Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-194P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-18-R-000004
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_STR_5140-194P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
HOOD ROAD BRIDGE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER HOOD ROAD
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/11
Report prepared by: ES
MILE POINT: 444.43
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 715.17 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
HOOD ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/27/11
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUNDATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
CONCRETE
FRAME
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT APPLICABLE
UNKNOWN
N/A
CONCRETE
000000000000 /
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
16.0 FT (4.9 M)
16.0 FT (4.9 M)
43.0 FT (13.1 M)
28.5 FT (8.7 M)
1967 (EST.)
N/A 22 °
NO
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 444.43 (KM PT 715.17)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 1.41 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 74 & 23
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. HOOD ROAD
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include a spall with exposed rebar on the south abutment, and a lack of object markers on the underpass approaches.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. THOMAS, R. TAYLOR (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JOE THOMAS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/19/11
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.1 CLEAN AND SEAL SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH
APPROVED PROTECTIVE COATING.
1 EA $1,000 $1,000
222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT UNDERPASS APPROACHES. 4 EA $250 $1,000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $2,000
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0 $0 $2,000
$2,000
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
$4,000
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal 5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
N1. DECK SLAB
N MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTHWEST 59.3 2. EXPANSION JOINTS
CORNER OF FRAME. MINOR SCRAPES ON UNDERSIDE OF TOP G3. WEARING SURFACE
G SLAB WITH SPALL ON WEST SIDE. REBAR AND REBAR CHAIRS ARE 4. RIDEABILITY
N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN EXPOSED.
G G
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKS IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS. MINOR 60.1 7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT. 8. UTILITIES
N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
N
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
1. BEARING DEVICES
N
G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ABUTMENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. G
WEEP HOLES7. G
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N
OTHER19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER9.
ALIGNMENT8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)
N N G G G G F G G
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
222.7 14' VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT EAST AND WEST UNDERPASS
APPROACHES. OBJECT MARKERS NOT PROVIDED AT UNDERPASS
APPROACHES.
222.9 MINOR SCALING AND CRACKING OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY
WEARING SURFACE.
36.A,C,D EXISTING 2'-0" BRIDGE RAILING HEIGHT DOES NOT MEET AASHTO
HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3". APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS DO
MEET AASHTO STANDARDS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 23 21 39 35
TYPE 3S2 36 33 61 55
TYPE 3-3 45 41 75 68
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5) ;ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... HOOD ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 033 - CASWELL
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-194P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... HOOD ROAD
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 194P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140194P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.41 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 444.43 (KM PT 715.17)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
16.0 FT (4.9 M)
16.0 FT (4.9 M)
0 - UNKNOWN
0 - UNKNOWN
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.5 FT (8.7 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°26'28.70"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°05'16.50"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 20 MI (32 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 01
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 1.0 FT (0.3 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0000
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
43.0 FT (13.1 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
22 °
NO
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
2.00 FT (0.61 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.00 FT (4.30 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
$2,000
$0
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-194P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD ASHEVILLE
PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE; NOTE LACK OF OBJECT MARKERS
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL RAIL END, NORTHEAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF RAILS, EAST RAIL SHOWN; NOTE
SPLITTING
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF STEEL BACKED TIMBER RAILS,
EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS ON
DECK UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #10 - SPALL AND SCRAPES DUE TO
COLLISION DAMAGE ON DECK UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #11 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
SOUTH ABUTMENT NEAR WEST SIDE
PHOTO #13 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON SOUTH ABUTMENT
NEAR WEST SIDE
PHOTO #14 - EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS IN DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR
EAST SIDE
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL CRACKING IN FLOOR AT
EAST END
PHOTO #16 - VERTICAL CRACKING ALONG
NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY
PHOTO #18 - VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT WEST SIDE
File details come from the government source that posted it.