Attachment 4 - Telephone Interview Questionnaire (For Government Use Only).pdf

PDF 329 KB Posted

Attached to
F-22 Low Observable Component Repair Facility (LOCRF) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9123621R2023
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Norfolk

About this file

This document contains a telephone interview questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for construction of a Low Observable Component Repair Facility at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. The contract opportunity involves construction of a 6,735 square meter facility with three low observable critical repair bays, one wash rack bay, shops, administration spaces, and building systems support. The facility must provide secure and climate-controlled space to accomplish specialized maintenance and repair of F-22A stealth aircraft. The construction is expected to be completed within 730 calendar days. The interview questionnaire provides a template for reference checks on contractors being considered for the opportunity and includes questions about past performance on contract type, period of performance, nature of work, technical quality, responsiveness, planning, staffing, schedule compliance, cost management, problems encountered and resolutions.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to F-22 Low Observable Component Repair Facility (LOCRF), newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 7- Revised Small Business Participation Plan.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 14.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Revised Bid Schedule.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 13.pdf PDF
Attch 40 06 61 16 AMENDMENT 09 FEB 22.pdf PDF
Attch 38 LOCRF DRAWINGS AMENDMENT 09FEB2022.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 12.pdf PDF
Attch 39 08 33 23 AMENDMENT 09 FEB 22.pdf PDF
Attch 38 08 81 00 Glazing.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Revised CLIN Schedule.pdf PDF
Attch 35 32 01 19.61 SEALING OF JOINTS IN RIGID PAVEMENT.pdf PDF
Attch 25 01 11 00 Appendix to 01 11 00 Government Furnished Equipment.pdf PDF
Attch 24 P 601 PLUMBING SCHEDULES.pdf PDF
Attch 23 A 533 ROOF DETAILS.pdf PDF
Attch 22 A 011 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE METALS TECH and SHOPS.pdf PDF
Attch 36 32 13 14.13 CONCRETE PAVING FOR AIRFIELDS AND OTHER HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENTS.pdf PDF
Attch 33 10 56 26.13 MOBILE STORAGE SHELVING UNITS (MECHANICALLY-ASSISTED).pdf PDF
Attch 32 09 97 13.27 HIGH PERFORMANCE COATING FOR STEEL STRUCTURES.pdf PDF
Attch 31 09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS.pdf PDF
Attch 30 08 34 16 CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR DOORS.pdf PDF
Attch 27 01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS.pdf PDF
Attch 26 01 14 00 WORK RESTRICTIONS.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 LOCRF Amendment 11.pdf PDF
Attch 29 06 61 16 SOLID SURFACE FABRICATIONS.pdf PDF
Attch 21 01FEB2022 AMENDMENT_DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 10.pdf PDF
Site Visit 10 January.pdf PDF
Attachment 20 LOCRF RTA Specifications.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 9.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 LOCRF RTA SID PACKAGE.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 LOCRF RTA DWGS PART 2 OF 3.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 LOCRF RTA FF and E PACKAGE.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 LOCRF RTA DWGS PART 3 OF 3.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 LOCRF RTA AF Sust Scoresheet GP vFeb2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attch 13- LOCRF 20Oct21 Blended Drawings Part 3 of 3.pdf PDF
Attch 10- LOCRF 20Oct21 Blended Drawings Part 1 of 3.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 8.pdf PDF
Attch 12- LOCRF 20Oct21 Blended Specifications.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 Amendment 6.pdf PDF
W9123621R2023 LOCRF Amend 5.pdf PDF
A.07.24 - Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Attch 12 - LOCRF 100 Specification Part 1 of 1.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Small Business Participation Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Small Business Subcontracting Record.pdf PDF
Attch 10 - LOCRF 100 Dwgs Part 1 of 2.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Proposal Data Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Letter of Commitment Sample.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Langley Environmental Management Special Conditions.pdf PDF
Solicitation W9123621R2023.pdf PDF
Show all 50

F-22 Low Observable Component Repair Facility (LOCRF) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

F-22 LOCRF Langley AFB, VA

W91236-21-R-2023

ATTACHMENT 4

TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

(To Be Used by the Government to Check References)

Contractor: Contract No.:

Subcontract No. (if applicable):

POC: Title:

(Name) (Title)

(Agency, Telephone No., Email & Facsimile No.)

If conducting a telephone interview:

“Hello, I am . I am calling in reference to Contract with a company called . My questions will pertain to the contractor’s record of past, which is defined as within the past five years, and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. A summary of this discussion may be sent to you for your records. The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective

DATA QUESTIONS

Contract Type: Period of Performance: .

(i.e., FFP, Cost Plus, etc.)

Total Contract Amount:

Nature and extent of the effort (i.e. scope of the effort performed by the contractor, type of tasks involved, and types of personnel (skills/expertise) utilized):

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

A. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of overall technical quality? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

F-22 LOCRF Langley AFB, VA

W91236-21-R-2023

B. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of its responsiveness to changes in technical direction? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

C. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of effectiveness/thoroughness in planning his operations? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

D. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of obtaining and retaining well qualified managers and craftsman?

(Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

E. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of ensuring his subcontractors provided adequate staffing? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

F. How was the contractor’s performance in terms of meeting milestones/schedules and reporting requirements and its responsiveness to changing schedules and priorities? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

G. How was the contractor’s performance in regard to financial/cost management and reporting? (Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable):

H. Were there any cost overruns incurred under the contract? (Yes/No)

1. If Yes, were the overruns due to the fault of the contractor? (Yes/No)

2. If Yes, what was the magnitude (% of increase) and cause of the overrun(s)?

I. When Contractor encountered problems, did he provide recommended solutions for them? (Yes/No):

J: Would you choose to work with the contractor again if given the opportunity? (Yes/No):

K. Did the contractor’s quality control organization find and correct most deficiencies? (Yes/No):

L. With respect to the contractor’s performance under this contract, are there any additional comments you wish to make that were not addressed above?

Name of SSEB Member conducting the interview:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .