About this file

This document includes a request for proposal and past performance questionnaire for chemical preparedness program support services. The Department of Homeland Security seeks to award an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Operations Support Directorate Chemical Preparedness program assistance. Interested offerors must submit technical and price proposals by March 12, 2024. References are required to complete past performance questionnaires assessing offerors' quality, timeliness, business relations, cost control, and customer satisfaction on relevant prior contracts. Ratings and comments are mandatory for consideration.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 1 Revised SOW 70RWMD24R00000001 22Mar24_Amendment 004.pdf PDF
70RWMD24R00000001 Amendment 004 SF 1449 RFP Conformed Copy 22March24.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Revised CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R0000001 Questions and Answers 22 March 2024.pdf PDF
Amendment 004 RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF30 22 March.pdf PDF
70RWMD24R00000001 Amendment 003 SF 1449 RFP Conformed Copy 15March24.pdf PDF
Amendment 003 RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Revised CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R0000001 Questions and Answers 15 March 2024.pdf PDF
RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF1449 and Continuation Pages Amendment 002 Conformed 13 March 2024 FE_.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 Questions and Answers 13 March 2024.pdf PDF
Amendment 002 RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R00000001002 PPQ -word version.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 SOW 70RWMD24R00000001 Amendment 001 11 March 2024_FE.pdf PDF
DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office Strategy 2020-2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 SOW 70RWMD24R00000001 24JAN24.pdf PDF
DHS Writing Style Guide (December 2020July 2014).pdf PDF
DHS Chemical Defense Strategy (December 2019).pdf PDF
National Strategy for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Terrorism (December 2018).pdf PDF
CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R0000001 Questions and Answers 11 March 2024.pdf PDF
Amendment 001 RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF30.pdf PDF
FEMA_Key Planning Factors and Considerations for Response to Recovery from a Chemical Incident_June 2022.pdf PDF
DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2020 (January 2020).pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 PPQ -word version.docx DOCX document
RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 SF1449 and Continuation Pages Amendment 001 Conformed 11 March 2024 FE_.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 IDIQ Pricing Table v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Response Risk Assessment Process for Chemical Incidents (September 2018).pdf PDF
DHS Lexicon_Terms and Definitions-2016 Edition.pdf PDF
Nassau County TTX -Decision-Making Analysis (November 2015).pdf PDF
DHS Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction State Local Tribal and Territorial Engagement Strategy FY 2022- 2025 (Septembe.pdf PDF
DHS Strategic Framework for Countering Terrorism and Targeted Violence (September 2019).pdf PDF
70RWMD24R00000001 SF1449 and Continuation Pages.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - CWMD OSD ChemPREP RFP 70RWMD24R0000001 Questions Template (1) (1).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 -RFP 70RWMD24R00000001 IDIQ Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 SOW 70RWMD24R00000001 24JAN24.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

70RWMD24R0000001 CWMD OSD ChemPREP – Attachment 3 Past Performance

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Completed questionnaires shall be received no later than 10:00 AM ET on March 12, 2024.

Please submit questionnaires directly to:

William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov , marcus.datcher@hq.dhs.gov and sara.toni@hq.dhs.gov please list the RFP # “70RWMD24R00000001 Past Performance” in the subject line.

Points of Contact regarding this questionnaire:

William B. Grimm Marcus Datcher Sara Toni Contracting Officer Contract Specialist Contract Specialist William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov Marcus.Datcher@hq.dhs.gov Sara.Toni@hq.dhs.gov

Name of Prime Contractor submitting proposal in response to RFP # 70RWMD24R00000001:

CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Program/Project Title:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from contractor name cited above):

Contract Number/Task Order Number:

Contract Type:

Period of Performance:

mailto:William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov mailto:marcus.datcher@hq.dhs.gov mailto:sara.toni@hq.dhs.gov mailto:William.Grimm@hq.dhs.gov mailto:Marcus.Datcher@hq.dhs.gov mailto:Sara.Toni@hq.dhs.gov

General description of products/services required under the contract:

RATINGS

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some moderate problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

1. Compliance of products, services, documents, and related deliverables with contract requirements:

□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Good

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

2. Accuracy and quality of reports and deliverables:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

6. Overall quality of product/service:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Reliability:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

2. Responsive to technical direction:

70RWMD20Q00000004 SSD A&AS – Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire

□ Good

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

BUSINESS RELATIONS:

1. Effectiveness of management, including managing their subcontractors:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

3. Responsive to contract requirements:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

4. Notification of problems:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

5. Flexibility:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

6. Pro-active vs. reactive:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

COST CONTROL:

1. Current, accurate and complete billings:

□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Good

□ Acceptable

2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

3. Cost efficiencies:

□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

□ Good

□ Acceptable

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

1. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction of Contractor Management Personnel:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

2. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction of Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel:

□ Good

□ Acceptable

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Please provide any other relevant performance information.)

Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Role on the subject contract:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

Signature of Respondent Date

Name of Prime Contractor submitting proposal in response to RFP # 70RWMD24R00000001:
RATINGS
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
□ Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Please provide any other relevant performance information.)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .