r T A / [ 6330 E. 75th St., Suite 152 EMSu na ytica' Inc. lndianapolis,IN 46250

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomics,, Inc.

5150 North 16th Street Suite A-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Phone: (317) 570-5892 Fax: (317) 570-5894

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99121

L_L;;~~~d L~~~p: ~;~~-~~~~::~:~M) J Project: LUKE A.F.B. - BLDG 1384

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONASBESTOS

SAMPLE LOCATION APPEARANCE % TYPE % FIBROUS % NONF/BROUS

White

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Building ID: 1384 Serial Code:LUKE A.F.8.

White

Fibrous Heterogeneous

Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Yellow

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dissolved

Dissolved

Dissolved

Disso!ved

Dissolved

Dissolved

None Detected 20% Cellulose B0°N Other

None Detected Cellulose 80% Other

None Detected Cellulose 80% Other

5% Chrysotile 95% Other

5% Chrysotile 95°Ai Other

None Detected 5% Synthetic 95°'6 Other

Comments: For al! obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is ana!yzed separately. Also,"# of Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples, "NY samples also analyzed by ELAP 198-1 Method

Tifseale

Analyst

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1% or none detected should be tested with either SEM or TEM. The above test report relates only to the items 7 tested. This report may only be reproduced in part v.ith written approval by EMSL The above test must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government All "NVLAP" reports with NVLAP logo must contain at least one signature to be valid. Laboratory is not responsible for the accuracy of results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples.

Analysis performed by EMSL lndianapotls (NVLAP Air and Bulk #200188-0,)

EMSL Analytical, Inc. Indianapolis, IN 46250

Phone: (317) 570-5892

SAMPLE

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomics, Inc.

5150 North 16th Street Suite A· 111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Fax: (317) 570-589.

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99121

POLARIZED LIGHT-MICROSCOPY (PLMJl

L__ __ P_e_rf_ormed by EP_A_G_o~~R-93/116 Method*~_j

Project: LUKE A.F.B. - BLDG 1384

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONASBESTOS

LOCATION APPEARANCE % TYPE % FIBROUS % NONF/B<<O

Tan Dissolved None Cellulose 98°Ai Other

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Building ID: 1384 Serial Code: LUKE A.F.B.

2-FA1-1

Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved

Dissolved

None Detected

None Detected

Grey ~T~-~~lved-"~-.. ---~ .. 5-~Ai Ch-;ysot~~--- Non-Fibrou

Homogene

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dissolved

Dissolved

None Detected

None Detected

2°ki Cellulose 98% Other

98% Other

95°*3 Other

100% Other

100°..b Other

L.-----··-·-"-----------· -·-'-----·· ···----'---·~--·--------'--------------'-------~--

Comments: For a!I obvlously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each cornponent is analyzed separately. Also,"# Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

•NY samples als<Jmalyzed by ELAP 198-1 Method

/ Ji~

/ Analyst

/'// '/ /L~

Approved ( \ Signatory

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed_ Samples reported as <1 % or none detected should be tested with either SEM or TEM. The above lest report relates only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in part with written approval by EMSL The above test must not be used by the clie11t to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government. All "NVLAP" reports with NV LAP logo must contain at least one signature to be valid. Laboratory is not responsible for the accuracy of results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples.

Analysis performed by EMSL lndiamipolis (NVLAP Air and Bulk #200188-0, )

EMSL Analytical, Inc. . 75tlt St., Suite 152 Indianapolis, IN 46250

SAMPLE

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomics, Inc.

5150 North 16th Street SuiteA-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Pltone: (317) 570-5892 Fax: (317) 570-58

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99121

IPOLARIZED LIGHTMICROSCOPY (PLM) I

L Performed ~Y EPA 600/~-93/116 Me~hod*

Project: LUKE A.f.B. • BLDG 1384

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONASBESTOS

LOCATION APPEARANCE

White

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Dissolved

% TYPE % FIBROUS % NONFIBROU

None Detected 100% other

Building ID: 1384 Serial Code: LUKE A.F.B.

White

Non~Fibrous

Homogeneous

White

Non~Fibrous

Homogeneous

Dissolved

Dissolved

None Detected 100% Other

None Detected 100% Other

I

~=======c=:c=c•=cc•======~==========*====c======~=================================cc=====J·~ Grey

Fibrous Homogeneous

Grey

Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased

Teased

Teased

None Detected

None Detected

I

40°'6 Cellulose

40% Glass

40°Ai Cellulose

40% Glass

20% Other

20% Other

20% Other NoneO D=-itected 40% Cellulose 40% Glass

Comments: For all obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. Also, "# o Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

* NY samples also analyzed by ELAP 198~1 Method llW~ ----;0 Jill Seale / Analyst

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1 % or none detected should be tested with either SEM or TEM. The above test report relates only to the items 2 tested. This report may only be reproduced in part with written approval by EMSL. The above test must not be used by the client to claim produd endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government. All "NVLAP" reports with NVLAP logo must contain at least one signature to be valid. Laboratory is not responsible for the accuracy of results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples.

Analysis performed by EMSL Indianapolis (NVLAP Air and Bulk #200188-0, )

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

SAMPLE

Attn.: Paul Nassef Environomics, Inc.

51 50 North 16th Street Suite A-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Fax: (317) 570-589.

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99121

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM) - j __ P_e_rf_o.rmed by EPA_ 600/R-93/116 Method*

Project: LUKE A.F.B. - BLDG Jl84

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONASBESTOS

LOCATION APPEARANCE

Grey

Fibrous Homogeneous

Teased

% TYPE %

None Detected

FIBROUS % NONF/Bl/OU

Cellulose

Glass

20°A:. Other

Building ID: 1384 Serial Code:LUKE A.F.B.

IS:CT1-3

I I.

[_ J_

I

Grey

Grey

Fibrous Homogeneous

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

1 White

Fibrous

Hom:~~neous

Teased

- ·--r· Teased

Teased

I I

None Detected

None Detected

40% Cellulose

40% Glass l 40% Cellulose

- 40% Glass

None Det ected 40% Cellulose

None Det ected

None Det

20% Other

20°ki Other

60°.k. Other

60°.k. Other

60°.k. Other

Comments: For a!I obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered sarnples, each component is analyzed separately. Also, "# o Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

* NY samples also analyzed by ELAP 198~1 Method

-,&U /~~eale

Approved Signatory Analyst

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Thus negative PLM results carrnot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1% or none detected should be tested with either SEM or TEM. The above test report relates only to the items 3 tested. This report may orily be reproduced in part with written approval by EMSL The above test must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government All "NVLAP" reports with NVLAP logo must contain at least one signature to be valid. Laboratory is not responsible for the accuracy of results when requested to physically separate and analyze layered samples

E'MSL Analytical, Inc. t., mte

Phone: (317) 570-5892

SAMPLE

7-DW-1

Fax: (317) 570-5894

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomics, Inc. Monday, January 18, 1999 51 50 North 16th Street Suite A-111 Ref Number: IN99121 Phoenix, AZ 85016

LOCATION

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method*

Project: LUKE A.f.B. • BLDG 1384

APPEARANCE

White Fibrous

Homogeneous

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

Crushed

ASBESTOS

% TYPE

None Detected

NONASBESTOS

% FIBROUS % NONFIBROUS

45% Cellulose

Building ID: 1384 Serial Code: LUKE A.F.B.

White Fibrous Homogeneous

None Detected 45% Cellulose

[CW~ ··~::=·-;=======--~=t=i;=:=:~===e=n~=~=u=s=-=·-----···T•:e:as-e~-- .... --!--=·=-=·=-=N=o=ne=D=e=te=c=te=d=_= __ "c __ =_4500%=-=C=-e=-l=t~=l~=~=~-=-=·=··~·=-=·::5-5=

=~:0:t:h=~-=r ==='1 t - 1·· -- White lrushed None Detected ------ - Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

White Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Crushed

Crushed

100% Other

None Detected Cellulose 80°'6 Other

None Detected 15% Cellulose 85% Other

Comments: For all obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. Also, "#of Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

*NY samples also analyzed by ELAP 198~1 Method

£!/h~.

Approved ( Signatory L

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples which contain asbestos. Thus negative PLM results cannot be guaranteed. Samples reported as <1% or none detected should be tested with either SEM or TEM. The above test report relates only to the items 4 tested. This report may only be reproduced in part with written approval by EMSL. The above test must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP nor any agency of the United States Government All "NVLAP" reports with NVLAP logo must contain at least one signature to be valid. Laboratory is not responsible for the accuracy of results when requested to physically separa.te and analyze layered samples.

EMSL Analytical, Inc. 6330 E. 75th St., Suite 152

SAMPLE

19-TC-1

Building ID: 1384

10-VC1-1

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomics, Inc.

51 50 North 16th Street Suite A-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Phone: (317) 570-5892 Fax: (317) 570-5894

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99121

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method'

Project: LUKE A.F.B. - BLDG 1384

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONASBESTOS

LOCATION APPEARANCE % TYPE % FIBROUS % NONFIBROUS

White None Detected 5% Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

Serial Code:LUKE A.F.B.

White Crushed None Cellulose 95% Other

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

White Crushed None Detected 2% Cellulose 98% Other

Non-Fibrous Homogeneous

White/Black Teased None 40% Other

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White/Black Teased None Detected Glass 40% Other

Fibrous Homogeneous

White/Black Teased None Glass 40%1 Other

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Comments: For all obviously heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. A!so, "#of Layers" refers to number of separable subsamples.

* NY samples also analyzed by ELAP 198-1 Method

Ii~ Approved Signatory Analyst

Disclaimers: PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples…