Attachment 5 - Asbestos Recert Ltr B1383 Wiring Upgrade.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

56TH FIGHTER WING (AETC)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE AZ 85309-1629

9 Dec 2024

MEMORANDUM FOR 56 CES/CEN

FROM: 56 CES/CEIE

SUBJECT: Asbestos Recertification Building 1383

1. A review was performed of the available asbestos reports. The review was performed to ensure the accuracy of this survey for the Inside Plant Wiring Upgrade.

2. The asbestos survey completed on 1 June 1999 by Environomics, Inc., indicates there is Non-friable but no Friable asbestos containing material (ACM) were observed in the building.

Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Results

NON-FRIABLE ACM

Ceramic Tile Underlayment Assumed

FRIABLE ACM

None

3. Based on the Statement of Work, the area to be disturbed WILL NOT require asbestos abatement in accordance with local Maricopa County Air Quality and Luke Air Force Base specifications.

4. A copy of this memorandum and the asbestos report must be on hand during the renovation/demolition. Failure to have these documents can trigger a NESHAP Notice of Violation from the Maricopa County Air Quality Division.

5. If there is a change in the scope of work or you have any additional questions regarding this survey, please contact me at 856-4569.

CARL F. MOSER JR., Civ, DAF Toxic Program Manager

Attachment:

1. Asbestos Survey Report, SHP, ICBM/TAC C&E (ID:1383), dated 1 June 1999

2. 56 CES Personnel Certifications

ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (ID: 1383)

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Prepared for:

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

Prepared by:

Environomics, Inc.

June 1, 1999

Project Number: 1629

Prepared By:

Barry Burrows an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector

C 1876

Reviewed By:

Russ Nassof an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector

B 9116

Section:

Appendices:

A

B

C

D

E

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Introduction

Description of Building Construction and Systems

Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials

Material Information Tables

Removal Cost Estimate Summary

Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Laboratory Bulk Sampling Reports

Summary of Regulatory Requirements

Drawings Indicating Asbestos Sample Locations

Executive Summary

Environomics, Inc. (Environomics) was retained by MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION to perform an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)/ National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) style asbestos survey of the SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (Building ID: 1383), to determine the locations of accessible and to the extent feasible, inaccessible friable and non-friable asbestos containing building materials (ACBM).

Friable materials are materials that can be reduced to powder with hand pressure such as fireproofing, sprayed-on acoustic ceilings, pipe and thermal system insulation. All other materials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable materials. Friable materials are of greatest concern from a health and safety point of view because of their ease of fiber release.

No friable asbestos-containing materials were observed in the building.

Asbestos was detected or assumed in the following non-friable materials:

Ceramic Tile Underlayment

Site !D: LUKE BASE Building JD: i383 SHP, !CBM/TAC C&E Asbestos Survey Report

Executive Summary Page 1

Section 1 Introduction

Environomics, Inc. (Environomics) performed an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)/ National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) style asbestos survey of the SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E located at Luke Air Force Base, AZ to identify ACBM. This report identifies the locations and asbestos content of friable and non-friable ACBM, provides assessment of the friable ACBM in relation to the material's hazard potential to building occupants and provides removal cost estimates.

Friable materials are materials that can be reduced to powder with hand pressure such as fireproofing, sprayed-on acoustic ceilings, pipe and thermal system insulation. All other materials such as floor tile, ceiling tile, adhesives, plaster, stucco, and sheet rock mudding compounds are considered non-friable materials.

Friable materials are of greatest concern from a health and safety point of view because of their ease of fiber release.

All identified suspect asbestos-containing materials are summarized in Section 3.

Materials testing positive for asbestos including material assessments, recommended response actions, and quantities are described in Section 4. Removal cost estimates for asbestos-containing materials are included in Section 5.

It is not our recommendation to remove these materials unless they are beyond repair, or planned demolition or renovation activities will disturb the materials.

Estimates are based on recent pricing we have received from contractors performing similar work and may vary from actual costs obtained due to the scope of work, prevailing wage, quantity of material removed, control measures specified and contractor work loads.

On Friday, January 8, 1999 Barry Burrows ( C 1876), an AHERA accredited asbestos inspector, from Environomics, performed an asbestos survey of the building in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act of 1987

(AHERA).

DISCLAIMER

This report is prepared for the express use and benefit of MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION, its agents and employees. The information in this report or portions thereof may be required to be included in notifications to employees, contractors or other visitors to the building( s ). This report is not intended to be used by the Owner or its agents as a specification contract document or work plan for any of the work suggested or recommended in the report.

This report is based upon conditions and practices observed at the property and information made available to the surveyor. This report does not intend to identify all hazards or unsafe practices, nor to indicate that other hazards or unsafe practices do

Site ID: LUKE BASE Bulklln~r SHP. ICBM /TAC C&E

Section 1 Page 1 not exist at the premises.

Environomics has performed this survey in accordance with industry standards and has used best efforts to determine the location of inaccessible ACBM. Environomics shall not be responsible for identifying all ACBM located behind walls and or columns, beneath flooring, above solid ceiling, underground or any other inaccesssible areas.

Site ID: LUKE BASE Building: SHP, ICBM /TAC C&E

Section 1 Page 2

Section 2 Description of Building Construction and Systems

Number of Floors: 1 Year Built: 1978

Structural components consist of:

Total Square Footage: 7,373

Concrete Slab Tilt-up Concrete

Exterior Wall construction components consist of: Concrete

Interior Wall construction components consist of: Drywall

Interior ceiling components consist of: Ceiling Tile Concrete

Heating and mechancial systems include: Flues Ducted Return Ducted Supply

Srte ID: LUKE BASE Section 2 Page 1

Building: SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials

The following table is a list of all materials at this building which were tested for the presence of asbestos along with overall sample results. Complete information on asbestos containing materials is included in Section 4 of this report.

Materials are listed by Homogeneous Sampling Area (HM). Each unique material within the building is assigned a unique HM number by the surveyor at the time the survey is performed.

Section 3 and Section 4 are organized by building, surfacing, thermal systems insulation, flooring, walls, ceilings, roofing and miscellaneous materials.

Site Information SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Survey Performed By Environomics, Inc.

Suspect Material

BASEBOARD ADHESIVE

Category

Flooring

Inspector Barry Burrows

HM Number

BA-3

Client Information

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

Inspection Date Friday, January 8, 1999

Job Number

Material Location(s) Floor Asbestos Present?

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE 1

SATELLITE/ WIDEBAND WORK

QUALITY ASSURANCE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

SUPPLY ROOM

No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 1 Licensed to: Environomics, !nc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Site Information

SHP, ICBM /TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Suspect Material Category HM Number

TAN CARPET ADHESIVE Flooring CA-1

CERAMIC TILE UNDERLAYMENT FlooringNValls CU-8

DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND Walls DC-5

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Material Location(s)

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

QUALITY ASSURANCE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

RESTROOMS

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

SATELLITE / WIDEBAND WORK

QUALITY ASSURANCE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

SUPPLY ROOM

RESTROOMS

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Floe, Asbestos Present?

No

Yes (assumed)

No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 2 Licensed to: Environomlcs, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Site fnformation

SHP, ICBM I TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Suspect Material Category HM Number

GYPSUM WALLBOARD Walls JW-4

TEXTURING COMPOUND Walls TC-6

2'X2' CEILING TILE Ceilings CT-2

Swvey Performed By Inspection Date

Environomics, Inc. Friday, January 8, 1999

Material Location(s) F!OOf" Asbestos Present?

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP No

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

SATELLITE/ WIDEBAND WORK

QUALITY ASSURANCE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

SUPPLY ROOM

RESTROOMS

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP No

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

SATELLITE/ WIDEBAND WORK

QUALITY ASSURANCE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

SUPPLY ROOM

RESTROOMS

RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP No

GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

COMM. WORK CENTER

GROUND RADIO OFFICE

SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

QUALITY ASSURANCE

DATA NCIOC OFFICE

STORAGE

HALLWAY

DATA MAINTENANCE

COMPUTER AFETS

AFETS

MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

Soctlon 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 3 Licensed to: Environcmics, lnc_, Phoenix, AZ., 85016

SHP, ICBM I TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Suspect Material Category

DOOR /WINDOW FRAME FILLER Miscellaneous

MATERIAL

HM Number

FL-7

Su,yey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Material Location(s)

EXTERIOR

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Floo< Asbestos Present?

No

Section 3 Summary of Findings for Suspect Materials Page 4 Licensed to: Environomics, !nc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Section 4 Material Information Tables

Site lnfonnation SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Luke Air Force Base, AZ 85309

Survey Pelformed By Environomics, Inc.

Material Description

I BASEBOARD ADHESIVE

Material C;:itegory

IF!ooring Friable Classirlcetion

[Non-Friable

Inspector Barry Burrows

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

!Fair I General Material Comments

I Material Localion(s)

!RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

!GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

IcoMM. WORK CENTER

!GROUND RADIO OFFICE

jGROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

!SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

!SATELLITE I WIDEBAND WORK CENTER

!QUALITY ASSURANCE

!DATA NCIOC OFFICE

!STORAGE

!HALLWAY

IDATA MAINTENANCE

jCOMPUTER AFETS

IAFETS

!MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

!MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

!CHIEF OFFICES

!SUPPLY ROOM

Sample ID(s)

IBA-3--1

IBA-3--2

i I

18A-3--3

Sample Location(s)

SATELLITE I WIDEBAND

SUPPLY ROOM

HALLWAY

Location Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Client lnfonnatlon

MORRISON-KNUDSEN CORPORATION

17300 RED HILL AVENUE, SUITE 150

IRVINE, CA 92614

EPA Category

!category l

Inspection Date Friday, January 8, 1999

Material Number lba-3

Total Quantity

11,510

Reoommended Response

Job Number

Asbestos Present?

!No

Unit of Measure

!Linear Feet

[ No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Commenfu (by Lwalion)

OveraJ! Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab

BLD 1)

2) 3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2) 3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section4 ~ge 1 Licensed to: Envlroriomics, Inc Phoenix, AZ, 85016

SHP, ICBM /TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description

IT AN CARPET ADHESIVE

Material Category

I Flooring Friable Classification

\Non-Friable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material kisessmenl iGood

General Material Comments

I Material Locafion(s)

!RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

!GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

!COMM. WORK CENTER

!GROUND RADIO OFFICE

!SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

!QUALITY ASSURANCE

!DATA NCIOC OFFICE

!STORAGE

!HALLWAY

!DATA MAINTENANCE

lcoMPUTER AFETS

IAFETS

!MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

IMAINENT ANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

!CHIEF OFFICES

Sample ID(s) Sample Location{s) lcA-1-1 I

QUALITY ASSURANCE

ICA-1-2 COMM. WORK CENTER

ICA-1-3 HALLWAY

Location Quantity

Ffoo, Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

EPA Category

!category 1

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Material Number ic•-1

T otaf Quantity

14,904

Recommended Response

Asbestos Prosent?

!No

Unit of Measure

!Square Feet

INo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Resuft Layer(s) Reported by Lab

BLD 1)

2) 3)

BLQ 1)

2) 3)

BLD 1)

2) 3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Section 4 Page 2 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc,, Phoenix, AZ, 85016

SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Material Description l CERAMIC TILE UNDERLAYMENT

Material Category

:FlooringMfal!s Friable Classification

\Non-Friable

General Condition Damage Category Overall Material Assess,rn,nt

:Good I General Material Comments

!ASSUMED POSITIVE, NOT SAMPLED AS PER OWNER

Material Location(s)

!RESTROOMS

Sample ID(s)

ICU-8-1

I

<cu-a-2

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

RESTROOMS

RESTROOMS

RESTROOMS

l DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND

Materiaf Category

IWalls Friable Cfassificafion

INon-Friable

Location Quantity

Analyzed

No

No

No

General Condiffon Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

[Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s) Floor Location Quantify

!RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP 2,000

!GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE 5CO

jCOMM. WORK CENTER 700

!GROUND RADIO OFFICE

!GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER 1,100

!SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE 800

!SATELLITE / WIDEBAND WORK CENTER 1,600

]QUALITY ASSURANCE 1,000

IDATA NCIOC OFFICE 400

!DATA NCIOC OFFICE 400

!STORAGE 5CO

jHALLWAY 2,000 lnspecUon Date Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc. Friday, January 8, 1999

EPA Category

!Category I

Material Number lcu-8

T otaf Quantity

Recommended Response

!Manage in Place

Location Condi/ion Material Comments (by Location)

Asbe1Jtos Present?

IYes {assumed)

Unit of Measure

!Square Feet

Overall Result

Not Avail.

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1) CERAMIC TILE

Results by Layer

Not Avail.

Not Avail.

2) 3)

1) CERAMICTILE

2) 3)

1) CERAMIC TILE

2)

3)

EPA Category

!category II

Material Number idc-5

Tota/Quantity

116,286

Asbestos P=ent?

INo

Unit of Measuro

!Square Feet

Recommended Response

)No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 3 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, AZ, 85016

Site fnformation

SHP, ICBM / TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

\DATA MAINTENANCE

!COMPUTER AFETS

jAFETS

!MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

IMAINENT ANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

\CHIEF OFFICES

[SUPPLY ROOM

!RESTROOMS

Sample JD(s)

IDC-5-1

IDC-5-2

I

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

SATELLITE /WIDEBAND

HALLWAY

RADAR MAINTENANCE

I GYPSUM WALLBOARD

Material Category

WValls Friable Classification jNon-Friable

1,200

5CXl

7CXJ

7CXJ

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage Category Overafl Material Assessment

\Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

I jRADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

!GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

]COMM. WORK CENTER

iGROUND RADIO OFFICE

!GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

!SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

!SATELLITE I WIDEBAND WORK CENTER

!QUALITY ASSURANCE

!STORAGE

!HALLWAY

IDATA MAINTENANCE

IcoMPUTERAFETS

I

Floor Location Quantify

2,(X)()

5CXl

7CXJ

6(X)

1,1CXJ

1,6CXJ

1,(X)()

5CXl

2,(X)()

1,200

5CXl

Sutvey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Overall Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

BLD 1)

BLD

BLD

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

£PA Category

\category 11

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

~w-4

Tota/ Quantify

\15,486

Recommended Response

[No

Unit of Measure

\Square Feet

]No Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 4 Licensed to: Environomlcs, Inc., Phoenix, AZ., 85016

SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE) iAFETS iMAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

IMAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

jCHIEF OFFICES

IsuPPLY ROOM

\RESTROOMS

Sample FD(s)

IJW-4-1

I jJW-4-2

Material Description

Sample Location(s)

SATELLITE I WIDEBAND

HALLWAY

RADAR MAINTENANCE

I TEXTURING COMPOUND

Flocc

Material Category

!Walls

Friable Classification

!Non-Friable

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage Gatego,y Overall Material Assessment

!Good

Gene,a/ Material Comments

Material Locatfon(s)

IRADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

]GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

!COMM. WORK CENTER

!GROUND RADIO OFFICE

!GROUND RADIO WORK CENTER

\SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

!SATELLITE I WIDEBAND WORK CENTER

!QUALITY ASSURANCE

iDATA NCIOC OFFICE

!STORAGE

!HALLWAY

!DATA MAINTENANCE

!COMPUTER AFETS

]AFETS

Fioo, Location Quantity

2,000

1,100

1,600

1,000

2,000

1,200

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Overalf Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

BLD

BLD

BLD

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

EPA Category

\category II

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Asbestos Present?

ltc-6

Total Quantity

115,886

Recommended Response jNo

Uni/ of Measure

\square Feet

INo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location CondiUon Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 5 Licensed to: Environomics, Inc,, Phoenix, />Z, 85016

SHP, ICBM /TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

[MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

l

1MAINENT ANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

,CHIEF OFFICES

/SUPPLY ROOM

!RESTROOMS

Sample ID(s)

ITC-6-1

I

Material Description l2'X2' CEILING TILE

Sample Location(s)

SATELLITE /WIDEBAND

HALLWAY

RADAR MAINTENANCE

Fio<x

Material Category

ICei!ings Friable Cfassification 1Friable

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condition Damage Categmy I

Overall Malarial Assessment

,Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

!RADAR MAINTENANCE SHOP

!GROUND RADIO NCIOC OFFICE

jcoMM. WORK CENTER

!GROUND RADIO OFFICE

!SATELLITE WIDEBAND NCIOC OFFICE

!QUALITY ASSURANCE

!DATA NCIOC OFFICE

!STORAGE

!HALLWAY

IDATA MAINTENANCE

!COMPUTER AFETS

!AFETS

!MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION

[MAINENTANCE SUPERINTENDENT &

!CHIEF OFFICES

Location Quantity

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Inspection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Overa/1 Result Layer(s) Reported by Lab Results by Layer

BLD

BLD

BLD

1)

2) 3)

1)

2) 3)

1)

2) 3)

EPA Category

IFriab!e

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number Mbestos Present?

ict-2

Total Quantity

14,004

Recommended Response

INo

Unit of Measure

Jsquare Feet iNo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected

Location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Section 4 Page 6 licensed to: Environomics, lnc., Phoenix, J.Z, 85016

SHP, ICBM /TAC C&E (Site ID: LUKE BASE)

Sample JD(s) Sample Looation(s) Flooc lcT-2-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE

I lcT-2-2 COMM. WORK CENTER iCT-2-3 I

HALLWAY

I Matariaf Description

IDOOR / WINDOW FRAME FILLER MATERIAL

Material Category

!Miscellaneous Friable Classification

!Non-Friable

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

General Condillon Damage Category Overall Material Assessment

!Good

General Material Comments

Material Location(s)

I EXTERIOR

Sample JD(s)

FL-7-1

FL-7-2

FL-7-3

Sample Location(s)

EXTERIOR

EXTERIOR

EXTERIOR

I

Flooc

F/oo,-

Location Quantity

Analyzed

Yes

Yes

Yes

Survey Performed By

Environomics, Inc.

Overall Result Layer(s) Reporled by Lab

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

BLD 1)

2)

3)

EPA CategOf}'

!Friable lmc;pection Date

Friday, January 8, 1999

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Material Number 1fl-7

Asbestos Present?

iNo

T oial Quantity

I= Unit of Measure

!square Feet

Recommended Response

INo Response Required, No Asbestos Detected location Condition Material Comments (by Location)

Overall Result

BLD

BLD

BLD

Layer(s) Reported by Lab

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

1)

2)

3)

Results by Layer

Below limit of detection

Below limit of detection

Below Hmit of detection

Section 4 Page 7 Licensed to; Environomics, Inc., Phoenix, /lZ, 85016

Section 5 Removal Cost Estimate Summary

It is not our recommendation to remove these materials unless they are beyond repair, or planned demolition or renovation activities will disturb the materials. Estimates are based on recent pricing we have received from contractors performing similar work and may vary from actual costs due to the scope of work, prevailing wage, quantity of material removed, control measures specified and contractor work loads, etc.

