Attachment 3 - CWMD OSDChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 PPQ.pdf
PDF 201 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70RWMD24R00000001
About this file
This document includes a request for proposal and past performance questionnaire for chemical preparedness program support services. The Department of Homeland Security seeks to award an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Operations Support Directorate Chemical Preparedness program assistance. Interested offerors must submit technical and price proposals by March 12, 2024. References are required to complete past performance questionnaires assessing offerors' quality, timeliness, business relations, cost control, and customer satisfaction on relevant prior contracts. Ratings and comments are mandatory for consideration.
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
70RWMD24R0000001 CWMD OSD ChemPREP – Attachment 3 Past Performance
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Completed questionnaires shall be received no later than 10:00 AM ET on March 12, 2024.
Please submit questionnaires directly to:
William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov , marcus.datcher@hq.dhs.gov and sara.toni@hq.dhs.gov please list the RFP # “70RWMD24R00000001 Past Performance” in the subject line.
Points of Contact regarding this questionnaire:
William B. Grimm Marcus Datcher Sara Toni Contracting Officer Contract Specialist Contract Specialist William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov Marcus.Datcher@hq.dhs.gov Sara.Toni@hq.dhs.gov
Name of Prime Contractor submitting proposal in response to RFP # 70RWMD24R00000001:
CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Program/Project Title:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from contractor name cited above):
Contract Number/Task Order Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
mailto:William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov mailto:marcus.datcher@hq.dhs.gov mailto:sara.toni@hq.dhs.gov mailto:William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov mailto:Marcus.Datcher@hq.dhs.gov mailto:Sara.Toni@hq.dhs.gov
General description of products/services required under the contract:
RATINGS
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some moderate problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
1. Compliance of products, services, documents, and related deliverables with contract requirements:
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Good
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
2. Accuracy and quality of reports and deliverables:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
6. Overall quality of product/service:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Reliability:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
2. Responsive to technical direction:
70RWMD20Q00000004 SSD A&AS – Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire
□ Good
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
BUSINESS RELATIONS:
1. Effectiveness of management, including managing their subcontractors:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
4. Notification of problems:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
5. Flexibility:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
COST CONTROL:
1. Current, accurate and complete billings:
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Good
□ Acceptable
2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
3. Cost efficiencies:
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Good
□ Acceptable
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction of Contractor Management Personnel:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
2. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction of Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel:
□ Good
□ Acceptable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Please provide any other relevant performance information.)
Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Role on the subject contract:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
Signature of Respondent Date
| Name of Prime Contractor submitting proposal in response to RFP # 70RWMD24R00000001: |
| RATINGS |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| □ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Please provide any other relevant performance information.) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .