The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
A COMPLETED, SIGNED, AND DATED COPY OF THIS CHECKLIST MUST BE
USED AS THE COVER SHEET FOR THE SUBMITTED QUOTE
Solicitation 47PB0021Q0001 Murphy Operations and Maintenance Appendix A Quote Checklist Cover Sheet
VENDOR NAME:
QUOTE DATE:
| QUOTE ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE SOLICITATION |
| Per |
| On Pg. |
| YES |
1. Is the Vendor not debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for Federal Agency contract awards?
| 2. Does the Vendor meet the NAICS Code 561210 size standard (less than $47 million in average annual receipts)? |
| RFQ 1.1 |
| 4 |
| |_| |
| 3. If a Teaming Arrangement, does the Team collectively possess the required Special Item Numbers (SINs): 561210FAC, ANCRA, ANCILLARY, and OLM? |
| RFQ 1.3 |
| 5 |
| |_| |
| 4. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote that includes the RFQ number? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.i |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 5. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote that includes the GSA Schedule Contract Number and expiration date? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.ii |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 6. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote that includes the Vendor’s SAM Unique Entity ID (UEI) number? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.iii |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 7. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote that includes the name, address, telephone, and email address of the Vendor? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.iv |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 8. Has the Vendor submitted evidence of its status as a Small Business, SDB, HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.v.i |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 9. If the Vendor qualifies in multiple socioeconomic categories, has it submitted evidence for each? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.v.ii |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 10. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member submitted evidence of its status as a Small Business, SDB, HUBZone, SDVOSB, or WOSB? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.v.iii |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 11. Has the Vendor submitted a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the RFQ? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.vi |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 12. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote that includes the name, title, contact information, and signature of the person authorized to sign the quote and individuals authorized to negotiate on behalf of the Vendor? |
| RFQ 2.1.1.vii |
| 6 |
| |_| |
| 13. Minimum 120-day acceptance period for offer abided by? |
| RFQ 2.1.6 |
| 7 |
| |_| |
| 14. Has the Vendor submitted a Quote without any assumptions, caveats or exceptions? |
| RFQ 2.1.8 |
| 7 |
| |_| |
| 15. Is the Solicitation Form (SF-1449) signed and dated? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| 16. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member signed and dated the SF-1449? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| 17. Are all the Amendments signed and dated or acknowledged on the SF-1449? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| 18. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member signed and dated all Amendments or acknowledged them on the SF-1449? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| 19. Has the Vendor submitted a fully-completed Electronic Offer Sheet in Microsoft Excel and PDF format? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
20. Do the Line Items in the Electronic Offer Sheet match the Line Items on the SF-1449?
| 21. Has the Vendor entered the Company Name and Address in the "Cover Page" tab of the Electronic Offer Sheet? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 22. Has the Vendor supplied their blanket Contract Labor Category Discount (if offered) in the "Labor Discounts" tab or attached a list of the current 03FAC contract labor category pricing with a discount rate listed for each labor category? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 23. Has the Vendor supplied a crosswalk between the GSA Schedule Contract 03FAC Contract Labor Categories and the SCLS/CBA Equivalent Code Titles in the "Labor Category Crosswalk" tab? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 24. Has the Vendor indicated whether or not a Post-Award CBA adjustment is required for each Labor Category in the "Labor Category Crosswalk" tab? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 25. Has the Vendor supplied a complete breakdown of the BPA Rates (to include wages, hours, fringe benefits, taxes, and all fees and burdens) for all Labor Classifications in the "Rates Breakout" tab? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 26. Has the Vendor entered pricing for every Line Item listed for each performance period for each contract performance period tab (i.e., Base Period, Option 1 Period, etc.) in the Electronic Offer Sheet? |
| RFQ Attachment 5 |
| 27. Have all recurring monthly service Line Item rates been rounded to the nearest dollar in the Electronic Offer Sheet? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
RFQ Attachment 5
| 28. Have all non-recurring service Line Item rates been rounded to no more than two decimal places in the Electronic Offer Sheet? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.1 |
RFQ Attachment 5
| 29. Has the Vendor submitted a copy of its GSA Schedule MAS contract and all Schedule pricing modifications? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.2 |
| 10 |
| |_| |
| 30. Does the Vendor's GSA Schedule MAS contract contain the required SINs (i.e., 561210FAC, ANCRA, ANCILLARY, OLM)? |
| RFQ 2.3.1 |
| 11 |
| |_| |
| 31. Is the ultimate 20-year contract expiration date on or after October 31, 2033, or are there option periods remaining that will—if exercised—provide coverage through that date? |
| RFQ 2.3.2 |
| 11 |
| |_| |
| 32. Has the Vendor submitted evidence that their GSA Schedule MAS contract has been modified through the most recent refresh? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.2 |
| 9 |
| |_| |
| 33. Has the Vendor submitted a completed Self-Certification Statement (see Appendix C) stating that all rates (except OLMs) match their Schedule Pricelist and do not exceed the rates of the applicable SIN? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.3 |
RFQ Appendix C
| 34. Has the Vendor submitted completed copies of their self-certifications in response to all applicable FAR/GSAM Provisions? |
| RFQ 2.2.c.4 |
Attachment 2
| 35. If Teaming Arrangement, has the entity submitted an executed copy of the teaming agreement with signatures? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.7 |
| 18 |
| |_| |
| 36. If Teaming Arrangement, does the teaming agreement provided designate all team members and their corresponding Schedule contract numbers? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.7 |
| 18 |
| |_| |
| 37. If Teaming Arrangement, does the teaming agreement provided describe the tasks to be performed by each team member, along with the associated proposed prices (e.g., unit prices, labor categories, and hourly rates)? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.7 |
| 18 |
| |_| |
| 38. If Teaming Arrangement, does the teaming agreement provided contain certificate or statement that identifies a single point of contact, i.e., a principal representative (by name) of the CTA for purposes of resolution of contractual matters and payment issues? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.7 |
| 18 |
| |_| |
| 39. Has the Vendor submitted separate Price and Technical Quotes? |
| RFQ 2.2 |
| 7 |
| |_| |
| 40. Are the Quotes correctly formatted? |
| RFQ 2.2 |
| 7-8 |
| |_| |
| 41. Has the Vendor submitted a Management Plan that includes a Staffing Plan, an Energy Conservation Approach, and an Innovative Solutions Approach? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.a - c |
| 14-15 |
| |_| |
| 42. Is the Management Plan 10 pages or less (excluding attachments)? |
| RFQ 3.1.1 |
| 14 |
| |_| |
| 43. Has the Vendor submitted a Management Plan with an attached Monthly Progress and Communications Plan, a Quality Control Outline, a Preventive/Predictive Maintenance (PM) Plan, an NCMMS Usage and Data Management Plan, A Repair Plan, a Project Management and Alteration Project Assistance Plan, and (if applicable) an executed GSA Schedule Contractor Teaming Arrangement? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.1 - 6 |
| 16-19 |
| |_| |
| 44. If Teaming Arrangement, does the Management Plan include a clear and concise statement describing the intent in entering into the teaming arrangement, the type of teaming arrangement, and the team members involved? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.7 |
| 19 |
| |_| |
| 45. Is the Management Plan's Monthly Progress and Communications Plan 2 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.1 |
| 16 |
| |_| |
| 46. Is the Management Plan's Quality Control Outline 5 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.2 |
| 16 |
| |_| |
| 47. Is the Management Plan's Preventive/Predictive Maintenance Plan 5 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.3 |
| 16 |
| |_| |
| 48. Is the Management Plan's NCMMS Usage and Data Management Plan 2 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.4 |
| 17 |
| |_| |
| 49. Is the Management Plan's Repair Plan 2 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.5 |
| 17 |
| |_| |
| 50. Is the Management Plan's Project Management and Alteration Project Assistance Plan 2 pages or less? |
| RFQ 3.1.1.d.6 |
| 18 |
| |_| |
| 51. For Past Performance, has the Vendor submitted no more than 3 similar projects (with at least one year of completed performance) performed within the past 3 years? |
| RFQ 3.1.2.2 |
| 19 |
| |_| |
| 52. Has the Vendor submitted a Cover Worksheet for their Past Performance projects? |
| RFQ 3.1.3.11 |
| 21 |
| |_| |
| 53. Is the Cover Worksheet limited to one page? |
| RFQ 3.1.3.11 |
| 21 |
| |_| |
| 54. For Past Performance, has the Vendor submitted no more than 3 CPARS Reports or Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs)? |
| RFQ 3.1.2.2 |
Appendix A
| 55. If no Past Performance submitted, has the Vendor affirmatively stated no relevant Past Performance or none available? |
| RFQ 3.1.2.6 |
| 21 |
| |_| |
56. Has the Vendor refrained from requesting use of Government-furnished property, materials, or information not provided for in the solicitation?
| 57. Has the Vendor submitted a signed GSA Form 527? |
| RFQ 3.2.7 |
Attachment 6
| 58. If Teaming Arrangement, has each member submitted a signed GSA Form 527? |
| RFQ 3.2.7 |
Attachment 6
| 59. Does the Quote abide by the 20-megabyte email attachment limit? |
| RFQ 2.2 |
| 10 |
| |_| |
| 60. If the Quote has been split into multiple emails to stay under the 20-megabyte email attachment limit, are the emails numbered as part of a series (i.e., "1 of 3")? |
| RFQ 2.2 |
| 10 |
| |_| |
| 61. Will the Quote be emailed with return receipt requested? |
| RFQ 2.2 |
| 10 |
| |_| |
Signature:
Name Date Title Company
Note: This checklist is not intended to supersede or alter any of the requirements of the Solicitation, nor to serve as a comprehensive repository of all such requirements, but only to aid Offerors by highlighting common deficiencies and issues encountered in reviewing Quotes. Offerors are solely responsible for reviewing and verifying all referenced requirements within the Solicitation itself.
