RFI Bldg 13 Chapel.pdf

12/21/2021

“CORRECT FCA DEFICIENCIES WITH HISTORICAL CHAPEL BUILDING 13” PROJECT

FOR THE

JAMES H. QUILLEN VA MEDICAL CENTER

MOUNTAIN HOME, TENNESSEE

PROJECT NUMBER: 621-20-101

RFI RESPONSES, UPDATED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS

FOR AMENDMENT 0005

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

RFI #1

Provide location of GC lay down area on VA campus in proximity of the work to be completed Response:

There is an available lawn area to the immediate east of the chapel building that is available for construction laydown. Contractor would be responsible to maintain lawn and reseed/straw where damaged at the conclusion of the project.

RFI #2

Confirm that the VA will provide temporary power available for GC use at GC trailer with understanding that GC will be responsible for connection / disconnection Response:

The VA will provide temporary power. GC will be responsible for connection / disconnection.

RFI #3

AE402 (sheet 32 of 75) – can you supply us with the 'Organ Evaluation Report?' The RFP makes mention of 'electric action' windchests as opposed to the 'existing electro-pneumatic' style.

Response:

See Organ Evaluation Report.pdf provided in Amendment 0001.

RFI #4

Confirmation of basic organ chamber measurements (length, width, depth, and height)

See Organ Evaluation Report.pdf provided in Amendment 0001 and scale drawings for general measurements.

RFI #5

Confirmation of organ age and manufacturer.

See Organ Evaluation Report.pdf provided in Amendment 0001.

RFI #6

Existing bell.

A. What is the dimension of the existing bell? (Measured at its opening) B. Are there any markings/ inscriptions on the bell that might indicate the year the bell was cast?

C. General Note ‘C’ indicates that the bell is to be ‘sealed’ – this is not recommended D. This is a bronze bell and bronze will ‘patina’ but not ‘oxidize.’ The natural patina on a bronze bell does not harm the bell in any way.

E. Applying a sealer to the bell will ‘deaden’ the sound of the bell when it is struck.

Advise on the final process. Furthermore, any sealer will yellow and crack over time causing the bell to look bad.

F. General Note ‘E’ indicates that stainless steel hardware is to be used. We prefer to install traditional hardened steel hardware which is stronger than same sized stainless steel. Advise if this is acceptable.

Response:

A. Exact measurements of the bell have not been taken. The bell is estimated to be 22”-

28” diameter at the opening B. Was cast in 1908 by the McShane Bell Foundry (Baltimore).

C. Sealing the bell will be removed from the project. Provide documentation to the VA that sealing the bell is not warranted.

F. Yes

RFI #7

Site work:

A. Are soil borings available at locations where work is to be performed?

B. Size of existing waterline to be removed. What is the location of the existing shutoff upstream?

C. Sheet CS100:

i. Site concrete to be installed along the East side of the building at the North chapel appears to be adjacent to several mature trees. Has it been determined if these trees and their root system will survive this new work?

D. Sheet CG101:

i. Confirm drainage piping around exterior of building is all 6” dia.? No slopes are provided. Provide information

ii. What size is Storm MH coded note 05 Response:

A. Soil reports and borings were not provided for this project. Refer to geotechnical report June 20, 2016 for borings in similar area. The Contractor will be responsible for additional borings as needed.

B. Waterline size needs to be confirmed. The waterline is being relocated to enter the building about 15 feet south of the existing location. It enters at the northwest vestibule area and is being relocated to enter along the west side of the building. We can add a valve 5 ft outside the face of the building. There is no existing valve shown but need field verification if a valve exists at the service line connections at the street (there should be a valve there).

C. It has been determined that these trees will not survive. See sheet CD100 for trees shown to be removed. All other trees shall be protected during construction.

D. All storm pipe for downspouts and all foundation drainpipe is eight-inch diameter (8”) and should be placed a 1% minimum slope starting at the southwest corner high point as indicated on CG101. For MH coded note 05 – This should be a 48” manhole.

RFI #8

Sheet SD101: Has existing concrete to be removed been tested for possible ACM materials

No, refer to asbestos report provided in Amendment 0001 and the specification.

RFI #9

Sheet SS101: Slab Plan 7: Provide size for 1/4 flat plate.

Approximately 4’-6”x1’-6”x1/4”.

RFI #10

Sheet SS101: Provide steel framing plan for area well with details. Refers to details J/SS501, L/SS501 / Y/SS501

Framing plan was provided on enlarged plan #1.

RFI #11

Sheet SS501: Detail Q: Detail does not reflect plan location sheet SS101.

It is called out on the plan. Detail Q is for the turned down slab in the North crawl space.

RFI #12

Sheet SS501: Details U & W: are structural posts and ties steel or wood?

Posts are wood.

RFI #13

Sheet AD101: Coded note 08: Has soil been tested for potential ACM.

Response:

The soil has not been tested. For bidding purposes, the contractor shall assume the soil does not have ACM. Additional testing and a report will be provided by the Government prior to the start of demolition.

RFI #14

Sheet AD103:

A. Coded note 6: Have materials been tested for ACM / Lead paint?

B. Coded note 14: Have materials been tested for Lead paint?

Response:

See ACM LBP Survey Report.pdf and Asbestos Removal Plan.pdf. provided in Amendment 0001 for extent of sampled areas.

RFI #15

Sheet AE102:

A. Coded note 1: Provide details for necessary repairs.

B. Coded note 7: Provide photos of existing and required details for repairs.

C. Coded note 9: Provide existing wood species to be matched.

D. Coded note 15: Provide clarification if the existing pavers are previously sealed.

E. Coded note 20: Provide details for restoration of Pulpit, alter and railings.

F. Coded note 20: Provide existing wood species.

Response:

A. A detail, photo and notes will be provided.

B. A detail, photo, and notes will be provided.

C. Red Oak Flooring (Contractor to verify) D. Existing pavers have previously been sealed.

E. Note #20 will be revised to say, “SAND SMOOTH AND REFINISH EXISTING PULPIT, ALTAR, AND RAILING.” Repair of these items is not anticipated.

F. Repair scope has been removed in this amendment. See above.

RFI #16

Sheet AE103:

A. Coded note 4: Existing damage is undefinable. Can an allowance be determined by the VA which all GC’s will carry for this possible work?

B. Coded note 5: Provide specification basis of design for ladder. Method of anchorage required.

C. Coded note 12: provide existing rubber floor specification of Basis of Design for new to make repairs.

i. Provide rubber floor installation details

A. Reference to repair of the trusses will be removed from the Contractor’s scope with this Amendment.

B. The basis of design is O’Keeffe’s Inc Model 523 with 75 degree. Reference 055000 Metal Fabrications for installation requirements.

C. The existing membrane is EPDM. A specification will be provided for a fluid-applied restoration system to coat the existing membrane and the patching of EPDM.

RFI #17

Sheet AE201: Coded note 9. Provide detail on required refastening

See detail 12 on sheet AS501.

RFI #18

Sheet AE301: Coded note 15: Provide access hatch framing at installation location. Coded note 8 Sheet AE302.

See Reflected ceiling plan 4 on sheet AC141.

RFI #19

Sheet AE311: Provide basis of depth to be assumed in excavation for waterproofing.

Response:

Assume 12” below basement footing at North Chapel and 4ft below grade at west chapel and Belltower.

RFI #20

Sheet AE601:

A. Drawings call for door 007A / type D to be removed and replaced per plan. Provide clarification for doors 010A, 107, 108, 113, 114, 116Band 116D

B. Provide clarification of *Panel Type – Seal door shut after installation of new furring and reinstallation of door. If door is to be addressed per note 1 why is door being sealed and drywalled over?

Response:

A. 007A - Door and frame shall be replaced with a hollow metal door and frame. See updated door schedule notes for clarification.

B. Door shall remain visible from the stage but will no longer function as a door.

Functioning hardware of the door will be removed and the door will be pinned in place.

RFI #21

Sheet AC141:

A. Coded note 3: Provide clarification on wood species.

B. Coded note 5: Provide existing finishes and work to be completed for this SOW.

C. Coded note 16: Provide wood species of beam and details of ornamental hanger

A. Scope related to the damage at trusses will be removed by this Amendment B. The existing skylight clerestory is wood paneling and paint. The new paint in the tower clerestory shall be P-2. Note was added to Section 2 on AE301 to show height of the clerestory wall

C. Pine or Douglas fir is acceptable. Stain to match existing adjacent.

RFI #22

Sheet AS432 / Sheet ES100: Existing manhole (MH1): Provide existing cover elevation

The manhole is flush with the pavement at this location. Approx. 1724 per sheet CD100.

RFI #23

Sheet AE502:

A. Detail 3: Laminated wood will not take paint or stain. Clarify finishes.

B. Detail 4: Provide wood species of beam and details of ornamental hanger.

Response:

A. Scope related to the beam bracket repair will be removed by this Amendment.

B. Pine or Douglas fir is acceptable. Stain to match existing adjacent.

RFI #24

Sheet AE441: Section 3: Confirm that existing surface does not contain ACM / Lead paint Response:

See ACM LBP Survey Report.pdf and Asbestos Removal Plan.pdf. provided in Amendment 0001 for extent of sampled areas. See Division 2 specifications for how to handle lead and asbestos.

RFI #25

Sheet FD101:

A. Confirm that existing piping is not covered with lead paint?

B. Coded note 3: is this a wall mount or post mount?

C. Can existing hydraulic information be provided?

D. Is existing water pressure sufficient or will new fire pump be required?

Response:

A – See ACM LBP Survey Report.pdf provided in Amendment 0001 for extent of sampled areas. See Division 2 specifications for how to handle lead and asbestos.

B - The existing fire department connection to be removed is mounted to the exterior wall. The new fire department connection will be installed in the same location.

C - The latest flow test data (~2020) shows a static pressure of 50psi and 45psi residual. The pressure gage at the fire water entrance is currently reading 70psi. A flow test conducted by the contractor will be required.

D - The existing water pressure is sufficient. Pressure loss calculations give a total loss of 35psi.

RFI #26

Sheet FX102: Provide clarification of new system installation and mounting location of new piping in relation to existing wood trusses in the Chapels.

Response:

The new sprinkler piping should be routed and installed similar to the existing piping.

RFI #27

Mechanical general: Provide existing controls manufacturer and who maintains the systems.

Response:

Existing system front end is Computrols via Bacnet. Note that any existing controls in the building are to be completely removed, replaced with new, and connected via new network equipment.

RFI #28

Sheet MH102/M601

A. Ceiling fan (CF-1 & CF-2): Provide specification (basis of design) and mounting height for support stem length.

B. Air Device Schedules (Supply Air – Return Air)

i. Provide specification (Basis of Design) for grilles

Response:

A – Ceiling fan basis of design is Big Ass Fan, Essence model. Stem length is 24”.

B – Decorative grille basis of design is KEES. Others are Titus.

RFI #29

Sheet ELP101: Provide clarification of new lightning protection ground rod size, depth and location(s) of ground rods Response:

Ground rod shall be a minimum of 3/4” x 10’ copper clad steel. This is covered in the specs.

26 41 00 2.1.

RFI #30

Sheet ES100:

A. Provide existing fire alarm system and company that maintains system.

B. Electrical Site Plan 3:

i. Provide number of wires and size of wires in existing 2 communication conduits

ii. Is new conduit installation to be concrete encased Response:

A. Simplex is the existing system. Local company is unknown.

B. (i) There is a least a dozen wires in the manhole many with are abandoned. Exact count is unknown.

(ii) Conduit is concrete encased. See detail on sheet E501.

RFI #31

Section 05 12 00: Can AISC requirement be waived if oversight can be provided?

Response:

Yes.

RFI #32

Section 08 71 00b - Door Hardware Attachment 1 appears to be missing. Provide clarification Response:

This attachment is not a part of the Procurement Documents and will be removed from the Table of Contents with this Amendment.

RFI #33

Section 31 31 16 Termite Control: Provide location of termite control installation.

The location of the termite control is noted in Part 3 of section 31 31 16 Termite Control.

RFI #34

Will the owner accept the use of the industry leading Procore Project Management software as the primary submittal and data tracking tool for this project?

The use of Procore is acceptable, hosted by the Contractor.

RFI #35

On AD103 it states that the bell tower is to receive new flooring - will this truly be new flooring or will a membrane roof be installed in place of the existing membrane roof? (note 3 - AD103) Response:

The note will be revised and a specification will be added for a fluid-applied rehabilitation system and EPDM patching. See section 07 01 50.74 Rehabilitation of EPDM Roofing.

Note #3 is related to the balcony woodwork, not the belltower flooring.

RFI #36

Can CPAR's be used in place of PPQ's?

Response:

The solicitation does not require bidders to provide CPARS or PPQs.

RFI #37

Please provide the existing roof warranty, manufactures data, and POC.

The roof is out of warranty. Review the Drawings and Specifications for more information.

RFI #38

Is this project tax exempt, and will the CO/COR provide the necessary tax exempt certificates?

No.

RFI #39

Is AISC (American Iron and Steel Certification) required for the structural steel fabrication and/or erection for this project?

Response:

AISC requirements can be waived.

RFI #40

For planning the preliminary project schedule, can you please provide an anticipated award date?

Response:

Anticipate awarding the project by January 31, 2022.

RFI #41

Please provide seismic bracing details for pipe and systems support.

Response:

Details are provided by the contractor. Seismic support requirements are detailed throughout the specifications. See reference to SMACNA Seismic Restraint Manual.

RFI #42

Please confirm that the owner will provide fire watch during the period of time that the fire suppression system is not in service.

Response:

Yes.

RFI #43

Will temporary construction fencing around the site be required?

Response:

Yes. See 01 10 00 General Requirements Part 1.6.K.

RFI #44

Please confirm that the owner will be contracting directly with a third-party commissioning agent for commissioning the project and that the Contractor is only to include participation/coordination with the Commissioning Agent.

Response:

Yes.

RFI #45

Who is the owner's service provider for the fire alarm system? Can you please provide contract information?

Unknown provider. Simplex fire alarm system.

RFI #46

Are there any restriction or requirements pertaining to working hours?

Response:

The project will take place between normal business hours. Variation can be made with approval from the VA COR. Excessive noise from construction activity before 0700 and after 1900 will be prohibited.

RFI #47

Will owner require GC’s to develop and submit coordination drawings in Revit?

The Contractor can develop as-builts using PDF, CAD or Revit software.

RFI #48

Can the owner please provide a single drawing that clearly states floor to ceilings heights for the construction area? This is used to ensure that the above ceiling utilities will fit in the above ceiling space.

See section and elevations for heights.

RFI #49

Where will the designated parking & laydown area be for workers accessing the construction site?

Response:

See RFI #1 - There is an available lot to the immediate east of the chapel building that is available for construction laydown.

RFI #50

Will the contractor be authorized to build a temporary office inside the space in lieu of renting an office trailer for the duration of the project?

Response:

Yes, so long as the existing building’s historic elements are not damaged (i.e. wood floor, wood trim) and anticipated equipment does not exceed reasonable floor loading limitations.

RFI #51

Is it possible that the wood subfloor underneath the carpets and VCT may not be salvageable?

Is any allowance to be included for the installation of new wood sub floors outside of the areas specifically called out?

VCT is not being salvaged in this building. Allowances will not be used. Additional scope items requested during construction will be handled by Change Order.

RFI #52

Please confirm the window replacement scope. Several windows are not called out to receive new but adjacent windows are.

Response:

All windows with window tags are to be replaced. The intent is that all windows are replaced except for the round windows at the top of the belltower.

RFI #53

Is there an existing vapor barrier in place currently?

No.

RFI #54

The roof tile count listed in the notes is (60) tiles to be replaced but the actual count on the drawings is 10 - please confirm count of tiles to be priced.

Price 60 tiles to be replaced.

RFI #55

If the bid date has to be pushed out past Dec 17th, we would like to request that it be pushed past the Christmas holiday.

See Amendment 0004 for extension to January 6th, 2022.

RFI #56

Is the existing fire system sized for additional lines?

Response:

The system is sized to serve the entirety of the existing footprint of the building. There will be one fire riser in the building and it is capable of serving 52,000 square feet. If an expansion to the building is constructed in the future, further evaluation will be needed to see whether a fire pump is necessary.

RFI #57

In order to raise the brick pavers in the east entry is the intent to fill and then lay new pavers?

The plans say to reseal the brick but it is not clear if the intent it to salvage the existing or install new?

Response:

Reinstall existing brick pavers per note #6 on AE102. Note #15 will be updated to read

“EXISTING BRICK PAVERS TO RECEIVE NEW SEALANT AFTER REINSTALLATION.”

RFI #58

Is it expected that any of the exterior soffit or angles will need to be replaced following the stripping of existing paint?

No, unless noted as such on the drawings.

RFI #59

Please confirm that all new brick will be as close to matching existing as possible?

Response:

Yes. New brick is to match existing as closely as possible. Salvage any existing brick being demolished for reuse per Drawings.

RFI #60

Can the government please provide the : Hazardous Material Reports, Roof Investigation Report, Site Investigation report and Chapel Organ Evaluation Report?

Reports have been provided in Amendment 0001.

RFI #61

Can the Government please provide the soil report?

Response:

Soil reports and borings were not provided for this project. Refer to geotechnical report June 20, 2016 for borings in similar area. The Contractor will be responsible for additional borings as needed.

RFI #62

Where is the storage space to be located?

Response:

The building will be available for the contractors use during the construction project. The contractor will be responsible to keep the building and other storage areas locked when not in use. A Contractor staging area can also be in the lawn immediately east or west of the Chapel building.

RFI #63

Would the Government accept daily photo documentation taken by the site superintendent and stored on a shared sited such as Procore in lieu of the specification?

Yes.

RFI #64

Are we to take "proposed" to mean new throughout the Civil set?

Yes, “proposed” indicates “provide new”.

RFI #65

Until the mold survey is completed there is no way of knowing the cost impact of remediation.

A. Will the Government treat the mold remediation as an unforeseen condition and issue a modification to cover the costs?

B. Will the Government set an allowance we can include in our proposals to cover the mold remediation?

Response:

The mold remediation can be treated as an unforeseen condition and a modification during construction as needed. All reference to mold remediation will be removed from the Contract Documents with this Amendment.

RFI #66

Where wood work is called to be striped and refinished could we replace it with new instead?

Response:

No. The intent is that the finish carpentry within this historic building would be handled carefully during removal and reinstallation. The existing wood needs to remain.

RFI #67

Can the Government please provide elevations for the existing footing or a assumed elevation for bidding purposes?

Existing footings are unknow as the construction documents dating back to 1905 are limited.

RFI #68

Can the Government please clarify which detail should be followed? (to include depth and size of pipe, depth of gravel, damp proofing and drainage board)

Follow detail 1 on sheet AE311.

RFI #69

Can the Government please supply the existing wood species for wood base, wall and door trim?

Response:

Destructive testing was not done any of the wood flooring, wood framing, doors, trim members. Therefore, an accurate determination of the wood species used throughout the Chapel can be determined at this time. Conduct with the COR a site discovery of the types of wood to use that will match existing finish materials. Reference Specification Section

062001 Wood Restoration, for how to refinish and restore all wood materials scheduled for restoration.

RFI #70

We feel there is a building structural deficiency based on the large crack in the West Chapel North wall near the west most roof truss. We feel this needs to be addressed during this renovation as there could be foundation issues. Please advise.

Response:

The structural (masonry) deficiencies causing this crack have been repaired. The plaster was not repaired but will be addressed in this project.

RFI #71

A. The demo drawings show existing soil to be removed from under the West Chapel that amounts to several dump loads worth. The same also happens in the Transepts. The question is, how is this to be accomplished? This is more than a means and methods.

Removing a few dump trucks worth in a crawl space is sketchy and iffy at best. Are we to use men with shovels and 5-gallon buckets or excavate outside the building, knock a hole in the wall and use a conveyor as a material transfer means? This deserves more thoughts on how/if this can be accomplished.

B. The same thing happens under the North Chapel, but in this case the amount of soil to be moved isn’t even given. We need quantities to even begin to estimate this. Please provide some estimates of soil to be removed.

C. Similar to the West Chapel and Transepts, how are we to convey this material out of the basement where there is no access for machinery? The amounts of dirt we’re talking about aren’t insignificant at all. As mentioned, we’re talking DUMP TRUCK loads worth, not a few wheelbarrows. Just the West Chapel alone would require more than 1,000 wheelbarrows!!! It also has to go up a flight of stairs to reach the ground level where it would be dumped.

Response:

A. All means and methods of construction are solely the responsibility of the contractor.

However, its worth pointing out that during construction a 200SF area of the floor is removed in the West Chapel and open to the crawl space. Both floors in the transepts are being removed as well. There will also be a large opening in the wall from where the existing air handlers are located on the north wall of the West Chapel.

B. The north chapel requires approximately 300 cubic feet of dirt removal. Drawings will be updated to specify this. As for removal in this area, there is an existing door to the North crawl space.

C. See response A for possible solutions. Stairs do not access the crawlspace and cannot be used for earth removal.

RFI #72

The plans call for the beams and exposed ceiling in the chapel to be cleaned but stops at that.

What are we to clean with? What method? What is the spec for cleanliness or what it the deliverable we’re trying to achieve for cleanliness?

The Contractor is to vacuum and/or wipe down the beams at the conclusion of the work to remove any dust and debris from construction activity.

RFI #73

While we were processing the specifications for the project above we noticed that the following were missing according to the table of contents:

085113 Aluminum Windows 281300 Physical Access Control System Response:

These specifications were provided in the original solicitation package dated November 16th.

File name, “Mt Home Chapel Bid Specifications 10.28.2021.pdf”

RFI #74

Our studio has been invited by several contractors to bid the two stained glass windows in this project. We have viewed the specs with no luck finding specs for restoration of these windows.

Could you please advise where they are? And how we could bid just those windows. Possibly a bid form. The proper procedure would be for our craftsmen to remove the windows and bring them to our studio in Natural Bridge completely restore them. Then return to the chapel.

Response:

See specification 12 17 00 Leaded Stained-Glass Windows – Restoration. Additional notes and elevation on sheet AE602 describe the work.

RFI #75

1 ). Is the purpose of the bid to restore the organ to its original physical appearance and function or to create a new organ from the existing parts? The organ survey provided by Randall Dyer in the summer of 2021 suggests replacing the mechanism, but does not mention changing its appearance, location or size. The proposed size and location shown in 4/AE402 is not viable.

Please advise.

2a). An alternate solution would be to restore the window per the drawings but only so that it is fully visible from the exterior, not fully visible to the interior. This could be effected by moving the entire organ forward approximately 2 feet, allowing an air space between the organ’s back and the restored window. Some of the window would be visible above the organ. While not optimal, this would preserve the historic organ case and also the window. Please advise 2b) If the purpose of the bid is to create a new organ using the existing parts and the VA does not wish to reinstall it as it is at present, would the VA accept installing a newly created organ, using as many of the original components as practical, in the West Chapel’s rear balcony? This would be similar to that in the North Chapel.

3) The cost for a new blower for the West Chapel organ will be included in the organbuilder’s bid. No provision is shown on the drawings for the location of the organ’s blower. The existing West Chapel blower is present but is beyond repair and may be considered scrap. During the site visit the machine had been removed from its original location, partially disassembled and left in the West Chapel proper. Its original location was not determined. The architect to provide a space for a blower box of 32” x 36” x 36” in a conditioned space. While modern blowers are contained within a muffler box, there is unavoidable low-level noise associated with any motor turning at 3,400 RPM. It is best practice to put the blower inside a sound insulated closet or an adjacent room. The blower (and its box) can be floor mounted, bracketed to a wall or hung from a ceiling on a platform. Access for maintenance to be provided in the architect’s plan. A connecting “windline” from the blower to the organ’s pressure regulating bellows is to be 6” diameter Schedule 40 PVC fully glued at all joints provided by the general contractor. The PVC “windline” must also be fully within conditioned space. It is not acceptable to run the “windline” through an attic or crawlspace.

4) The organ survey from the summer of 2021 suggests the addition of a self-playing mechanism so that the organ may be used in the absence of an organist. Please indicate if this is, or is not, a requirement in the organ bid.

5) The following dedicated electrical circuits are to be provided for the West Chapel organ:

(a) 120v, 20 amp for the blower with switch leg to the organ console. Provide junction box at or near the organ console location. Final connections to be made on installation of the organ.

(b) 120v, 20 amp for the organ console lights and accessories. Provide junction box at or near the organ console location. Final connections to be made on installation of the organ.

(c) 120v, 20 amp circuit with minimum four (4) standard, flush mounted receptacles equally distributed along the walls surrounding the organ for use during organ maintenance.

(d) 120v. 20 amp circuit. Provide 2 wall mounted junction boxes +/- 7’-0” A.F.F. on opposite side walls at the organ location. Both boxes wired to a wall switch at or near the organ’s service access point. The organbuilder to provide work lights for these locations.

Response:

Comply with the organ specification and Organ Evaluation Report.pdf provided in Amendment 0001 unless directed otherwise by the C.O.R.

DRAWING MODIFICATIONS

SS501:

1. Detail U and W: Added a 4x4 between the posts and modified the connection to the brick wall.

AD101:

1. Note #7 Shows “APPROXIMATLY 300 CF” for soil removal.

AE102:

1. Note #20 will be revised to say, “SAND SMOOTH AND REFINISH EXISTING

PULPIT, ALTAR, AND RAILING.”

2. Note #15 will be revised to say, “EXISTING BRICK PAVERS TO RECEIVE NEW

SEALANT AFTER REINSTALLATION.”

3. Note #1 revised to say “See Detail 9 on sheet AE402”.

AE103:

1. Note #4 has been removed from the drawings

2. Note #12 revised to say, “FLUID-APPLIED REHABILITATION SYSTEM OVER

EXISTING EPDM ROOFING”

3. Note #17 added to the drawings “FRAME EXSITING OPEINING – ½” PLYWOOD

INFILL – ½” COVERBOARD – EPDM MEMBRANE.”

4. Section Detail added to show Note #17

AE131:

1. Section Detail of copper ridge cap added to the plan. Detail 8 on sheet AE131.

AC141:

1. There are now 2 smaller ceiling fans per chapel instead of 1 larger one.

2. Note #15 will be revised to say, “10’-0” DIA. CEILING FAN – SEE MECHANICAL

DRAWINGS.”.

3. Note #5 revised to say “REPAINT WOOD PANEL WALLS OF SKYLIGHT

CLERESTORY TO P-2.”.

4. Note #17 added to the drawings “FRAME EXSITING OPEINING – ½” PLYWOOD

INFILL – ½” COVERBOARD – EPDM MEMBRANE.”

5. Section Detail added to show Note #17

AE301:

1. Fan and beam location updated to show 2 fans instead of 1.

2. Note #10 will be revised to say, “10’-0” DIA. CEILING FAN – SEE MECHANICAL

DRAWINGS.”.

3. Tower vault shown in section.

AE302:

1. Fan and beam location updated to show 2 fans instead of 1.

2. Note #19 will be revised to say, “10’-0” DIA. CEILING FAN – SEE MECHANICAL

DRAWINGS.”.

AE402:

1. Removed Note C “SEAL BELL WITH A CLEAR SEALER TO PREVENT RAPID

OXIDATION”.

2. Added General notes, picture, and elevations for the notification box.

3. Added General notes, picture, and elevations for the Confessional.

AE601:

1. Updated 007A door panel and schedule notes in the door schedule.

AS501:

1. Detail of existing and new EPDM flooring added (Detail 12).

MH101:

1. Updated duct sizing throughout crawl space.

MH102:

1. Updated ceiling fan layout and added keynote.

MP101:

1. Removed ½” Pipe sizes. Minimum pipe for hydronic distribution piping is ¾” per

M001 General Note #24.

M601:

1. Update ceiling fan schedule per revised layout.

SPECIFICATION MODIFICATIONS

01 00 00 Table of Contents:

1. 07 01 50.74 - Rehabilitation of EPDM Roofing has been ADDED to the table of contents.

2. 08 71 00b – Door Hardware – Attachment 1 has been REMOVED from the table of contents.

07 01 50.74 Rehabilitation of EPDM Roofing:

1. This specification has been added in its entirety and includes a fluid-applied rehabilitation system and minor EPDM patching at curb infills.

- - - END - - -