B01 Attachment J02-g Santa Fe Asbestos Inspection Report.pdf
PDF 7 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 75H70126R00031
About this file
This is an Asbestos Inspection Report documenting bulk sampling and analysis of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) conducted at the Santa Fe Service Unit of the Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service in Santa Fe, New Mexico in December 2006. The survey was performed by the U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health and included inspection of eight facility buildings: a main hospital (Building 2000), dental clinic, maintenance building, and five support buildings (333, 334, 335, 336, 2001, 2002, and 2003). Non-destructive bulk sampling was conducted throughout interior and exterior spaces of each building using procedures consistent with EPA AHERA regulations. Five AHERA-accredited inspectors collected samples that were analyzed by Fiberquant Analytical Services using polarized light microscopy, with samples designated by unique identification numbers and assessed for damage and friability classifications.
The survey identified asbestos-containing materials in seven of the eight buildings, with materials including floor tiles and mastics, sheet vinyl flooring, pipe insulation, ceiling tiles, caulks, window putty, sink undercoating, roofing materials, and various other building components. ACMs were classified as either friable Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM) or non-friable NESHAP Category I or II materials. The report provides detailed bulk sample results for each building with laboratory analysis confirming asbestos content by fiber type and percentage. Programming cost estimates for asbestos abatement were developed using the Means Cost Guide and local contractor consultation, with an 18% logistical markup applied. The total estimated removal cost for all asbestos-containing materials across the Santa Fe Service Unit was $269,125.85. The report includes functional space maps, sample logs, laboratory results, and inspector certifications as appendices and emphasizes that material removal or disturbance must be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel in accordance with OSHA and EPA regulations.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Asbestos Surveys
At
Santa Fe Service Unit Santa Fe, New Mexico
For
Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service Division of Health Facilities 5300 Homestead Road, NE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110
By
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health
2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx-21 Seattle, Washington 98121-2500
September 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title Page No.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDINGS INSPECTED
3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES
4.0 FINDINGS AND COST ESTIMATES
5.0 ACM DESCRIPTIONS
6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS
Appendices
1 FUNCTIONAL SPACE MAPS AND BULK SAMPLE LOGS
2 BULK SAMPLE RESULTS AND COST ESTIMATES
3 LABORATORY RESULTS
4 CERTIFICATIONS
Asbestos Building Inspections Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As requested by the Albuquerque Area Indian Health Service, bulk sampling of suspect asbestos-containing building materials was conducted on eight (8) facility buildings at the Santa Fe Service Unit in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Sampling occurred on December 10 to December 21, 2006. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were collected throughout the interior and exterior of each building. Non-destructive sampling practices were utilized during the inspection.
Federal Occupational Health (FOH) representatives Mr. Donovan Denny, Mr. Landon Johnson, Ms.
Stephanie Jury, Mr. James Marshall and Mrs. Suzette Numkena, performed the asbestos inspections. Each inspector holds current Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accreditation as Asbestos Building Inspectors. Certifications for each inspector can be found in Appendix 4.
Sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials was conducted using procedures similar to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) AHERA regulation, 40 CFR 763. Samples were analyzed by Fiberquant Analytical Services in Phoenix, Arizona. Fiberquant is fully accredited by the EPA-required National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis of asbestos bulk samples using polarized light microscopy, and is also an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF BUILDINGS INSPECTED
The Santa Fe Service unit consists of eight (8) facility buildings. This includes a main hospital, dental clinic, maintenance building, and other medical and administrative support buildings. The majority of the buildings are modular style buildings. The main hospital (Building 2000) is a large structure built slab on grade. Building 333 is also a former clinic building, which is non-modular. All buildings are located on the same medical complex grounds. Refer to the bulk sample logs, Appendix 2, for a list of individual building materials found at each building. Building floor plans for each type of structure are located in Appendix 1.
Examples of suspect building materials identified and sampled throughout the buildings included floor tiles and associated mastics, sheet vinyl flooring and associated mastics, various carpet mastics, concrete, ceramic tile grout, gypsum drywall materials, wall textures, vinyl wall paper, ceramic wall tile, CMU, CMU mortar, stucco, plaster materials, cement asbestos panels, various ceiling tiles, various mastics, sink undercoating, various insulations, gaskets, fireproofing, thermal pipe insulation, covebase mastic, various caulks, foam, window putty, duct tape, and roof materials.
Suspect roof materials were not sampled due to winter weather conditions for the following buildings 2003, 334, and 336.
3.0 SURVEY PROCEDURES
Each room of each building was assigned a unique functional space number. Each functional space was visually inspected for suspect asbestos-containing materials. Materials were mapped and quantified on maps provided by the IHS or hand drawn maps.
Each suspect ACM was designated as a distinct homogeneous area, which is a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material. The inspector touched each suspect material in order to determine friability.
A sufficient number of samples were collected of each material to satisfy the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations for the determination of asbestos content. Bulk sample logs are located in Appendix 1.
Each sample was assigned a unique sample identification number and assessed for damage and friability classifications. The samples, with Chain of Custody documentation were delivered to Fiberquant Analytical Services in Phoenix, Arizona. Fiberquant is fully accredited by the EPA-required National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) for analysis of asbestos bulk samples using polarized light microscopy, and is also an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory.
Laboratory analysis reports are located in Appendix 3.
4.0 FINDINGS AND COST ESTIMATES
Table 1 summarizes each building inspected and provides hyperlinks (electronic copy) to Bulk Sample Results & Programming Cost Estimate Tables and Analytical Laboratory Results. The information is also located in the appendices.
Table 1: Santa Fe Service Unit Buildings Inspected for Asbestos Containing Materials and
Associated Hyperlinks (electronic version only)
Location Building Number Unit Type
(Appendix 1) Asbestos Present
Bulk Sample Results and
Programming Cost Estimate
(Appendix 2)
Analytical Laboratory
Results (Appendix 3)
Santa Fe 333 Service Yes 1 Santa Fe 334 Office Yes 1 Santa Fe 335 Service Yes 1 Santa Fe 336 Service Yes 1 Santa Fe 2000 Hospital Yes 1 Santa Fe 2001 Service Yes 1 Santa Fe 2002 Storage Yes 1 Santa Fe 2003 Clinic No 1
The Bulk Sample Results Table (Appendix 2) provides detailed information on materials that tested positive or negative for asbestos content. A separate Bulk Sample Results Table is provided for each building inspected.
Programming Cost Estimates (Appendix 2) were developed for positive asbestos-containing materials found in each Building. The Programming Cost Estimates were derived by use of the Means Cost Guide and by consultation with experienced local contractors. The pricing reflects current industry rates. Future fluctuations in industry pricing, both natural and seasonal, may affect this estimate. In addition, Service Units outside of metropolitan areas may incur additional costs due to travel requirements on the part of abatement contractors. For purposes of this estimate, an 18% mark-up for logistical costs is included.
This estimate is for abatement contractor costs only. Additional costs, which are not included in this estimate, are those of an environmental consultant and replacement of building materials that have been removed. The total estimated cost for the removal of asbestos-containing materials from the Santa Fe Service Unit is $269,125.85.
5.0 ACM DESCRIPTIONS
Descriptions of materials found to contain asbestos are as follows:
Floor tile is classified as a non-friable NESHAP Category I material. This material is currently in good condition and intact floor tile poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed flooring material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Floor tile mastic is classified as a non-friable NESHAP Category I material. This material is currently in good condition. Floor tile mastic that is beneath floor tile, i.e., inaccessible, poses little to no health threat.
Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed flooring material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Sheet vinyl flooring and associated materials are classified as friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos- Containing Material (RACM). The material is currently in good condition and intact sheet vinyl flooring poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed sheet vinyl flooring and associated materials should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Pipe elbow/fitting insulation is classified as friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM). Intact pipe insulation poses little to no health threat. Pipe insulation inside wall cavities also poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material is considered an OSHA Class I action, and should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed insulation should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Exterior building mastic is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is undamaged; therefore, it poses little to no health threat. Removal of mastic and/or affected materials or other disturbance to this material, should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel.
Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Duct seam tape is classified as a friable NESHAP Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material (RACM).
The intact duct seam poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed duct seam tape should be disposed at a landfill that is approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for acceptance of friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Door and window frame caulk is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and intact door frame caulk poses little to no health threat. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel.
Removed caulk material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Sink undercoating is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and undamaged sink undercoating poses little to no health threat. Removal of this material typically involves the physical removal of the entire sink (whole) and should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Window putty is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is currently in good condition and intact window putty poses little to no health threat. Removal of this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel using intact removal methods. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Covebase mastic is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category II material. The material is undamaged and inaccessible; therefore, it poses little to no health threat. Removal of covebase mastic and/or affected materials (e.g. covebase with mastic adhered), or other disturbance to this material, should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed materials should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Roofing material is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category I material. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel. Removed roofing material should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste. Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
Roof penetration mastic is classified as non-friable NESHAP Category I material. Removal or disturbance to this material should be performed by appropriately trained and certified personnel.
Removed penetration mastic should be disposed at a landfill that accepts non-friable asbestos waste.
Landfills should be checked for acceptance of this material prior to disposal.
6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS
This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by industrial hygiene and environmental consultants performing similar services.
The procedures used in this investigation attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time, and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all environmental or occupational hazards have been identified and fully evaluated. Where sample collection and testing have been performed, FOH's professional opinions are based in part on the interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at non-sampled locations. FOH assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of FOH or from omissions or errors in public records.
Furthermore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since FOH is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action.
APPENDIX 1
Functional Space Maps
Bulk Sample Logs
6 5 4 3
21 20
Project:
ALBUQUER
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health 2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21 Seattle, Washington 98121-2500
2 1
QUE
SAN
Sa
AREA INDIAN HEALT
TA FE SERVICE UNIT
nta Fe, New Mexico
Functional Space Map
Building 333
ICE
H SERV
NORTH
Functional Space Map
Building 334
Project:
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe, New Mexico
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health 2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21
8 5
7 6
Building 335
Project:
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe, New Mexico
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health
Building 336
Project:
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH
SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21 Seattle, Washington 98121-
4 3 2 1
N02
LD1 BM G1
D
227 22 222A 220A 21 230
238 236 234 232 228 226 224 222 220 2 A A A A A A A
244A
100D
250A
310 308 306
120D
117A 115A
117C 117E 117D
177B
A
119 120B
0A
0C
115 115B
115A 115C
328 326
322 320 318 316
311 309 307
332 334
350 130A 352
352A
179B
179A
361E
361B
361A
D
271A 271 270
271B
A
G613 G612
701 290
282 267
262 261
0A
801A
8 292
180A
G608
G609 178
178C
178A
178B
252A 200C
273A
266A
200A
274A
801B
258A
256A
200B
100C
247 245
2 239 237 2
2 2
B 2
400C
149B
143C
143D 145 141
147 149A
143A
143B 143F
C
361C
139B
135 136 400B
129 506
133A
133B
131A
133 501
400A
E
1F
121D
121A
1C
B
ALBUQUE
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health 2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21 Seattle, Washington 98121-2500
213 160 158
152 150 156 154
209 207 205 203 201 110
100A
166 219 162
100B 5 223 221 8A 216A 214A
18 216 214 212 210 208 206 204 202 200 208A 206A 204A 202A 200A
210A 212A
200A
190 196
300A
194 193 192 191
195B
195A 195
360D
F Santa
RQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe, New Mexico unctional Space Map Fe Hospital Building 2000
C1
Santa Fe Hospital
Building 2000 Cooling Tower
Project:
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe, New Mexico
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health
15 14
4 12
7 8
Building 2001
Project:
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe, New Mexico
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
Santa Fe New Mexico
U.S. Public Health Service Federal Occupational Health 2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21 Seattle, Washington 98121-2500
Garage Door
Building 2002
Building 2003
Project:
ALBUQUERQUE AREA INDIAN HEALTH
SERVICE
SANTA FE SERVICE UNIT
2201 Sixth Avenue, M/S Rx21 Seattle, Washington 98121-
APPENDIX 2
Bulk Sample Results and
Programming Cost Estimates
Building 333 Bulk Sample Results
December 19, 2006
HA # Material Functional Space ACM Condition Quantity
1A 9”x9” White Floor Tile & Mastic 21
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Good 40 sf
1B Concrete 4, 6, 29 No Good 240 sf 2A Plaster Skim Coat Throughout No Good 16,000 sf 2B Plaster Brown Coat Throughout No Good 16,000 sf 2C Stucco Exterior No Good 6,540 sf
5A TSI Insulation Boiler Room
Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile;
5-10% Amosite
Good 300 sf
5B TSI Elbow Boiler Room Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile Good 20 sf
7A Caulking Exterior No Good 2 sf 7B Window Putty Exterior No Damaged 80 sf
7C Window Sill Duct Tape Exterior Yes: 5-10%
Chrysotile Slightly
Damaged 20 sf
8A Roof Core Exterior
Yes: 30-40% Chrysotile
Roof Ply/Bitumen
Bottom Layer
Good 4, 015 sf
8B Black Penetration Mastic Exterior
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile
Black Caulk
Slightly Damaged 8 sf
8C Light Gray Penetration Mastic Exterior No Good 10 sf
Programming Cost Estimate Building 333
Asbestos-Containing Material Quantity of Material (sf)
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 40 sf $4.00 18% $ 188.80 TSI Insulation 300 sf $25.00 18% $8,850.00
TSI Elbow 20 sf $25.00 18% $ 590.00 Window Sill Duct Tape 20 sf $40.00 18% $ 944.00
Roof Core 4,015 sf $2.25 18% $10,659.83 Roof Penetration Mastic 8 sf $20.00 18% $188.80
Total $21,421.43
December 20, 2006
1B 12”x12” Beige Floor Tile & Mastic 4 & 5
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Only
Good 50 sf
1C 12’x12’ Brown Floor Tile & Mastic Throughout No Good 800 sf
1D Foam & Mastic 5 No Good 10 sf 2A Gypsum Drywall 6 No Good 104 sf 3A 2x4 White Ceiling Tile Throughout Except: 6 No Good 900 sf
7A Brown Covebase Mastic
Throughout Except:
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile Good 60 sf
7B Yellow Covebase Mastic 1-4 Yes: 2-5%
Chrysotile Good 45 sf
7C Window Caulk 1-4 No Good 4 sf 7D Blown-In Insulation Throughout No Good 896 sf
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 50 sf $4.00 18% $ 236.00 Brown Covebase Mastic 60 sf $4.00 18% $ 283.20 Yellow Covebase Mastic 45 sf $4.00 18% $ 212.40
Total $ 731.60
December 21, 2006
1A 12”x12” Beige Floor Tile & Mastic
Throughout Except:
2, 3
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Only
Good 877 sf
2A Gypsum Drywall 10, 11 No Good 492 sf 2B Joint Compound 10, 11 No Good 492 sf 3A 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile Throughout No Good 1,680 sf
7A Brown Covebase Mastic
Throughout Except:
10, 11
Yes: >1-2% Chrysotile
Mastic Only Good 83 sf
7B Yellow Covebase Mastic 2, 3, 10, 11 No Good 55 sf
7C Sink Undercoating 12 Yes: >1-2% Chrysotile Good 4 sinks
7D Gray Window Caulk Exterior:
2, 10, 12 No Good 4 sf
7E Blown-In Insulation Plenum No Good 1,680 sf
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 877 sf $4.00 18% $4,139.44 Brown Covebase Mastic 83 sf $4.00 18% $ 391.76
Sink Undercoating 4 sinks $200.00 18% $ 944.00 Total $5,475.20
1A 12”x12” Beige (W/ Brown Lines) Floor
Tile & Mastic
Throughout Except:
6 No Good 1,620 sf
1B 12”x12” Beige (W/
Brown Specks) Floor Tile & Mastic
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Only
Good 24 sf
1C Yellow Sheet Vinyl Flooring
Throughout Except:
Yes: 20-30% Chrysotile Good 1,620 sf
2A Gypsum Drywall 4 & 6 No Good 140 sf 2B Joint Compound 4 & 6 No Good 140 sf
3A 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile (Holes)
Throughout Except:
4, 6 No Good 1,524 sf
3B 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile (Texture) 5 No Good 56 sf
7A Covebase Mastic Throughout Except:
6 No Good 73 sf
7B Interior Door Caulk Throughout No Good 5 sf
7C Black Mastic (On Ducts) Plenum No Good 20 sf
7D Blow-In Insulation Plenum No Good 1,644 sf
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 24 sf $4.00 18% $ 236.00 Sheet Vinyl 1,620 sf $4.50 18% $8,602.20
Total $8,838.20
Building 2000-Santa Fe Hospital
December 13, 2006
1A 12”x12” White w/ Gray Specks Floor
Tile & Mastic
109, 291, 293, BM
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile
Black Mastic Only
Good 118 sf
1B 18”x18” Carpet (Clear Mastic)
102, 120A, 120C, 120D, 121, 121A-F, 141, 143C, 500-504, No Good 3,501 sf
1C 1’x1’ Light Ceramic Tile Grout
103, 141, 143, 143B-D, 143F, 145, 179B, 200A, 202A, 204A, 206A, 208A, 210A, 212A, 214A, 216A, 218A, 220A, 222A, 223, 224A, 226A, 227, 228A, 232A, 234A, 236A, 238A, 244A, 250A, 252A, 253, 256A, 258A, 260A, 262, 264, 266A, 273, 273A, 274, 274A, 314A, 360B, 801B
No Good 3,330 sf
1D 12”x12” Beige Floor Tile &
Mastic
Throughout Except:
102, 103, 109, 113, 115, 115A-D, 117, 117A-E, 118, 130, 131, 131A, 134, 139A-C, 141, 143, 143B, 143D, 143F, 145, 149, 149A, 149B, 150, 152, 158, 160, 180A, 181, 182, 196, 200A, 202A, 203, 204A, 206A, 208A, 208A, 210A, 212A, 214A, 215, 216A, 218A, 220A, 222A, 223, 224A, 226A, 227, 230, 232A, 234A, 236A, 237, 244A, 250A, 252A, 253, 256A, 258A, 260A, 262, 264, 266A, 274A, 277, 288A, 330, 332, 334, 336, 340, 341, 352, 701, G608, G609, G612, G613, 801B
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile
Black Mastic
Good 40,000 sf
1E 12”x12” Blue &
White Floor Tile & Mastic
203, 300A, 340, 341, 361 No Good 800 sf
1F Brown Ceramic Tile Grout
113, 131A, 150, 152, 211, 215, 230, 303, 362 No Good 1,597 sf
1G 12”x12” White Floor Tile & Mastic 223 No Good 575 sf
1H 12”x12” Orange & Brown Floor Tile &
Mastic 196 No Good 650 sf
1I Yellow Carpet Mastic
115, 115A-D, 117, 117A-E, 118, 119, 120, 120B, 129, 133, 133A, 133B, 137, 139A-C, 301-303, 305, 341
No Good 5,440 sf
1J Black Mastic 139A-C Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile Good 270 sf
1K 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tile & Mastic 143F No Good 25 sf
1L Brown Floor Tile & Mastic 352
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile
Black Mastic
Good 240 sf
1M Green & Black
Sheet Vinyl Flooring & Mastic
117C-E, 277, 298, 701, G608, G609, G612, G613 No Good 2,073 sf
2A Gypsum Drywall Throughout No Good 100,000 sf
2B Joint Compound Throughout No Good 100,000 sf
2C Texture 1
Throughout Except:
100A-C, 110, 121A, 121D, 121E, 121F, 149, 149A, 149B, 162, 166, 170, 172, 180A, 181, 182, 200A-C, 201, 203, 219, 250, 251, 252A, 253, 277, 291, 293, 300A, 400A-C, 500, 500A, 501-504, 701, 800A, 801A, 900A, G608, G609, G612, G613
No Good 40,000 sf
2D Vinyl Wall Paper
100, 100A-C, 110 171, 196, 200A-C, 211, 300A, 400A-D, 500A, 600A, 700A, 800A, 801A, 900A
No Good 40,540 sf
2E Texture 2
100D, 103, 111, 121A, 175, 201, 203, 249, 251, 255, 300A, 500-
504, BM, G1, N02, O2
No Good 4,500 sf
2F Texture 3 195, 300A, 312 No Good 1,000 sf 2G Texture 4 195A No Good 320 sf 2H Texture 5 137 No Good 60 sf
2I 4”x4” Beige
Ceramic Wall Tile Grout
103, 131A, 143, 169, 171, 179B, 200A, 202A, 204A, 206A, 208A, 210A, 212A, 214A, 216A, 218A, 220A, 222A, 223, 224A, 226A, 227, 228A, 232A, 234A, 236A, 238A, 244A, 250A, 252A, 253, 256A, 258A, 260A, 262, 264, 266A, 269, 273A, 274A, 277, 291, 293, 314, 330, 332, 352A, 360A, 360B, G608, G609, G612, G613
No God 2,456 sf
2J 4”x4” White
Ceramic Wall Tile Grout
150, 152, 211, 215, 230, 231A, 231B, 303, No Good 3,000 sf
2K 12”x12” Wall Tile 100 No Good 100 sf 2L CMU C-1 No Good 300 sf 2M CMU Mortar C-1 No Good 300 sf
2N Cement Asbestos Panels Exterior
Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile
Gray Cem/Asb
Board
Good 4,800 sf
2O Exterior Stucco Exterior No Good 62,000 sf
3A Pin Hole 2’x4” Ceiling Tile
100, 100A-C, 101, 102, 105, 109, 110, 115, 115A-D, 117, 117A-E, 118, 119, 120, 120A-D, 121, 121A-D, 129, 132, 133A, 133B, 134, 137, 139A-C, 141, 143A, 143A, 147, 171, 175, 178, 178A-C, 179, 179A, 179B, 190-195, 200A-C, 205, 211, 225, 229, 231, 238, 239, 241-243, 251, 252A, 268, 270, 284, 292, 294, 300A, 301-311, 320, 324, 326, 328, 340, 341, 343, 360, 360D, 361, 361A-D, 400A-C, 500, 500A, 506, 700A, 701, 800A, 801A, 900A
No Good 40,000 sf
3B 2’x4” Ceiling Tile 121E, 133, 195, 196, 500A, 701 No Good 1,600 sf
3C Smooth 2’x4” Ceiling Tile
195A, 200, 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 224, 226, 228, 232, 234, 236, 244, 250A, 256, 258, 260
No Good 600 sf
3D Rough Pinhole 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile 501-504 No Good 2,000 sf
3E Exterior Texture Exterior Overhang No Good 2,200 sf
5A Hanger Block Insulation Penthouse No Good 120
Hangers 5B Green Gaskets Penthouse No Good 2 Gaskets
5C Hard Pack Pipe Elbow Joints 149, 182 No Good 6 Elbow
5D Boiler Gaskets 149A No Good 6 Gaskets 5E Pipe Insulation Casts C-1 No Good 300 sf 6A Fireproofing Plenum, 172 No Good 15,000 sf 6B Fire Doors Throughout Assume Good 60 Doors
6C Fire Door Frame Throughout Assume Good 60 Door Frames
7A Black Sink Undercoating
101, 102, 316, 318, 320, 322, 326, 328 No Good 19 sinks
7B Purple Sink Undercoating
205, 294, 361, 361A, 361C, 361D
Yes: >1-2% Chrysotile Good 8 sinks
7C Black Tar Sink Undercoating
100A, 180A, 182, 201, 206A, 207, 219, 221, 226A, 233, 237, 249, 251, 255, 276, 282, 321, 344, 352
Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile Good 11 sinks
7D Yellow & Brown
Mix Covebase Mastic
Throughout Except:
130, 130A, 131, 131A, 134-136, 143, 143B, 143D, 143F, 145, 149A, 150, 152, 154, 156, 162, 166, 169, 171, 179B, 180A, 181, 182, 200A, 201, 202A, 204A, 206A, 208A, 210A, 212A, 214, 215, 216A, 218A, 219, 220A, 222A, 223, 224A, 226A, 227, 253, 271, 271A, 271C, 277, 288, 291, 293, 296, 298, 303, 312, 330, 332, 348, 350, 316B, 362, 701, 801A, 900A, G608, G609, G612, G613
No Good 17,500 sf
7E Black Window Caulk Throughout No Good 500 sf
7F White HVAC Caulk Penthouse
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile
White Caulk Good 70 sf
7G Silver HVAC Caulk Penthouse
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile
Grey Caulk Good 70 sf
7H White Floor Penetration Caulk Penthouse No Good 400 sf
7I Fiberglass Duct Insulation Throughout No Good 40,000 sf
7J Black Tar Duct Mastic Throughout No Good 40,000 sf
7K Tank Insulation (Foam) C-1 No Good 200 sf
7L Exterior Expansion Caulk Exterior No Good 200 sf
7M Interior White Door Caulk C-1 No Good 10 sf
7N (Gray) Exterior Vent Caulk Penthouse Exterior Yes: 5-10%
Chrysotile Good 15 sf
7O Vent Mastic Penthouse Exterior No Good 2 sf
8A Rolled Roof Cooling Tower Roof
Yes: 30-40% Chrysotile Black Roof
Ply/Bitumen
Good 900 sf
8B Cooler Roof Penetration Mastic Cooling Tower Roof
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile
Black Caulk Good 50 sf
Building 2000-Santa Fe Hospital
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile & Mastic 40,628 sf $4.00 18% $191,764.16 Cement Asbestos Panels 4,800 sf $4.00 18% $22,656.00
Fire Door & Frames 60 sf $60.00 18% $4,248.00 Sink Undercoating 19 sinks $200.00 18% $4,484.00
HVAC Caulk 140 sf $30.00 18% $4,956.00 Vent Caulk 15 sf $8.00 18% $ 141.60 Rolled Roof 900 sf $2.25 18% $2389.50
Roof Penetration Mastic 50 sf $20.00 18% $1180.00 Total $231,819.26
December 15, 2006
1A 12”x12” White Floor Tile & Mastic 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 No Good 529 sf
1B Green Carpet Tile Mastic 1, 10, 11 No Good 288 sf
1C Clear Carpet Tile Mastic 3, 5, 7, 8 No Good 464 sf
1D 12”x12” Beige Floor Tile & Mastic 14
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile Floor Tile
Only
Good 84 sf
1E Blue Sheet Vinyl 15 No Good 60 sf
2A Gypsum Drywall 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 No Good 2,369 sf
2B Joint Compound 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 No Good 2,369 sf
2C Drywall Texture 1 4, 9, 10, 11, 12 No Good 1,768 sf 2D Drywall Texture 2 3 No Good 320 sf
3A 1’x1’ Ceiling Tile w/ Holes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 No Good 975 sf
3B 1’x1’ Ceiling Tile Mastic 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 No Good 975 sf
3C 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile w/ Pinholes 14, 15 No Good 144 sf
7A Covebase Mastic 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8 No Good 107 sf
7B Interior Window Caulk 14 No Good 2 sf
7C Gray Penetration Mastic Exterior No Good 10 sf
8A Roof Penetration Mastic Roof
Yes: 5-10% Chrysotile
Black Mastic
Good 8 sf
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Floor Tile 84 sf $4.00 18% $ 396.48 Roof Penetration Mastic 8 sf $20.00 18% $ 188.80
Total $ 585.28
December 14, 2006
7A Fiberglass Insulation 1 No Good 1,800 sf
7B Interior Window Caulk 1
Yes: 2-5% Chrysotile
White Caulk Good 5 sf
8A Gray/Black Roof Penetration Mastic Roof
Yes: 10-20% Chrysotile
Black Caulk Good 12 sf
8B Gray Flue Mastic Roof Yes: >1-2% Chrysotile
Gray Caulk Good 4 sf
Unit Cost (per sf)
Logistical Markup Price
Interior Window Caulk 5 sf $8.00 18% $ 47.20 Roof Penetration Mastic 12 sf $20.00 18% $ 283.20
Flue Mastic 4 sf $10.00 18% $ 47.20 Total $ 377.60
Building 2003
1A Pink Sheet Vinyl Flooring
Throughout Except:
4, 5, 6 No Good 1,323 sf
1B Yellow Carpet Mastic 4, 5, 6 No Good 521 sf
1C Yellow Sheet Vinyl Flooring 8, 9 No Good 83 sf
1D Blue Sheet Vinyl Flooring 8 No Good 240 sf
1E Green Carpet Mastic 5 No Good 10 sf 2A Gypsum Drywall Throughout No Good 4,072 sf 3A 2’x4’ Ceiling Tile Throughout No Good 1,960 sf 7A Caulking Throughout No Good 10 sf 7B Covebase Mastic Throughout No Good 14 sf
7C White Sink Undercoating 3, 11 No Good 3 sinks
7D Gray Sink Undercoating 11 No Good 1 Sink
APPENDIX 3
Laboratory Results
Client Job: 07P-3031A / IHS-333 PO Number: 07P-3031A
JobNumber: 200700081
Routing Number: -
# Samples: 51
PLMi
PLM PLM analysis for asbestos in bulk smp
Client:
Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) Analysis for Asbestos
Method and Analysis Information:
Each bulk sample is first dissected under a 7-30x magnification stereo-microscope. This examination is used to determine the general type of sample, how many and what type of layers it has, and initial estimates of fiber types and quantities. Second, liquid media mounts are made of each layer - such mounts may be of selected fibers (used solely for identification purposes) or may be representative of the layer as a whole (used for quantitation purposes). The mounts may be made in a synthetic Canadian balsam, one of several solvents, or in refractive index oils (media of known refractive index). Generally, a variety of different mounts are made: some optimized for fiber visibility, some optimized for fiber identification, and some optimized for fiber quantitation. The mounted slides are then examined at 50-400x magnification on a Nikon Labphot-pol microscope. Optical characteristics are used to identify each observed fiber type; the optical data are contained for each sample on its detail analysis sheet, attached.
Current EPA, NESHAP and OSHA regulations designate a result of <=1 % asbestos as "negative" and >1 % asbestos as "positive". Samples containing layers that have been determined to be "positive" may have to be handled differently during a renovation or demolition than samples whose layers have been determined to be "negative."
The method of fiber analysis and identification is the EPA Interim Method (EPA Method 600/M4-82-020). The method of fiber quantitation is an estimation technique in which the analysts quantitation is routinely calibrated by reference quantitation standards, and which has been shown to be equivalent in precision and accuracy to point counting. Friability is estimated for the purposes of deciding when to point count. Friabilities determined in the field take precedence over those determined in the laboratory. Those sample layers which are friable and estimated by the analyst to contain <= 1% asbestos are point counted using 400 points, and the results listed on the detail analysis sheet. Such point counting is required by NESHAP (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Polutants, Nov. 1990) in order to rely on analytical results that are <= 1%. The coefficient of variation for the estimation quantitation technique is 100% in the range 0-5%. This means that PLM analysis is not capable of conclusively determining whether a layer containing close to 1% asbestos is actually "positive" or "negative". For this reason, Fiberquant refers to results where asbestos was detected but <= 1% as "borderline negative", and results where asbestos was >1 % but <= 2% as "borderline positive" to indicate the uncertainty in assigning a "positive" or "negative" label. In the sample summary, a "ND" means that no asbestos was detected during the analysis. A "Tr" or "Trace" of asbestos is defined for our purposes as the detection of several asbestos asbestos fibers during the analysis; an amount essentially at the limit of detection for the method. The limit of detection (the smallest % of asbestos that can be detected) varies greatly depending on the matrix in which the asbestos is found. As little as 0.001% asbestos can be detected in favorable samples, while detection in unfavorable samples may approach the detection limit of 1% stated in the method. During the analysis, the analyst, for Fiberquant identification purposes only, determines the "apparent sample type" and "apparent layer types." It must be emphasized that these types are only what is apparent. Often, different materials appear similar or identical after sampling, so the analyst may assign a type other than what was sampled.
Floor tiles present a special problem for PLM asbestos analysis. Floor tile can contain chrysotile fibers so thin that they cannot be resolved by optical methods. In such a case, we may observe a percentage of asbestos which is lower than the actual percentage, or not observe asbestos at all when some is present. For this reason, floor tiles reported as negative should be confirmed to be negative using transmission electron microscope (TEM) analysis. Likewise, vermiculite insulation materials containing traces of asbestiform asbestos present a problem for routine PLM analysis - the amphiboles are sometimes present in trace amounts inhomogeneously distributed. We recommend a hydro-separation technique for such samples.
Vermiculite-containing samples may contain trace amounts of asbestiform amphibole that may or may not be detected during routine PLM analysis. For this reason, loose vermiculite samples reported as negative should be confirmed to contain no amphibole using hydroseparation techniques.
The samples were analyzed under the following ongoing quality assurance program: Blank samples are routinely analyzed to maintain contamination-free materials. Each analyst is a degreed geologist or mineralogist, and has also completed extensive training specific to asbestos analysis for 1-3 months before being allowed to analyze client samples. Qualitative reference samples are routinely analyzed to assure that analysts can identify asbestos and asbestos-look-alike fibers. Quantitative reference samples are routinely analyzed to calibrate and characterize the estimation procedure. Microscope alignment is checked each day. Refractive index oils are calibrated at least monthly. At least 10% of client samples are re-analyzed from scratch by a different analyst than the original, and any discrepancies are resolved for the sample and similar sample types before the results are reported. All quality checks performed for these samples were in control except as detailed in the "Analytical Notes" below. All analysts participate in interlab round robins and proficiency testing to assure competence. Fiberquant is accredited by NVLAP (#101031) for the analysis of bulk samples for asbestos using PLM. Accreditation does not imply endorsement by the EPA, any other United States governmental agency or any private agency or association. Each lab analysis refers only to the sample tested, and may not, due to the sampling process, be
Method: Interim (EPA/600/M4-82-020)Rec: 1/4/2007
Report Date: 1/23/2007 Date Analyzed: 1/23/2007
Fiberquant Internal SOP:
IHI ENVIRONMENTAL
(PHOENIX OFFICE)
4527 N 16th ST STE 105
PHOENIX, AZ
Office Phone: (602) 776-0300
FAX: (602) 776-0301
85016-0000
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 1 of 23
PLM Analysis Summary: Job Number: 200700081 07P-3031A / IHS-333 representative of the material sampled. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Fiberquant Analytical Services.
The "Analysis Results" below are the averages for all layers of each sample listed. The "+ Layer" column indicates whether any of the layers in the sample were >1% asbestos. Please refer to each detailed analysis sheet to determine which layer(s) of a sample was(were) positive.
Job Analysis Notes:
Single layer sample analysis as per client request. Any material or layer other than that indicated on the chain of custody was not analyzed, even if a suspect material.
Some results may have been calculated using client supplied data, such as volume or area sampled, for which Fiberquant assumes no liability for accuracy.
Sample Number Lab Number Apparent Sample Type * Positive Layer Yes or No
Layer Color Apparent Layer Type * Asbestos Results
Flooring2007-00081- 1IHS-333-1A1-1 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestosfloor tileoff-whiteLayer # 1
Flooring2007-00081- 2IHS-333-1A2-2 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestosfloor tileoff-whiteLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedmasticYellowLayer # 2
Flooring2007-00081- 3IHS-333-1A3-3 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestosfloor tileoff-whiteLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedmasticYellowLayer # 2
Cementitious2007-00081- 4IHS-333-1B1-4 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedconcreteGrayLayer # 1
Cementitious2007-00081- 5IHS-333-1B2-5 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedconcreteGrayLayer # 1
Cementitious2007-00081- 6IHS-333-1B3-6 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedconcreteGrayLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 7IHS-333-2A1-7 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 8IHS-333-2A2-8 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 9IHS-333-2A3-9 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 10IHS-333-2A4-10 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 11IHS-333-2A5-11 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 12IHS-333-2A6-12 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 13IHS-333-2A7-13 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (top coat)WhiteLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 14IHS-333-2B1-14 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 15IHS-333-2B2-15 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 16IHS-333-2B3-16 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 17IHS-333-2B4-17 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 18IHS-333-2B5-18 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 19IHS-333-2B6-19 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 20IHS-333-2B7-20 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedplaster (scratch coat)TanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 21IHS-333-2C1-21 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 22IHS-333-2C2-22 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 23IHS-333-2C3-23 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 24IHS-333-2C4-24 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 25IHS-333-2C5-25 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 26IHS-333-2C6-26 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
Wall System2007-00081- 27IHS-333-2C7-27 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedstuccoTanLayer # 1
TSI2007-00081- 28IHS-333-5A1-28 Positive Layer? YesSample 10-20% chrysotile asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 2 of 23
TSI2007-00081- 29IHS-333-5A2-29 Positive Layer? YesSample 10-20% chrysotile asbestos 2-5% amosite (grunerite) asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
TSI2007-00081- 30IHS-333-5A3-30 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestos 5-10% amosite (grunerite) asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
TSI2007-00081- 31IHS-333-5B1-31 Positive Layer? YesSample 10-20% chrysotile asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
TSI2007-00081- 32IHS-333-5B2-32 Positive Layer? YesSample 10-20% chrysotile asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
TSI2007-00081- 33IHS-333-5B3-33 Positive Layer? YesSample 10-20% chrysotile asbestosinsulationWhiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 34IHS-333-7A1-34 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkwhiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 35IHS-333-7A2-35 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkwhiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 36IHS-333-7A3-36 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkwhiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 37IHS-333-7B1-37 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkOff-whiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 38IHS-333-7B2-38 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkOff-whiteLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 39IHS-333-7B3-39 Positive Layer? NoSample <=1% chrysotile asbestoscaulkOff-whiteLayer # 1
Miscellaneous2007-00081- 40IHS-333-7C1-40 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedduct tapeWhiteLayer # 1
Miscellaneous2007-00081- 41IHS-333-7C2-41 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestosduct tapeOff-whiteLayer # 1
Miscellaneous2007-00081- 42IHS-333-7C3-42 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestosduct tapeOff-whiteLayer # 1
Roofing2007-00081- 43IHS-333-8A1-43 Positive Layer? YesSample no asbestos detectedpaintOff-whiteLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedpaintWhiteLayer # 2 no asbestos detectedfoamYellowLayer # 3 no asbestos detectedpaper/cardboardTanLayer # 4 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 5 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 6 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 7 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 8
30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 9 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 10 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 11 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 12 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 13 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 14
Roofing2007-00081- 44IHS-333-8A2-44 Positive Layer? YesSample no asbestos detectedpaintOff-whiteLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedpaintWhiteLayer # 2 no asbestos detectedfoamYellowLayer # 3 10-20% chrysotile asbestosbitumenBlackLayer # 4 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 5 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 6 no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 7 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 8
30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 9 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 10
Roofing2007-00081- 45IHS-333-8A3-45 Positive Layer? YesSample no asbestos detectedpaintOff-whiteLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedpaintWhiteLayer # 2 no asbestos detectedfoamYellowLayer # 3 10-20% chrysotile asbestosbitumenBlackLayer # 4
30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 5 30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 6
30-40% chrysotile asbestosroof ply/bitumenBlackLayer # 7
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 46IHS-333-8B1-46 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestoscaulkBlackLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 47IHS-333-8B2-47 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestoscaulkBlackLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 48IHS-333-8B3-48 Positive Layer? YesSample 5-10% chrysotile asbestoscaulkBlackLayer # 1
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 49IHS-333-8C1-49 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkGrayLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedcaulkWhiteLayer # 2
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 50IHS-333-8C2-50 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkGrayLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedcaulkWhiteLayer # 2
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 3 of 23
Adhesive/caulk2007-00081- 51IHS-333-8C3-51 Positive Layer? NoSample no asbestos detectedcaulkGrayLayer # 1 no asbestos detectedcaulkWhiteLayer # 2
* Apparent Sample Types and Apparent Layer Types are as they appeared to the analyst. Since many types of materials appear similar after sampling damage, the apparent type of material may not be the actual type of material.
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 4 of 23
PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 200700081 07P-3031A / IHS-333
2007-00081- 1IHS-333-1A1-1 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007
Homogeneous
Flooring
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers YesPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type chrysotile asbestosFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. No mastic was observed.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos 1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder, 3# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 5-10% - - - - -floor tile off-white 1
100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Average %
2007-00081- 2IHS-333-1A2-2 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007
Homogeneous
Flooring
No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers YesPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type chrysotile asbestosFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations
1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos 1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder, 5# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 97 5-10% - - - - -floor tile off-white 1 2 3 n.d. - - - - -mastic Yellow 1
100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Average %
2007-00081- 3IHS-333-1A3-3 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007 Homogeneous
Flooring No
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
2# Layers YesPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type chrysotile asbestos cellulose fiberFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per Refractive Index Determinations
1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos cellulose fiber
1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P W F N N H + U
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, binder, 5# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 97 5-10% n.d. - - - -floor tile off-white 1 2 3 n.d. <=1% - - - -mastic Yellow 1
100Total % 5-10% <=1% - - - -Average %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 5 of 23
2007-00081- 4IHS-333-1B1-4 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007
Homogeneous
Cementitious
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. Procedure: tweased apart using forceps.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, 3# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 n.d. - - - - -concrete Gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Average %
2007-00081- 5IHS-333-1B2-5 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007
Homogeneous
Cementitious
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. Procedure: tweased apart using forceps.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per Refractive Index Determinations none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, 3# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 n.d. - - - - -concrete Gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Average %
2007-00081- 6IHS-333-1B3-6 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007 Homogeneous
Cementitious Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. Procedure: tweased apart using forceps.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per Refractive Index Determinations none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, 3# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1 100 n.d. - - - - -concrete Gray 1
100Total % n.d. - - - - -Average %
5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558
Fiberquant, Inc. Page 6 of 23
2007-00081- 7IHS-333-2A1-7 12/19/2006Lab Number Sample Sampled:
RAMAnalyzed By 1/23/2007
Homogeneous
Wall System
Yes
Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?
1# Layers NoPos Layer?
Apparent Smp Type noneFiber Identification:
Sample Analytical Note
Procedure: dissolution of matrix using dilute HCl acid. Procedure: tweased apart using forceps.
Fibers
Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per
Refractive Index Determinations none
Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): powder, rock, 3# Sub-Samples
Condition: acceptable
Layers
# Layer Type % Color Friability
Percents of Each Fiber
Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6
1…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .