HMSG RFI 166-171.pdf

PDF 59 KB Posted

Attached to
Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden Building Envelope Repairs (SF Project No. 1821115)
Solicitation number
333302-20RF-0010034
Issued by

About this file

This request for proposal from the Smithsonian Institution solicits proposals for the design and construction of building envelope repairs at the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden in Washington, D.C. Offerors are asked to provide all materials, equipment, labor, and supervision necessary to improve the building's energy performance and waterproofing through tasks such as installing new insulation and waterproofing, fabricating and installing new precast concrete wall panels to match existing panels, replacing balconies, and demolishing and rebuilding the roof. Proposals are due by August 31, 2020 and are evaluated based on experience, plans of accomplishment, key personnel, precast concrete qualifications, and price. Subcontracting goals include 23% for small businesses with subsets for small disadvantaged, veteran-owned, HUBZone, and women-owned small businesses.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
HMSG Design for Building Envelope Repairs RFI 2020-09-11.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Amendment 6.pdf PDF
HMSG Building Envelope Repairs RFI 182-195.pdf PDF
HMSG Repair Building Envelope Bid Sheet 9-9-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Availability of Funding_BID SHEET Rev 9-9-2020.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Amendment 5.pdf PDF
HMSG Repair Building Envelope Bid Sheet 9-9-20.pdf PDF
HMSG Building Envelope Repairs RFI 172-181.pdf PDF
HMSG ENVELOPE CONSTRUCTABILITY STUDY.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Amend 4.pdf PDF
RFI 155-SGH SK-1.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Amendment 3.pdf PDF
Availability of Funding_BID SHEET Rev 8-27-2020.pdf PDF
HMSG ENVELOPE CALC CUT SHEET-100CD FINAL BACKCHECK-1821115.pdf PDF
Precast Panel Shop Drawings.pdf PDF
HMSG Building Testing Report Appendix D Photos.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Adendum 2.pdf PDF
3-6A Roof Plan.pdf PDF
9E-9A Third Floor condensed.pdf PDF
A-2 - 1992 roof replacement.pdf PDF
HMSG Design for Building Envelope Repairs RFIs Part I (1-165).pdf PDF
Capabiliteis Statement Revised 8-27-2020.pdf PDF
HMSG ENVELOPE BOD-100CD FINAL BACKCHECK-1821115.pdf PDF
33330220RF0010034 Amendment 1.pdf PDF
Solicitation 33330220RF0010034.pdf PDF
Construction Qualification Statement.pdf PDF
Availability of Funding_BID SHEET.pdf PDF
HMSG ENVELOPE SPECIFICATIONS.pdf PDF
HMSG ENVELOPE DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
Solicitation 33330220RF0010034.pdf PDF
Contractor COVID-19 Prevention and Control Plan Guidelines .pdf PDF
Pre-Bid Virtual Walk Through CC.mp4 MP4 file
Wage Determination DC20200002 07-10-2020.txt TXT text file
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

refer to sheet E1 A-507, typical top panel section at parapet and precast panel. Per site walk, there is a roof edging detail located just above the panel in the field but is not shown/identified on the plans.

Please provide additional clarification and drawing for this detail.

Existing reglet set roof flashing above exterior-top-panel to be removed and not replaced. Remove/clean sealant from reglet cut in concrete and grout reglet to match existing CIP concrete. See

Addendum Detail RFI 155.

refer to sheet E1 A-507, detail D10. The self-adhered flashing membrane along the existing building concrete wall appears to terminate in the corner and does not return down towards the wept sealant joint. This leaves a section of the existing concrete unprotected. Please confirm if this was intended or if detail should be revised.

The intent is to terminate the self-adhered flashing membrane on the horizontal surface as shown in D10/E1 A-507.

Contract drawing E1 S-000, note #4 under PCC panel installation states 1/16” accuracy of installation is to be achieved reliably. This tolerance exceeds known PCI tolerances, and does not match specification section 034500.3.3.A., B, C. Please confirm the tolerances noted in specification

034500 is closer to industry tolerance and shall supersede the structural note on drawing E1 S-000, please confirm?

The intent is to terminate the self-adhered flashing membrane on the horizontal surface as shown in D10/E1 A-507.

In the event that location of the new panel anchoring installation requires the existing CIP concrete drum reinforcing steel to be cut or modified, will this be acceptable to the

Smithsonian.

It is not recommended that CIP wall reinforcing be cut. It is recommended that the installation adjustability be provided in the connection plates that attach to the drum surface.

If the CIP concrete drum reinforcing steel is not be cut or modified to allow for the new anchor bolts, will the Smithsonian provide what allowable adjustment would be acceptable.

The only adjustability to wall reinforcing that will be considered are adjustments that replace any cut reinforcing with new reinforcing with the same capacity as what was cut. Note that existing cast-in panel anchors are attached with rebar and this rebar could be cut if it can be distinguished from wall reinforcing.

Please refer to page 47 of 64, FAR 52.236-S0052

Correction of Work (Jun 2000). States “The

Contractor shall bear all costs correcting such rejected Work, including compensation for the

Architect's and any other additional services made necessary thereby.” Please provide further explanation of what is described as ‘additional services’.

Bear the cost of any additional testing, inspections or security cost associated with rejected work.

HMSG Design for Building Envelope Repairs RFI Response Part 2 Questions 166-165

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .