Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-126P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

U.S. ROUTE 276 BRIDGE

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER U.S. ROUTE 276

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/13/15

Report prepared by: WS

MILE POINT: 411.90

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 662.87 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

U.S. ROUTE 276 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/13/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 65.2 FT (19.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 65.2 FT (19.9 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.5 FT (10.5 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2U6 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1980-JOINT REPAIR. 2002-APPROACH GUARDRAIL REPLACED.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 411.90 (KM PT 662.87)

STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 18.3 MILES TO NC ROUTE 191

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 276

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the masonry mortar joints in the parapets, wingwalls, and fascia which has led to some of the masonry blocks becoming dislodged and fall from the fascia at the southeast, southwest, and northeast corners; additional masonry blocks have fallen from the east fascia at midspan since the previous inspection. Other problems include a full vertical crack at the north abutment, transverse cracking of the pavement over the abutments, erosion along the southeast wingwall, clogged drain at the southeast corner, and a functionally obsolete guardrail system.

In order to help prevent injury to the underpass motorists, a throughout check/removal of loose masonry stones on risk of falling over the underpass roadway, before more permanent repairs are in place, is recommended as soon as possible. Other corrective actions should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

It should be noted also that the bridge parapet and approach guardrail do not meet current safety standards.

Consideration should be given to raising the parapet and replacing the approach guardrail to help improve motorist safety.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.3, 222.4 SAW CUT AND SEAL TRANSVERSE CRACKS ON PAVEMENT OVER ABUTMENTS. 60 LF $50 $3,000

58.6, 60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 20 LF $150 $3,000

59.8 CHECK FOR LOOSE MASONRY STONES ON FASCIA THROUGHOUT. REMOVE/FIX

MASONRY STONES ON RISK OF FALLING ON UNDERPASS ROADWAY.

1 LS $3,000 $3,000

60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE ERODED AREA ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. 5 CY $200 $1,000

58.7 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DRAIN INLET AT SOUTHEAST CORNER. 1 LS $1,000 $1,000

58.5, 222.7 REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST AND WEST CURBLINES. REMOVE

VEGETATION GROWTH AROUND UNDERPASS VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS.

1 LS $1,000 $1,000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $12,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.8 REPLACE MISSING FASCIA MASONRY ON SOUTHWEST AND EAST

CORNERS OF ABUTMENTS. REPLACE MISSING FASCIA MASONRY

AT MIDSPAN EAST FASCIA.

1 CY $4,000 $4,000 $0

59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS $3,000 $3,000 $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $7,000 $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0 $7,000 $12,000

$19,000

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

$19,000

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

It should be noted that the bridge parapet and approach guardrail do not meet current safety standards.

Consideration should be given to raising the parapet and replacing the approach guardrail to help improve motorist safety.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N F N N N N F G

N G

G N N N N G G F G G N N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.3, 222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF PAVEMENT

OVER STRUCTURE. MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

APPROACH PAVEMENT OVER ABUTMENTS. NO PAVEMENT

STRIPPING ALONG PAVEMENT EDGES.

58.5 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG EAST AND WEST

CURBLINES.

58.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

JOINTS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG PARAPETS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION WITH VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG

CURBLINES.

59.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINT ON

SLAB UNDERSIDE.

59.8 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON FASCIA MASONRY WINGWALLS.

MISSING MASONRY STONES IN FASCIA AT SOUTHWEST AND AT

EAST CORNERS NEAR ABUTMENTS; MASONRY STONES HAVE

FALLEN FROM MIDSECTION OF FASCIA ON EAST SIDE SINCE

PREVIOUS INSPECTION. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN MORTAR

JOINT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER. EFFLORESCENCE PRESENT ON

RING STONES.

60.1 HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACKING OF BREASTWALLS. FULL VERTICAL

CRACKING AT NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY JOINTS .

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS.

60.8 NO SEALANT PRESENT IN VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS. MINOR

VEGETATION GROWTH IN JOINTS OF WINGWALLS.

G G N F F N

N

N

N

N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)

N N G F G G G G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N

60.9 MINOR EROSION AT EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT AT DRAINAGE

OUTFALL. MINOR TO MODERATE EROSION ALONG SOUTHEAST

WINGWALL.

222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF TIMBER RAILS. NO RAIL SYSTEM PRESENT AT

SOUTHEAST APPROACH.

222.4 MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON ASPHALT APPROACHES,

ADJACENT TO CATCH BASIN.

222.7 13'-9" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGNS AT BOTH UNDERPASS

APPROACHES.

36.A,B EXISTING 2'-0" BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT DOES NOT MEET AASHTO

HEIGHT SPECIFICATIONS OF 2'-3". RAIL IS NOT CONNECTED TO

PARAPET WALL.

36.C,D EXISTING 1'-8" APPROACH RAIL HEIGHT DOES NOT MEET AASHTO

HEIGHT SPECIFICATIONS OF 2'-3" AND DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT

STRENGTH TO REDIRECT AN ERRANT VEHICLE. RAIL ENDS DO NOT

MEET AASHTO STANDARDS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 19 17 32 29

TYPE 3 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3S2 24 22 40 36

TYPE 3-3 29 26 49 44

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 276 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 087 - HAYWOOD

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-126P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 276

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 126P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140126P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 18.3 MILES TO NC ROUTE 19

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. BALSAM (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2U6 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 411.90 (KM PT 662.87)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

65.2 FT (19.9 M)

65.2 FT (19.9 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 19.0 TONS (17.2 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.0 FT (9.1 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°22'24.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°47'26.70"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 40 MI (64 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 03

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 7.0 FT (2.1 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 000N

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

34.5 FT (10.5 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

30 °

NO

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.00 FT (0.61 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

14.08 FT (4.29 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

$12,000

$7,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1980-JOINT REPAIR. 2002-APPROACH GUARDRAIL REPLACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-126P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF RAILING AT SOUTH APPROACH

AND OVER BRIDGE, EAST RAILING SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - CRACKING AND SEDIMENT ON

NORTH APPROACH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE

PHOTO #6 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR

JOINTS ALONG PARAPETS, EAST PARAPET

NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - CRACKING ON WEARING

SURFACE AT SOUTH APPROACH

PHOTO #8 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON

WEARING SURFACE AT SOUTH APPROACH;

SIMILAR AT NORTH END

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #10 - EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF RING STONES AT EAST SIDE,

SIMILAR ALONG WEST SIDE

PHOTO #11 - ADDITIONAL STONES FROM EXTERIOR SIDE ABOVE

CROWN HAVE FALLEN ON ROADWAY SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION;

NOTE SOME OTHER STONES MIGHT FALL

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - FULL CRACKING AT NORTH

ABUTMENT NEAR EAST END

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #15 - MISSING STONE ON EAST SIDE ABOVE SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - MISSING STONE AT WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #17 - EROSION AT SOUTHEAST

CORNER IN FRONT OF DRAINAGE PIPE AT

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #18 - MOSS AND VEGETATION

GROWTH ALONG VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINT

AT SOUTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #19 - MISSING STONE AND VEGETATION GROWTH ON

NORTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN

PHOTO #20 - VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN ON WEST SIDE; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWING AROUND SIGN

PHOTO #21 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY LOOKING

EAST

PHOTO #22 - SIGN AT SOUTHEAST CORNER