Informational_Only_3_-_Engineer's_Garage_Asb_Insp_Rpt.Final.pdf

640 EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TELEPHONE: 801-466-2223 FAX: 801-466-9616 E-MAIL: IHI@IHI-ENV.COM

SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE

PRE-DEMOLITION INSPECTION FOR ASBESTOS AND

UNIVERSAL, HAZARDOUS, AND TOXIC WASTES

USDA Forest Service

Bridger-Teton National Forest Compound Jackson, Wyoming

Building TN807017 Engineer’s Garage

September 5, 2014

Prepared for:

Mr. Kevin Lewis, Project Manager Case, Lowe & Hart, Inc.

2484 Washington Boulevard Ogden, Utah 84401

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

John C. Larson, Utah State Certification No. ASB-0894

AHERA Certification No. 130712

Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager

State of Utah Company Certification No. 22

IHI Project No. AL147459C

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage Table of Contents IHI Environmental Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL147459C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Facility Description

1.2 Scope of Work

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Bulk Sample Collection

2.2 Bulk Sample Analysis

2.3 Bulk Sample Results

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Regulatory Guidance

3.2 Inaccessible Areas/Materials

4.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

TABLES

Table 1: Material Inspection Summary Table 2: Asbestos Material Disposition Summary

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix B: Photographic Log of Materials Sampled Appendix C: Asbestos Sampling Locations (Drawing) Appendix D: Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Inspection Appendix E: Inspector Certifications

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage Executive Summary IHI Environmental

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On August 5, 2014, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the

Engineer’s Garage building located at the USDA Forest Service, Bridger Teton National

Forest Compound, Jackson, Wyoming. Mr. Kevin Lewis, Project Manager for Case, Lowe and Hart, Inc., requested this inspection to identify asbestos-containing material (ACM) and

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes materials that need to be addressed before the building is demolished or renovated. The following ACMs and Universal, Hazardous, and

Toxic Wastes materials were identified during this inspection and assessment.

ACM

Gypsum board wall system (675 square feet)

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes

None

Table 1 in this Asbestos Inspection and Assessment Report contains detailed information about the ACM, and Section 2 (Findings) in the Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Waste

Inspection Report contains detailed information about the Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic

Wastes.

CONCLUSIONS

ACM – IHI recommends that a Wyoming-certified asbestos abatement contractor remove and properly dispose of all the ACM in this building prior to demolition or renovation.

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes – None of the Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic

Wastes materials listed in the inspection scope were identified. No further action is required.

COST ESTIMATES

IHI’s cost estimates to remove the ACM and remaining hazardous materials outlined above are:

ACM (building interior): $1,550

Hazardous Materials: None

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage Executive Summary IHI Environmental

These estimates do not include the costs for asbestos abatement design and management consulting services

The report that follows this Executive Summary should be read in its entirety because it includes important information, such as material descriptions and locations, regulatory requirements, and building specific recommended response actions.

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 1 IHI Environmental

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On August 5, 2014, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the

Engineer’s Garage building located at the USDA Forest Service, Bridger Teton National

Forest Compound, Jackson, Wyoming. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing material were collected by Mr. John Larson (State of Utah, Asbestos Inspector Certification Number

ASB-0894) (AHERA Certification Number 130712). The State of Wyoming has a reciprocal agreement with the State of Utah and honors the same requirements for certification.

1.1 Facility Description

The building is a single-level structure. Building size is approximately 450 square feet.

Construction date is 1946. The construction is wood frame with wood siding. Interior finishes are gypsum board walls and ceiling. The wood floor has no coverings. The roof has wood shingles on a pitched wood substrate with tar felt underlayment. No heating or cooling systems were identified.

1.2 Scope of Work

The objective of this inspection was to locate, identify, quantify, and document the accessible suspect ACM, universal, hazardous and toxic wastes, and to provide a cost estimate for proper removal. The inspection was limited to accessible surfaces, structures, and mechanical systems with minor destructive sampling of wall cavities.

ACM is any material containing more than one percent asbestos, as determined by polarized light microscopy (PLM).

2.0 METHODOLOGY

Suspected ACM was identified and characterized in terms of homogeneous areas. A homogeneous area is defined as a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material.

All suspect ACM was touched to determine its friability. Friable ACM, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 2 IHI Environmental

The inspector photographed each homogeneous area sampled. Photographs are included in

Appendix B of this report.

2.1 Bulk Sample Collection

Bulk samples were collected from accessible homogeneous areas of suspected ACM for subsequent laboratory analysis to determine actual asbestos content. Sampling was generally conducted in a manner that minimized damage and unsightly marks in the building and did not create a health hazard for building occupants or inspectors.

The number of samples collected from each homogeneous area generally followed the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

(AHERA) regulations (see 40 CFR part 763, subpart E), and the Wyoming Department of

Environmental Quality regulations, which generally follow the AHERA guidelines.

Although AHERA regulations do not apply to this property, the AHERA regulations provide the most comprehensive and acceptable guidance for conducting field inspections for ACM.

The AHERA regulations require the inspector to collect between three and seven samples of surfacing materials, depending on the size of the homogeneous area. Likewise, inspectors collect enough samples of thermal system insulation and miscellaneous materials to confidently characterize the material’s composition.

2.2 Bulk Sample Analysis

All bulk samples were analyzed by EMLab P&K, in Phoenix, AZ, using PLM in accordance with the EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA-

600/R-93-116). EMLab P&K is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and

Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP).

2.3 Bulk Sample Results

Table 1 identifies all material sample numbers and locations, the homogeneous area number and description, and the quantity of the material. Appendix A includes the analytical reports provided by the laboratory. Appendix B contains photographs of each homogeneous area of suspect ACM identified during this inspection.

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 3 IHI Environmental

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

The materials identified in Table 2 contain asbestos. As such, disturbance of these materials in Wyoming is regulated by EPA, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, and/or

OSHA and must be removed by a Wyoming-certified asbestos abatement contractor prior to the start of any renovation or demolition activities that will disturb them. Table 2 includes the recommended response action.

3.1 Regulatory Guidance

The Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality regulations define ACM as a material containing more than one percent of asbestos, as determined by PLM. All three agencies regulate ACM in Wyoming, but only if the material contains more than 1 percent asbestos. If a material contains less than 1 percent, the EPA does not regulate removal or disposal.

However, activities involving materials containing less than 1 percent asbestos are regulated by OSHA.

The OSHA construction regulation pertaining to asbestos (29 CFR 1926.1101) indicates that any asbestos work – including work with materials containing between zero and 1 percent asbestos – that has the potential of producing airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the permissible exposure limit (PEL) must be performed applying specific precautions outlined in the regulation.

3.2 Inaccessible Areas/Materials

Suspect materials that were hidden or inaccessible may not have been characterized by this inspection. Therefore, any material not identified in this report as having been tested should be treated as suspect ACM until it has been sampled by a Wyoming-certified inspector and analyzed by an accredited laboratory applying EPA methods.

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 4 IHI Environmental

4.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

This project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by industrial hygiene consultants performing similar services.

The procedures used in this investigation attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time, and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all hazardous materials have been identified and fully evaluated. IHI’s professional opinions are based in part on the interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at non-sampled locations. IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records.

Furthermore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client’s needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action.

Table 1

Material Inspection Summary

Material Sample #

Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C)

47459AC-1

M001: Wall system – gypsum board, tape and joint compound – throughout the building

<1% Chrysotile (joint compound)

Composite by point count

None detected ~675 square feet

Northwest corner

47459C-2 <1% Chrysotile (joint compound)

Northeast corner

47459C-3 <1% Chrysotile (joint compound)

Southwest corner

47459C-4 M002: Ceiling tile – 12” with random holes with tan matrix – entire ceiling None detected ~450 square feet Center east area, at damaged area

47459C-5 M002A: Ceiling tile adhesive – dark brown – entire ceiling None detected ~450 square feet Center east area, at damaged area

47459C-6 M003: Insulation – brown tar paper with brown insulation – throughout walls and attic space None detected ~675 square feet North wall, east end

47459C-7

M004: Window glazing – white – all windows

None detected

5 units

East window

47459C-9 None detected East window

47459C-10 None detected East window

47459C-8 M005: Tar paper – black – throughout roof under wood shingles None detected ~500 square feet Roof, southwest corner

Table 2

Asbestos Material Disposition Summary

Homogeneous Area Number Quantity & Substrate

Assessment Category

& Damage

Disturbance Potential

& Accessibility Recommended

Response Actions Abatement

Cost M001 ~675 Sq. Ft. - Framework X Low / Continuous 3 ~$1,550

Damage Assessment Categories 1-Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM 2-Damaged friable surfacing ACM 3-Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM 4-Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM 5-ACM with potential for damage 6-ACM with potential for significant damage 7-Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspect ACM X-Not applicable (non-friable surfacing or miscellaneous material)

Recommended Response Actions 1-Regulated ACM (EPA, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, and OSHA) – Repair or remove immediately 2-Regulated ACM (EPA, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, and OSHA) – Remove prior to disturbance 3-Regulated asbestos material (OSHA only) – Remove prior to disturbance

Appendix A

Laboratory Analytical Reports

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Renee Luna

Report for:

Mr. John Larson IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City 640 E. Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84106

Regarding: Project: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

EML ID: 1246140

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116: 08-15-2014

Service SOPs: Asbestos-EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (EPA-600/M4-82-020 (SOP 01267))

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 1 of 5Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

EMLab P&K 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.com Client: IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City C/O: Mr. John Larson Re: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

Date of Sampling: 08-05-2014 Date of Receipt: 08-12-2014 Date of Report: 08-15-2014

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Total Samples Submitted: 10 Total Samples Analysed: 10

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0

Location: 1, 47459C-1 Wall System Lab ID-Version‡: 5671058-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Drywall with Brown Paper ND

Off-White Joint Compound < 1% Chrysotile Cream Tape ND

Off-White Compound < 1% Chrysotile Composite Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Asbestos

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Comments: Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP. This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines.

Location: 2, 47459C-2 Wall System Lab ID-Version‡: 5671059-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Drywall with Brown Paper ND

Off-White Joint Compound < 1% Chrysotile Cream Tape ND

Off-White Texture with Multilayered Paint < 1% Chrysotile Composite Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Asbestos

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Comments: Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP. This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines.

Location: 3, 47459C-3 Wall System Lab ID-Version‡: 5671060-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Drywall with Brown Paper and Green Paint ND

Off-White Joint Compound < 1% Chrysotile Cream Tape ND

Off-White Texture with Multilayered Paint < 1% Chrysotile Composite Asbestos Fibrous Content: < 1% Asbestos

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 15% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Poor

Comments: Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP. This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines.

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 2 of 5Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.com Client: IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City C/O: Mr. John Larson Re: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

Date of Sampling: 08-05-2014 Date of Receipt: 08-12-2014 Date of Report: 08-15-2014

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 4, 47459C-4 Ceiling Tile Lab ID-Version‡: 5671061-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Ceiling Tile with White Surface ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 95% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 3 of 5Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.com Client: IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City C/O: Mr. John Larson Re: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

Date of Sampling: 08-05-2014 Date of Receipt: 08-12-2014 Date of Report: 08-15-2014

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 5, 47459C-5 Adhesive Lab ID-Version‡: 5671062-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Adhesive ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 6, 47459C-6 Tar Paper Lab ID-Version‡: 5671063-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Brown Insulation ND Brown Tar Paper ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 45% Glass Fibers 35% Cellulose

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate

Location: 7, 47459C-7 Window Glazing Lab ID-Version‡: 5671064-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Window Glazing with Green Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 8, 47459C-8 Roofing Felt Lab ID-Version‡: 5671065-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Dark Brown Roofing Felt ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: 80% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 4 of 5Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.com Client: IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City C/O: Mr. John Larson Re: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

Date of Sampling: 08-05-2014 Date of Receipt: 08-12-2014 Date of Report: 08-15-2014

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT: EPA-600/M4-82-020 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 9, 47459C-9 Window Glazing Lab ID-Version‡: 5671066-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Window Glazing with Green Paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: < 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

Location: 10, 47459C-10 Window Glazing Lab ID-Version‡: 5671067-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content White Window Glazing with Green Paint ND

Composite Non-Asbestos Content: < 1% Cellulose Sample Composite Homogeneity: Good

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 5 of 5Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Renee Luna

Report for:

Mr. John Larson IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City 640 E. Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 84106

Regarding: Project: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

EML ID: 1246140

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the items tested.

EMLab P&K ("the Company") shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

REVISED REPORT

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos-EPA 400 point count: 08-20-2014

Service SOPs: Asbestos-EPA 400 point count (EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (EPA-600/M4-82-020 (SOP 01262))

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 1 of 2Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

(800) 651-4802 Fax (623) 780-7695 www.emlab.com Client: IHI Environmental, Salt Lake City C/O: Mr. John Larson Re: AL147459; Engineer's Garage

Date of Sampling: 08-05-2014 Date of Receipt: 08-12-2014 Date of Report: 08-20-2014

ASBESTOS POINT COUNT REPORT: EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116

Location: 1 47459C-1 Wall System

Total Points Counted: 400

Lab ID-Version‡: 5685514-3

Sample Layers Asbestos Type Asbestos Points Counted

Asbestos Concentration (%)

White Drywall /Joint Compound - - ND Layer Totals: - -

Comments:Composite asbestos content provided is only for Drywall/Joint compound. Composite content provided does not follow the guidelines set forth by NVLAP. This analysis was performed by following the NESHAP guidelines. No asbestos was detected and no points were counted.

EMLab ID: 1246140, Page 2 of 2Aerotech Laboratories, Inc

The results relate only to the items tested. Interpretation is left to the company and/or persons who conducted the field work. The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government.

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. EMLab P&K reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is

Appendix B

Photographic Log of Materials Sampled

Photograph 1 Exterior view from the southwest.

Photograph 2 OSHA-regulated wall system, homogeneous area M001.

Photograph 3 Non-ACM ceiling tile and adhesive, homogeneous area M002.

Photograph 4 Non-ACM wall and ceiling insulation, homogeneous area M003.

Photograph 5 Non-ACM window glazing, homogeneous area M004.

Photograph 6 Non-ACM roofing tar paper, homogeneous area M005.

Appendix C

Asbestos Sampling Locations (Drawing)

Project Mngr:

Approved By:

Checked By:

Drawn By:

Project No.

Scale:

Date:

File No.

FIG. No.

640 East Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, Utah

FAX. (801) 466-9616PH. (801) 466-2223

A

COMPANY

JHS

Keith

JCL

JRB

AL147459

1" = 5' - 0"

AL147459.dwg

August 2014

Engineer's Garage - Building # TN 807017

United States Forest Service Pre-Demolition Inspection

Case Lowe & Hart, Inc.

340 North Cache Street Jackson, Wyoming

N

1 6 2

4 5 7

Asbestos Sample Number & Location

Explanation

OSHA Regulated Wall System (wall and ceiling)

Note:

No Universal Hazardous Materials Identified

N P r o j e c t s A

L W o r k i n g

F i l e s D i a g r a m s D r a w i n g s F i g u r e s A

L d w g f i g b l d g c e n g i n e e r g a r a g e

A

M k f a r r e l l

A

N S

I f u l l b l e e d

A x

I n c h e s

Appendix D

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Inspection

640 EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 TELEPHONE: 801-466-2223 FAX: 801-466-9616 E-MAIL: IHI@IHI-ENV.COM

SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE

UNIVERSAL, HAZARDOUS, AND TOXIC WASTE INSPECTION

USDA Forest Service Bridger-Teton National Forest Compound

Jackson, Wyoming

Building TN807017 Engineer’s Garage

September 5, 2014

Prepared for:

Mr. Kevin Lewis, Project Manager Case, Lowe & Hart, Inc.

2484 Washington Boulevard Ogden, Utah 84401

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

John C. Larson, SL County Pre- Demo Building Inspector PBI-012

Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager

Project #AL147459C

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage IHI Environmental Hazmat Inspection Project No. AL147459C

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 METHODS

3.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

4.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 1 IHI Environmental

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On August 6, 2014, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the

Engineer’s Garage building located at the USDA Forest Service, Bridger Teton National

Forest Compound, Jackson, Wyoming. Mr. Kevin Lewis, Project Manager for Case, Lowe and Hart, Inc., requested this inspection so that these materials could be identified and removed before demolition of this building.

The following materials were included in the scope of this inspection:

batteries pesticides mercury-containing thermostats and lamps

PCB light ballasts and oil-containing transformers identified and/or potential hazardous wastes

CFC-containing air conditioning units or refrigerators other containerized toxic or special wastes in the building

The building is a single-level structure. Building size is approximately 450 square feet.

Construction date is 1946. The construction is wood frame with wood siding.

2.0 METHODS

IHI conducted a visual inspection of all accessible areas throughout the building, but did not conduct any destructive inspection to characterize any material.

3.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

None of the materials listed in the inspection scope were identified. No further action is required.

4.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS

This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by

EH&S consultants performing similar services.

USDA FS/Engineer’s Garage 2 IHI Environmental

The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all universal, toxic and/or hazardous wastes have been identified and fully evaluated.

Furthermore, IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records.

It is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action

Appendix E

Inspector Certifications

Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix B - Photographic Log of Materials Sampled Appendix C - Asbestos Sampling Locations (Drawing) Appendix D - Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Inspection Appendix E - Inspector Certifications