250203_SOW_Verification.pdf

PDF 265 KB Posted

Attached to
CallCabinet Annual Maintenance Renewal
Solicitation number
250203
Issued by
Orange County, California

About this file

This is a Scope of Work Verification Form submitted by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) for the CallCabinet Annual Maintenance Renewal project. The document certifies that the scope of work was independently prepared to invite competition and does not include brand name references or unreasonable restrictions that would favor any specific vendor. The procurement seeks authorized resellers to provide CallCabinet annual maintenance renewal services for a three-year term. Written questions and clarifications must be submitted no later than 11:00 a.m. on February 23, 2026, with OCTA issuing written responses by addendum no later than February 25, 2026.

The total budget allocated for this three-year maintenance renewal is $56,051. By submitting a quote, firms certify compliance with all Ukraine/Russia-related economic sanctions imposed by the State of California and the United States Government, including Presidential Executive Orders 13660, 13661, 13662, 13685, and 14065. Firms agree to the terms and conditions outlined in Exhibit A, OCTA General Provisions. The procurement is identified under Requisition No. R001105 and was verified by the Project Manager on December 15, 2025.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
250203_PP_01-29-26-APPROVED.pdf PDF
250203_Email_CallCabinet_Reseller_Confirmed_01-28-26.pdf PDF
250203_PP_01-29-26.docx DOCX document
250203_PS_01-29-26.docx DOCX document
250203_ICE.pdf PDF
250203_RFQ_Exhibit_A,_General_Provisions.pdf PDF
250203_SOW_Verification_Memo_12-15-25.pdf PDF
250203_R001105.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SCOPE OF WORK VERIFICATION

This Form Must Be Submitted with Scope of Work (SOW)

FA-CAMM-071.docm (05/16/16) Page 1 of 1

The following general rules shall apply when preparing scopes of work and specifications:

a) Provide a clear and concise Scope of Work (SOW) and not impose unreasonable requirements.

b) Specifications and Scopes of Work shall identify all characteristics and specific tasks and functions of the items or services to be procured, and meet the Authority’s requirements.

c) Whenever possible, the expected quality of services to be provided or the performance characteristics of the item shall be specified.

d) The requestor shall identify all optional items, and the solicitation documents shall set forth the expected needs and the manner in which the related bid prices will be considered.

e) Brand name specifications must be accompanied by an explanation that clearly indicates that the specification is not intended to be restrictive.

f) The salient characteristics represented by the brand names shall be identified to allow for evaluation of possible “or equal” material.

g) Because standard specifications and requirements allow for more efficient operations and result in lower prices, they shall be used wherever suitable.

h) Industry, federal, state and local government specifications and requirements can be used.

Consultants are prohibited from writing the Scope of Work or assisting in the development or writing the Scope of Work in which they may bid.

INSTRUCTIONS

Project Managers (PM) must select one of the following certifications and submit this form with the scope of work/specifications. This form must be signed by the Project Manager and one of the following: the PM’s Department Manager or Director or Executive Director.

Project Description: CallCabinet Annual Maintenance Renewal Requisition No: R001105 o I certify that the attached SOW/specifications was independently prepared to invite competition;

does not include reference to a brand name, or include unreasonable restrictions or an intent to favor any specific vendor or brand product.

OR

o The SOW/specifications prepared includes a “brand name or equal” description because it was determined to be “impractical or uneconomical” (as referenced in FTA Circular 4220.1F -revised March 18, 2013) to write a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements of the goods or services to be acquired. However, the specific features or salient characteristics of the named brand which must be met by offerors of “an equal” proposal have been clearly stated, as required by Federal Transit Administration regulations. (FTA Circular 4220.1F – revised March 18, 2013)

Project Manager Signature Dept. Manager/Director/Executive Director Signature

Information Systems 12/15/25 Department Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .