47PB0024Q0001 Request For Quote Appendix A - Past Performance Questionnaire 2023 11 15.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PB0024Q0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing operations and maintenance services. The General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 1 is soliciting quotes for operations and maintenance and related services at the Murphy Federal Records Center in Waltham, Massachusetts under solicitation number 47PB0024Q0001. The incumbent contractor is evaluated based on its management of the project, quality control, adherence to schedules, technical knowledge and ability of staff, recruitment and retention of personnel, management of subcontractors, flexibility and ability to adapt to changing requirements, and effectiveness partnering with the agency. Responses to the questionnaire are due to the contractor by December 15, 2023 to be submitted with its quote. The past performance evaluation will be considered in selection of the contractor for the blanket purchase agreement.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation 47PB0021Q0001 Murphy Operations and Maintenance Appendix B Past Performance Questionnaire
Operations and Maintenance and Related Services
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLIENTS COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE: The General Services Administration (GSA), Public Buildings Service (PBS) is evaluating past performance in selecting a contractor for a Blanket Purchase Agreement for Operations and Maintenance and Related Services. You have been identified by one of the Offerors as someone who could attest to the quality of that Offeror’s performance on the contract listed below. Your completion of the attached questionnaire would be of great benefit in selecting the most qualified firm to perform the work under this Blanket Purchase Agreement.
PBS requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits it directly back to the Offeror. The Offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to PBS with their quote and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on PBS RFQs. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to PBS via email at simeon.berry@gsa.gov no later than 2:00 pm, EST, Friday, December 15, 2023. The government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: _______________________________________
CONTRACT BEING EVALUATED: _______________________________________
NAME OF EVALUATOR: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S AGENCY/COMPANY: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S ROLE IN PROJECT: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S EMAIL ADDRESS: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S TELEPHONE NUMBER: _______________________________________
May GSA contact you for clarification? ____ Yes ____ No
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: _______________________________________
CONTRACT NAME: _______________________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________________________________
CONTRACT LOCATION: _______________________________________
CONTRACT AWARD METHODOLOGY: ______________________________________
(i.e., best value, sole source, low bid)
NAME OF EVALUATOR: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S AGENCY/COMPANY: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S ROLE IN PROJECT: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S EMAIL ADDRESS: _______________________________________
EVALUATOR’S TELEPHONE NUMBER: ______________________________________
On a scale of 0 to 5, rate the Contractor on following areas of performance (scale is defined with each factor).
1. Rate the Contractor’s overall management of the project.
0 – Contractor was not proactive and services suffered due to lack of management.
5 – Contractor was proactive and responsive and the services were efficiently and effectively provided.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Rate the Contractor’s quality control of the project.
0 – There were a significant number of quality of work issues and the services suffered due to lack of quality control.
5 – If any, Contractor resolved quality of work issues and services flowed smoothly resulting in a high-quality project.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract deliverable schedules at significant milestones?
0 - Contractor rarely met scheduled milestone requirements.
5 - Contractor met/exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. To what level of consistency did the Contractor’s staff demonstrate technical knowledge to successfully perform the services?
0 – Contractor’s staff failed to adequately demonstrate technical knowledge required to successfully perform the services.
5 – Contractor’s staff consistently demonstrated adequate technical knowledge to successfully perform the services.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Rate the Contractor’s ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel, especially the onsite management team.
0 – Contractor did was not able to satisfactorily recruit and retain qualified managers or other key personnel.
5 – Contractor was able to continually recruit and retain qualified managers or other key personnel.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Rate the Contractor’s management of subcontractors on the project.
0 – Contractor channeled all subcontractor issues through to the Government without any involvement and the quality of work suffered significantly due to lack of management.
5 – Contractor actively and effectively managed the subcontractors and handled all coordination issues.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Does the contractor have the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?
0 - Contractor was unable to demonstrate flexibility or adaptability
5 - Contractor was very effectively able to proactively plan, communicate and adapt to changing requirements outside of areas of control
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. How effectively did the contractor partner with your organization or agency?
0 – Contractor failed to partner effectively creating difficulty in communicating issues and presenting a fractured front to the customer agencies
5 – Contractor partnered effectively by clearly communicating issues and concerns and presenting a common front to customer agencies.
Rating: _____ Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Overall Rating
In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor:
____ Excellent
| ____ Very Good |
| ____ Acceptable |
| ____ Unacceptable |
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Would you hire or work with this contractor again? (If “no” please explain in comments below):
____ Yes ____ No
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additional Comments
If you know any further information that was not covered by this questionnaire, but you feel is important, please provide this information:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .