Attachment__1_-_Past_Performance_FACTS_Sheet.docx
DOCX document 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SEKI 326438 KNP Hazard Tree Removal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140PS124R0003
About this file
This document is a "FACTS Sheet" template for offerors to provide information on their past performance for a federal contract opportunity. The FACTS Sheet requests details such as the company name, contract type and value, period of performance, a description of the relevant work performed, and an assessment of the relevancy of the past contract to the current opportunity. It also includes sections for the offeror to provide information on their utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors and any quality issues or corrective actions taken on the prior contract. The FACTS Sheet is to be submitted as an attachment to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the "SEKI 326438 KNP Hazard Tree Removal" contract opportunity with the Department of the Interior's National Park Service.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
CONOPS STATEGIC
1849 C Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C., 20240
NPS-ConOps Strategics Page 6 of 6
RFP ATTACHMENT #1
Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”
(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR, JOINT VENTURE MEMBER
Request the offeror/joint venture member, if applicable, complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract that reflect performance of services that are similar in scope and size to the current effort. Offeror/joint venture member is requested to provide frank, concise comments regarding technical capability of performing the current effort.
OFFEROR:
1. Name (Company/Division)
(2) Address
(3) CAGE Code
PROGRAM/PROJECT TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER*:
(* If contract listed is a Dept of Defense contract, then attach electronic copy of Performance Work Statement to FACTS Sheet).
Role of the Offeror in Effort: __________ Prime Contractor _________ Subcontractor
Note that the information provided in the FACTS Sheet shall reflect the role that the offeror/joint venture member performed in the effort, i.e. an offeror who performed as a subcontractor shall identify the contract type, dollar value, description, etc. of its subcontract with the prime contractor.
NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:
CONTRACT TYPE(S) – CHECK ALL THAT APPLY
1. Firm Fixed Price ____________________________________
1. Time and Materials ____________________________________
1. Other (Explain) ____________________________________
CONTRACT $ VALUE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your contract $ value and the PRIME’s contract $ value, if known. Describe any changes in dollar value that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the effort or the present, whichever is applicable.)
1. Original Contract Dollar Value:
1. Current Dollar Value:
1. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (includes start and end dates, i.e. Jan 2020– Dec 2023)
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT:
1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.
1. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery, technical quantity and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B above.
RELEVANCY TABLE
The Relevancy Table on the following page will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the Landscape Maintenance Services requirement at National Park Service – National Capital Region (NPS-NCR). Offeror/joint venture member, if applicable, shall only complete column three. Offeror’s/joint venture member’s answers are applicable only to the effort identified in paragraph B. above, not the offeror’s/joint venture member’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. If additional space is needed, please attach a separate sheet to your response (limited to two pages).
RELEVANCY TABLE
Complete with each effort submitted for evaluation. Please follow guidance in paragraph above.)
| Category |
| The Proposed Effort |
Requires:
(DO NOT CHANGE)
Fill-in for the Effort Identified in paragraph B above (Offeror completes) The effort in paragraph B required:
1. Type of contract
| Commercial |
| Circle one |
| Commercial |
| Noncommercial |
2. Requiring activity of contract
| National Park Service |
| Circle all that apply |
| National Park Service |
| Department of Interior |
| other |
3. Contract Requirements
| Felling of designated hazard trees |
| Ref. SOW 1.3 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Pile/loop & scatter slash |
| Ref. SOW 1.4 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Buck & loading boles |
| Ref. SOW 1.5 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Flush cut stumps |
| Ref. SOW 1.6 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Limbing of slash |
| Ref. SOW 1.7 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Erosion control |
| Ref. SOW 1.9 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Repair of damage |
| Ref. SOW 1.10 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Hydraulic mulching |
| Ref. SOW1.11 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Culvert cleaning |
| Ref. SOW 1.12 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Traffic Control |
| Ref. SOW 1.13 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Hauling of logs/biomass |
| Ref. SOW 1.14/1.16 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
| Grind logs for biomass sale |
| Ref. SOW 1.15 |
| Circle one |
| Yes |
| No |
3. If you are small business, or, if you are a large business and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 was NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, by completing the following. That is, when subcontracting possibilities existed on this effort, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? If FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of this effort, address whether or not it was your policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.
| Utilization of Small Business Concerns |
| Small Business |
| Large Business |
No subcontracting possibilities
In compliance
Not in compliance (address why)
4. If you are a large business, identify whether a subcontracting plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, was required by this effort. If one was required, complete the following regarding subcontracting goals and status-to-date. If goals were not met, please explain. This is applicable to large businesses only.
_____ Required
_____ Not Required
| Category |
| Goals |
| Achieved-to-Date |
Small Business
Small Disadvantaged Business
Women-Owned Small Business
HUBZone Small Business
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
HBCU/MI
PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror/joint venture member is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)
| Name and Office Symbol |
| Phone Number |
| 1. Procuring Contracting Officer |
| DSN & Comm |
| Email address |
| 1. Govt Program Manager |
| DSN & Comm |
| Email address |
| 1. Administrative Contracting Officer |
| DSN & Comm |
| Email address |
| 1. Contracting Officer’s Rep (COR) |
| DSN & Comm |
| Email address |
If the offeror or joint venture member (if applicable) is a newly formed (in existence less than (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation) entity who either has no prior contracts or does not possess relevant corporate past performance, but does have key personnel with relevant past performance while employed by another company, specify by name, such key individual(s) who will participate in the proposed effort under this acquisition who also participated in the program identified in B. above, and indicate their contract role. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the previous effort and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.
Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.
Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.
Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's/joint venture member’s ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.
Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous National Park Service procurement. Yes _ No _ . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.
PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
NPS-ConOps Strategics Page 1 of 6
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
Preserving unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 3.104
image1.jpeg image2.jpeg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .