Amendment 007.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

NATIONAL MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (NMACC III) SMALL BUSINESS POOLS 2 & 3

PROPOSAL DUE DATE AND TIME REMAIN UNCHANGED

See Continuation Page

U.S. Coast Guard Facilities Design & Construction Center 5505 Robin Hood Rd, Suite K Norfolk, VA 23513

70Z04723RNMACCSB

01/17/2023

1 3

7 0 Z 0 4 7 2 3 R N M A C C S B

CONTINUATION PAGE

This amendment is being issued to answer the following questions.

Questions and Answers (numbering continues from Amendment 006):

81. Provided at least 2 projects are between 5 and 9 million, and at least 1 project is over 10 million; may we submit a project under 5 million if it is relevant and similar in scope, i.e. water front, design build, etc.? Or are only projects over 5 million allowed?

Answer: The $5M to $9M is the preferred range; however, there is not a required minimum value.

82. Would the government consider increasing the past performance cutoff of 8 years to 10 years? This would allow small businesses more flexibility in meeting the stricter past performance requirements.

Answer: The 8 year requirement in Past Performance is associated Factor 1 requirement; therefore, the Government does not anticipate a change at this time.

83. When the offeror has a second key subcontractor (other than the designer), and their experience is utilized via the submission of (1) project for factor 1.1 construction, will this count against the offerors total of 7?

Answer: Yes, all Key Subcontractor experience for Factor 1.1 counts towards the total projects

84. What areas within Pool #3 are expected to receive the most projects?

Answer: Projects could be anywhere within Pool #3 the Coast Guard or other DHS Components have facilities/installations

85. Will the government consider allowing the Key Subcontractor to have acted as a major subcontractor on their submitted project experience?

Answer: The Government does not anticipate a change at this time

86. Will the government consider allowing the utilization of (2) projects submitted for factor 1.1 -construction from the offeror's key subcontractor?

Answer: The Government does not anticipate a change at this time

87. Can the designer of records PPQ for a private design build project be filled out by the prime contractor for that project? The prime contractor is not the offeror for this RFP.

Answer: The Designer of Record's PPQ should be filled out by the entity that contracted/hired the Designer of Record

88. If the project owner is unable or unwilling to fill out a PPQ, is it acceptable to fill out and submit all information except for the PPQ POC's signature and assessment?

7 0 Z 0 4 7 2 3 R N M A C C S B

Answer: Yes; however, it should be documented the project owner was unable or unwilling to complete

PPQ.

89. Do the 2 waterfront projects need to be new construction or can they also be renovation?

Answer: Per the solicitation: c) Experience with new construction or major renovation (at least two (2) projects) of waterfront structures

90. If an owner POC is not available to fill out a PPQ submission, would the government accept a PPQ filled out by the DOR's client? If not, what is an acceptable alternative?

Answer: Based upon the National Defence Authorization Act FY2021, the entity that hires the Designer of Record may fill out the PPQ

91. How would the government like "Meaningful involvement" in a Key Subcontractors Letter of Commitment to be exemplified?

Answer: The Offeror should make the decision of how to exemplify the Key Subcontractor's involvement

92. Can FAR Clause 52.216-4 "Economic Priced Adjustments" be added to the RFP?

Answer: The Government does not anticipate including this clause into the contract at this time.

93. Proposal submittal instructions on page 99 reads to include the proposal in two separate PDFs, however on page 101 Offerors are instructed to submit their Phase I proposals in one (1) single file.

Please clarify if you want one file or two separate files (Admin Documents) (Tabs 1-3).

Answer: Offerors may submit their entire Phase I proposal as one single file

94. Drawings can be included in 11 x 17 format. Does this format count as 1 or 2 pages?

Answer: Per Factor 2 paragraph a. Organization Chart does not count towards page count

95. Please confirm that Section 16 of Attachment B.2 can be one page and does not count towards the overall 4 page count for each project.

Answer: Section 16 to include industry awards/pictures, etc should be one page and does not count towards page count

END OF AMENDMENT