Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-156P.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Pavement Preservation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-18-R-000004
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_STR_5140-156P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TUNNEL INSPECTION REPORT
BIG WITCH TUNNEL
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY THROUGH BIG WITCH MOUNTAIN
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
NP
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/15/15
Report prepared by: SP
MILE POINT: 461.14
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 742.11 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
BIG WITCH TUNNEL INSPECTION DATE: 6/15/15
TUNNEL IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
LINING MATERIAL: ............... CONCRETE MINIMUM VERTICAL CLR: .... 12.7 FT (3.9 M)
SPRINGLINE LENGTH: ........ 29.5 FT (9.0 M) STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 353.0 FT (107.6 M)
CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.5 FT (9.0 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 2Y7,2Z1 / 00000 YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1958-CONCRETE LININGS ADDED. 2008-REFLECTORS REPLACED.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 461.14 (KM PT 742.11)
STATE: .................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 5.5 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 19
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... BIG WITCH MOUNTAIN
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete lined tunnel is in good condition overall. Problems include, minor leakage and efflorescence occurring at recently repaired drain chases, particularly at 63', 92', 132', and 240' from the north portal; spalling with exposed rebar on the crown at 120' from north portal; and a clogged drain inlet on the west side of the north portal.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, R. SILVESTRY
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/31/15
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
59.8, 222.9 RESET REFLECTORS ALONG LINING AS NECESSARY. REMOVE DEBRIS AND
CLEAN INLET AT WEST SIDE OF NORTH PORTAL.
1 LS $2,000 $2,000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $2,000
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS) QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
$0 $0 $2,000
$2,000
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
$2,000
REMARKS:
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
59. TUNNEL 7
1. LINING G
PORTALS 2. G
CURBS AND SIDEWALKS 3. N
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE 4. F
WEARING SURFACE5. G
RIDEABILITY 6. G
LIGHTING 7. N
OTHER 8. (REFLECTORS/STRIPING) G
9. ADEQUACY OF OPENING SUFF
222. APPROACHES 6
N1. APPROACH SLABS
N2. RELIEF JOINTS
N3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
F4. SURFACING
G5. EROSION
G6. SETTLEMENT
P7. SIGNS
G8. ALIGNMENT
F9. OTHER (DRAIN INLET)
223. RETAINING WALL 7
G
2. WEEP HOLES
1. WALL
N
N3. FOUNDATION
G4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
G5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N6. OTHER
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
NA. BRIDGE RAILINGS
NB. TRANSITIONS
NC. APPROACH GUARDRAILS
ND. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
59.1,4 SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON CROWN AT 120' FROM NORTH
PORTAL.
ACTIVE LEAKAGE ON DRAIN CHASES NOTICED AT 63', 92', 132', AND
240' FROM NORTH PORTAL.
VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND POPOUTS ON
EAST WALL APPROXIMATELY 155' FROM NORTH PORTAL.
EFFLORESCENCE ON PATCHED AREA ON EAST WALL NEAR SOUTH
PORTAL
59.2 MINOR DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND MINOR MOSS GROWTH.
59.8 ROTATED REFLECTORS ON WEST WALL NEAR SOUTH PORTAL.
222.7 11'-10" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT SOUTH APPROACH, 13'-7"
VERTICAL CLEARANCE SIGN AT NORTH APPROACH CURRENTLY
INSTALLED.
222.9 DRAIN INLET CLOGGED WITH LEAVES ON WEST SIDE OF NORTH
PORTAL.
223.1 MINOR DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINTS IN RETAINING WALL AT
NORTH PORTAL, WEST SIDE WITH MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH
ON WALL.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BIG WITCH TUNNEL (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............3 - TUNNEL (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 087 - HAYWOOD
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-156P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... BIG WITCH MOUNTAIN
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 156P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140156P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 5.5 MILES TO U.S. ROUTE 1
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. BALSAM (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 11.67 FT (3.56 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 2Y7,2Z1 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 461.14 (KM PT 742.11)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 00000 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
18 - TUNNEL
29.5 FT (9.0 M)
353.0 FT (107.6 M)
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 0.0 TONS (0.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 0.0 TONS (0.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/15 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 29.5 FT (9.0 M) (16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°31'04.20"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°12'53.40"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 20 MI (32 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.7 FT (1.1 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: .........N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: ..............N
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
38.0 FT (11.6 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
8.0 FT (2.4 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
29.5 FT (9.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0 - N/A
0 - N/A
0 - N/A
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
12.67 FT (3.86 M)
12.67 FT (3.86 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
$2,000
$0
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1958-CONCRETE LININGS ADDED. 2008-REFLECTORS REPLACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-156P
PHOTO #1 - NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH PORTAL
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL ROADSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW INSIDE TUNNEL LOOKING NORTH; NOTE
DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST WALL
PHOTO #6 - PARTIALLY CLOGGED DRAIN INLET ON WEST SIDE OF
NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #7 - EFFLORESCENCE ALONG DRAIN
CHASE ON WEST SIDE AT 40' FROM NORTH
PORTAL; SIMILAR AT EAST
PHOTO #8 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE ALONG
DRAIN CHASE THROUGH CROWN TOWARD
WEST LINING APPROXIMATELY 63' FROM
NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #9 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE ALONG
DRAIN CHASE ON EAST SIDE APPROXIMATELY
92' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #10 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE ALONG
DRAIN CHASE ON WEST SIDE APPROXIMATELY
92' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #11 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR AT CROWN
APPROXIMATELY 120' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #12 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE ON GROUND AT DRAIN CHASE
APPROXIMATELY 132' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #13 - ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE ALONG
DRAIN CHASE ON WEST SIDE APPROXIMATELY
132' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #14 - VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE AND POPOUTS ON EAST
WALL APPROXIMATELY 155' FROM NORTH
PORTAL
PHOTO #15 - DRAIN CHASES WITH ACTIVE WATER LEAKAGE AND
EFFLORESCENCE APPROXIMATELY 240' FROM NORTH PORTAL
PHOTO #16 - PIECE OF WOOD IMBEDDED IN CONCRETE IN WEST WALL
APPROXIMATELY 30' FROM SOUTH END; NOTE DELAMINATION
PHOTO #17 - GOOD CONDITION PATCHED AREA ON THE WEST WALL
NEAR SOUTH PORTAL
PHOTO #18 - ROTATED REFLECTORS ON WEST WALL NEAR SOUTH
PORTAL
PHOTO #19 - MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ALONG CROWN NEAR SOUTH
PORTAL
PHOTO #20 - EFFLORESCENCE ON PATCHED AREA ON EAST WALL
NEAR SOUTH PORTAL
PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RINGSTONES AT PORTALS, WEST SIDE
OF SOUTH PORTAL SHOWN
PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL MOSS GROWTH ON
PORTALS, EAST SIDE OF SOUTH PORTAL
File details come from the government source that posted it.