Atch 7 - PPQ.pdf

CUI//SP-SSEL

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 1 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

The 6th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force’s 6th Air Refueling Wing is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the MacDill AFB Flooring Services program at MacDill AFB, FL (FA481425R0002).

We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts to gauge their ability to perform on our contract.

The enclosed questionnaire summarizes our areas of interest regarding the Offeror’s performance. To meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data and make a timely selection.

Please complete the questionnaire electronically, sign digitally or manually, and e-mail it to thomas.grove.1@us.af.mil and 6cons.pkm.flight@us.af.mil, or email any questions to those addresses. All responses will be kept confidential in accordance with applicable federal and agency regulations.

We greatly appreciate your assistance and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this acquisition.

X Ljuan Benbow, 2Lt Contracting Officer

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 2 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

Section 1: Contract Identif ication

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Brief Description of Services Provided:

E. Period of Performance

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

F. Contract Dollar Value

G. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

H. Number of flooring installation projects performed:

I. Types of flooring installed

J. Approximate total square footage of all projects:

Less than 50,000sf 50,001 to 250,000 sf 250,0001 to 1M sf Greater than 1M sf

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identif ication

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identif ication

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title (and position if different):

C. Respondent’s phone number / e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 3 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

E. Other suggested points of contact (only if they have more knowledge than respondent):

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided (not required, but very helpful). Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 4 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

Contract Administration/Management E V S M U N/A

A1. Ease of contacting, and responsiveness of, contractor

A2. Responsiveness in providing price quote(s) requested (exclude those of a competitively established due date).

A3. Contractor ability to complete service at the awarded price (excluding pricing changes driven by customer requirement changes).

A4. (If respondent is an Air Force office) Contractor compliance with the Air Force Carpet Program

A5. (If respondent is a US Government customer) Contractor ability to efficiently obtain installation/facility passes.

A6. Compliance with all customer facility (and installation, if applicable), local and environmental rules and regulations.

A7. Promptness and accuracy of invoicing customer.

Project Execution E V S M U N/A

B1. Timeliness of starting project(s)

B2. Timeliness of completing project(s) by the scheduled date (including customer-driven date changes).

B3. Quality of flooring installation.

B4. Providing the appropriate number of skilled laborers to complete the job on time and to quality standards

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 5 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

Project Execution E V S M U N/A

B5. Ability for installing carpet in facilities with furniture present without damage to furniture, installed and existing flooring, or the building.

B5. Ability for removing/storing/replacing furniture without damage to furniture, flooring, or facility(s).

B6. Contractor’s maintenance of the appearance and security of project site.

B7. Performance of debris collection during the project and removal during/after project completion.

B8. Interactions with building occupants at all stages of the project.

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Termination ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I Would ☐ would not ☐ award to him today given that I had a choice.

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please email this completed questionnaire to:

Ljuan.Benbow.1@us.af.mil and 6cons.pkm.flight@us.af.mil mailto:Ljuan.Benbow.1@us.af.mil mailto:6cons.pkm.flight@us.af.mil

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire FA481426Q0014

Page 6 of 6 CUI//SP-SSEL

ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT COMMENTS

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836