Building SHP, ICBM/ TAC C&E

Appendix A Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

Definitions of Terms and Assessment Criteria

This survey report organizes information on each suspect ACBM identified in tables located in Section 4. This section describes how to interpret the data found on materials listed in Section 4.

Material description contains the description of the suspect homogeneous asbestos containing building material.

Material Serial Number is used to reference the material for reinspections, etc ..

Asbestos type and content describes the type of asbestos and its percentage in the material.

Asbestos Results for positive materials are shown as a percentage. Samples having less than 1 % asbestos are reported as containing "Trace" amounts of asbestos and samples with no detected asbestos are reported as "BLD" or below limtt of detection.

Sample number(s) identifies a particular material sample obtained from a specific sample location. Sample numbers are used primarily for laboratory identification.

Sample Location identifies where the samples of this material were obtained.

Material Category categorizes each material as surfacing, TSI or miscellaneous.

Surfacing Materials -Asbestos containing materials that are sprayed-on, trawled-on or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.

Thenna/ Systems Insulation (TS/) -Asbestos containing materials applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breaching, tanks, ducts or other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain or water condensation.

Miscellaneous Materials -Asbestos containing materials applied to or a part of building components that are not classified as surfacing materials or thermal systems insulation.

Quantity & Units reports approximate total quantity per unit of measure for each material.

Building(s) & Floor(s) specifies where a material is located.

Material Location describes where the material is found throughout the building.

Material Condition identifies the material as Friable, Non-friable or Jacketed {for thermal systems insulation only) if asbestos is present

Friable - An asbestos containing material that can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder, when dry, by hand pressure, such as spray applied fireproofing on structural steel members, spray applied acoustical ceiling materials or damaged thermal systems insulation. Friable materials are of greatest concern due to their potential fiber release.

Non-Friable - An asbestos containing material where the asbestos is bound tightly in a matrix or sealed by a protective layer.

Non-friable materials can become friable by being rendered to a crumbled, pulverized or powdered state, when dry, by crushing, sanding, sawing, shot-blasting, severe weathering or by other mechanically induced means. Common examples of non-friable materials are adhesives, floor tiles, transite and roofing materials.

Jacketed -An asbestos containing material applied to thermal systems insulation and "jacketed" with a protective outer layer such as canvas or metal to keep the material in good condition. Undamaged jacketed ACBM is considered non-friable. If the jacketing is damaged, the material is considered friable.

Damage Category describes the type of damage, if any, to the material. The following damage categories are used: None, Physical, Air, and Water.

Material Assessment identifies the condition of the material in relation to physical and water damage, delamination of the material from its substrate, the extent of the damage and the potential for damage from building conditions, such as, accessibility by building occupants, influence of vibration, etc. The six standard assessment categories ranked by hazard potential, wtth the first being the lowest hazard are as follows: 1) Potential for Damage, 2) Potential for Significant Damage, 3) Damaged, 4) Damaged with Potential for Damage, 5) Damaged with Potential for Significant Damage, and 6) Significantly Damaged. Only friable materials are assessed under AHERA regulations. Non-friable materials, unless damaged, are not assessed and can be assumed to be in good condition.

- -water stains, marring or otherwise abraded over less than on-tenth (1/10) of the surface if the damage is evenly distributed or one-fourth (1/4) if the damage is localized.

Significant Damage - The damage or deterioration of the material results in inadequate adhesion or cohesion and the damage is extensive and severe with one or more of the following characteristics: 1) Crumbling or blistering over at least one-tenth (1/1 OJ of the surface if evenly distributed, one-fourth (1/4) if the damage is localized; 2) Areas of the material hanging from the surface, delaminated, or showing adhesive failure; 3) Water stains, gouges or marred.

Recommended Response suggests the appropriate options for controlling or maintaining ACBM in a safe manner. There are four options used:

Operations & Maintenance (O&M) - A program designed to "manage" asbestos in-place. As long as asbestos containing materials remain in a building, an O&M program should be instituted to alert maintenance personnel, custodial workers and outside vendors of the existence and location of these materials and to set a policy for the maintenance of these materials. The material is usually only required to be removed if it is significantiy damaged, prior to demolrtion of the building or if it will be disturbed by renovation activities.

Repair- The restoration of damaged or deteriorated asbestos containing building materials to an intact condition. Once the intact condition is established, the material should be included in an O&M program. The material is usually only required to be removed if it is significantiy damaged, prior to demolrtion of the building or if rt will be disturbed by renovation activities.

Abate Due to Condition - This material is significantiy damaged and is unsafe in Its current condition. The access to the area should be restricted to personnel equipped with appropriate personal protection. This material should be property removed by a licensed contractor using workers trained in the safe removal of asbestos.

Abate Prior to Renovation - This material should be properly removed prior to planned renovation activities by a licensed contractor using workers trained in the safe removal of asbestos. This recommendation is usually made only on survey reports prepared prior to planned renovation activities.

Comments & Damage Description contains any additional information and or specific details of material damage are noted here.

EPA Category provides the appropriate material category as outlined in the NESHAPS regulation. The four options are friable, Category 1, Category 2, and needs determination.

Friable- Materials containing greater than 1% asbestos are always considered Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) that require removal prior to building renovation or demolitlon activities that impact the material.

Category 1 - Materials that are bituminous non-friable and contain more than 1 % asbestos that become RACM and require removal only when will be subject to grinding, cutting, sanding or abrading.

Category 2 - Materials that are non-friable and contain more than 1% asbestos that will have a high probabilrty of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by the demolition or renovation activity. These material usually become RACM and will require removal.

Needs Determination - Materials that the individual designing the abatement and demolition project needs to inspect and evaluate to determine the potential for the material to become RACM and/or evaluate the asbestos content for the composite and individual layers of the material. For sheet rock with mudding compounds only, the EPA allows using the composite sample result. If the composite result by Point Counting the sample is below 1 % asbestos, the material is not RACM.

Appendix B Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Bulk Sampling Protocol and Analytical Methods

Bulk samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials were obtained using standard industrial hygiene techniques including wetting the material to minimize fiber release. Our personnel wore half-face air purifying respirators equipped with high efficiency particulate (HEPA) filters while obtaining samples.

Our sampling strategy for suspect friable surfacing materials was based on the guidelines outlined in the EPA publication Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials, and the procedures outlined in 40 CFR 763, Subpart E (AHERA). For non-friable suspect materials, AHERA requires the building inspector to determine the appropriate number of samples to obtain and analyze.

Usually one to three samples of non-friable materials are collected.

For each homogeneous material identified by visual inspection as suspect material, random samples are obtained. There were three samples collected randomly from each homogeneous area and submitted to laboratory for analysis.

The bulk samples were delivered to an independent laboratory that participates in the bulk sample proficiency analysis program conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Program (NVLAP). The samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining to estimate the percent of asbestos composition by volume. Samples with no observable asbestiform minerals or with asbestiform in concentration of less than 1% are designated as None-Detected. All other samples are designated as asbestos containing with the appropriate percent of asbestos noted.

Appendix C Laboratory Bulk Sampling Reports

Atta.: Paul Nassef Erwlronomics, 111<, 5150 North 16th Streer Suit• A-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

Fax: (ll 7) 570-589

Monday, January 18, 199'!

RefNumbH: IN99120

[POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

Perfonned by EPA llOOiR-931116 Method' _j

Project: LUK£ A, F.8. • BLDG UBJ

ASBESTOS _NO.NASBESIOS sAMPLE TREA TME1tr % TYPE FIBROUS % NONF/ll!lOUS SAl~PLE LOCATION APPEAP.ANCE

----=--,-------,,-------,-,, -~I 7d-----,---,~,:or~,e::-;:De:;:te:c~!@:d;--,---;5;r;~i,-r~,:.;;;lkC.a'!o~s=•;:------;g~5~,~~• (Qt~,;h,,;:;:----1 1-CA,-1 !Tari 1~·.;e

! Non-FJl:ireiu,s I Horno9sneo'..ls

L_ _____ .J. __ --,---,-::,~'--::-::----------'---------'-----------~ ---------------------1 sert:31 CQde;!.UK1: A.F.6 Blii\dirg i J. 1383 j l-CA.--: !ran 1 Nori~FibfOUS i Hornr:,i.;ensiou:;;: • I

Ir,, Non-t'!b.rnus

: Disso;\led 5% CG!iJbse S5% other

None Df'!t!lci.ed

1, Homcg~N!S I __J ''=-~·-==!c=======;======,c=====c=====~~-·~ I ~>GT-1 : Grey Tea~ed 20% otrer 1 i Fibro,a5 i Hmi.og8r,80US. , ;Grey ; Fibrous

I H::>t:'lG-g~r:eou~ i

I Teased

I

!✓cne- Detedect i',.0% Cellli!Ose

40% ~!a$S

Nori~ O~eded 40% C!!llulc,~~ 20% Dthe(

40% Glass

Commo)n~. For a!\ obvicu$!y hetErcgehMus samp:~f; Msfly separated into subssrnplea, and fi'.lr layerl:!d samples, each rompo:iern ,s analyzed SJ:Jparatts-ly. Als.c, "# of Layer.;" refars to ·,umbiolr of separab!~ subsarnplF.!S,

• NY samp!f>'S :i,f;C -ana.yzed.!n EtAP 196·1 Mel'lod

Note' •sAMP:~~/U€.~IVE8"

]iii Seale An.,ly,t

Dis:c:l.iir:,.::s:: P!..M ~ .. t..i,m ~.now~ t:; mi:;:; BS!::~-;;tos Ir;,; ~msil perc,wrtB!::€1 or .;o;,ripli;-s wf'.tc,1wnt.q_,111:i~OO:;tc,s. "'.}.1Jl.- n.::::i;.,tv9 PLM ;;:.suit& c1111r,.:it ')"' $;llrar<1:>i_t.<11 .. <J, Se,rr,pli!e M•~rt1_;1<l M •:1% or Ml!"' do,';~~ ,.,~c,·Jl<i I>= t,,:tl.,:! w,1!; ,:,Ith,,,; ~EM a:,f TEJ,t Tn~ ~~~J'C .:~.,~ f"'~~ ',:,l:,t,» orJyt<., thi, ibr<1.,, ~<:i:<(1. TMi rtlij¢r( h\!\Y QnlV l:I<! fi!lt,fr.l(!uc,:,d i~ part '1',i\t: wrifum 3p;:;rov~! by EMSI... The ~=~t mu1r, :id: be \!$<:d i,y the- ~!~"it to claim 11,·rn..ia >ls!hi<:>l~~mwt cy !'.Vl..,~P ~¥ ,r,r,y ~,;,!\C) « th,:- IJr,i~o· S'::z,I<," G;::;',-,:,r;,rro,,i( Aff "NYI.JI.P" ,-.,pocl:: W:'h t~VLAP !ego mco:rt,:;cl"'~;~ :,'i i~~:d enc .,;,Jm:Cc,·a 1)) t:eo;,-i:;11:1, Ub,;;ret~ry Y.f /lot re~J:i;;n111~e for the ~1m1r:icy :ifresut~ \'1fh21; ;,;i:~-s'J<d tv p.liv,;;:C-iJllY ~i;;,r::-tlii ~~ an,1lv.:~ l,WB'?~ ;.~rrc,!~;, An::,l)"!l'ii: ~~,fo=~d l:y EMSL 'r,cf<ar,~p,:,!t;. li'IVLA;:: Alt >!IHI 8!•1K #201J~8S.O,)

SAMPL.£.

Attn.: Paul Nassof Environomlcs, Inc: ..

5150 North I 6th Street Suite A-111 Phoenix, AZ 85016

nc. J,ii/ian.apdi,, IN 46250

Phone: (317) 570-5892 Fax: (317) 570-589

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99120

\ POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY {PLM)

Performed by EPA 600/R-931116 Method'

Projecu LUKE A.f.B. • BLDG 1l8l

SAMPLE

TREATMENT

ASBESTOS NONA.SBE§[OS

LOCATION APPEARANCE

'.Grey l ribrous i rloMl"(1ftf1€0U5

¾- TYPE

I Teased

FIBROUS ¼ NONFJfJR.OU

40% Cellulose

40% Glass

20% other

Eui:ding lO: ~353 Se(ai ~octe:UJKE A.F.B, :3--BA-1

L i '11\ihite

: Non-flbrou:s

! Homoger$O~$

\White 'Non-Fibrol.ls i Hamogeneove I

'white

I ! Non-Fibrous nomogs:;eous iVVhite ! Nun-=ibr'ws i Homogeneou~

I

:Whit~

1 t,;on-F"lbr-.1LJs ! Homoga;ir.e-ous:

i

I 9iosOIVOd lo1ssotved I

I

I :crushed I

Nan@ Detected

None Detected

None Detected 20% Celh..ilose

20% Cel!L'iDse

5% Gl8~S

100% Cthe:r

100% Olhsr

'100% Oth~r

80% OthBI

75% O'lher

Cvmments: For ail obviou;1:!y heterogeneo(ls $~t,iples easily separatOO Into subsamples, arid for layered sa1:1pl1:1s, aach component is ;s.m1!1z:e::l -~ei:,arat91y. Also, "# of Layers" re:fers iu number c1 separable m..:OOamp!es.

~ NY 5~tnplas abc amilyzed by SLAP 193-·! Methtd

Note: "SAM~LE~ I:1:IVED"

/ Jill Seale Analyst

Qi,ai:;l;i:Jmcr~ ?1.M h~ 1,,~.:.r, ~nown I: mlM ~..i:.;...til,;. i~ 11. ~-r.c:111 ,,..,c,intsi,tt ofs.impl~ whi,:;h tomsm ;.s;oe:.to!;, Th~,:, r~~-:1ti,11 f:LM ri:=lk ~-<:-M,Qt be _QU;.r.i.11teed. Sa•;,p►.,,e r.;pi:,r,;i:d :a <:1% !lr n:nil'!' detttetija :.r,ou:d be 1.,.,t .. d w:t~, 411th<1t f;:::;M o:TEM. Th"' .;b,;"1:, ~:,;t ~;i,:,rt i\\l,s,t,11,,; ,:,rdv f,, ~he item" 2 11,:;t.,d. Tt',l!o r,i,;ieri: may <'111¥ h~ r~pr,:,du~,;,,l i~ p:.,tw.ih Wrltl,m ;lpproYiil by EMSL. Tfl~ aOOVl:I = l""i!J?.t rmt b!i1 ~.-~ by l~ i;;li_llrntk, tl~.1/Ti pF-1:!~o!

1m<:h:ori:l(!IT!$ilt by 1'.'VLAP ml! 11.riy agenci, cf th!: Unii,:,d $ta!,;~ Co~~r,,mi:~t. All "!-NLAP'" 1;:,p"rl!a with N\ILAP !¢:Js'> mu..t OQ11b,11 at !e,,;,st oni:: i1g,,~tij~ t:. be V3il~. L•"<:.oral:oiy ;,. nd '"'-"P"na:lbi,:, fur t!"I! s:,::ur~y ofr=~i:~ Wheifi IB<,:l!J~d to piW$1Ca11y<-11;;1:1.1;;tti t!!n~ !:\'i1\)'2'3 h1y.in.,ci !;a.mpl,:,t:, Aooly,;.IB v11rf0nn=d by Et,',8!. :nar«r,a;,.c:ili:- (NVL,'P Alf ti.,,ci Bili~ #2.0C183-0, ) tf'bL

EMSL A11aly•tical, lnc. lndianapo/4 IN 46100 Plw,u: (317) 571)-5892 }'ax: (3/7) 570-5894

:6-TC-3

Attn., Paul Nassef Environc111ic.s, Inc. Monday, January 18, 1999

S I 50 North 16th Street Suite A-111 Re/Number, IN99120

Phoen IX, Al.. 8 50 I 6

LDCATIOff

---------------------~ POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

Pertormed by EPA 600/R-931116 Method• l'roJect: LUKE A.F.8. • BLDG 1383

_APPEARANCE

( White l Nor.~Fib:'otis ! Homogs~euws

SAMl'LE

TREATMENT

!crushed

ASBESTOS

¾ TYPE

None WeletrtSJ

NOJLAS'Uf;S'_(~

FIBROUS ¾ NONF:BR.OU

15% other

I I

.----'---------'---------'----------·L------------------7.J Bt..ilO\:,g lC, 1-3$3 Serial Code:L!JKE A.F.6.

\ Grey 1 Non-Flbrous ! Homogeriac;,,i$ I

D1s~olved

~=====c:2========='=========:;::::::::========'=======~-=-=-=-=-= =========c:::======-~·=··==-=-=-=tcc loii--S>JlVed ]Gr,,;y

/ Non- l=furol.ls I honogeneous

IGre:

i Non~F!brnus

\ HoMOf}ef!e0i.lS

I '8-"TG-i

I Disso!'.IM

Noni~ Deter;fed

(;a:rimentr;' For ~11 -obvlo-u~ly ":eter0g:':'nem.1~ s;:,rnp!es easily sep.irated into sJbscarr,pJes, and for layered :!iamplt:i;-$., eai;:17 compr,M/1t L~ arniy;ad ~r,pvr;,.halj Ab<i, ··t_! o 1-ayef:5" :sfer.;, to nurr1Per of 31:'psrabie subsamples.

' NY sarnpies -also ana'.yze.;i by EL.AP 198,1 Metho,;i fo'~AMPt1,1i:,IEC('VED' r.:l~t •

:J1.;i::il~m~1e,. P'...M h<.t t,.,.;;ri k,-,,Mt 1¢ mi,z :i~';-&;;.tc'!:. in~ 9tc1llli i,eiroe,r'll;~Q~ c-f 21_n,;,l1<~ whiGh Gi>rit;,,;,. M!l,!.id:!:<" Th;; ''-'f'"'tWi< Pc,,.A '!l'z,;itC- Si-I'••::':

1:,,.. ,ii;~:::,nt!.ec( 5.,im~ii,i1 '6-:X,;ie.c: Iii> •1% er .-,;;n'!l «~.,c:cd ,ho~l<i b,. k111-¼d wittl ,.;tn..r sE!.1 o'. TEM, ·r:•,e 11t,_rJ., t~~-! ;'!-~'.'fl: r.:lQJ::-<:1- ,.n.v,o ~-"' ~.'e!rr,<. 4 t~'i,d. T1'1>:< re:p<>i_! m~; ""'I} e,e repr,;~.:~'='(I h"i p,·:._rtv.-i!:h W!':t"~ ;;ipp/011:;.\ !:ly 1::.M5L 1'h= a.lx>V<,'c=l .:"'-'"t";<.>t et> ~,-i,tl i;.!>' l~ ,:::;-,11• 10 c:~!(;, ;;;a.}.;!1,•iT.

<md<:t:,iffn~r>t by dVLAP nor l!~)' a11.::n:;y c,fti'-'.' v,i~e:d Stat~ Go.-,,. ,,rn,,.,t Att 'N\ILAP" ,,.tic-11:6- w1~n NV~.:,;, !n:g::i ,111.is: =~•t.::in .;.t 1,r,i:;it-:1rs: <-l,1r-.:,c1,~,,.

W !;2 valid. Le:bS:'i>~O<)' l'l .'Nt N:sp,;irielbl<l' br th"' "~cs;ri:;c:y of t,,%lt!o wrli,f) ii!i(W~S1ed to phy:ai<-'e:ill} '11!-tR;">J.t<> :,l!ll ti~.:ily'u la,'<;'r1d fll!'.!l1:,l11$.

Jl..nal~r- :xrb:'rn-~ Py 8'11& in(li$n;,,p,;,li~ (NVL~P Ait ,;NJ ;;l,;'~#JOO~ $(!.i'.!, )

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

6330 E. dtii St ... Suite 13J JnditDtapolis1 IN 4625{) PhOII<-' (317) 570-5892 Fa.,: (317) 570,589

'i-JV\--3

Attn.: Paul Nas,of Environo1nics,, ln-c.

S 1 SO North 16th Str~et SulteA-111 Pho,,nix, AL 85016

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99 I 20

~---------------------------, I POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

I Perto,rned by EPA 600/R-93/11 S Method'

Project: ll.lKE A.F,B. • BLDG 1 l8J '

SAMPLe

TREATMENT

AS!IE§TOS @NAS[';ESTQ§

LOCATION APPEAR.4NCE

u\thile

N:J!"t-F!Pro~t;

Hoh'l()geneaus

% TYPE

None D>!'i.acted

FIBROUS ¾ NONRBROU

5% CeHuJose

5% Gla.l:iS

90% Other

1;i1.11\din9 1:.): 1:3,S3 Serial Code:UJKE .t•.,F.B.

1Whlte I Non-Pi;.Wnus

5% Celiubse

! Hi:imcgenecus

\WMe

• Nor.~Ffbrous

I HomogeneoJS

1wr,t• -!crushed None Dete-cted 1DD% Other i Non-FibroUs I Ht1rr:ogenec!.is

;white l Fibrous I Homog@rieous

__ I __

Nme D~tected iWhlt@

! Non-Flbrous j Homoge.nMus

C,:,m!':i.int:r FtY ~i! obvkivs:y heteroget1sous s~rnp!es easily !aa~r2ted into subssmp!es, ·aM fc:; !;;i.yered samples. eact' cDrnpoMnt :s am'll':,'ZBd s,;ipa,rntei'{. AIM, 'ti of Li!'.;t.rs-" refers to m:mber or sepi,:.'.!clb1ei aub!5a:'r\ples.

~ tJY ::.o.a.mple5 ti1'so 3,ri,alyzect 'r;j ELAP ·19B,-.1 Metnod

1\ote. "SAMPLE~-6-S NOT R~C:il\/ED'"

~1ll· , J 1~i.{, .

-v/,/ ,,_ / /"./ //r··/

1/ iii Seale Analyst S!ginrory

Q,,.c;:airr,6R>_ Pt,M h:a:; boon Kll'-'"'"" b ,,-,ia,, ~'SW~tt;:< ',n :. ~f>l9.II p;,i-cealt:age OT S!iilJ"lpl.::s Which -c0·pl\i>in .:,~b!>e,';o/;, Ti-«__,:; ~.,:gsi:.1-,.;. l:>l,.!-~ ,,,_tcJ!t~ <.>~nri,:e· be g~ar~hre-&d. !;i;;;rnple::; repcr.0<111,::. -=1% -::r m,r/1!' .;i.:et.:ctcd =~o,JKI M ~~:.k,-~ wi\~ ,a,l~i'l,:rS!:.M Qt TEM rr~ ::abc,v1, ti,st r~por. r,,;~roo,,nty 10 t/"le- !t!Wl'l J ket""1. TH:- r.,p,,,-t rn.w ,;,,,ly b .. repr::><lu® ;,, F?"' ,vitt•, WTl~11 ;i.r;ipr~I fyE!,.4$'~. Toi:, >,!!J,;•,i,, ·i;e::;;t ml16t Mt l::rt •..t~'l:6 /)lo' t.'li;. l:.~!!!rt\k ~:.-.Im p·,:dUL-!

-J1_-.r.;a:\\ent br NV LAP ruY ;;my ;ii.g-e,f!Oy (';{;h.i t_hitz:d 5\~s, ::i~v,:r1S!\1!1rlt. A!l "NVL<l.P" Ji;l)Qrt'< ,,,;ff, Nl/1.AP logo IT,\l>)t ctn;i;.tr. ;i._': !~.et Oil'! :;i:,,-,a,:b'.,, tc b:e ~at<1. L;.i:o•••~Y Ii r,,:,t '=fl""~b/.,:t,rthra~.:curacy ~r 'BWlr; ,t.-f!en feil\11)$\11,d 10 ,::,h.Y!!lcat!y :.cp;,:;;ib:, l:I',•' ~n<tly,:,:, 11!.l'"''"'l ,;i:;mp!~~ i;,n~')~i~ per(i;:,r,r,<i<d by Eh!Sl 1,,q;~napoU:: /f-NLAP Air:r-d Qui!: ;f.;>OCiE<I..O,)

E~MSL Anll(Vtical, Inc.

Am1.; Paul Nassof Environomlcs, Int.

51 50 North 16th So·eet Sulte A· 111 Phoenlx, AZ 85016 t:.M'.:iL

6330 Jt. fstA &, salt, 152 Indianapqlis1 IN 46250

Phone; (317) 510-58.9J Fa:c: (3J ~J 570-589·

Monday, January 18, 1999

Ref Number: IN99120

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY (PLM)

Pertormed by El'A 6001R·93/116 Method'

Pro)<1ct: LU KE A. f. B. • BLDG ll ll'J

WCAT/ON APPl!ARANCE

SA/,!PLE

TR1'ATME1'fT

Building ID: 1383 Seri-a:lCotie:LUKE A,f.B.

NON4SBE;STQ§

% f'JBR01.JS ¾ NONFIBRO

C.:imments: F,~F a.11 obviously reterogeneous s,:;ir:,ple~ e-J.sHy c5Ap,1_rated lnto ;;;ub~a1np!eca1 arid for .layered sample~. ~a-en 00rnpor,ent is a11ai}'2e'..i ~epa~sr.Qly Atso. "ft, Layer~/' refer::; to n,;mber o1 separable .';il..lbsamples.

~ NY s.:irnple<:,. also analyzed by E~AP ·198--1 MethM

No'nl: "'SAMPLES 15-1-6-3 NOT RGCE1\JE0*

-414~~-

/ Analyst "· ;;:j;;J

01:.ct:aiml(ln•· P-:..M t•:i•_ l:""'" \<,r.cwr, h 1\'1112: ;:,50..,;ws ir & $ffl;;C! ;::i1n;,;,nt"l:II" ,;,.' ""mf,~ wr,i~r. ~nhlt1 llSO.::,w;i,, 7,,,_~ '½g.i~vc ?LM ,.,.,,.~ts n ... r.ne:>t \'!,), !,1~r,.r,t.3!l'd. S::o.r"~}'= r!!l),;rts:d ""' .;;f:,,;, or ::ot,J:> ;:!et.,;:t~ s:~oUlt: bit t~(l V.li\h el\l'.'1r :SE!M Qr 1'E!V. T~a. ;m,:,.,,,, ~:, .. ;,,;ir!r,ef"!c,,£ only !o !/If< i~m~ !} t!,$'c>j;J T'iil!- f'!'porl rM}' orly\::,, f(>prcc:c•JJSd fr• p,:f;; '!1/llh ,i,nn:,ri "?pr04/ by EM~. n,,., ;,b,:;,,·.,, ti.,;t nus\ hr,,t: ~ u,~""-~ by\/',,; i;,h:,;ot tc, ,:,:>1:,,,., p(¢(",,ct s110CBerr'lOC\t byNVL I;,P ~or :i'.lY .ig"nC'f 01 :h,:, Unit.id. Sb;;:'l'" Gci~emment.. All ''NVLAP" ,..,poi'",;,%'<.'! NVU,P loi;)t, mu,rt 0C;n+.;i;in d li,lil~t ,:ma, >,,'1,n.1~.,~ \o Pt ..-.,lici. L<;J:;:;ci<:<ty a; no':: r8ollp01'1Sibi~l'l;t ffill <>,0N'""Y of r,.s;ult~ Wl'IA!\ <"9<1tl,;,:;l.!>d lD l)hy5i-.:;i.s/ly ~?.ra!''° ,;r,d \!;I'~\.:<> ;-a~,er,;:d ,:;a;,,r.\~,:;.

An:ily'Sis, p!!m:l;rn.-.J bl' EMl:5l !r.cllaM.pc:1\,i iNVC.AP Air .;,r.d BlllK #;,:(}Y;,!ll)-0, j

Appendix D Summary of Regulatory Requirements

Appendix D Summary of Regulatory Requirements

This appendix provides a summary of building owner and manager requirements under various asbestos regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect building occupants and employees from exposure to asbestos.

Survey Requirements

Prior to any renovation activity, OSHA and EPA regulations require that a complete asbestos survey be performed to determine if asbestos is present in any suspect asbestos containing material that will be present in the construction or work area. This survey report addresses accessible materials. It is recommended that prior to renovation activites, inaccessible areas that could contain asbestos materials be inspected.

Notification and Posting Requirements

Regulatory agencies feel that the building owner or manager should be responsible for knowing and communicating the locations of asbestos in their buildings to building employees, outside contractors and tenants to prevent exposure to asbestos.

OSHA requires building employees, outside contractors, vendors and construction contractors bidding on or performing work in buildings to be provided with notification regarding asbestos containing materials in their work areas. OSHA also requires that asbestos warning signs be posted in mechanical rooms.

Removal Requirements

Under EPA regulations, asbestos containing materials must be properly removed by licensed asbestos abatement contractors prior to renovation or demolition activities that would disturb friable materials or cause non-friable materials to become friable and a regulated material.

Repair of Damaged Materials and Cleanup of Debris

OSHA requires that asbestos containing debris be immediately cleaned up. It is recommended that damaged materials that may release fibers be repaired as soon as possible to prevent fiber release and potential exposures.

Training Requirements

OSHA requires employers whose employees are likely to or required to disturb asbestos to receive an asbestos training course. Refresher training is required to be provided annually.

Appendix E Drawings Indicating Asbestos Sample Locations

Appendix F Drawings Indicating Sampling Locations

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SCALE IN FEET

1051 2

N

N

SCALE IN FEET

1051 2

ROOF

ROOF

EXT

EMPTY

ER

1383-CA-1-1 (BLD )

1383-CA-1-2 (BLD )

1383-CA-1-3 (BLD )

1383-CT-2-1 (BLD )

1383-CT-2-2 (BLD )

1383-CT-2-3 (BLD )

1383-BA-3-1 (BLD )

1383-BA-3-2 (BLD )

1383-BA-3-3 (BLD )

1383-JW-4-1 (BLD )

1383-JW-4-2 (BLD )

1383-JW-4-3 (BLD )

1383-DC-5-1 (BLD )

1383-DC-5-2 (BLD )

1383-DC-5-3 (BLD )

1383-TC-6-1 (BLD )

1383-TC-6-2 (BLD )

1383-TC-6-3 (BLD )

1383-FL-7-1 (BLD )

1383-FL-7-2 (BLD )

1383-FL-7-3 (BLD )

1383-CU-8-1 (BLD )

1383-CU-8-2 (BLD )

1383-CU-8-3 (BLD )

NACM

LUKE AIR FORCE BASE

BLDG I.D.

REVISIONS

DWG: B1383.DWG

DWG#

DRAWN BY:

REVIEWED BY:

SCALE:

DATE:07-06-99

TEJ

KEN

NTS

ASBESTOS: BUILDING #1383