SF-30 SEAM II.pdf
PDF 244 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80JSC020R0045
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
This is Amendment 1 to the Request for Proposal entitled Specialized, Engineering, Aeronautics, and Manufacturing (SEAM)
II 80JSC020R0045.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
NASA/Johnson Space Center Attn: Darrell Compton/BR 2101 E NASA Parkway Houston, TX 77058-3696
See Block 6
80JSC020R0045
80JSC020R0045
See Block 16C
09/22/2020
80JSC020R0045
Amendment 1
The purpose of Amendment 01 is as follows:
To provide revisions to 80JSC020R0045 as a result of questions received in response to the Final RFP.
To assist Offerors, by providing the following Attachments:
“Attachment 1: Si SEAM Cover Letter” in Adobe PDF.
“Attachment 2: SEAM II RFP 80JSC020R0045” in Adobe PDF.
“Attachment 3: L.32.2 Past Performance Reference Table” in Microsoft Excel “Attachment 4: L.32.6 “Pricing Templates” in Microsoft Excel “Attachment 5: 80JSC020R0045 Track Changes” in Microsoft Word
To provide a list of revisions entitled “Amendment 1: SEAM II Final Request for Proposal List of Revisions,” which provides a comprehensive description of all revisions to 80JSC020R004.
To provide a separate signed PDF cover page of the Final RFP and the SF 1447 as Attachment 1. Please note that neither the cover letter nor the SF 1447 has been revised.
Rather, the purpose of providing the signed cover letter separately is to allow Offerors to convert Attachment 2: Final RFP from Adobe PDF to Microsoft Word.
To provide a complete copy of the Request for Proposal entitled Specialized, Engineering, Aeronautics, and Manufacturing (SEAM) II 80JSC020R0045 as Attachment 2, which incorporate changes detailed in the list of revisions entitled “Amendment 1: SEAM II Final Request for Proposal List of Revisions.” Please note that this version of the document is capable of being converted from Adobe PDF to Microsoft Word.
To provide updated Excel versions of L.32.2 “Past Performance Reference Table” as Attachment 3 and L.32.6 “Pricing Templates” as Attachment 4, which incorporate changes detailed in the list of revisions entitled “Amendment 1: SEAM II Final Request for Proposal List of Revisions.”
To provide a Microsoft Word Version of 80JSC020R0045 as Attachment 5 that details track changes for Sections A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, and M. The Government has provided this document as an additional resource to assist Industry in tracing a majority of the changes described above. Please note that this version of the document does not include Section C or Section J.
Amendment 1: SEAM II Final Request for Proposal List of Revisions
# Clause Page #s From To
I.22 I-2 “52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING
FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND
VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR
EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019)”
Updated the date of Clause I.22:
“52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR
CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO
SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
(AUG 201920)”
2 DRD J.2.7 158 The final RFP had incorrectly provided a second copy of the Organizational Conflicts of Interest Plan instead of DRD J.2.7 “Reports for Logistics.”
Replaced DRD J.2.7 in its entirety to ensure it includes the correct DRD J.2.7, “Reports Required for Logistics.”
3 DRL Line Item No. 3
134 “Project Status Report” DRL Line Item 3 has been revised to reflect “Task Order Status Report.”
4 K.10 K-12 – K-15 N/A Added Clause K.10 in full text:
52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING
CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO
SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT
(AUG 2020)
5 K.11 K-15 N/A Added Clause K.11 in full text:
52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES-REPRESENTATION
(DEC 2019)
6 L.22 L-L-4 The Table on L-L-4 states the following:
Page Limit Up to 6 pages for each Task Category to which the offeror is proposing.
Additional Information Offeror’s response shall not exceed 6 pages per Task Category.
The Table on L-L-4 is revised to state the following:
Page Limit Up to 6 8 pages for each Task Category to which the offeror is proposing.
Additional Information Offeror’s response shall not exceed 6 8 pages per Task Category.
7 L.23 L-L-6 (NOTE: Information required in this clause shall be submitted as a separate tab after the Property Management Plan (if the plan is required with submittal) or in the Management volume, unless stated otherwise in this RFP.)
Deletion of the note at the end of Clause L.23 listed below:
(NOTE: Information required in this clause shall be submitted as a separate tab after the Property Management Plan (if the plan is required with submittal) or in the Management volume, unless stated otherwise in this RFP.)
8 L.25 L-L-6 The Offeror shall submit their proposal via NASA’s secure Large File Transfer (LFT). (Edit or Remove, as applicable: Major Subcontractors for the Cost Volume and/or the Past Performance Volume may submit their required proposal information separately using the instructions in this provision.)
The first paragraph of L.25 has been revised as follows:
The Offeror shall submit their proposal via NASA’s secure Large File Transfer (LFT). (Edit or Remove, as applicable: Major S Subcontractors for the Cost Volume and/or the Past Performance Volume may submit their required proposal information separately using the instructions in this provision.)
9 L.25 L-L-7 Offerors are cautioned to allow for sufficient time to ensure timely proposal delivery before the submission deadline of 1500 CDT on October 1, 2020.
The last paragraph of L.25 has been revised as follows:
Offerors are cautioned to allow for sufficient time to ensure timely proposal delivery before the submission deadline of 13301500 CDT on October 221, 2020.
10 L.30.2 L-L-11 Table L-3: “Overview of Proposal Volumes, Page Limitations, Copies, and Format” states the following:
Page Limit 6 pages per Task Category for Narrative.
Table L-3 is revised as follows:
Page Limit 6 8 pages per Task Category for Narrative.
11 L.31.1 L-L-14 (a) Offerors shall complete Attachment L.32.1 (Relevant Past Performance Matrix) for each Task Category proposed. Offerors shall list up to one company, the prime or a major subcontractor, per critical capability. If the prime or a major subcontractor do not have relevant past performance for a critical capability, the Offeror shall leave the cell for the Contractor Name blank or insert “N/A”. A subcontractor is considered major if they are proposed to provide three or more critical capabilities in a single task category under SEAM II.
The first paragraph of “Relevant Past Performance Matrix (Attachment L.32.1)” has been revised as follows:
(a) (a) Offerors shall complete Attachment L.32.1 (Relevant Past Performance Matrix) for each Task Category proposed. Offerors shall list up to one company, the prime or a major subcontractor, per critical capability. For purposes of the Past performance evaluation, the prime may have no more than three subcontractors per Task Category. As stated in Section M, the past performance of the prime Contractor will be weighted more heavily than any subcontractors or combination of subcontractors in the overall past performance evaluation. If the prime or a major subcontractor do not have relevant past performance for a critical capability, the Offeror shall leave the cell for the Contractor Name blank or insert “N/A”. A subcontractor is considered major if they are proposed to provide three or more critical capabilities in a single task category under SEAM II.
12 L.25, L31.1, L.32.4, M.1.1
L-L-6, L-L- 14, L-L-15, L-L-27, L-L- 34, L-L-41, M-2
Major Subcontractor/Major Sub All references to Major Subcontractor/Major Sub have been replaced with Subcontractor/Sub in multiple clauses as follows:
Major Subcontractor/Major Sub
13 L.31.1 L-L-15, L-L-six contract references per Task Category. The removal of references to six contracts and replaced with ten contracts in two clauses:
six ten contract references per Task Category.
14 L.31.1 L-L-15 The heading for Past Performance narrative states the following:
Past Performance Narrative (subject to page limitations; up to six pages per Task Category)
The heading for Past Performance narrative has been changed as follows:
Past Performance Narrative (subject to page limitations; up to six eight pages per Task Category)
15 L.31.2 L-L-17 The second bullet of L.31.2 contains the following sentence:
The clause only allows for a price adjustment if the Government changes a wage determination in the future and those updated minimum wages or benefits exceed amounts previously being paid by the Contractor. Since the clause does not provide a price adjustment for other reasons, the Offeror shall provide rationale to demonstrate the realism of any proposed escalation in prices in consideration of the contract’s full period performance.
The sentence has been revised as follows:
The clause only allows for a price adjustment if the Government changes a wage determination in the future and those updated minimum wages or benefits exceed amounts previously being paid by the Contractor. Since the clause does not provide a price adjustment for other reasons, the Offeror shall provide rationale to demonstrate the realism reasonableness of any proposed escalation in prices in consideration of the contract’s full period performance.
16 L-L-21;
Table L-4:
Pricing Template Naming Acronyms
References to the four Template-Specified Resources Tabs within the Pricing Methodology subsection of L.31.2 Price Factor – Volume 2
The Government has revised Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” to provide Template-Specified Resources Tabs for both FFP and Time and Materials. As a result, there are now eight separate tabs that provide specified resources by Task Category. A listing of these tabs is as follows:
1. TOPT-SR-Category A FFP
2. TOPT-SR-Category A T&M
3. TOPT-SR-Category B FFP
4. TOPT-SR-Category B T&M
5. TOPT-SR-Category C FFP
6. TOPT-SR-Category C T&M
7. TOPT-SR-Category D FFP
8. TOPT-SR-Category D T&M
Therefore, all references within the L.31.2 Price Factor Volume II have been modified to reflect the change from four to eight tabs.
In addition, the reference of the FBACP Template has also been included to the specified information on page L-L-21 and Table L-4.
17 L.31.2 L-L-21 The following language under 2. Price Proposal Organization:
For task categories A, B, C and D, when multiple versions of the same template are required, then submit the multiple templates inside one worksheet stacked vertically. For example, when proposing different FBRs for T&M and FFP portions of “TOPT-SR-Category A” through “TOPT-SR-Category D,” then two vertically stacked templates (T&M and FFP) will be submitted under each tab entitled “TOPT- SR- Category A” through “TOPT- SR- Category D” under the workbook “EPM - Template IDIQ Workbook.xlsx” for each applicable Task Category the Offerors are proposing.
The following language under 2. Price Proposal Organization is replaced in entirety with the following:
Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” provides Template-Specified Resources Tabs for both FFP and Time and Materials for each Task Category.
18 L.31.2 L-L-23 The language under a. Task Order Pricing Template for Specified Resources (TOPT – SR)* states the following:
A separate TOPT-SR templates for each Task Category (A-D) is provided for pricing the Government Specified Resources (SR) direct labor hours and “plugged” NLRs for each Task Category identified in the “EPM- Template IDIQ Workbook.xlsx.” The templates cover the estimated price (cost and profit) to perform the
This language has been modified to reflect the requirement to complete a TOPT-SR template for both FFP and T&M for each Task Category in which the Offeror submits a proposal. This updated language states the following:
A Two separate TOPT-SR templates for each Task Category (A-D) is are provided for pricing the
Government SR productive hours and NLRs for each Task Category being proposed. In addition, a separate TOPT-SR template for T&M and FFP is required if the Offeror is proposing separate FBRs for each contract type per applicable Task Category (the two boxes at the top section of each TOPT-SR are provided to facilitate this). Offerors shall refer to Paragraph D.2. above regarding the instructions for completing multiple versions of the same template. Offerors shall complete only the applicable TOPT-SR templates for those Task Categories they are proposing, and annotate the remaining TOPT-SR templates as “NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)” or Offerors may delete the remaining unused templates. Note: Task Category A and Bare Small- Business Set-Aside. The template for each Task Category is divided into three main sections. The first section addresses Productive Hours.
Government Specified Resources (SR) direct labor hours and “plugged” NLRs for each Task Category identified in the “EPM-Template IDIQ Workbook.xlsx.” The templates cover the estimated price (cost and profit) to perform the Government SR productive hours and NLRs for each Task Category being proposed. In addition, a separate TOPT-SR template for T&M and FFP is required if the Offeror is proposing separate FBRs for each contract type per applicable Task Category (the two boxes at the top section of each TOPT-SR are provided to facilitate this). Offerors shall refer to Paragraph D.2.
above regarding the instructions for completing multiple versions of the same template. Offerors shall complete only the applicable TOPT-SR templates for those Task Categories they are proposing, and annotate the remaining TOPT-SR templates as “NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)” or Offerors may delete the remaining unused templates. Note: Task Category A and Bare Small- Business Set-Aside. The template for each Task Category is divided into three main sections. The first section addresses Productive Hours.
19 L.31.3 L-L-27 Note: For purposes of this requirement, major subcontractor is defined by this solicitation as a company that the offeror anticipates providing at least as a subcontractor proposed to accomplish 25% of the value the proposed work priced in the proposal for each of the five years
Note: For purposes of this requirement, major subcontractor is defined by this solicitation as a company that the offeror anticipates providing at least as a subcontractor proposed to accomplish 25% of the value the proposed work priced in the proposal for each of the five years
20 L.32.3 L-L-34 Surveillance, and management of major/critical subcontractors
Surveillance, and management of major/critical subcontractors
21 L.32.2 N/A Attachment L.32.2 “Past Performance Reference Table” template is replaced in its entirety.
The L.32.2 template has been revised as follows:
A spreadsheet field entitled “Percentage of Contract Value performed if acting as a subcontractor” has been modified to remove the drop-down menu with selections of either prime or sub from Column C, Row 11 – Column G, Row 11 and formatting the specified fields as a percentage.
22 L.32.6 N/A Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” template is replaced in its entirety.
The L.32.6 template has been revised as follows:
The Specified Resources Tabs have been sub-divided to provide separate specified resources estimates for both FFP and Time and Materials. As a result, there are now eight separate tabs that provide specified resources by Task Category as follows:
1. TOPT-SR-Category A FFP
2. TOPT-SR-Category A T&M
3. TOPT-SR-Category B FFP
4. TOPT-SR-Category B T&M
5. TOPT-SR-Category C FFP
6. TOPT-SR-Category C T&M
7. TOPT-SR-Category D FFP
8. TOPT-SR-Category D T&M
In addition, the directions provided within the FBR Tab have been revised to remove references to the OHT, IRAP, and GAT templates.
The FBR directions have also been modified to remove references to major and minor subs and to remove the requirement for subcontractors to complete pricing templates. Please note that Offerors are still required to document subcontractor’s pricing data for Standard
Labor Categories that constitute a portion of the Offeror’s proposal per the revised FBR instructions.
23 M.1.1 M-2 The Offeror and major subcontractor’s past performance will be evaluated by the SLPT. Any past performance data provided on a minor subcontractor will not be considered.
The Offeror and major any subcontractor’s for which its past performance proposed in the Past Performance Volume to demonstrate past performance in one or more critical elements of a task category will be evaluated by the SLPT. Any past performance data provided on a minor for other subcontractors will not be considered evaluated under the Past Performance Factor.
24 M.1.2 M-5 The last sentence of the introduction to M1.2 Price Factor – Volume II states the following:
In addition, the Government will review all proposed Fully Burdened Rates (FBRs) and prices for all contract years per Task Category to determine if they are realistic.
The last sentence of the introduction to M1.2 Price Factor – Volume II has been modified as follows:
In addition, the Government will review all proposed Fully Burdened Rates (FBRs) and prices for all contract years per Task Category to determine if they are realistic reasonable.
| SF-30 SEAM II.pdf |
| SF-30 SEAM II.pdf |
| Amendment 1 SEAM II Final Request for Proposal List of Revisions A.pdf |
| Updated the date of Clause I.22: |
| “52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019)” |
| “52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 201920)” |
| Replaced DRD J.2.7 in its entirety to ensure it includes the correct DRD J.2.7, “Reports Required for Logistics.” |
| The final RFP had incorrectly provided a second copy of the Organizational Conflicts of Interest Plan instead of DRD J.2.7 “Reports for Logistics.” |
| DRL Line Item 3 has been revised to reflect “Task Order Status Report.” |
| “Project Status Report” |
| Added Clause K.10 in full text: |
| N/A |
| 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2020) |
| Added Clause K.11 in full text: |
| N/A |
| 52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES-REPRESENTATION (DEC 2019) |
| The Table on L-L-4 is revised to state the following: |
| The Table on L-L-4 states the following: |
| Page Limit |
| Page Limit |
| Up to 6 8 pages for each Task Category to which the offeror is proposing. |
| Up to 6 pages for each Task Category to which the offeror is proposing. |
| Additional Information |
| Additional Information |
| Offeror’s response shall not exceed 6 8 pages per Task Category. |
| Offeror’s response shall not exceed 6 pages per Task Category. |
| Deletion of the note at the end of Clause L.23 listed below: |
| (NOTE: Information required in this clause shall be submitted as a separate tab after the Property Management Plan (if the plan is required with submittal) or in the Management volume, unless stated otherwise in this RFP.) |
| The first paragraph of L.25 has been revised as follows: |
| The Offeror shall submit their proposal via NASA’s secure Large File Transfer (LFT). (Edit or Remove, as applicable: Major Subcontractors for the Cost Volume and/or the Past Performance Volume may submit their required proposal information separately using the instructions in this provision.) |
| The Offeror shall submit their proposal via NASA’s secure Large File Transfer (LFT). (Edit or Remove, as applicable: Major S Subcontractors for the Cost Volume and/or the Past Performance Volume may submit their required proposal information separately using the instructions in this provision.) |
| The last paragraph of L.25 has been revised as follows: |
| Offerors are cautioned to allow for sufficient time to ensure timely proposal delivery before the submission deadline of 1500 CDT on October 1, 2020. |
| Offerors are cautioned to allow for sufficient time to ensure timely proposal delivery before the submission deadline of 13301500 CDT on October 221, 2020. |
| Table L-3 is revised as follows: |
| Table L-3: “Overview of Proposal Volumes, Page Limitations, Copies, and Format” states the following: |
| Page Limit |
| 6 8 pages per Task Category for Narrative. |
| Page Limit |
| 6 pages per Task Category for Narrative. |
| The first paragraph of “Relevant Past Performance Matrix (Attachment L.32.1)” has been revised as follows: |
| (a) Offerors shall complete Attachment L.32.1 (Relevant Past Performance Matrix) for each Task Category proposed. Offerors shall list up to one company, the prime or a major subcontractor, per critical capability. If the prime or a major subcontractor do not have relevant past performance for a critical capability, the Offeror shall leave the cell for the Contractor Name blank or insert “N/A”. A subcontractor is considered major if they are proposed to provide three or more critical capabilities in a single task category under SEAM II. |
| (a) (a) Offerors shall complete Attachment L.32.1 (Relevant Past Performance Matrix) for each Task Category proposed. Offerors shall list up to one company, the prime or a major subcontractor, per critical capability. For purposes of the Past performance evaluation, the prime may have no more than three subcontractors per Task Category. As stated in Section M, the past performance of the prime Contractor will be weighted more heavily than any subcontractors or combination of subcontractors in the overall past performance evaluation. If the prime or a major subcontractor do not have relevant past performance for a critical capability, the Offeror shall leave the cell for the Contractor Name blank or insert “N/A”. A subcontractor is considered major if they are proposed to provide three or more critical capabilities in a single task category under SEAM II. |
| All references to Major Subcontractor/Major Sub have been replaced with Subcontractor/Sub in multiple clauses as follows: |
| Major Subcontractor/Major Sub |
| Major Subcontractor/Major Sub |
| The removal of references to six contracts and replaced with ten contracts in two clauses: |
| six contract references per Task Category. |
| six ten contract references per Task Category. |
| The sentence has been revised as follows: |
| The second bullet of L.31.2 contains the following sentence: |
| The clause only allows for a price adjustment if the Government changes a wage determination in the future and those updated minimum wages or benefits exceed amounts previously being paid by the Contractor. Since the clause does not provide a price adjustment for other reasons, the Offeror shall provide rationale to demonstrate the realism reasonableness of any proposed escalation in prices in consideration of the contract’s full period performance. |
| The clause only allows for a price adjustment if the Government changes a wage determination in the future and those updated minimum wages or benefits exceed amounts previously being paid by the Contractor. Since the clause does not provide a price adjustment for other reasons, the Offeror shall provide rationale to demonstrate the realism of any proposed escalation in prices in consideration of the contract’s full period performance. |
| The Government has revised Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” to provide Template-Specified Resources Tabs for both FFP and Time and Materials. As a result, there are now eight separate tabs that provide specified resources by Task Category. A listing of these tabs is as follows: |
| References to the four Template-Specified Resources Tabs within the Pricing Methodology subsection of L.31.2 Price Factor – Volume 2 |
| 1. TOPT-SR-Category A FFP |
| 2. TOPT-SR-Category A T&M |
| 3. TOPT-SR-Category B FFP |
| 4. TOPT-SR-Category B T&M |
| 5. TOPT-SR-Category C FFP |
| 6. TOPT-SR-Category C T&M |
| 7. TOPT-SR-Category D FFP |
| 8. TOPT-SR-Category D T&M |
| Therefore, all references within the L.31.2 Price Factor Volume II have been modified to reflect the change from four to eight tabs. |
| In addition, the reference of the FBACP Template has also been included to the specified information on page L-L-21 and Table L-4. |
| The following language under 2. Price Proposal Organization is replaced in entirety with the following: |
| The following language under 2. Price Proposal Organization: |
| Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” provides Template-Specified Resources Tabs for both FFP and Time and Materials for each Task Category. |
| For task categories A, B, C and D, when multiple versions of the same template are required, then submit the multiple templates inside one worksheet stacked vertically. For example, when proposing different FBRs for T&M and FFP portions of “TOPT-SR-Category A” through “TOPT-SR-Category D,” then two vertically stacked templates (T&M and FFP) will be submitted under each tab entitled “TOPT- SR- Category A” through “TOPT- SR- Category D” under the workbook “EPM - Template IDIQ Workbook.xlsx” for each applicable Task Category the Offerors are proposing. |
| The language under a. Task Order Pricing Template for Specified Resources (TOPT – SR)* states the following: |
| A separate TOPT-SR templates for each Task Category (A-D) is provided for pricing the Government Specified Resources (SR) direct labor hours and “plugged” NLRs for each Task Category identified in the “EPM-Template IDIQ Workbook.xlsx.” The templates cover the estimated price (cost and profit) to perform the Government SR productive hours and NLRs for each Task Category being proposed. In addition, a separate TOPT-SR template for T&M and FFP is required if the Offeror is proposing separate FBRs for each contract type per applicable Task Category (the two boxes at the top section of each TOPT-SR are provided to facilitate this). Offerors shall refer to Paragraph D.2. above regarding the instructions for completing multiple versions of the same template. Offerors shall complete only the applicable TOPT-SR templates for those Task Categories they are proposing, and annotate the remaining TOPT-SR templates as “NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)” or Offerors may delete the remaining unused templates. Note: Task Category A and Bare Small-Business Set-Aside. The template for each Task Category is divided into three main sections. The first section addresses Productive Hours. |
| Note: For purposes of this requirement, major subcontractor is defined by this solicitation as a company that the offeror anticipates providing at least as a subcontractor proposed to accomplish 25% of the value the proposed work priced in the proposal for each of the five years |
| Note: For purposes of this requirement, major subcontractor is defined by this solicitation as a company that the offeror anticipates providing at least as a subcontractor proposed to accomplish 25% of the value the proposed work priced in the proposal for each of the five years |
| Surveillance, and management of major/critical subcontractors |
| Surveillance, and management of major/critical subcontractors |
| The L.32.2 template has been revised as follows: |
| Attachment L.32.2 “Past Performance Reference Table” template is replaced in its entirety. |
| A spreadsheet field entitled “Percentage of Contract Value performed if acting as a subcontractor” has been modified to remove the drop-down menu with selections of either prime or sub from Column C, Row 11 – Column G, Row 11 and formatting the specified fields as a percentage. |
| The L.32.6 template has been revised as follows: |
| Attachment L.32.6 “Price Templates” template is replaced in its entirety. |
| The Specified Resources Tabs have been sub-divided to provide separate specified resources estimates for both FFP and Time and Materials. As a result, there are now eight separate tabs that provide specified resources by Task Category as follows: |
| 1. TOPT-SR-Category A FFP |
| 2. TOPT-SR-Category A T&M |
| 3. TOPT-SR-Category B FFP |
| 4. TOPT-SR-Category B T&M |
| 5. TOPT-SR-Category C FFP |
| 6. TOPT-SR-Category C T&M |
| 7. TOPT-SR-Category D FFP |
| 8. TOPT-SR-Category D T&M |
| In addition, the directions provided within the FBR Tab have been revised to remove references to the OHT, IRAP, and GAT templates. |
| The FBR directions have also been modified to remove references to major and minor subs and to remove the requirement for subcontractors to complete pricing templates. Please note that Offerors are still required to document subcontractor’s pricing data for Standard Labor Categories that constitute a portion of the Offeror’s proposal per the revised FBR instructions. |
| The Offeror and major any subcontractor’s for which its past performance proposed in the Past Performance Volume to demonstrate past performance in one or more critical elements of a task category will be evaluated by the SLPT. Any past performance data provided on a minor for other subcontractors will not be considered evaluated under the Past Performance Factor. |
| The Offeror and major subcontractor’s past performance will be evaluated by the SLPT. Any past performance data provided on a minor subcontractor will not be considered. |
| The last sentence of the introduction to M1.2 Price Factor – Volume II has been modified as follows: |
| The last sentence of the introduction to M1.2 Price Factor – Volume II states the following: |
| 2020-09-30T09:37:17-0500 | |
| ROGER ROBERTS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .