Attachment__5_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 92 KB Posted

Attached to
SEKI 326438 KNP Hazard Tree Removal Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140PS124R0003
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to RFP 140PS124R0003 for the SEKI Hazardous Tree Mitigation project. The questionnaire requests information from a respondent about a contractor's past performance on a specific contract, including details such as the contractor's role, contract value, performance ratings across various criteria, and the respondent's overall assessment and willingness to award to the contractor again. The questionnaire provides detailed performance rating definitions to assist the respondent in their evaluation. The related federal contract opportunity is for the "SEKI 326438 KNP Hazard Tree Removal" project, which involves hazard tree cleanup for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks following the 2021 KNP Complex Wildfire. The solicitation is being issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SEKI 326438 KNP Hazard Tree Removal, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_140PS124R0003_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
Attachment__7_-_Hazard_Tree_Quantities__Locations__and_Sizes_v4_0_(06_18_2024_)_0004.pdf PDF
Attachment__4_-_Price_Schedule_(06_18_2024)_0004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment__10_-_Performance_Work_Statement_REV7_(06_18_2024)_0004.docx DOCX document
Attachment__11_-_Project_Activity_Levels_(06_18_2024_)_0004.docx DOCX document
Attachment__3_-_Transmittal_Letter_0003.docx DOCX document
Sol_140PS124R0003_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140PS124R0003_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment__3_-_Transmittal_Letter_0002.docx DOCX document
Attachment__10_-_Site_Visit_Map_0002.pdf PDF
B08h_-_Attachment__7_-_Hazard_Tree_Quantities__Locations__and_Sizes_v2_0_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140PS124R0003_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment__8_-_AT_T_Phone_Line_Map.pdf PDF
Attachment__9_-_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment__2_-_Client_Authorization_Letter.docx DOCX document
Attachment__7_-_Hazard_Tree_Quantities__Locations__and_Sizes.pdf PDF
Attachment__1_-_Past_Performance_FACTS_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Sol_140PS124R0003.pdf PDF
Attachment__3_-_Transmittal_Letter.docx DOCX document
Attachment__4_-_Price_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment__6_-_WD_2015-5657_(Rev__19).pdf PDF
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

United States Department of the Interior

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

CONOPS STATEGICS

1849 C Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C., 20240

NPS-ConOps Strategic Page 4 of 4

RFP 140PS124R0003

ATTACHMENT #5

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SEKI Hazardous Tree Mitigation

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

I. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name of Respondent and Role Relative to Contract (Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

Name:

Role:

Agency or Business:

Address:

Telephone No.:

Email address:

II. Please provide the following information on the specific program:

Contractor/Business:

Contract Number:

Program Title and Brief Description:

Contractor’s Role in the Program:

Prime

Subcontractor

Vendor/Supplier

Number of Years:
Basic:

Option:

Competitive Contract:
Yes:

No:

III. General Information about this Contract

Period of Performance of Contract or Effort Beginning Date (mm/yyyy)

Through (mm/yyyy)

Have there been any changes to the original schedule? If yes, please explain.

Original Contract Dollar Value
$
Current Contract Dollar Value
$

IV. The following section will require you to rate the past/present performance of the offeror. Should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation. If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory. To assist you in your evaluation, please use the following definitions:

E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

N/A
U
M
S
V
E

1. Provides experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Hires, trains, and applies a qualified workforce to this effort.

3. Provides effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

4. Quality of records management and reporting.

5. Provides timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

6. Provides accurate and complete reports and documentation in a timely manner.

7. Maintains a viable and effective Safety Program.

8. Demonstrates positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes.

9. Pays subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

10. Submits timely, accurate, and complete invoices.

11. Overall commitment to customer satisfaction.

12. Demonstrates professionalism and courtesy in dealing with customers.

13. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance for this contract?

Additional Comments for 1-13: (please indicate number next to comment)

V. Miscellaneous Questions

15. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.

16. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

17. Describe the contractor’s or companies strong and/or weak points identified during the life of the contract.

18. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

19. Do you feel you “got what you paid for”? Please explain.

20. Additional Remarks.

The comments and information you’ve provided are invaluable to the source selection process. The National Park Service thanks you for taking the time to fill out this questionnaire.

NPS-ConOps Strategic Page 1 of 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104

Preserving unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104

image1.jpeg image2.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .