Amendment 4 - 47PH0824R0004.pdf
PDF 859 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PH0824R0004
About this file
This document is Amendment 4 to Solicitation 47PH0824R0004 for the Ysleta Land Port of Entry Pavement Replacement Repairs Project in El Paso, Texas.
The amendment provides additional information related to the solicitation, including a running list of questions and answers, attachment of TXDOT compliant concrete mix designs, and a reminder of key dates. The total pavement area for replacement is approximately 252,000 square feet, which includes 8,500 cubic yards of concrete and 3,500 cubic yards of asphalt. GSA will not accept preliminary EPDs or allow adjustments to concrete mix designs that would exceed the Low Embodied Carbon (LEC) requirements. Reinforcing steel and asphalt must also meet the LEC greenhouse gas emissions limits. Proposals are due by 12:00 PM CDT on May 16, 2024, and the government anticipates award by August 1, 2024. This is a Total Small Business Set-aside with a NAICS code of 237310 and a $45 million size standard.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
Ysleta Land Port of Entry Pavement Replacement Repairs Project
See following pages for description of Amendment
Acquisition Management Division Acquisition Program Support Branch 819 Taylor Street: RM 11A09
Same as Box 6
04/47PH0824R0004
1 7
04/11/2024
04/11/2024
Solicitation 47PH0824R0004 Amendment 4 Ysleta Pavement Repairs Replacement Project, El Paso, TX
Amendment No. 4 Ysleta Pavement replacement Repairs Project, El Paso, Texas
This amendment is issued to provide the following:
1) The running list of questions and answers. Questions 1 through 19 that have been answered in Amendments 1 through 3. Questions 20 through 24 are asked and answered in Amendment 4.
2) The TXDOT compliant mix designs indicating the current calculated GWP limits for Class P concrete charts are attached (1 page) to answer question number 22.
3) As a reminder all questions are to be submitted to Jason Gerloff at Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov. The last day to submit a question is May 1, 2024.
REMINDER: Proposal Due date remains the same, May 16, 2024, at 12:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time (CDT). Only electronic submissions are allowed, and all submissions are to be emailed to Jason Gerloff at: Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov.
mailto:Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov
Ysleta Land Port of Entry Pavement Replacement Repairs Project, Request for Information
1) Can a company use a final CPARs evaluation instead of the past performance questionnaire?
Answer: Yes, for Factor 1 (Company), No, for Factor 2 (Key Individuals)
2) When is the proposal due?
Answer: May 16, 2024, at 12:00 P.M. Central Time
3) When is the last date a contractor can submit a question to be answered in an Amendment?
Answer: May 1, 2024, at 12:00 P.M. Central Time.
4) Which form do we fill out for Factor 4?
Answer: Fill out page 4 and 5 of the Request for Proposal (RFP) and fill out the Excel spreadsheet
(attachment 4) titled Excel spreadsheet titled Factor 4 LEC Material IRA Sustainability Factor
Table). Both the PDF and Excel spreadsheet are required with the proposal.
5) Is GSA aware of any suppliers who have an EPD that meets the GSA minimum requirements per Factor 4 in the geographical area of Ysleta?
Answer: No, GSA is unaware of any concrete suppliers in the area of Ysleta/ El Paso that currently have EPDs. A free, public Building Transparency EPD map (https://www.buildingtransparency.org/resources/maps/) is updated weekly for everyone’s information.
6) If any LEC materials are from Mexico, are we to submit all of the information required
Under FAR 52.225-11 with our proposal?
Answer: Yes. Both FAR 52.225-10 and 52.225-11 are applicable and contain necessary information you need when considering LEC materials from Mexico for this procurement. You should comply with both of these clauses and submit all necessary information with your proposal. Any information provided for the Buy American Act will not be counted in the technical 40 page limit.
7) Do I need a GACA account? (Attachment 1)
Answer: No, a GACA account is only required when GSA is unable to attached all of the attachments on SAM.Gov. GSA was successful in attaching the RFP, 14 attachments and two reference documents to SAM.gov.
8) How do we submit the proposal to GSA?
Answer: The proposal is to be sent to Jason Gerloff at Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov. This is the only vehicle for submitting a proposal.
First eight questions were answered in Amendment 1.
https://www.buildingtransparency.org/resources/maps/ https://www.buildingtransparency.org/resources/maps/ https://www.buildingtransparency.org/resources/maps/ mailto:Jason.gerloff@gsa.gov
9) As per TXDOT air entrainment in concrete for class P concrete is no longer required in the El Paso District. Will GSA accept the TXDOT Class P Concrete approved design for El Paso District without requiring air entrainment?
Answer: If air entrainment is omitted, contractor shall lower the w/c ratio to a maximum of 0.4 in order to increase the strength and ultimately the durability of the concrete.
10) Section 32 12 16 Asphalt Concrete Paving 3.3 Asphalt Surface Course calls out for Item 340 however does not specify Type or PG grade oil to be used for pavement details for HMAC underneath concrete pavement shown on plan sheet C 400. TXDOT typically specifies for this application Item 340 TXDOT Type D With PG 64-22 to serve as a bond breaker between concrete pavement and base course. Will GSA require TXDOT Item 340 Type D With PG 64-22 oil for this application?
Answer: Contractor shall use Type B with PG 64-22 or greater for the asphalt 4-inch base course.
11) Will GSA post the pre-bid attendee list?
Answer: Yes, the attendee list from the pre-proposal meeting will be included in Amendment 2.
12) Is there an interested vendors list that will be posted on the on Sam.Gov website?
Answer: As of the pre-proposal meeting (Thursday, March 21, 2024) the only interested party list is the attendees from the meeting. The sign-in sheet with their information is included in Amendment 2. All amendments are posted on SAM.Gov.
13) Are subcontractors required to be small businesses in order to collaborate with the primary contractor that has been awarded?
Answer: NO. Only the prime contractor who is awarded the contract from the Government has to be a small business. Sub-contractors can be small or large business concerns.
14) Will GSA allow the use of TXDOT Type D 1993 Recycled Concrete Crushed Base
Course (See Attached) for Flex Base as shown on Plan Sheet C400.
Answer: Yes. Refer to SECTION 32 12 16 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING Paragraph
2.3 BASE MATERIAL, Paragraph B. TXDOT Item 247.
15) Is there a Geotech Report available to view.
Answer: Yes, attached to Amendment 3 is the USDA Custom Soil Resource Report (45 pages).
16) Within the drawings, starting from sheet T500, there are call-outs recommending the use of concrete barricades to safeguard the worksite.
Could water barriers serve as a viable alternative for protecting the worksite?
Answer: Water barriers can be used as an alternative only on POV areas.
17) Per the solicitation, the purpose of this project is to address approximately 725,000 sf of pavement. After conducting an in-house quantity assessment, the contractor identified disparities between the quantities measured and those presented in the solicitation. Could you please clarify whether this square foot quantity pertains solely to the concrete pavement or if it also encompasses the asphaltic layer and the flex base layer?
Answer: Total square footage of pavement replacement is approximately 252,000 sf which translates to 8,500 CY of concrete considering the different thicknesses specified on the plans and 3,500 CY of asphalt.
18) Would it be acceptable for a representative end-user or Contracting Officer /
Contracting Officer Representative, who no longer holds the same role as during the referenced project, to fill out the "Past Experience and Performance of the Company" evaluation report questionnaire?
Answer: Yes, as long as it is explained what their role was during the project.
19) If you were a subcontractor and did not have direct contact with the end user representative of a similar project, can a representative of the general contractor serve as the person to fill out the "Past Experience and Performance of the Company" evaluation report questionnaire?
Answer: NO, the Past Experience and Pat Performance MUST come from the Contractor who was the Prime Contractor.
Questions 1 through 19 have all been answered in Amendments 1 through 3.
20) How will GSA handle the procurement of materials testing for this solicitation.
Will that responsibility fall to the awarded General Contractor, will that be up to the GC to decide which quality assurance subcontractor to use?
Answer: The responsibility falls under the awarded Contractor. All interested parties are to review Section 01 40 00 – Quality Assurance & Control Requirements Guidance.
21) Can a ready mix concrete mobile batch plant get an EPD without 12 months of operating data?
Answer: Yes. The latest concrete product category rule (PCR) includes Appendix Z: Deviation", allowing mobile batch plants to use estimated operating data to get an EPD. Concrete PCR version 2.3 (February 2024) notes that "Average operations for new portable plants or plants that have not been used enough to cover the 12-month period may be estimated based on operational data for similar equipment used in similar applications." Please contact concrete PCR program operator NSF International at sustainability@nsf.org or 734-476-2543 with any questions."
22) Building on question #9 from Amendment #3, asking that as per TXDOT doesn't utilize air entrainment in the El Paso District, with the answer recommending instead a water-to-cement ratio decrease to a maximum of 0.4 to increase concrete strength and durability. This would entail increasing cement content up to 38%, potentially pushing the LEC (Low Embodied Carbon) requirements beyond acceptable limits thus affecting the EPD score.
Is this adjustment deemed acceptable by GSA?
Answer: No. Reference the attached pre-existing TxDOT compliant mix designs indicating the current calculated GWP limits for Class P concrete.
23) Due to the dynamics of environmental product declaration generation, it's possible that some producers and/or suppliers may not have completed it 100%. We want to ascertain whether it's acceptable to submit a preliminary proposal through a temporary pre-qualification process, with the final certificate to be provided in subsequent weeks?
Answer: NO
24) Does the reinforcing steel and asphalt have to meet the LEC GWP requirements?
Answer: Yes. Steel must comply with the GWP requirements. Asphalt must also comply with the GWP requirements whether being used as the finished product or as a base material. Any product that is acquired outside the United States shall comply with Buy America Act, FAR 52.225-11 and 52.225-12.
https://d2evkimvhatqav.cloudfront.net/documents/PCR-Product-Category-Rules/NSF-1112-19-w-2024-dev-2024Ext.pdf?v=1709737159#page=41 mailto:sustainability@nsf.org
TxDOT Compliant Mix Designs GWP Es mates from NRMCA_Ysleta LPOE, El Paso, TX These charts are in reference to question 22, Amendment 4.
Typical El Paso, TX Mix Designs
Cement Source GCC/Samalayca Cement Source GCC/Samalayca Cement Source GCC/Samalayca Cement Source GCC/Samalayca Cement Source GCC/Samalayca Cement Type Type I/II Cement Type Type IL Cement Type Type IL Cement Type Type I/II Cement Type Type IL SCM Source Mexico SCM Source N/A SCM Source N/A SCM Source Escelante SCM Source Mexico SCM Type Class F SCM Type N/A SCM Type N/A SCM Type Class F SCM Type Class F
Coarse Agg 1962 Coarse Agg 1951 Coarse Agg 1530 Coarse Agg 1593 Coarse Agg 1820 Fine Agg 1350 Fine Agg 1331 Fine Agg 1800 Fine Agg 1289 Fine Agg 1380 Cement 416 Cement 465 Cement 450 Cement 451 Cement 451
SCM (20%) 104 SCM (0%) 0 SCM (0%) 0 SCM (20%) 113 SCM (20%) 113
water 253 water 233 water 267 water 254 water 248 Admix Ty D, oz/cwt 5 Admix Type A, oz/cwt 7 Admix Type A, oz/cwt 7 Admix Type A, oz/cwt 8 Admix Type A, oz/cwt 7
Admix Type F, oz/cwt 7 Admix Type F, oz/cwt 6
Specified Strength, psi 4000 Specified Strength, psi 4000 Specified Strength, psi 3000 Specified Strength, psi 3600 Specified Strength, psi 4000 7 day compression, psi 4630 7 day compression, psi 5160 7 day compression, psi 2680 7 day compression, psi 3630 7 day compression, psi 4260 28 day compression, psi 5660 28 day compression, psi 6300 28 day compression, psi 3420 28 day compression, psi 4830 28 day compression, psi 6010 28‐day % over specified strength 41.5 28‐day % over specified stre 57.5 28‐day % over specified stre 14.0 28‐day % over specified stre 34.2 28‐day % over specified stre 50.3 GWP, KgCO2e/yd
3 225 Meet Limit? 240.6 259.6 238.6 224.8 GSA IRA GWP Limit ‐ Average or Better, KgCO2e/yd3 (Specified Strength) 269.1 Y 269.1 Y 243.1 N 258.7 Y 269.1 Y GSA IRA GWP Limit ‐ Top 40%, KgCO2e/yd3 (Specified Strength) 249.2 Y 249.2 Y 222.5 N 238.5 N 249.2 Y GSA IRA GWP Limit ‐ Top 20%, KgCO2e/yd3 (Specified Strength) 217.1 N 217.1 N 196.5 N 208.5 N 217.1 N Baseline (NRMCA South Central) GWP, KgCO2e/yd
3 (Specified Strength) 218.6 N 218.6 N 187.7 N 206.2 N 218.6 N Baseline (NRMCA IW EPD) GWP, KgCO2e/yd
3 (Specified Strength) 251.7 Y 293.3 Y 238.1 N 251.7 Y 251.7 Y Cement GWP KgCO2e / metric ton (Industry Average) 922 846 846 922 846 Cement GWP KgCO2e / metric ton (Plant or Product EPD) 1104 800 800 1104 800 % change from industry average 19.7 ‐5.4 ‐5.4 19.7 ‐5.4
Class P Class P Class A
Mix Proportions (lb/cy or dosage) Mix Proportions (lb/cy or dosage) Mix Proportions (lb/cy or dosage) Mix Proportions (lb/cy or dosage) Mix Proportions (lb/cy or dosage)
Trial Batch Strength Data Trial Batch Strength Data Trial Batch Strength Data Trial Batch Strength Data Trial Batch Strength Data
Class C Class S
GSA (Avg) GSA (40%) GSA (20%) NRMCA South Central NRMCA IW EPD Class P1 (4,000 psi) 225 269.1 249.2 217.1 218.6 251.7 Class P2 (4,000 psi) 240.6 269.1 249.2 217.1 218.6 293.3 Class A (3,000 psi) 259.6 243.1 222.5 196.5 187.7 238.1 Class C (3,600 psi) 238.6 258.7 238.5 208.5 206.2 251.7 Class S (4,000 psi) 224.8 269.1 249.2 217.1 218.6 251.7
El Paso TxDOT Concrete Class ]
Baseline GWP, KgCO2e/yd3 at Specified Strength
Amendment 04: Solicitation 47PH0824R0004 Ysleta Land Port of Entry Pavement Replacement Repairs Project.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .