8-6-MP27005-24279300 CoHa DD 100 Narrative.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MP27005-INSPECTIONS
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a project narrative document for the State of Utah Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM) related to Code & Special Inspections Services for the Convergence Hall construction project (#24279300). The Convergence Hall project is a six-story, approximately 163,000 square foot building located at the University of Utah (part of the Utah System of Higher Education) that will contain diverse room typologies including office space, maker space, retail, event, and housing facilities. DFCM is soliciting services from prequalified Code Inspection Firms to provide comprehensive code and special inspection services throughout the construction phase. All special inspections contractors, material testing laboratories, and special inspectors performing work on this DFCM project must be listed on the DFCM Approved Special Inspection Firms, Material Testing Labs, & Special Inspectors list.
The estimated inspections budget for this project is $650,000.00. This Request for Proposal is directed toward DFCM Prequalified Code Inspection Firms, and contractors must ensure all personnel involved in special inspections work maintain current approval status with DFCM. The scope of work encompasses the full range of code compliance and special inspection requirements necessary to support the construction and completion of this institutional higher education facility at the University of Utah campus.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONVERGENCE
HALL
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DELIVERABLE
DFCM PROJECT NO. 24279300
2 JULY 2026
01.
INTEGRATED
DESIGN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DELIVERABLECONVERGENCE HALL
SUBJECT RESPONSIBILITY NARRATIVE
Community-Oriented Design Community Orientated Design
FFKR Landscape Site specific strategies to advance community oriented design per DFCM standards include inclusive, accesible outdoor spaces and pedestrian focused amenities to strengthen connections to the greater context. All plans show paths with a Minimum of 5' sidewalks for all door locations. As retail spaces are developed, we will coordinate with the Civil and Architects to ensure public access and refine outdoor seating locations. These will be incorporated to enhance safety, longevity, and comfort.
Transportation Management Alternative Transportation Management Strategy
FFKR Landscape Transportation strategies are largely provided through The Point Framework Plan and address public transit, vehicular, cycling, and pedestrian focused options. The site specific design of this project will maintain public sidewalk access consistent with the framework and accommodate bicycle parking. We are currently showing a 10 bike rack split between the north and south entrances to the building. This would be in addition to any bike locker provided inside by the architects.
Site Design (FFKR Landscape) Stormwater Management Strategy
CAPE Civil Storm Water detention/retention is provided by The Point development downstream of the project. Because storm water is managed downstream, it is impractical to store the first one-inch of rainfall on site. The site density also makes most stormwater quality BMP's impractical. Therefore, the design team is requesting variances for both HPBS design requirements.
Heat Island Reduction Plan
FFKR Landscape We will reduce the urban heat-island effect across the site and roof gardens through a coordinated hardscape and landscape strategy that includes the following measures:
pedestrian-oriented hardscape areas will utilize concrete or light-colored pavers or pavement; any colored concrete will have a 90-day aged SRI of less than 29. Soil cell structures will be incorporated to support large-canopy trees in ground-level plazas and along streetscapes, providing shade over hardscape areas and mitigating summer heat.
Roof areas visible from interior spaces will utilize planted or Paved roof systems to reduce glare and enhance occupant comfort.
Light Pollution Reduction Strategy
Envision The largest impact to light pollution is exterior lighting; however, interior lighting can also contribute to light pollution. Both interior and exterior lighting will utilize LED technology for greatest efficiency. Exterior lighting will utilize dark sky approved, full cutoff fixtures that direct the light downward with internal shielding to limit light trespass onto neighboring properties. Careful selection of brightness levels, color temperature and pole height shall ensure that over-illumination is avoided and that optimal comfort for pedestrian safety and functionality is provided. The interior lighting will utilize full cutoff fixtures near windows that direct the light downward as well as enhanced lighting controls that will reduce the light output during the hours of 11:00 pm and 5:00 am in spaces that are being occupied, and turn off lighting in spaces that are not in use. Emergency lighting shall only be provided when the space is occupied or in the event of a power failure.
Water Use Reduction Landscape Water Approach
FFKR Landscape Site design to focus around native and native adapted plant selection, rainwater harvesting/ low impact development stormwater strategies and efficient irrigation design. we have included an initial draft version of the Water Sense Budget Worksheet for the Site.
Building and Process Water Use Strategy
Colvin The plumbing system is designed to minimize potable water consumption through the specification of EPA WaterSense®-qualified fixtures for all applicable interior uses. Water closets, urinals, lavatory faucets, kitchen faucets, and shower fixtures are selected to meet or exceed WaterSense performance criteria.
Process water consumption for evaporative cooling equipment (pending system selection) is minimized through an integrated design and control strategy. Cooling systems are selected for high efficiency with optimized cycles of concentration to reduce blowdown volumes while maintaining water quality and protecting equipment longevity. Conductivity-based controls and automated makeup water management are incorporated to closely regulate water use. The design emphasizes equipment selection and maintenance practices that reduce drift, leakage, and unnecessary purge.
BASIS OF DESIGN
(Reference HPBS Appendix A Project Checklist for Schematic Design Requirements)
Building Envelope Performance / Commissioning Building Envelope Performance Strategy
Gensler/Stantec At the conclusion of Schematic Design, the project is progressing in compliance with Utah DFCM Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECx) requirements, and preliminary enclosure coordination discussions have been initiated with the project team. During Design Development, the A/E will advance and finalize the enclosure Basis of Design (BOD) in coordination with the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) and the BECxA, including continued coordination meetings and formal design reviews. The enclosure design will be further developed to confirm continuous air, water, vapor, and thermal control across all commissioned systems and interfaces in accordance with DFCM standards.
Building System Performance / Commissioning Building System Performance Strategy
Colvin/Envision/
UNVC
At the conclusion of Schematic Design, the project is progressing in compliance with Utah DFCM Building System Performance and Commissioning requirements, and initial coordination regarding mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and envelope system performance has begun. During Design Development, the design team will further develop and document system selections and the Basis of Design (BOD) in alignment with the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR), with continued participation and review by the Commissioning Agent (CxA). The DD phase will focus on advancing system integration, controls strategies, and commissioning planning to support functional performance, constructability, and long-term operational performance in accordance with DFCM and applicable ASHRAE commissioning standards.
BAS Tagging and Metering Metering Strategy Colvin/Envision Electical power, chilled water, heating water, natural gas, and domestic cold water meters will be provided and connected to the Building Automation System (BAS). The metered information shall be readily and easily available for users and Owner for review.
Energy Star Purchasing Energy Efficient Equipment Purchasing Standard
FFKR During design development, the architect is planning to work with the owner to provide a list of owner-provided appliances that meet one or more of the following criteria: Energy Star Qualified, EPACT Registered, producs that meet or exceed the US Dept. of Energy's FEMP Energy Efficiency Recommendations, and/or utility company incentive/rebate approved equipment.
Material Impact Reduction Sustainable Material Strategy
FFKR Project must meet UHPBS including tracking all materials in the HBPS sheet.
Other materials to be avoided include: Formaldehyde, Flame retardant chemicals, per-and poly-fluorinated compounds (PFCs or PFAS) Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), Antimicrobials, including triclosan and triclocarban.
Construction and demolition waste recycling shall achieve at least 75% landfill diversion rate.
Post-Occupancy Recycling Strategy
FFKR A waste management consultnat will be onboarded for this project to comply with DFCM standards.
Material Durability Strategy
FFKR/Colvin/ Envision
Specifications have been updated to match the required lifespan of the exterior building cladding, aluminum window system, roof membrane, metal roof, mechanical systems, plumbing systems, and electrical accessories. Mechanical system lifespans and replacement costs are included in the 40 year LCCA evaluation as a part of the mechanical system selection. Electrical distribution equipment typically lasts around 30 years. Modern LED lights have a lifespan exceeding 50,000 hours, which translates to more than 20 years under normal usage. Digital lighting control systems are generally expected to operate for 15 to 20 years.
BASIS OF DESIGN, CONT’D.
(Reference HPBS Appendix A Project Checklist for Schematic Design Requirements)
Occupant Wellness Indoor Air Quality Design Strategy
Colvin Toilet rooms, Break Rooms, Copy and Print Rooms, Janitor's closets, Mechanical Rooms, and Refrigerant Machinery rooms will be exhausted as defined in the Mechanical Basis of Design Narrative to maintain required Indoor Air Quality.
Operations Indoor Air Quality Management Strategy
Colvin/ FFKR There will be an IAQ Construction Management Plan that includes the use of high efficiency filters (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) = 13, as determined by ASHRAE 52.2- 1999), at each return air grille for systems used during construction.
Hazardous Material Management Strategy
FFKR No hazardous materials are expected to be housed in the building.
Daylight and View Strategy
Gensler/FFKR Workspace – Varies between direct or borrowed daylight and views Residential – Daylight and views in all residential units and common spaces Event Space – Daylight in all event spaces. Varies between general and prime views.
Retail – Daylight in all retail spaces. Views to and from streetscape.
Building Services – No daylight and view requirements.
Environmental Control Strategy
Thermal control zones: Maximum of three private offices per control zone, open interior zones will have a maximum of 2000 square feet per control zone. Conference rooms, meeting rooms, and other single-purpose rooms will be on separate control zones.
Health and Productivity Strategy
Gensler/FFKR During Design Development, the team will refine and document a minimum of four health and productivity strategies, integrating elements such as access to daylight, supportive staff amenities, movement opportunities, and biophilic design concepts as appropriate to the project. These strategies will be further coordinated with architectural and building systems design to support occupant comfort, wellness, and long-term operational success.
BASIS OF DESIGN, CONT’D.
(Reference HPBS Appendix A Project Checklist for Schematic Design Requirements)
C O N V E R G E N C E H A L L
Owner Project Requirements
DFCM Project Number: 24279300
Design Development Phase Deliverable
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
1. GENERAL OVERVIEW 1
2. COMMISSIONING SCOPE. 3
3. DESIGN PROCESS. 5
4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. 7
5. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS. 9
6. LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS. 10
7. ACCESSIBILITY. 11
8. SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS. 12
9. HEATING, VENTILATION, & AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC). 17
10. ELECTRICAL AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS. 24
11. PLUMBING SYSTEMS 28
12. FIRE ALARM. 30
13. FIRE PROTECTION. 32
14. SECURITY AND ACCESS CONTROL. 33
15. DATA AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS. 35
16. BUILDING ENVELOPE. 36
17. SYSTEMS MANUAL AND O&M MANUALS ATTIC STOCK. 38
18. TRAINING. 40
19. HOT BUTTON ITEMS AND SUCCESS. 41
Owner Project Requirements (ORP) Convergence Hall
1 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
1. GENERAL OVERVIEW.
1.1 Introduction.
The purpose of the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) is to provide a clear and concise document of the Owner’s goals, expectations and requirements for the building. It provides the design-build team with the information to develop the Basis of Design (BOD) during schematic design, serving as a road map for the development of the design and construction documents.
Additionally, OPR and BOD provide the owner and commissioning agent with tangible benchmarks to measure success and quality and confirm that the building and systems constructed align with the Owner’s expectations and requirements.
As the project develops, it is expected that many of the elements of the OPR will evolve. Once the initial OPR is developed by the owner, design team, or the Commissioning Agent (CxA), and the CxA has been integrated into the project (if not previously included), it is to be reviewed by the CxA and compared to Project Documents throughout each phase of the Commissioning Process. Changes to the OPR from one phase to the next must be documented by the CxA.
Additionally, the OPR should serve as a foundation for the project’s systems manuals delivered to the Owner as part of the “as-built” documents.
1.2 Scope of OPR.
This document includes requirements for systems that will undergo the formal commissioning process. This document will not be comprehensive of all systems that will be a part of the design and construction process but only those systems that are included in the Commissioning Process. Refer to Section 2 for Commissioning Scope of Work.
1.3 OPR Content and Format.
This document asks a series of questions. Each question will have a response in one of four different ways.
1. A response that the Owner uses to define the requirement.
2. A response that refers to a requirement that is already defined in the owner’s standards.
3. A response that the Owner will defer to the Architectural Team.
4. A response that is unknown at the time, that an individual will be assigned the responsibility to follow up on for a response.
1.4 Responsible Parties.
The table below identifies different areas of the OPR Scope and identifies the approver responsible for confirming the OPR content. The personnel listed below must be alerted by the CxA of any changes to the OPR before the OPR can be approved at any stage of the Cx Process (Design, Construction, O&M, Ongoing).
Discipline Responsible Party Phone Email Overview and Scope Jefferson Moss
Angela Smith Taylor Maxfield
801.792.8866 jeff@nucleusutah.org angela@nucleusutah.org tmaxfield@utah.gov
Commissioning Scope Chris Cox 801.903.3567 christophercox@utah.gov
Design Process Jefferson Moss Angela Smith Taylor Maxfield
801.792.8866 jeff@nucleusutah.org angela@nucleusutah.org tmaxfield@utah.gov
General Requirements Jefferson Moss Angela Smith Taylor Maxfield
801.792.8866 tmaxfield@utah.gov
Warranty Scott Whitney
2 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
Brandon Stokes (Roof) Life Cycle Cost Chris Cox Accessibility Scott Whitney Energy Efficiency Chris Cox HVAC Scott Whitney
Brandon Andersen Chris Cox
801.618.5190 385.443.3143 801.903.3567 sbwhitney@utah.gov bbandersen@utah.gov christophercox@utah.gov
Building Management Controls
Scott Whitney Brandon Andersen Chris Cox
Electrical Scott Whitney
Plumbing Scott Whitney
Fire Protection State Fire Marshal - Through EDMS Fire Alarm State Fire Marshal - Through EDMS Data and Communications
Scott Whitney
Audio / Visual Security and Access Energy Efficiency Scope Chris Cox 801.903.3567 christophercox@utah.gov
1.5 Revision History.
The table below is the revision history of the OPR. It includes brief comments on items revised and why. At the end of each Phase, the OPR must be revised and re-approved by the “Responsible Parties” for which disciplines were affected by the revision of the OPR. Such revisions also include any other “Design Standards” or other guidelines set forth as a part of this OPR by reference.
Revision Date Discipline Affected Reason for Changes Original 04/16/25 All Establish OPR @ HPBS workshop Programming 06/04/25 All Completed for Inclusion in Programming
Report SD Phase TBD All Schematic Design Updates
Design Guidelines/Standards Revision Date Document
2026 –07-02 Design Development Requirements (any adjustments are shown in red text)
2026-02-20 Schematic Design Requirements
2024-05-29 DFCM Design Requirements HPBS – Chapter 5 2024-05-29 DFCM Design Requirements 2023-11-21 The Point – Design Guidelines Initial Phase
3 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
2. COMMISSIONING SCOPE.
Below is a set of questions to help identify which systems will undergo the Commissioning Process as well as the rigor in which those systems will be reviewed by the CxA Team. The Commissioning Agent will be hired directly by the Owner and charged with the responsibility of delivering technical commissioning for the project.
2.1 Questions.
2.1.1 What is the current scope of systems that will undergo some level of the Commissioning Process?
The table below lists the systems and whether those systems are going through the Cx process (Yes or No) or are only elements of the scope being covered (Partial).
System Cx System Cx HVAC Yes Fire Alarm Yes Electrical Yes Data and Communications Yes Sustainability and Energy Yes Security and Access Yes Building Envelope Yes Fire Protection Yes Plumbing Yes Building Management Controls System Yes Elevators Yes Doors and Hardware Yes Audio / Visual Yes
2.1.2 What tasks are expected to be completed by the CxA for each phase of the Cx process?
(Yes, No, or a Number)? A number represents the number of meetings or site visits that the Cx is expected to attend or perform.
Task Cx Scope Task Cx Scope Design Phase OPR Creation No Lighting Controls Meeting yes OPR Review Yes BMS Controls Meeting yes BOD Review Yes Mechanical/Electrical Coordination
Meeting yes
Schematic Design Review Yes Bid-Set/CD Review Yes Design Development Review Yes Value Engineering Meetings Yes Supply Cx Specifications for Systems defined in 2.1.1
Yes Pre-Bid Meetings Yes
Construction Phase
Submittal Reviews for Systems defined in 2.1.1
Yes Contractor Readiness Forms (filled out by CxA)
No
Cx Kickoff Meeting 1 Contractor Readiness Forms (filled out by Contractor)
Yes
Commissioning Plan Yes FAT Testing (by CxA) Yes Create and Manage Issues Log Yes FAT Testing (by Contractor) No MEP/Cx Coordination Meetings 18 NTE Review SOO Yes PFAT/FAT Checklist Creation for Systems defined in 2.1
Yes Review 4-Weeks of Trending Yes
Site Reviews for systems in 2.1 18 NTE Create Commissioning Report Yes PFAT Forms (filled out by CxA) Yes Review Training Agendas Yes PFAT Forms (filled out by Contractor) No Verify Training Yes Site Reviews Yes Review Systems Manual Yes
Operations Phase Opposite Seasonal Training (Performed by CxA)
Yes Create Warranty Issues Log Yes
Warranty Site Visits Yes Ongoing Cx (1 year post) Yes
4 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
2.1.3 What is the thoroughness or rigor that the Commissioning Agent will apply to each system?
Discipline Cx Scope % Inspection Building Envelope Weather Resistant Barrier Inspection 20+ Building Envelope Roof Inspection 20+ Building Envelope Roof Leak Detection Testing 100
Building Envelope Window/Door Inspection 20+ Building Envelope Enclosure Functional Performance Testing One specimen at 10%, 30%, 60%, 90% completion for ea. type of glazing system
Building Envelope Whole Building Air Test 100 HVAC Ductwork 50 HVAC Ductwork Static Testing 100 HVAC Hydronic/Refrigerant Piping 10 HVAC Hydronic/Refrigerant Piping Static Testing 10 HVAC Equipment PFAT 100 HVAC Equipment FAT 100 HVAC Control System PT-PT 100 HVAC Control System SOO 100 Plumbing DWV Piping 10 Plumbing Domestic Piping 10 Plumbing Plumbing Fixture FAT 100 Plumbing Plumbing Equipment PFAT 100 Plumbing Plumbing Equipment FAT 100 Electrical Equipment Inspection 100 Electrical Pull the Plug 100 Electrical Lighting FAT 100 Electrical Torque Verification 40 Electrical Overload Coordination Study Implementation 100 Electrical Circuit Testing 100 Electrical Outlet Testing 1 per Circuit Electrical Local Lighting Controls (Occ Sensors, Switches, Daylighting)
Electrical Relay-Based or Local Lighting Controls 100 Electrical Panel Board Verification 100 Communications Cable Tray Installation Verification 20 DAS Upgrade Cellular System 20 Security Installation Verification 20 Security FAT Testing 100 Fire Alarm Installation 20 Fire Alarm Fire/Smoke Damper FAT 100 Fire Protection As it affects MEP Installation 100 Elevators As it affects life safety Correlate with required operation certifications Data and Communications
As it affects life safety, security, building management system and code required elements
TBD
Emergency Generator/ATS
Ensure power transfer (per specs.) within specified times
TBD
5 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
3. DESIGN PROCESS.
3.1 Basis of Design.
The Basis of Design (BOD) is the design-build team’s response to the OPR. The BOD informs the Owner how the design team has interpreted this document and how they intend on meeting the requirements.
Throughout this document, there are answers to questions in areas that need to be addressed in the Basis of Design. The Basis of Design is a narrative document created by the design-build team that records the concepts, calculations, decisions, and product selections used in the design to meet the goals of the OPR and to satisfy the applicable regulatory requirements, standards, and guidelines. The document includes both narrative descriptions and specific assumptions made by the designers.
The BOD documents the designer’s work and includes, but is not limited to:
a) Ambient and space conditions used in the design.
b) Input and output data utilized for the load calculations.
c) Assumptions and safety factors utilized in the design.
d) Specific codes, standards and guidelines considered and utilized for the design.
e) Reasons for system selections made and reasons for systems selections that were rejected.
f) Specific engineering studies that were done in determining selected systems, components, or assemblies.
g) Specific design elements that were used to meet sustainable goals.
h) Addressing each question and component outlined in the OPR.
3.1.1 Are there any standard details or specifications that the Owner has created that the design team should use, instead of the design team’s standard specifications or details?
DFCM High Performance Building System, DFCM Student Housing Design Requirements, DFCM Enhanced Accessibility Standard. Variance requests should be made whenever there are items that the project team determine do not add value.
3.1.2 What is the current Owner Standards, Design Guidelines or Instructions to Architects?
DFCM High Performance Building Standard, DFCM Student Housing Design Requirements, DFCM Enhanced Accessibility Standard. Variance requests should be made whenever there are items that the project team determine do not add value Form located here and in the DFCM Design Requirements document.
3.1.3 What are the expected deliverables to be included in the various Design Phase Packages (SD, DD, CD), or what standard is expected to be followed for confirmation of completion of the phase or completion of the documentation?
Please see:
• https://dfcm.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/design_process.pdf
• HPBS Project Checklist
• https://dfcm.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/HPBS-Appendix-A-Project-Checklist-2020-03-20.xlsx for deliverables by project stage.
Variance requests should be made whenever there are items that the project team determine do not add value.
See design solicitation documents for additional information.
3.1.4 Who is responsible for approving each phase of the design process, or who is responsible for allowing the design team to move to the next phase?
-Taylor Maxfield and Angela Smith are the two parties to have each phase approved.
3.1.5 If one of the above design phases is found to be incomplete or there are issues found, what is the expected process that the design team should follow?
Design team required to provide a schedule and then complete requirements prior to moving to next phase of design. See HPBS retainage requirements.
3.1.6 What design tools are desired to be used for this project?
• Revit for construction documents.
• Including as-builts in 3-D per DFCM Design Requirements.
6 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
• See https://dfcm.utah.gov/construction-management/#documents
• Specifically Design Management Document section 11 and 12 regarding DFCM drawing requirements.
3.1.7 Is the design team expected to review and resolve conflicts in the 3D BIM model of any clash detection?
Yes, complete with design-build process, Navis works or similar.
3.1.8 List the requirements for engineering calculations and assumptions.
IECC 2021 This building should use IECC 2021 design temperatures for all calculations. Set point temperatures should be based on the DFCM Design Requirements. Building should be designed to ASHRAE 1% Summer and Winter Design temperatures.
3.1.9 List any special design guidelines or standards besides ASHRAE 62.1 Air Quality, IECC, ASHRAE 55 Comfort, NFPA 101 and 110 Fire and Emergency Power, and applicable state codes and standards that should be used in designing this building with appropriate elements incorporated.
DFCM Design Requirements and Guidlines – the May 29, 2024 version.
Pomsla Guidelines - Follow when appropriate
3.1.10 What methods are desired for informing the designer relative to energy efficiency, ventilation and comfort (standard written guides and practices, bin analysis, hourly simulation tools, computational fluid dynamic tools for special situations)?
HPBS, ASHRAE 90.1 2016, eQuest, EnergyPlus, IES VE or equivalent.
3.1.11 Who will own the design documents?
NUCLEUS and DFCM
3.1.12 In what size and scale(s) shall the drawings be delivered?
See DFCM Design Process document
3.1.13 Will there be a requirement for the design team to maintain a Web based project site that maintains the latest design and construction documents in PDF format?
Yes - This site shall be maintained from schematic design through the warranty period of the project, and all documents located on this site shall be the latest version of the document. ACC – During Design, CMIC-Construction
3.1.14 Are there requirements that the Mechanical Drawings should include or specific detail for equipment such as:
All equipment should have a unique number identifier; a detail shall be included for each piece of equipment; schematics for systems, controls diagrams for each piece of equipment, etc.? Generate schematics for each system type, including air side and hydronic. Review numbering scheme with Facilities Maintenance (FM) during SD or DD level design. All equipment should have a unique number identifier; a detail shall be included for each piece of equipment; schematics for systems, controls diagrams for each piece of equipment, etc. Need this as a reference for CMS and O&M manual.
3.1.15 Are there requirements that the Electrical Drawings should include or specific details for equipment such as: All panels shall utilize the owner’s panel naming standards, fire alarm schematic & wiring details, security system schematics & wiring details, communication systems schematics & details, grounding system riser diagram, etc.?
Generate schematic riser and/or one-line diagrams for power, fire alarm, telecommunication, access control, video surveillance, etc. Yes, Arc flash ratings are required for every panel per NFPA 70E.
Emergency exit signage shall be included on the lighting panel on a single circuit. All panels shall utilize the owner’s panel naming standards, fire alarm schematic & wiring details, security system schematics & wiring details, communication systems schematics & details, grounding system riser diagram, etc.
3.1.16 Are there any requirements for a Conformed Set to be issued by the deign team?
This will be coordinated between the design team and the CMGC.
3.1.17 What is the procedure for the design and construction teams to produce As-Built documents?
Follow DFCM General Requirements specification to be included in the Project Manual
7 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
4. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
4.1 Questions.
4.1.1 Describe this project, including the overall objectives?
See Convergence Hall Program report
4.1.2 What is the anticipated budget for the project?
$150 million state funding for total project cost. $115 million for the construction cost.
4.1.3 What is the anticipated construction delivery method for this project?
CMGC
4.1.4 What is the proposed facility’s life expectancy? (General Building, Envelope, HVAC Systems, Plumbing Systems, Electrical Systems)
40 Years
4.1.5 Describe the existing conditions of the site.
See Section 3.11 of the Program Report and The Point Framework Plan.
4.1.6 Will the Owner operate and maintain the building?
DFCM will maintain the building, Scott Whitneys Group
4.1.7 What frequency of change will the building undergo during its lifetime?
High frequency of change is likely based on innovation center program.
4.1.8 What are the overall energy efficiency goals and objectives Comply with the Utah High Performance Building Standard (and identified variances)
4.1.9 What are the objectives relative to the local neighborhood?
See The Point Framework Plan
4.1.10 What are the challenges relative to the local neighborhood and adjacent buildings?
See The Point Framework Plan
4.1.11 - Is it anticipated that parts of the building will be leased or rented out to a third party? If so what is the anticipated leasee and renter lease lengths?
Retail spaces will be leased out, Office Space could be leased out, Residential Spaces will be rented for up to a year.
4.1.12 – Is it anticipated that the leased or rented out spaces will have utilities billed directly to the renter or leasee through the utility (need for separate RMP, Embridge metering)?
TBD – Angela Smith to get info.
4.1.13 - What direction is the front of the building intended to face? How much latitude is in this?
Up to the architect.
4.1.14 Describe the expected phasing of the project for construction and occupancy? Include descriptions for each of the occupancy types.
Possibly looking at opening the retail spaces before the rest of the building. Still being investigated. Will need Layton to look at the phase construction to look at impacts and report.
In general, the entire building is anticipated that the entire building opens at once.
Decision will be made after Layton report by Taylor/Angela no later than end of SD.
8 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
4.1.15 Time of Day Schedules: What is the expected occupancy schedule and days of week each type of space will be occupied?
Residential – 24/7 Offices – 24/7 Large Event Gathering Spaces – 0600-2400 Retail – 0600-1000
4.1.16 - Is there expected to be a Custodial/Facilities Office, Building Storage, Attic Stock storage rooms?
A need for Facilities Office, shop space. Attic Stock storage room will be a requirement (50-100 sqft room).
4.1.17 – What are the floor numbers and/or building height requirements, desires and limitation?
Limit cost don’t go high rise, 75’ max height.
4.1.18 – In the retail spaces will there be restaurants or food services in these areas? Are they expected to have grills, ovens, etc.?
At least one lease space will be a restaurant, and a strong chance that there is a lot of it. Angela Smith will coordinate with TPP. End of January this decision needs to be made.
Tom with FFKR indicated they are going with a soft 50% for now.
9 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
5. WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS.
General warranty periods provided by manufacturers for building materials and systems equipment are for a period of one year after substantial completion as defined in the contract documents. Some specific materials, systems or equipment may have a longer warranty period.
Are there any extended warranties expected for the building above the typical one-year warranty?
5.1 Building System Warranties.
5.1.1 General Building.
N/A
5.1.2 Roofing.
30 years labor and material
5.1.3 Windows.
10 years labor and material
5.1.4 Sealants.
5 years labor and material
5.1.5 HVAC Compressors.
5 years labor and material
5.1.6 Water Heaters.
5 years labor and material
5.1.7 Elevator.
1 year labor and material
5.1.8 DDC Control System.
1 year labor and material
5.1.9 UPS Battery System.
5 years labor and material
5.1.10 Generator.
5 years labor and material Will there be a generator? – There should be a generator, yes.
[Suggest emergency loads only] Suggest looking at inverters
5.1.11 Lighting Drivers
10 years labor and material
5.1.12 Other
Landscaping, 1 Full Growing Season after Substantial Completion Any other HVAC, Electrical, etc. warranties
10 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
6. LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS.
This section is for assistance with Life Cycle Cost Analysis and ensuring the correct inputs are being used to inform the Owner on what Energy Efficiency Measures should be used.
6.1 Questions.
6.1.1 Is it anticipated that this project will hire an Energy Engineer? If Yes, who will this be?
David W. Griffin II
6.1.2 At what phases of design will the LCCA be completed?
Per HPBS
6.1.3 Are there any anticipated incentives or rebates that the project will be pursuing through the local utilities?
TBD
6.1.4 How many years will the Life Cycle Cost Analysis be judged against?
40 Years
6.1.5 Energy Performance Expectations EUI Target. What will be the deliverable from the Energy Engineer?
HPBS source EUI modeling target based DFCM’s HPBS use categories and associated square footage.
Appendix D of the HPBS will be updated at the end of each design phase and submitted to DFCM at the conclusion of design.
EUI provided by Colvin Engineers and reviewed and confirmed by Chris Cox and David W. Griffin II
6.1.6 Energy Efficiency Equipment Purchasing Expectations.
What will be the indicator or Return on Investment for selection of Energy Efficiency Measures?
Compliance with DFCM typically 10 yr. ROI or Best Life-cycle Cost
6.1.7 Are there any efficiency requirements for equipment (computers, printers) or appliances (refrigerators, ovens)?
See HPBS Utilize Energy Star Equipment.
11 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
7. ACCESSIBILITY.
The facility shall meet all current ADA requirements. Systems requiring routine operation and maintenance, such as HVAC components and electrical panels shall be designed to provide adequate access and clearances for all operation and maintenance tasks.
7.1 Questions.
7.1.1 Are there any requirements to provide more Accessibility requirements than required by code?
DFCM Enhanced Accessibility Standard
7.1.2 Who and the approved manufacturers for elevators?
N/A
7.1.3 What accessible means should be required to access the roof space? (should stair go to the roof or is a ship’s ladder or ladder allowed)
Stairs preferred. If water softener is on roof, then we want an elevator. If AHU is on the roof, stairs are acceptable. If chemical treatment is needed, then elevator is needed.
7.1.4 Are there any requirements for accessibility to equipment located in interstitial spaces?
Yes
7.1.5 Are there any requirements for Electrical Equipment accessibility above normal code requirements?
No
7.1.6 What working room is required for mechanical rooms? (including walkable areas and equipment access areas) Comply with DFCM standards and meet and coordinate with building management prior to final approval. 3’ space around each piece of equipment to all sides requiring access for maintenance. Follow manufacturer clearance requirements. Account for future removal and replacement as well as regular maintenance. Plan for removal and replace of mechanical equipment, without dismantling.
7.1.7 Can mechanical, electrical, and fire protection equipment be in public spaces, rooms or stairways accessible to the public?
No
7.1.8 What are the requirements for accessing the exterior windows for washing them? Is there an approved system that the building should be designed around?
Yes, window washing tie back anchors. [All roof systems (mechanical, beacon, vents etc.) system should be centrally located if on the roof to stay at least 20 feet (10 ft per code?) away from edge otherwise a 42” parapet is required. If the access for window washing from grade with a lift is not reasonable, appropriate tie-offs, roof edge protection, and similar provisions are needed
7.1.9 Fire truck access requirements?
Fire truck access to be reviewed with fire marshal early and repeatedly during design. Length of hose reach vs building will be important to assess whether a drivable fire lane needs to be created. See programming meeting notes from site considerations with State and Draper City Fire Marshals.
12 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
8. SUSTAINABILITY REQUIREMENTS.
8.1 Questions.
8.1.1 What are the general sustainability goals for this project?
State of Utah HPBS requirements.
8.1.2 State where any sustainability certifications or achievements will make the project eligible for Federal, state or local tax credits or incentives.
Rocky Mountain Power – Lincoln Harmer at KW Engineering is assigned to The Point project. As relevant to the design goals.
8.2 Certifications.
8.2.1 Describe any High Performance certification goals and objectives:
No certification goals have been identified for the project.
8.2.2 Heat Island Reduction. Provide the list of High Performance Building Standards features desired or required to be incorporated.
Building Location and Orientation Heat Island Reduction
We will plan exterior hardscape materials on the site and at the roof gardens to reduce the urban heat-island effect on the site by implementing the following:
Use concrete or light-colored pavers or pavement at all pedestrian oriented hardscape areas. Colored concrete shall not have a 90-day aged SRI equal to or greater than 29.
We will use soil cell structures to allow large canopy trees to thrive on the ground level plazas and along the street scape. They will shade much of the hardscape and mitigate the harsh summer temperatures under their canopies.
Utilize a planted or ballasted roof at roofs that are visible from inside the building to reduce glare and increase occupant comfort.
COMMENTARY
MB – 05.30.25 – We may want to have a discussion around this and any garden type roofs.
DECISION
• To comply with the DFCM High Performance Building Standard, the building will utilize reflective roofing to reduce the urban heat-island effect.
• A reflective roof with an SRI of 78 or greater over 75% of the low slope roof areas (slopes below or equal to 2:12).
• Install roofing with an SRI of 29 or greater at steep-sloped areas (slopes above 2:12)
• Tan colored, planted, or ballasted roofs shall be considered at roofs that are visible from inside the building to reduce glare and increase occupant comfort.
8.3 Water Efficiency and Conservation.
See HPBS Requirements Section 5 Low flow fixtures –Watersense or equivalent Water-wise landscaping, as approved by Auxiliary Services.
8.3.1 Describe the water efficiency goals of the project.
See HPBS Requirements
13 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
Landscape Water Use Expectations.
Water conservation and efficiency is a key focus of this site. With most of the state in a drought and population continuing to increase, we see this project as an opportunity to highlight not only common water saving practices but innovative solutions that can serve as a model for future development. Our goals focus around native and native adapted plant selection, rainwater harvesting/ low impact development stormwater strategies, efficient irrigation design and potentially graywater reuse.
Watersense Water Budge, Building, Landscape To be calculated when design is further developed.
Building Water Use Expectations EPA WaterSense qualified fixtures shall be utilized.
Water Closet flush rate shall be 1.28 GPF.
Urinal flush rate shall be 0.125 GPF.
Public Lavatory Faucets flow rate shall be 0.25 GPM, and be metered-type.
8.3.2 Is grey water recovery a consideration for this project?
If the agency is interested in pursuing innovative systems that complement the program:
Gray water and its reuse is an underutilized practice that could be a part of the innovative design of this building and site. We would study and propose opportunities for where grey water could be reused on site for the use of irrigation on site.
8.3.3 Is rainwater harvesting and use a consideration for this project?
If the agency is interested in pursuing innovative systems that complement the program:
Rainwater harvesting can be a passive system that is integrated into the stormwater management system using rain gardens, vegetative roofs, soil cell structures, and permeable paving. We will look to integrate as many of these options into the design as possible. We will also look at the ability to integrate cisterns and water storage to decrease the irrigation water needs during the dry seasons.
8.3.4 What level of low-water use landscaping is desired or would be considered?
In conformance with HPBS:
The design of plants on site will consider their water use along with microclimates of their location in an effort to place plants where they will thrive and will be efficient in their watering needs.
8.3.5 To what level of sophistication will the irrigation controls be, beyond simple typical time clock functions and above ground sprinklers, to reduce water consumption?
The irrigation design will make sure to use match precipitation heads, flow sensors, weather sensors and smart controllers to provide an efficient system. We will create irrigation zones with similar water needs based on plant type and microclimate. The subsurface drip will be used where practical to minimize run-off, overspray, and excessive evaporation.
8.3.6 Provide the list of the water efficiency features desired or required to be incorporated or those that are not to be considered.
High Performance Building Standard, POMSLA Guidelines (where applicable)
8.4 Energy Efficiency.
8.4.1 Is there a desired path to compliance for code IECC vs ASHRAE 90.1?
IECC 2021.
8.4.2 What level of overall building energy efficiency is required above code? (none, 10%, 20%, 30%, etc.).
See HPBS - Building should exceed are required for the project.
14 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
8.4.3 Specifics of HVAC energy efficiency are found in the HVAC section, lighting efficiency under Electrical and water heating under Plumbing.
• All cost-effective measures as defined by DFCM (cost effective less than 40 years)
• Specifics of HVAC energy efficiency are found in the HVAC section, lighting efficiency under
Electrical and water heating under Plumbing.
8.5 Materials and Resource Efficiency.
8.5.1 Describe any sustainable material and resources goals.
• Project shall integrate interior materials that support very healthy, productive and safe indoor air quality.
• Alignment with HPBS regarding Low-VOC materials.
• Construction and demolition waste recycling to follow HPBS guidelines.
8.6 Indoor Environmental Quality.
8.6.1 HVAC related IEQ goals and requirements are listed in the HVAC section.
8.6.2 Interaction with building operations personnel. Describe the interface that occupants will have with operations and maintenance personnel to voice concerns over IEQ and related issues (e.g., direct to facility manager’s office, front receptionist, internal company supervisor, etc.).
On-site Maintenance personnel will address issues as they arise in addition to the implementation of CMMS system to create work orders and equipment preventive maintenance schedules.
8.6.3 List any indoor environmental quality goals or elements from a High-Performance Building Standard.
See to HPBS Requirements chapter 5 DFCM design requirements.
8.6.4 Lighting and visual quality requirements.
Lighting kelvin will be determined as part of the design process. General assumption 3000K
8.6.5 Acoustics. What is the desired level of acoustical performance and control (background noise levels) of each of the occupancy types (standard, above standard, exceptional)? List any spaces with special acoustical requirements. Give NC targets for each.
- Event Spaces will be above standard, Residential above standard for Dorms, Offices above standard. Acoustics will be important. Broadcast and Production rooms exceptional.
8.6.6 Are there any areas where a special level of acoustical separation is desired from adjacent rooms, spaces or from outdoors (e.g., between condominiums, executive offices, strategic planning rooms, recreation rooms, rest areas, conference rooms, mechanical rooms, etc.)? Minimally, indicate these special acoustical separations to be above standard or exceptional. Ideally, provide a target separation (wall, ceiling, floor) Sound Transmission Class (STC).
- Event Spaces will be above standard, Residential above standard for Dorms, Offices above standard.
Acoustics will be important. Broadcast and Production rooms exceptional.
8.7 Material Impact Reduction
8.7.1 Alternate Transportation Management Expectations – What is the desired level of public transportation access, car pool drop off and bicycle access?
See DFCM standards and Reference The Point Framework Plan
15 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
8.7.2 Sustainable Material Requirements. What are the expectations of sustainability material requirements?
• Identify and specify building materials that are both extracted and manufactured within 500 miles of the project site. Only the value associated with the regional content, by percentage, shall contribute to the sustainable value of the product.
• Key materials include concrete, concrete masonry, brick, stone, gypsum board, steel joists, and regionally manufactured misc. metals.
• Identify and specify building materials that contain recycled materials. Only the value associated with the recycled, by percentage, shall contribute to the sustainable value of the product.
• Recycled content shall be tracked as both pre-consumer and post-consumer recycled content. Only 50% of the value of the pre-consumer recycled content shall contribute toward the sustainable value of the product.
• Only the value associated with the recycled content shall contribute to the sustainable value of the product.
• Key materials containing recycled content include concrete, all metal containing materials, plastic containing materials, carpet, and suspended ceiling systems.
• 35% of building materials, by value, shall meet the regional and/or recycled content thresholds.
• Identify key materials that shall meet a regional or recycled material threshold within the project specifications.
• Contractor to track regional and recycled content in construction materials using the DFCM HPBS
Appendix G
MB – 05.30.25 – No project sustainability requirements are to go beyond the DFCM HPBS requirements.
8.7.3 Durable Material Requirements, What are the expectations of durable material required?
• The project shall be designed to meet the owner’s expectations for building life span. Within these buildings, the building systems are anticipated to achieve the following life spans prior to replacement per chapter 5, 5.6,2, E, F of the DFCM design requirements:
• Building Structure: Lifespan of the building designed to meet the seismic requirements set forth in relevant section of the DFCM Design Requirements.
o Exterior Building Cladding: 50 + Years o Aluminum Window System: 25 Years o Membrane Roof: 20 Years o Metal Roof: 40 Years o Mechanical Systems: 20 Years o Plumbing Systems: 30 Years o Electrical Accessories, Lighting, and Controls: 10-30 Years o Materials with a useful lifespan of less ten years or less shall be 100% recyclable, at the end of their life. These materials may include, but are not limited to carpet, appliances and equipment, and furniture systems. Any material that is on a replacement cycle of less than ten years, based on DFCM facility maintenance standards falls under this requirement.
o At the completion of construction, a list of building systems and anticipated life spans shall be submitted to DFCM with the project closeout documents to be incorporated into the State Asset management software. Specific recycling instructions for materials with an anticipated life span of less than ten years shall be provided in the Operations and Management documentation.
MB – 05.30.25 – Should perform a life cycle cost analysis to determine the appropriate minimum roof system. Typically, a 25 or 30 year membrane system has a lower life cycle cost.
8.7.4 Daylight & View Requirements. What are the daylight view requirements?
• See DFCM HPBS documents
16 Owner Project Requirements (OPR)
• Workspace – Varies between direct or borrowed daylight and views
• Residential – Daylight and views in all residential units and common spaces
• Event Space – Daylight in all event spaces. Varies between general and prime views.
• Retail – Daylight in all retail spaces. Views to and from streetscape.
• Building Services – No daylight and view requirements.
8.7.5 Health and Productivity Requirements.
See DFCM HPBS documents.
8.8 Storm Water Management
8.8.1 Stormwater Runoff Considerations
Site development increases both the total runoff volume (cubic feet) and the runoff rate (cubic feet per second). Runoff volume increases because undeveloped soils allow infiltration, whereas impervious surfaces—such as buildings, pavement, and hardscape—prevent absorption. As a result, a greater portion of precipitation becomes surface runoff.
Runoff rates are also increased in developed conditions. Conveyance over pavement, along curbs, and through storm drainage infrastructure occurs more rapidly than over vegetated surfaces, where flow is slowed by surface roughness and infiltration.
In addition to hydrologic impacts, water quality is typically degraded by development. Runoff from undeveloped sites is generally cleaner due to natural filtration provided by vegetation and the relative absence of pollutant sources. In contrast, developed areas—particularly parking and vehicular circulation areas—are potential sources of oil, sediment, trash, and other contaminants.
8.8.2 Downstream Stormwater Management
Stormwater runoff from this site is managed downstream by The Point development. This regional system provides both peak flow attenuation (via stormwater detention) and treatment for stormwater quality. As such, the downstream infrastructure is designed to mitigate both the increased runoff rates and pollutant loads associated with development.
Applicable Standards and Requirements
The DFCM High Performance Building Standard establishes the following stormwater management requirements:
1. Design, construct, and maintain Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) to manage rainfall on-site and prevent off-site discharge of the first 1 inch of rainfall from a 24-hour storm event, assuming the storm is preceded by at least 48 hours…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .