Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-120P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-18-R-000004
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_STR_5140-120P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER U.S. ROUTE 25A
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/15
Report prepared by: WS
MILE POINT: 388.07
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 624.57 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/15
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 219.9 FT (67.0 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 97.0 FT (29.6 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.8 FT (10.9 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.1 FT (8.6 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2R12 / 41920 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 42 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-DECK SEALED
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 74
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 25A
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This continuous concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. The main problems include moderate scaling and cracking of the deck especially over the piers which could potentially be hazardous to motorists when the deck is wet; and some hairline cracks at both webs of the box girder, some extending to the underside. Other problems include a 3" gap between the slope paving and breastwall at each abutment, several clogged deck drains with debris accumulation along the curblines, and exposed rebar in the northbound lane near the north abutment. Due to traffic volume on this section of the Parkway, consideration should be given to installing Type 3 reflective object markers at the parapet ends.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.11 SEAL GAP BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND ABUTMENTS. 60 LF $50 $3,000
58.7 CLEAN DEBRIS FROM DECK DRAINS AND ALONG CURBLINES. CLEAN DEBRIS
FROM ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.
1 LS $2,000 $1,000
58.1 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE
COATING.
1 LS $1,000 $1,000
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA $250 $1,000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $6,000
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK. 6,200 SF $6 $38,000 $0
59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS $26,000 $26,000 $0
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $64,000 $0
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0 $64,000 $6,000
$70,000
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
$70,000
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
OTHER
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
FOUNDATIONS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
PIER(S)
OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
(VEGETATION/STRIPING)
G F N N N N N N G
N G
G N G G G G G N G G F N
G N N N G G N
11.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
(CONCRETE FTG)
58.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON TOP OF DECK
SURFACE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE, ESPECIALLY NEAR PIERS. MODERATE SCALING
OVER SOUTH PIER AND IN NORTHBOUND LANE CURBLINE NEAR
MIDSPAN OF CENTER SPAN; MINOR SCALING IN OTHER LOCATIONS.
EXPOSED REBAR IN NORTHBOUND LANE ABOVE NORTH ABUTMENT
DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER.
58.1, 59.2 MINOR STAINING ALONG EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX GIRDER
NEAR SOUTH PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AT BOTH
EXTERIOR WEBS OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH AND CENTER SPANS,
SOME CRACKS EXTENDING TO UNDERSIDE.
58.2 DECK JOINT SEALS IN GOOD CONDITION WITH MINOR DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION AT JOINT ENDS.
58.5 MINOR SPALL ON WEST CURB, 6' NORTH OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
58.7 SEVERAL DECK DRAINS ARE CLOGGED WITH DEBRIS. MODERATE
DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.
59.1 MISSING ANCHOR BOLT NUT AT BEARING #2, NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SEATS; MODERATE AT SIDES.
60.6,11 MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG ALL
WINGWALLS, MINOR VEGETATION ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION.
N G G G F N
G
G
G
F
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
1. APPROACH SLABS N
N G F G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
60.11 SLOPE PROTECTION HAS A 3" WIDE GAP ALONG BREASTWALL AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS.
60.13 MODERATE TO HEAVY VINE GROWTH ON BOTH COLUMNS OF
NORTH PIER.
222.3 VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST PARAPET IN NORTH APPROACH.
VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTH APPROACH CURBS.
222.4 POTHOLE FORMING AND MINOR CRACKING AT SOUTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 22 20 37 33
TYPE 3 21 19 35 32
TYPE 3S2 25 23 42 38
TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42
DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 021 - BUNCOMBE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-120P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 25A
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 120P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140120P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 7
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2R12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 41920 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
97.0 FT (29.6 M)
219.9 FT (67.0 M)
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.9 TONS (19.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.6 TONS (33.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.1 FT (8.6 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°31'29.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°31'06.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 15 MI (24 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
35.8 FT (10.9 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
42 °
NO
28.1 FT (8.6 M)
2.7 FT (0.8 M)
2.7 FT (0.8 M)
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
3 - CONCRETE/STEEL
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.75 FT (0.84 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
17.83 FT (5.43 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
$6,000
$64,000
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2009-DECK SEALED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
SNOOPER OR BUCKET TRUCK REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD CHEROKEE
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - EXPOSED REBAR NEAR
EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH END; NOTE
TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING ALONG JOINTS ON
TOP OF ABUTMENT BACKWALL
PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT
NORTH SPAN
PHOTO #6 - SCALING OF WEARING SURFACE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE
AT CENTER SPAN; NOTE ALSO PREVIOUS PATCHING REPAIRS
PHOTO #7 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF
WEARING SURFACE IN NORTHBOUND LANE AT
SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #8 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON
WEARING SURFACE ABOVE SOUTH PIER
PHOTO #9 - ABRASION OF WEARING SURFACE
ALONG EAST CURBLINE
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH
ALONG APPROACH CURB AND OVER
APPROACH PARAPET
PHOTO #11 - CRACKING AND SPALLING ON SOUTH APPROACH
PAVEMENT
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING
NORTH
PHOTO #13 - VERTICAL CRACKING ON
EXTERIOR WEB AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH
SPAN
PHOTO #14 - WATER STAINING AND FULL
HEIGHT HAIRLINE CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF
BOX GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #15 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF
BOX GIRDER AT CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER AND EAST COLUMN
PHOTO #16 - WATER STAINING ALONG EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX
GIRDER NEAR SOUTH PIER
PHOTO #17 - WATER STAINING ON EAST SIDE
OF BOX GIRDER NEAR NORTH PIER
PHOTO #18 - TRANSVERSE HAIRLINE
CRACKING ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE NEAR
MIDSECTION OF CENTER SPAN
PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SOIL ACCUMULATION AT BEARING SEAT ENDS,
EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - MISSING ANCHOR NUT ON BEARING #2 AT NORTH
ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARING
SEATS AND BACKFILL LEAKAGE THROUGH WEEP HOLES
PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL GAP BETWEEN
ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION AND
ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, NORTH ABUTMENT
SHOWN
PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #25 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT AREA AT
WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; NOTE VEGETATION
GROWTH ON WEST COLUMN
File details come from the government source that posted it.