Past performance Questionnaire.docx.pdf
PDF 195 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design/Build Construction for Recapitalize Central Steam Distribution System at USCG Academy, New London, CT
- Solicitation number
- 70Z04724RPCNI0009
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) form used jointly by NAVFAC, USACE, and USCG to evaluate contractor performance on previous contracts. The form consists of two main sections: contract information to be completed by the contractor (Blocks 1-4) and client evaluation information to be completed by the client (Blocks 5-8).
The evaluation criteria cover five major areas: Quality, Schedule/Timeliness of Performance, Customer Satisfaction, Management/Personnel/Labor, Cost/Financial Management, Safety/Security, and General performance. Each area contains multiple sub-criteria rated on a scale of Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), or Not Applicable (N). The form requires clients to rate contractors on specific aspects like technical quality, schedule compliance, customer satisfaction, management effectiveness, cost control, safety compliance, and overall performance. The completed questionnaire must be submitted directly by the client to the contractor, who then includes it with their proposal submission to USCG. The government reserves the right to verify all information provided on the form.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NAVFAC/USACE/USCG PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information
Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: Unique Entity ID:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission?
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information
Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE:USCG REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMIT DIRECTLY BACK TO THE
OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USCG WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY
DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USCG SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED
TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND
ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
Contractor Information (Firm Name):
Client Information (Name):
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH
BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE
CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
Contractor Information (Firm Name):
Client Information (Name):
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E
VG
S
M
U
N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes
No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .