eLibrary 4 Selection and Evaluation Statement Ex.pdf
PDF 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NRESS III Draft RFP 80HQTR25R7002
- Solicitation number
- 80HQTR25R7002
About this file
This document is a NASA Technical Evaluation/Selection Statement for a research proposal. The document outlines the evaluation process for a research proposal, indicating it was one of multiple compliant submissions reviewed by peer panel for a NASA research program. The evaluation includes an overall grade, assessment of scientific/technical merit, and relevance to NASA's research objectives.
The document recommends awarding the proposal, with options for funding through a Grant, Contract, Cooperative Agreement, or Interagency Agreement. The primary purpose appears to be supporting or stimulating basic knowledge and understanding in aeronautics and space research. A Technical Officer will oversee the award, though specific details about the award's financial terms, duration, or exact research focus are not fully detailed in this excerpt.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL EVALUATION/SELECTION STATEMENT/NASA CONCURRENCE ON PROPOSAL
IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO AN NRA
«Response_number» «PI_Last_name» TE
PROPOSAL TITLE/PI/INSTITUTION:
Proposal Number: «Response_number» Proposal Title: «Title» PI Name: «PI_First_name» «PI_Last_name» Institution: «Linked_Org»
TECHNICAL EVALUATION/SELECTION STATEMENT:
This proposal was one of XXX compliant received in response to <<NRA Number and Name>><<program element name if relevant>>Program, and is one of YY selected for award. It was reviewed by a panel of the proposer's peers. A summary is as follows:
OVERALL EVALUATION: «M__Grade_»
Explain the relevance of this research to this NASA program (or other programs):
<<add text>>
Describe the proposal's overall scientific or technical merit:
<<add text>>
Comment on the cost elements:
<<add text>>
RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD:
GRANT – The principal purpose of accepting the proposal is for support or stimulation by increasing basic knowledge and understanding in aeronautics and space, and no substantial Federal involvement is anticipated. Grants involve the transfer of anything of value to the recipient to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by Federal statute.
CONTRACT – The principal purpose of accepting the proposal is to acquire, for NASA's direct use or benefit, a well-defined, specific effort clearly required for the accomplishment of a scheduled NASA mission or project. There will be firm contract deliverable requirements for supplies or services.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT – The principal purpose of accepting the proposal is for support or stimulation by increasing basic knowledge and understanding in aeronautics and space. Cooperative Agreements involve the transfer of anything of value to the recipient to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by Federal statute and they are distinguished from Grants based on the involvement by or collaboration with NASA.
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT – The principal purpose is to obtain needed supplies or services from another U.S. Government agency.
It is recommended that this proposal be supported by an award.
The Technical Officer on the award is Arik Posner
Program Officer Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .