80NSSC22R0013 SF30 Amendment 00004 Signed.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

N/A

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to provide a response to three questions submitted by Industry for solicitation

80NSSC22R0013.

The NEHCSS FRFP Combined Q&A Log on Page 2 of this amendment provides details of the response.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

NASA Shared Services Center Procurement Operations Division - XD042 Bldg. 1111 Jerry Hlass Road, Room 292

80NSSC22R0013

02/28/2022

01/26/2022

00004

Question RFP Attachment Name Section Number Page Number Question (for submission to NSSC) Response

FRFP Combined QA Amendment 00002

Attachment 02 OCHCO Price Schedule

QA 98

The Government’s response to Question 98 states that Offerors should only propose 1 Contract Program Manager in Attachment 2, Pricing. (See excerpt below). To clarify, the Government is asking Offerors to only fill in a rate for one location and ignore all other “green” highlighted cells for the Contract Program Manager labor category? Additionally, if we are proposing only 1 position and it is located in Washington, DC, for example, where there are hours for 2 FTEs, should we also adjust the hours in that yellow cell (i.e., cell I9) to 1920 hours? Finally, if this is the Government’s directive, please clarify how all Offeror’s will be evaluated for their IDIQ pricing purposes if each Offeror uses higher or lower location pricing where the Offeror believes their Contract Program Manager will be located?

The location of the Contract Program Manager position is a business decision of the offerors, rates for all centers should be provided for evaluation purposes. The hours in cell I9 should not be adjusted. Section IV Evaluation Factors for Award para 4.0 states how the pricing will be evaluated.

Section III - Instruction to Offeror

7.2

My understanding reviewing this questionnaire is to evaluate contractors that have worked with the agency in the past. Although we have engaged and served the local and state agencies, our firm is new to the federal government contracting, hence we would not have had a project that can be evaluated. Would you kindly let me know if we need to submit the Contract Performance Report anyway, and if so, how do we indicate that we have not had a project to be evaluated?

The requirement for Government contracts was removed with Amendement 00002

FRFP Combined QA Amendment 00002

I was reaching out to ask if the Government be willing to extend the NASA NEHCSS solicitation by 1 week due to the amendments and detailed Q&A?

There is no intention to extend the due date at this time.