AMENDMENT 005 - 70Z08526QLREP0012.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

70Z085

SUBJECT: SOLICITATION NO. 70Z08526QLREP0012, DRY-DOCK & REPAIRS OF CGC ALEX HALEY (WMEC 39)

SEE PAGES 2 - 11 FOR DESCRIPTION

USCG, SURFACE FORCES LOGISTICS CENTER

CP&D2 - LREPL

BLDG. 55, COAST GUARD ALAMEDA BASE

ALAMEDA, CA 94501

ATTN: VALERIE RIVERA-CHASE

SAME AS BLOCK 6

52000PR260000177

70Z08526QLREP0012

1 11

03/11/2026

02/02/2026

Solicitation No. 70Z08526QLREP0012 Dry-dock & Repairs of CGC ALEX HALEY (WMEC 39) Amendment 005

The purpose of the amendment is as follows:

a. Due to the answers on the Request for Clarifications below, the specification has been revised and a copy of the specification is an Attachment to this amendment. USCGC ALEX HALEY (WMEC 282) SPECIFICATION FOR DRYDOCK REPAIRS FY2026, REV. 05, dated 05 March 2026 will be utilized for this requirement.

b. The answers to the Request for Clarifications are as follows:

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-36, Paragraph Number, if applicable,

3.3. In order to work on this item, optional item 37 must be authorized. There are no references listed on this work item that show the upper rudder carrier bearing (i.e.

how it is designed to work, dimensions, or types of materials needed). Without references contractor does not know how to repair. Provide references showing carrier bearing details, or provide a change request for repairs after initial inspections. On the Rudder & Stock Drawing 519-001 Rev D, it states that the bearings were manufactured by Donkin & Co. LTD and referenced a Drawing – Main Deck Plan 2670558, is this drawing available? Page 197, Paragraphs 3.4 through 3.4.3, is the Contractor to assume that the replacement if needed to the upper rudder stock bearings would be the subject of a change order?

ANSWER: All work items listed in Attachment 1 – Schedule of Prices will be priced separately. US Coast Guard will activate the work items that will be executed at the time the Task Order is obligated. Work Items that are considered Optional Items may be awarded if inspection reports reveal the necessity for activation, or if funds are made available, at the price proposed in the Contractor’s proposal. Therefore, Work Item 37 will be activated if deemed necessary by the US Coast Guard.

This drawing is not available. The only information we have about this component is included in the reference section of the work item. Instructions are provided in paragraph 3.4.4 of Work Item 36 to reverse engineer the necessary components.

This is part of the baseline specification.

Replacement of the upper rudder stock upper bearing insert is discussed in paragraph 3.9 of Work Item 37. It will be a definite item, and reverse engineering this component is part of the baseline specification.

Amendment 005

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-18, Paragraph Number, if applicable:

3.2.1. What is the total volume of the non-accessible voids? Please answer in gallons or cubic feet.

ANSWER: Older/Existing Spec and CG Dwgs of Alex Haley are missing, unclear, and/or ineligible. Therefore, exact/accurate answers cannot be provided. The Contractor must determine and/or estimate by themselves.

FYI : For WMSL, Flush/Float Coat Fluids used ~ 50 Gallons

Alex Haley is smaller than WMSL, and Her Size is ~ 3/4 of WMSL.

Therefore, Flush/Float Coat Fluids used is ~ 36 Gallons. (or ~ < 40 Gallons)

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-37 Paragraph Number, if applicable

3.7. The material callout is for MIL S 23284, Class 1 for the rudder stock, this material is not common in the ship repair industry. Contractor knows no sub-contractor that is USCG/ABS approved to carbon steel weld repair this material.

Would 308/309 stainless steel clad welding be acceptable? Page 207, paragraphs

3.9 through 3.9.4, is the Contractor to assume these paragraphs pertain to replacing the upper rudder stock bronze bearing bushings and not the carrier Vee plates?

There are many different types of bronzes with different costs and availabilities of the bronze materials. Can the Coast Guard tell the Contractor what bronze material is preferred? Is there any drawings available to tell the Contractor the OD and ID and length of the upper bearings? Page 209, Paragraph 3.14.7, Could the Coast Guard tell the Contractor what Type and size the zincs are on the bottom of the rudder blades are and how many zincs per rudder.

ANSWER: MIL-STD-2191A referenced in paragraph 3.7.2 lists the acceptable clad weld materials and processes. Do not use the stainless clad weld option that is listed in MIL-STD-2191A.

These instructions are for the insert of the carrier bearing shown in Figure 2. The carrier Vee plates are addressed in Work Item 36

Paragraph 3.9.2 requires a test to determine the material of this bearing. The only drawings available for the rudder stock system are listed in Section 2. REFERENCES.

Amendment 005

These zincs are not shown in any drawing. For bidding purposes, assume that the zincs meet the requirements to the table below and are similar to the zincs specified in Work Item 39

QTY TYPE/DESCRIPTION SIZE (INCHES) LOCATION

10 ZHC-23 12” x 6” x 1-1/4” Rudder

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-31, Paragraph Number, if applicable.

On Page 172, paragraph 1.1, it states to inspect and perform maintenance on the servo pumps but does not mention what is to be done on the pumps in the rest of the Item. Can the Coast Guard tell the Contractor what is to be done on the servo pumps? On page 174, paragraphs 3.6 through 3.6.3 it talks about the servo pump motors and what is to be accomplished with the motors and check the alignment to the pumps.

ANSWER: The body of this work item contains all of the necessary maintenance for this work item.

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-32 Paragraph Number, if applicable.

If the Contractor finds that any valve that is beyond overhauling, that the Coast Guard will agree that replacement of a valve or valves beyond overhauling shall be the subject of a change order? Page 183, paragraph 3.9 Waster Pieces Renewal, is the Contractor to assume that all of the valves in Table 1 and Table 2 have waster pieces? Is the Contractor only to include in its price to renew the overboard valve waster pieces?

ANSWER: If a valve is beyond overhauling because of damage to the valve, then the Contractor must submit a CFR. The Coast Guard will determine whether or not a change order will be issues.

Note that the Contractor can propose renewing any valve slated for overhaul per paragraph 3.6. This proposal would be at the Contractor’s convenience. The USCG will not require the Contractor to renew a valve scheduled for overhaul under the provisions in paragraph 3.6 if the valve is too badly damaged to be overhauled.

Only the valves with an asterisk in the “Type” column in Table 1 and Table 2. have waster pieces. The Contractor is expected to renew these waster pieces.

Amendment 005

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-44 Paragraph Number, if applicable.

What is the Make, Model Numbers, Serial Numbers of each of the new Diesel Engines? What is the Make, Model Numbers, Serial Numbers of each of the new Generators? Does the Coast Guard have cut sheets on these new generator sets that show dimensions of the new Gen Sets on their skid mounts , weights, etc. Does the Coast Guard have the weights of the existing Generator Sets with Skid Mounts?

ANSWER:

C18 SCAC T3/IMO2 624HP@1800RPM 430 EKW W/O FAN 60HZ, Feature Code:

C18MS89, Engine Arrangement: 6283099. The Serial Number is not available yet.

Cat SR4B generators are built by Leroy Somer, Generator Arrangement: 4425980.

Serial Number is not available yet

Please reference CM20241224-4fcba-92c97.pdf. If CPD is unable to acquire, please contact SES.

TP 0961-LP-059-3010 contains details about the existing generator

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-43 Paragraph Number, if applicable.

I apologize for having to ask for clarification on what is in the scope. I may get some better idea once we have photos, but does this quote need to include replacing the runs of copper as well as valves or TXV, pressure regulators, strainers, etc? Work item 43 states that government furnished 2 condensing units. It also states in

3.3.1.2 evaporator will require new brackets. I do not see where the evaporators are provided equipment, or what is specified for this installation. I would like some clarification as Item 43 states 2 condensing units, but in the drawing 282-516-030 I am seeing a forward and aft system with 2 condensing units each. I am assuming that as noted in 3.3.2 to use drawing 282-WMEC-503-001. This shows the 2 condensing units that I expect to install.

ANSWER: Please reference Rev-5 specification update to paragraph 3.3.2 to the following:

3.3.2 The Contractor must modify the entire refrigeration system in accordance with CG Dwg 282-WMEC-516-030 and TP 10995 Section 2.

Amendment 005

3.3.2.1. The only GFE provided will be the Carrier refrigeration plant (Piece 1) and the evaporators (Pieces 2, 3 and 4).

3.3.2.2. The Contractor must remove and discard the old refrigerant in accordance with Federal, state and local laws and SFLC Std Spec 0000. Reference TP 3419 for removal of the old refrigerant in the Adrick system.

3.3.2.3. The Contractor must conduct leak testing in Step 9, Section 2 of TP 10995 in the presence of a Coast Guard Instructor. Submit a CFR documenting the completion of this test.

The three evaporators (pieces 2, 3 and 4, CG Dwg 282-WMEC-516-030) are provided as GFE. Their exclusion from the GFE table was an oversight.

There are two skids that need to be installed – one forward and one aft. Each skid has two circuits in it. This is why the diagrams on Sheet 5, 282-wmec-516-030 look like there are 4 systems to be installed, but it is really only two skids.

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-24 Paragraph Number, if applicable:

3.2 & 3.3. Contractor has no way to determine what repairs will be required, and the amount of the repairs. Should repairs be subject to a change request? Assuming that the shafts are painted over the shaft coverings (GRP), doesn’t the paint need to be removed completely to inspect and determine the condition of the shaft coverings (GRP)?

ANSWER: Yes, repairs are subject to a change request. Yes, the paint needs to be removed that does not damage the GRP. All repairs need to be conducted per the specification and MIL-STD-2199B.

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-11 Paragraph Number, if applicable:

3.4 Freeboard, transom, and flight deck aft coaming preservation 3.4.2 Corrosion removal 3.4.3 Abrading 3.4.6.1 Coating – substrate surfaces.

Regarding 3.4 - Are we correct in our interpretation that the intended scope does not include preservation and painting of the helo net frames?

Regarding 3.4.2 - What percentage of the freeboard surfaces are to be partially preserved to SP-10?

Amendment 005

Regarding 3.4.3 - Is the intended sweep blast to be prepared to an SP-7 standard (rather than an SP-6)? Can these sweep blasted areas instead be prepared to an SP- 3 standard, or is the intent SP-7?

Regarding 3.4.6.1 - Is the intent that only surfaces prepared to an SP-10 standard (in item 3.4.2) be prime coated, or is this to also include the remaining areas prepared in 3.4.3?

Regarding 3.4.6.3 & 3.4.6.4 - Is the intent of 3.4.6.3 that 100% of freeboard surfaces be coated with epoxy polysiloxane, or is this to only be applied to areas partially prepared to SP-10? Is the intent of 3.4.6.4 for 100% of freeboard surfaces to receive a second coat of polysiloxane or is this the only 100% coating application?

ANSWER:

Helo Net Frames are not included for Partial Preservations, but are still Adjacent Surfaces/Components and required Touch-Ups.

~ Less than < 33% of Total Freeboard Areas.

No. WI specify SSPC-SP 6 (WAB)/NACE No.WAB-3, SSPC-SP 6/NACE No. 3, and SSPC-SP 11 (or Equivalent) for Partial Preservation.

(and SSPC-SP 10 (WAB)/NACE WAB-2, SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2, and SSPC-SP 11 (or Equivalent) for Corrosion Removal.)

(Exposed) Substrate Surfaces must be prepped to SSPC-SP 10 or Equivalent, then re-primed with Primer first.

(Remaining) Painted Surfaces must be abraded/feathered to SSPC-SP-6 or Equivalent, then re-painted with Mid-Coat, and Top-Coat.

Yes. 3.4.6.3 Topcoat/Abraded surfaces. is 100% Top Coat of Freeboard Areas.

(Required)

Yes. 3.4.6.4 Full coat. is the Second 100% Top Coat of Freeboard Areas.

(Redundant).

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-06: Superstructure Stack and Hanger, Inspect Paragraph Number, if applicable:

Amendment 005

1.1 Intent 3.3 Substrate filling and fairing

3.4 & 3.5 3.6.1 Coating repairs

3.6.2 Other miscellaneous surfaces

Regarding 1.2: Intent As written, the intent suggests inspections and isolated repairs while the specifications appear to sugges recoating of large surfaces. Should the intent be expanded to reflect the specifications?

Regarding 3.3: Substrate filling and fairing Are we correct in the following interpretation of the specifications: - We are to randomly identify pits greater than 25% in base metal depth or in way of active corrosion. - Those pits and spots of active corrosion are to mechanically prepped to an SP-3 level prep. - Pits and spots of active corrosion are to be filled with epoxy fairing material. - If more than 4 kits of epoxy filler are necessary (2 gallons), additional labor and material to prepare surfaces and apply filler will be the subject of a contract change. - After application of filler, the filler material is to be faired (sanded) smooth to adjacent surfaces.

Regarding 3.4 & 3.5: Thread inspection and fastener replacement Can the Government provide a count (estimate) of the number of threaded holes and fasteners to be addressed under this specification? Can the Government provide specific regions or areas to where these fasteners need to be addressed?

Regarding 3.6.1: Coating repairs - Do closures include doors and hatches? - Are we correct in assuming that we are only coating surfaces that are exposed to weather? - Please confirm that superstructure preservation (including all componentry) excludes all davits, deck equipment, deck machinery (windlasses, capstans, etc.), and helo deck net framing.

Regarding 3.6.2: Other miscellaneous surfaces - Is this reference intended to apply a finish color coat to the entire superstructure?

ANSWER:

Unnecessary. As DeSpecC/WI Standard, Most WIs incorporate3.N Touch-up preservation (i.e. < 10 sqft/Spots, and < 10% of Total Areas). Although No Major Coating Defects are reported, this WI incorporates and includes Paragraphs and Estimates for 3.6 Preservation (3.6.1 Coating repairs, 3.6.2 Other miscellaneous surfaces, 3.6.3 Touch-up preservation) already.

Amendment 005

Thoroughly inspect/identify Pits/Corrosions on All Substrates of Superstructure Stack and Hangar.

Pits and spots of active corrosion are to be mechanically prepped to SSPC-SP11 or SSPC-SP3. Pits or Avg Corrosions < 25% may be Temporarily Repaired using Epoxy Repairs. Anyhow, Pits or Avg Corrosions > 25% must/should be Permanently Welded Repaired by Clad Wed Repairs/Plate Renewal as Applicable and Convenient via

CFR.

Yes, if more than 4 kits of epoxy filler are necessary (2 gallons), additional labor and material to prepare surfaces and apply filler will be the subject of a contract change.

Yes, after application of filler, the filler material is to be faired (sanded) smooth to adjacent surfaces.

The Contractor must determine and/or estimate by themselves. Expected ~ < ~ 10% of Total Threaded Holes.

Regarding 3.4 and 3.5, these fasteners need to be addressed in All Substrates of Superstructure Stack and Hangar, and Adjacent Components/Surfaces.

Yes. Doors and Hatches are Closures. 3.6.1 Coating repairs. Preserve all exterior and interior surfaces of closures, covers, and coamings.

No we are coating all of superstructure stack and hanger, and adjacent components/surfaces. And some interiors surfaces e.g. closures, covers, and coamings.

Superstructure preservation may include tops of Superstructure Stack and Hangar, and Adjacent Components/ Surfaces (Paints). (As designed by the COR) Deck Machinery, Equipment and Fittings are not included in this WI, but they may be Preserved/Touched-Up together with WIs for Deck Preservations. Helo Deck Net Framing are Touched-Up in WIs for Freeboard Preservations.

Yes, 3.6.2 other misc. surfaces reference is for restoring Color Markings/Coatings on Specifical/Specific Components/Surfaces on Superstructure Stack and Hangar, and Adjacent Components/Surfaces

Amendment 005

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-15 Paragraph Number, if applicable.

In Table 1, the bottom section, what exactly is getting painted, and what prep is required.

ANSWER: Please see Table 1 and SFLC Std Spec 6310 for details. All Ground Tackles must be fully preserved/painted.

Table 1: Gound Tackle Components list Hawse Pipes, Chain Pipe Covers, Chafing Plates, Mooring Bitts, Pad Eyes, Assemblies, Power Control Stands, etc.

Paragraph 3.6 Anchors, chains, and ground tackles preservations specify SSPC- SP10 (WAB), SSPC-SP10, or equivalent (SSPC-SP11).

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: Item 44, Paragraph Number, if applicable: 3.8.6.

Per above section, designated intake ducting is to be renewed per drawing 300-027.

Material for these components is called out as 9.5”dia with a 0.40” thickness. Is this intended to be 0.040” thickness (20ga)? If not, please reaffirm material thickness on galvanized steel intake ducting.

ANSWER: The issued drawing contains some discrepancies in material specification and requirements.

Drawing 282-WMEC-300-027 shall be modified as follows:

Material list:

Item # 6, 7, 8: material thickness 0.048” Exhaust piping: 10” NPS Schedule No. 5 (0.134” wall thickness) in accordance with MIL-P-

24691/3 (ANSI B36.10 dimensions incorporated by reference) Items # 9, 10, 11: Deleted

New materials:

Weld Spud: 316 Stainless Steel, 3/8 in x 3/8 in Fitting Pipe Size, Female NPT x Female NPT, Grainger Item Number: 60WL37 (or equivalent) 3/8" FNPT to 3/8" 37degree JIC, Aeroquip P/N: 202113-6-6S (or equivalent) 3/8" JIC Cap Nut, Aeroquip P/N: 210292-6S (or equivalent)

Amendment 005

General Notes: Delete existing note # 18, replace with: Install ¼” NPT standoff pipe with connection as listed in the updated material list for manometer hose connection. Test connection must be in the same location relative to the exhaust outlet for all three engines.

QUESTION: Section/Work Item Number: WI-14; Paragraph Number, if applicable.

In USCG Dwg 282-WMEC-607-004 Rev D Arrg of Chain Locker Wood Sheathing, it shows wood sheathing on all of the longitudinal frames of the chain lockers. Is there any wood sheathing in the existing chain lockers? How many shots of anchor chain are in each chain locker (Port and Starboard)?

Answer: There are wood sheathings located in each longitudinal frame (stringers) including the chain lockers, as seen below. There are 10 shots of anchor chain per side.

c. All other terms and conditions cited on the requirement will remain unchanged.