4. Past Performance Questionnaire - AG WELLS CVIA H2 B5.pdf
PDF 314 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA468622R0004
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor related to an upcoming solicitation from the Department of the Air Force for utility water well replacement and agricultural well installation services at Beale Air Force Base in California. The solicitation will require drilling a new utility water well to replace existing well number one, decommissioning the present well, and installing a new agricultural well at the Commercial Vehicle Inspection Area near the Wheatland Gate. Optional work includes installing a new electrical transformer and replacing an existing water tank at the CVIA site, and installing two additional agricultural wells powered by solar systems at pasture locations H2 and B5. The contractor will furnish all supervision, labor, materials, equipment, and permits to complete the well drilling and connection work. Responses to the past performance questionnaire will be used to evaluate contractors' qualifications and experience for the solicitation requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)
ITO – 1.2 FA4686-16-R-0007 Page 1
Agricultural Well CVIA, H2 & B5 Past Performance Questionnaire
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor: _________________________________
Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________
Contract number: _______________________________________
Contract type: ______________________________ (If multiple types (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price with Time & Material), list percentage and dollar amount of Firm-Fixed Price portion)
Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
Did this contract include Design-Build efforts ? Yes _____ No _____
Did this contract include Bonding ? Yes _____ No _____
Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
Initial contract price: $____________________________
Current/final contract price: $_______________________________
Reasons for differences between initial contract price and final contract price:
Description of service provided:
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) FOR BAFB GC-MACC IDIQ FA4686-16-R-0004
ITO – 1.2 FA4686-16-R-0007 Page 2
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
Customer or agency name:
Customer or agency description (if applicable):
Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
Evaluator's name:
Evaluator's title:
Evaluator's phone/fax number:______________________________________________________ Evaluator’s email: __________________________________________________________________
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: ___________________________________
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO)
ITO – 1.2 FA4686-16-R-0007 Page 3
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE--PERFORMANCE LEVEL
G- GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y- YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R- RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N- NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
G Y R N Special Standards of Responsibility/Bonding T1. Contractor ability and qualifications to manage and execute design-build projects.
T2. Contractor ability to have a sound staffing approach to include subcontractor and teaming arrangements.
T3. Contractor ability to staff appropriate key positions in management/administrative staff as well as field construction staff; such as Project Manager, Project Superintendent, Safety Manager and Quality Control Manager T4. Contractor ability to hire, manage, retain, and replace personnel who have the knowledge, experience, and required certifications, inclusive of the ability to meet any surge requirements.
T5. Contractor ability to provide and execute Safety Plan that demonstrates commitment to safety, training, and incident reporting and methods/procedures for implementing safety.
T6. Contractor ability to provide and execute Quality Control (QC) Plan that provides qualifications, responsibilities, and authority levels of each position assigned to the QC function.
Special Standards of Responsibility/Bonding Pl. Contractor ability to provide Work Plan and associated drawings for evaluation and execution of a construction project.
P2. Contractor ability to provide a delivery order proposal based upon the specifications and SOW provided.
P3. Contractor ability to provide a description of procedures, processes and methods for tracking progress of the project and interface with the Government, with attention to quality, timeliness, and cost control.
Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated G/S (Green/Satisfactory ), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
No ___ Yes___ for Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) FOR BAFB GC-MACC IDIQ FA4686-16-R-0004
ITO – 1.2 FA4686-16-R-0007 Page 4
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?
What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
ATTACHMENT - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (ITO) FOR BAFB GC-MACC IDIQ FA4686-16-R-0007
ITO – 1.2 FA4686-16-R-0007 Page 5
Evaluator’s Signature Date__________________________
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
9th Contracting Squadron ATTN: A1C Madison DeGarmo / Martin Vessels 6500 B Street Beale AFB, CA 95903 madison.degarmo@us.af.mil and martin.vessels@us.af.mil mailto:Kelly.Benton@us.af.mil mailto:Dustin.Lashley@us.af.mil
ITO ATTACHMENT 1.2
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .