ATCH 8 _ Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

ATTACHMENT 9 - Past Performance Questionnaire

FA441825Q0043

30 July, 2025

Memorandum for Prospective Evaluators

From: 628 Contracting Squadron 101 E. Hill Blvd Joint Base Charleston, SC 29404

1) The 628th Contracting Squadron, Joint Base Charleston, SC is in the process of selecting a contractor for an ongoing service requirement for Right of Way Tree Trimming and Land Management located at Joint Base Charleston, SC

2) One of the considerations in quote evaluation is verification of the Offeror’s past performance on contracts which reflect the Offeror’s ability to perform the proposed effort. We depend on information received from Agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror’s performance on those contracts.

3) Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire by indicating your rating and providing comments wherever applicable. For any ratings above or below satisfactory, please explain how the contractor either exceeded or failed to meet your requirement and attach it to your response. This can be a copy of a performance evaluation, discrepancy report, or other documentation. Once complete, please sign the document in the space provided.

4) Prospective offerors may be contacted regarding questions or concerns identified. However, the individual’s name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed.

5) Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated and is critical to our evaluation.

Please return the completed questionnaire as soon as possible but NLT 4:00 PM EST on 5 September , 2025 to Morgan Hart at morgan.hart.1@us.af.mil and Matthew Michel at matthew.michel@us.af.mil.

6) If you have any questions, please email or call Contract Specialist, Morgan Hart at 843-963-8973. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

Morgan Hart Contract Specialist mailto:morgan.hart.1@us.af.mil mailto:matthew.michel@us.af.mil

Attachment 9: Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The 628th Contracting Squadron at Joint Base Charleston, SC is in the process of competitively seeking a source to provide an ongoing Right of Way Tree Trimming and Land Clearing Service requirement for 628 Civil Engineering Squadron. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this selection. Please return via email no later than 4 pm EST on 5 September 2025 to Morgan Hart; morgan.hart.1@us.af.mil and Matthew Michel;

matt.michel@us.af.mil.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

POC Title:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Requirement:

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

mailto:morgan.hart.1@us.af.mil mailto:matt.michel@us.af.mil

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime Subcontractor

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

Assess how the Contractor: E V S M U NA

Demonstrated the ability to meet work requirements and quality standards for this contract

Completed orders for the requirement on time and within budget

Addressed any quality issues or deficiencies either during the contractor’s service or upon notification of deficiency Was responsive in communications with Government during and after the contract action

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

E V S M U NA

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY Yes No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default, convenience or cause?

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: Date:

Print Name: Title:

Telephone:

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.