The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Past Performance Questionnaire: Instructions This questionnaire follows the format of Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) guidelines for ‘Non-Systems.’ The data fields included on the attached form have the same character limitations that are set in CPARS.
The CPAR(s) of record for the contract citations identified on the Contract Data Matrix (CDM) finalized during the period of performance defined as ‘recent’ will be used to assess the quality of the offeror’s performance. In the event the contract citation does not have a CPAR of record, questionnaires will be issued by the GOVERNMENT to the points of contact (References) indentified in columns “M” and “N” of the CDM.
PPQ Form Part 1 is to be completed by the offeror; the Government will not complete any section of Part 1. It is encumbent upon the offeror to ensure data provided in Part 1 is complete and accurate. Incomplete / inaccurate data will be a reflection of the offeror’s quality of products and services.
PPQ Form Part 2 will be completed by the evaluator(s) (i.e., references identified in columns “M” and “N”).
The notional process that may be used by the government for processing of CPAR / Past Performance Questionnaire data is shown in the following figure.
The PPQ form is built in Micrsoft Word; after enabling content, please ensure you are able to open, use, save and print the data before completing.
H95001-15-R-0001 Attachment L07
Part 1: Contract Data [to be completed by offeror] We are competing for Solicitation #H95001-15-R-0001 as a:
| |_| | Prime Contractor |
| |_| | Subcontractor to: |
This past performance evaluation is for Attachment L-04 Contract Data Matrix Reference Number:
Team / CDM # Page 2 Company
| 1.1 | Company Name: | | |
| 1.2 | Contract Number: | | |
| 1.3 | Contract Title: | | |
| 1.4 | Contract Data: | | |
| 1.4.1 | PSC: | | |
| 1.4.2 | NAICS Code: | | |
| 1.4.3 | Period of Performance (PoP): | Start: | Click here to enter a date. |
| | End: | Click here to enter a date. |
| 1.4.4 | Value / Funding of Prime (or Subcontract if applicable) Contract associated with | | |
PoP cited in section 1.4.3:
| Value ($M): | | | | | | |
| Funding ($M): | | | | | | |
| 1.4.5 | Contract Type(s): | |_| | CPIF | |_| | CPAF | |_| | CPFF |
| (check all that apply) | |_| | FPIF | |_| | FPP | | | |
| Other: | | | | | | | |
| 1.4.6 | Place(s) of Performance: | | | | | | |
1.4.7 Total Number of Delivery / Task Orders:
| 1.4.8 | SB Subcontracting Plan: | |_| | Yes | |_| | No |
| 1.4.9 | CPAR Assessments? | |_| | Yes | |_| | No |
| 1.5 | Contract Effort Description (limited to 5,500 characters): | | | | |
Enter description of the contract or task order; this section is limited to 5,500 characters (consistent with CPAR limitations).
H95001-15-R-0001 Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Part 2: Performance Assessment [to be completed by past performance reference]
| 2.1 | Do you agree with the data submitted under Part 1 of this questionnaire? | | |
| |_| | Yes | |_| | No; please explain: |
2.2 Please use the following definitions when evaluating the contractor’s performance under Sections 2.2.1 – 2.2.14.
Table PP-1. Evaluation Rating Definitions
| E |
| Exceptional |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VG |
| Very Good |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory |
| M |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| NA |
| Not Applicable |
| Unable to provide a rating |
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by checking the appropriate block using the scale defined in table PP-1. Please provide exemplifying comments to assist the past performance assessment team determine quality of the contractor’s performance.
Rating
| Evaluation Areas |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| 2.2.1 | Technical (Quality of Product) |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.1a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.2 | Product Performance |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.2a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.3 | Systems Engineering |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.3a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.4 | Software Engineering |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.4a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.5 | Logistic Support/Sustainment |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.5a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.6 | Product Assurance |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.6a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.7 | Other Technical Performance |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.7a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.8 | Schedule |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.8a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.9 | Cost Control |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.9a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.10 | Management |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.10a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.11 | Management Responsiveness |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.11a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.12 | Subcontract Management |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.12a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.13 | Program & Other Management |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.13a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.2.14 | Utilization of Small Business |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| |_| | |
| 2.2.14a | Comments / Discussion |
| Enter any comments you may have. | |
| 2.3 | Has any ‘marginal’ or ‘unsatisfactory’ performance rating identified above been shared with the contractor? | | | | | | | | |
| |_| | Yes | Method of communication was: | |_| | Written | |_| | Oral | | | |
| |_| | No | | | | | | | | |
| 2.4 | Government Contracts ONLY: Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? | | | | | | | | |
| |_| | No | |_| | Yes* | |_| | Default | |_| | Convenience | |_| | Pending Terminations |
*If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
| 2.5 | Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? | | |
| |_| | No | |_| | Yes: please explain |
2.6 Prepared / Submitted by:
2.7 Do you have any comments / questions you would like to sure with the acquisition team?
| 2.8 | Would you like to discuss any part of your assessment with the IRES Past Performance Evaluation Team? | |
| |_| | Yes, please call me | Enter the best phone number and time to contact you |
Thank you for your assistance, we appreciate your time and cooperation.
image1.png