Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-120P.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
693C73-18-R-000004
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Bridge Inspection Report_STR_5140-120P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation, newest first.
File Type Posted
69C37018R000004_Amendment_000001.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-157P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-146P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-156P.pdf PDF
NEPA_document_CE.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-186P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-117P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-116P.pdf PDF
Plans_Adv.pdf PDF
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-194P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-149P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-118P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-124P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-143P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-139P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-185P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-147P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-155P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-141P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-122P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-129P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-119P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-144P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-173P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-123P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-126P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-150P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-158P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-148P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-193P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-140P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-142P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-151P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-127P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-153P.pdf PDF
RFP_Solicitation_NP-BLRI_PVT_PRES_FY17.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-145P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-125P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-121P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-131P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-203P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-197P.pdf PDF
Synopsis_-_BLRI_PVT_PRES_FY17.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER U.S. ROUTE 25A

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/15

Report prepared by: WS

MILE POINT: 388.07

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 624.57 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/11/15

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 219.9 FT (67.0 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 97.0 FT (29.6 M) WEARING SURFACE: .......... NONE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.8 FT (10.9 M) ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 28.1 FT (8.6 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2R12 / 41920 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 42 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2009-DECK SEALED

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)

STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 74

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. U.S. ROUTE 25A

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This continuous concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. The main problems include moderate scaling and cracking of the deck especially over the piers which could potentially be hazardous to motorists when the deck is wet; and some hairline cracks at both webs of the box girder, some extending to the underside. Other problems include a 3" gap between the slope paving and breastwall at each abutment, several clogged deck drains with debris accumulation along the curblines, and exposed rebar in the northbound lane near the north abutment. Due to traffic volume on this section of the Parkway, consideration should be given to installing Type 3 reflective object markers at the parapet ends.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.11 SEAL GAP BETWEEN SLOPE PROTECTION AND ABUTMENTS. 60 LF $50 $3,000

58.7 CLEAN DEBRIS FROM DECK DRAINS AND ALONG CURBLINES. CLEAN DEBRIS

FROM ABUTMENT BEARING SEATS.

1 LS $2,000 $1,000

58.1 CLEAN AND COAT EXPOSED REBAR IN DECK WITH APPROVED PROTECTIVE

COATING.

1 LS $1,000 $1,000

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT PARAPET ENDS. 4 EA $250 $1,000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $6,000

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

58.1 CLEAN AND SEAL DECK. 6,200 SF $6 $38,000 $0

59 CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND

DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS $26,000 $26,000 $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $64,000 $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

$0 $64,000 $6,000

$70,000

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

$70,000

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

(VEGETATION/STRIPING)

G F N N N N N N G

N G

G N G G G G G N G G F N

G N N N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(CONCRETE FTG)

58.1 MODERATE TO SEVERE TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON TOP OF DECK

SURFACE AND UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE, ESPECIALLY NEAR PIERS. MODERATE SCALING

OVER SOUTH PIER AND IN NORTHBOUND LANE CURBLINE NEAR

MIDSPAN OF CENTER SPAN; MINOR SCALING IN OTHER LOCATIONS.

EXPOSED REBAR IN NORTHBOUND LANE ABOVE NORTH ABUTMENT

DUE TO INSUFFICIENT COVER.

58.1, 59.2 MINOR STAINING ALONG EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX GIRDER

NEAR SOUTH PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING AT BOTH

EXTERIOR WEBS OF BOX GIRDER IN SOUTH AND CENTER SPANS,

SOME CRACKS EXTENDING TO UNDERSIDE.

58.2 DECK JOINT SEALS IN GOOD CONDITION WITH MINOR DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION AT JOINT ENDS.

58.5 MINOR SPALL ON WEST CURB, 6' NORTH OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.

58.7 SEVERAL DECK DRAINS ARE CLOGGED WITH DEBRIS. MODERATE

DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.

59.1 MISSING ANCHOR BOLT NUT AT BEARING #2, NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

60.3 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON SEATS; MODERATE AT SIDES.

60.6,11 MODERATE TO HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG ALL

WINGWALLS, MINOR VEGETATION ALONG SLOPE PROTECTION.

N G G G F N

G

G

G

F

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS2.

1. APPROACH SLABS N

N G F G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.11 SLOPE PROTECTION HAS A 3" WIDE GAP ALONG BREASTWALL AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS.

60.13 MODERATE TO HEAVY VINE GROWTH ON BOTH COLUMNS OF

NORTH PIER.

222.3 VEGETATION GROWTH ON WEST PARAPET IN NORTH APPROACH.

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG NORTH APPROACH CURBS.

222.4 POTHOLE FORMING AND MINOR CRACKING AT SOUTH APPROACH

PAVEMENT.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 22 20 37 33

TYPE 3 21 19 35 32

TYPE 3S2 25 23 42 38

TYPE 3-3 28 25 46 42

DESIGN LOADING: H15 (M13.5)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... U.S. ROUTE 25A BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 021 - BUNCOMBE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-120P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... U.S. ROUTE 25A

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 120P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140120P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 3.4 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 7

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. GILLESPE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2R12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 388.07 (KM PT 624.57)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 41920 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

97.0 FT (29.6 M)

219.9 FT (67.0 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 2 - H15 (M13.5) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 21.9 TONS (19.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 36.6 TONS (33.2 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 28.1 FT (8.6 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°31'29.30"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 82°31'06.40"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 15 MI (24 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

35.8 FT (10.9 M)

38.0 FT (11.6 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

8.0 FT (2.4 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

42 °

NO

28.1 FT (8.6 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2.7 FT (0.8 M)

2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

3 - CONCRETE/STEEL

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.75 FT (0.84 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

17.83 FT (5.43 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

$6,000

$64,000

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2009-DECK SEALED

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

SNOOPER OR BUCKET TRUCK REQUIRED FOR HATCH ACCESS.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-120P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD CHEROKEE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - EXPOSED REBAR NEAR

EXPANSION JOINT AT NORTH END; NOTE

TYPICAL EDGE SPALLING ALONG JOINTS ON

TOP OF ABUTMENT BACKWALL

PHOTO #5 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE AT

NORTH SPAN

PHOTO #6 - SCALING OF WEARING SURFACE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE

AT CENTER SPAN; NOTE ALSO PREVIOUS PATCHING REPAIRS

PHOTO #7 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

WEARING SURFACE IN NORTHBOUND LANE AT

SOUTH SPAN

PHOTO #8 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON

WEARING SURFACE ABOVE SOUTH PIER

PHOTO #9 - ABRASION OF WEARING SURFACE

ALONG EAST CURBLINE

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH

ALONG APPROACH CURB AND OVER

APPROACH PARAPET

PHOTO #11 - CRACKING AND SPALLING ON SOUTH APPROACH

PAVEMENT

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF CENTER SPAN LOOKING

NORTH

PHOTO #13 - VERTICAL CRACKING ON

EXTERIOR WEB AT WEST SIDE OF SOUTH

SPAN

PHOTO #14 - WATER STAINING AND FULL

HEIGHT HAIRLINE CRACK ON WEST SIDE OF

BOX GIRDER IN CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #15 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX GIRDER AT CENTER SPAN NEAR NORTH PIER AND EAST COLUMN

PHOTO #16 - WATER STAINING ALONG EAST SIDE OF DECK AND BOX

GIRDER NEAR SOUTH PIER

PHOTO #17 - WATER STAINING ON EAST SIDE

OF BOX GIRDER NEAR NORTH PIER

PHOTO #18 - TRANSVERSE HAIRLINE

CRACKING ON BOX GIRDER UNDERSIDE NEAR

MIDSECTION OF CENTER SPAN

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON EAST SIDE OF NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SOIL ACCUMULATION AT BEARING SEAT ENDS,

EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - MISSING ANCHOR NUT ON BEARING #2 AT NORTH

ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT BEARING

SEATS AND BACKFILL LEAKAGE THROUGH WEEP HOLES

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL GAP BETWEEN

ABUTMENT SLOPE PROTECTION AND

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, NORTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #25 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEAT AREA AT

WEST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH PIER; NOTE VEGETATION

GROWTH ON WEST COLUMN

File details come from the government source that posted it.