2024.07.31 SAMPLE Transcript - 112025.pdf
PDF 688 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Court Reporter for Administrative Hearings
- Solicitation number
- 70CNR-S3484
- Issued by
- Clark County, Nevada
About this file
Summary of Court Reporter Services Hearing Transcript and Related RFP
This document is a verbatim transcript of a public hearing conducted by the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, on July 31, 2024, regarding water rights adjudication matters in Buena Vista Valley (Hydrographic Basin 10-129) located in Pershing and Churchill Counties. The hearing addressed objections to a preliminary order of determination regarding vested water rights claims filed by James Estill and Salvador Galindo. Testimony was provided by four witnesses—James Estill, William Price, Salvador Galindo, and Laurie Pearce Price—who presented historical research and evidence supporting claims for stock water and irrigation rights with priority dates ranging from 1862 to 1881. The hearing officer, Melissa Flatley, conducted the proceeding and indicated that a final order of determination would be issued following receipt of supplemental documentation, including homestead entry files from the National Archives and historical tax records for John G. Taylor, which counsel agreed to submit within 30 days and two weeks respectively. The transcript, consisting of 125 pages with full court reporting by Capitol Reporters, was prepared for submission to the district court having jurisdiction over the matter.
The related state procurement (RFP 70CNR-S3484) seeks qualified court reporting services for administrative hearings conducted by the Division of Water Resources on an ongoing basis through a four-year contract beginning February 10, 2026. Contractors must be Nevada state-certified with demonstrated experience in administrative and technical hearings, preferably in water law matters. Deliverables include verbatim transcripts in PDF, Word, and hard copy formats, with standard transcripts due within 10 business days and expedited transcripts within 3 business days. Evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: Experience and Qualifications (30%), Quality and Accuracy Standards (25%), Timeliness and Availability (20%), Customer Service and References (10%), and Cost Proposal (15%). The submission deadline is December 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM Pacific Time, with evaluation occurring December 4-11, 2025. The State offers a five percent preference to Nevada-based businesses and requires vendors to maintain Nevada business licenses, active registrations on nevadaepro.com and sam.gov, and commercial insurance including General Liability ($2,000,000 aggregate/$1,000,000 per occurrence), Automobile Liability ($1,000,000), Workers' Compensation (statutory limits), and Professional Liability ($1,000,000 per claim/$2,000,000 aggregate). No specific budget or incumbent vendor is identified in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70CNR-S3484-Reference-Questionnaire_112025.docx | DOCX document | |
| 70CNR-S3484 - Scope of Work rev102825.docx | DOCX document | |
| 70CNR-S3484-RFP - Request-for-Proposals~3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Insurance Schedule .doc | DOC document | |
| Standard-form-contract~7.docx | DOCX document | |
| 70CNR-S3484 Bid_Q and_A -Responses_FINAL_112025.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| COURT REPORTER- COST SCHEDULE.pdf | ||
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~7.pdf | ||
| 70CNR-S3484-checklist-scorecard rev102825.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Certification-regarding-lobbying~7.pdf | ||
| 70CNR-S3484-Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| 2024.07.31_SAMPLE_Redacted_Invoice_4674_from_Capitol_Reporters _Buena Vista Adj._.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
In The Matter Of:
EPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES VS
IGHTS IN AND TO THE WATERS OF BUENA VISTA VALLEY
July 31, 2024
Capitol Reporters
628 E. John St # 3
Carson City, Nevada 89706
775 882-5322
Original File 073124 water_1.txt
Min-U-Script® with Word Index
1 STATE OF NEVADA
2 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
3 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
4 BEFORE MELISSA FLATLEY, HEARING OFFICER
5 ---oOo---
9 IN THE MATTER OF THE DETERMINATION
OF THE RELATIVE RIGHTS IN AND TO THE
10 WATERS OF BUENA VISTA VALLEY
HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN NO. 10-129,
11 PERSHING AND CHURCHILL COUNTIES,
NEVADA.
15 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
16 PUBLIC HEARING
17 WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 2024
18 CARSON CITY, NEVADA
21 REPORTED BY: CAPITOL REPORTERS
Certified Shorthand Reporters
22 BY: CHRISTY Y. JOYCE, CCR
Nevada CCR #625
23 628 E. John Street #3 Carson City, Nevada 89706
24 (775)882-5322
CAPITOL REPORTERS (775) 882-5322
1 A P P E A R A N C E S
3 For the Claimants:
4 THERESE STIX, ESQ.
CAITLIN R. SKULAN, ESQ.
5 Schroeder Law Offices, PC 10615 Double R Boulevard Suite 100
6 Reno, Nevada 89521
8 Adam Sullivan, Nevada State Engineer
9 Melissa Flatley, Esq.
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Jared McCrum, 11 Supervising Technical Specialist
12 James Henson, Hearing Section Analyst
13 Gabrielle Souza, Adjudication section
14 Jennifer Kluever, Adjudication section
15 Chad Welling, Chief of the Well Drilling and
16 Adjudication sections
1 I N D E X
2 WITNESS PAGE
3 JAMES ESTILL
4 Direct Examination by Ms. Stix 12
5 Examination by Mr. McCrum 36
6 WILLIAM PRICE
7 Direct Examination by Ms. Stix 39
8 Examination by Hearing Officer Flatley 64
9 Examination by the State Engineer 66
10 SALVADOR GALINDO
11 Direct Examination by Ms. Skulan 75
12 LAURIE PEARCE PRICE
13 Direct Examination by Ms. Skulan 85
14 Examination by Hearing Officer Flatley 118
15 Examination by the State Engineer 120
1 WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 2024, 9:00 A.M.
2 ---oOo---
3 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Good morning, Everyone.
4 Today is July 31st, 2024. My name is Melissa Flatley. I'm
5 the chief administrative law judge and I'll be the hearing
6 officer for today's hearing of objections pursuant to NRS
7 533.150 in the matter of the determination of the relative
8 rights in and to the waters of Buena Vista Valley located
9 within the Central Region Hydrographic Basin 10-129, Pershing
10 and Churchill Counties, Nevada.
11 And, we have a lot of people to make appearances, 12 so I'll start with you, Ms. Stix, and then we'll just go
13 around the room. So just state your name and who you're
14 representing.
15 MS. STIX: Good morning. I'm Therese Stix with
16 Schroeder Law Offices. My co-counsel, Caitlin Skulan, is
17 also here with me today. We're representing the Galindos and
18 Estill.
19 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you very much and
20 good morning.
21 MS. STIX: Good morning.
22 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: And we'll start down
23 here at this end with Division staff.
24 MS. SOUZA: Good morning. I'm Gabrielle Souza.
1 I'm part of the adjudication section.
2 MS. KLUEVER: Hi. My name is Jennifer Kluever.
3 I'm a part of the adjudication section as well.
4 MR. WELLING: Good morning. Chad Welling. I'm
5 the chief of our adjudication section.
6 THE STATE ENGINEER: Adam Sullivan, Nevada State
7 Engineer.
8 MR. HENSON: James Henson, hearing section
9 analyst.
10 MR. MCCRUM: Jared McCrum, supervising technical
11 specialist in the hearing section.
12 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: All right. Thank you.
13 Just as a little bit of background and overview, 14 the preliminary order of determination in this matter was
15 signed on September 6th, 2023. There were objections to that
16 order filed by Mr. Estill and the Bureau of Land Management
17 on November 3rd, 2023, and by the Galindos on November 6th, 18 2023.
19 The notice for this hearing was sent out on April
20 12th, 2024.
21 On July 15th, 2024, pursuant to a verbal request
22 that the BLM had made for additional time, they waived their
23 appearance at the hearing. The State Engineer will consider
24 the BLM's objections without submission of further evidence.
1 And then on July 24th, I received the joint
2 pretrial memorandum from the Galindos and Estill and the
3 motion with the late-submitted exhibit, which I will, of
4 course, grant. I'm going to redo the order a little bit, but
5 I'll sign it and give you a copy.
6 So Exhibit 41 will be added to the exhibit list.
7 And I have the hard copy and the copy that was e-mailed. So
8 thank you for that.
9 As far as organizing today's hearing, did you
10 have any idea on how you plan to proceed, Ms. Stix?
11 MS. STIX: Yes. So we're going to start with the
12 Estill case and we will first call Mr. Estill and then
13 followed by Mr. Price and so that's kind of our order. And
14 then this afternoon, or whenever we're done, Galindo and
15 we'll start with Mr. Salvador Galindo and then followed by
16 Ms. Pearce Price.
17 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: All right. Thank you.
18 Like we talked about, my hope is that we can
19 finish in one day. We've had some scheduling issues come up.
20 So, if we don't finish today, we won't have the full day
21 tomorrow. But just keep that in mind. I already addressed
22 the motion.
23 I received exhibits from both the Galindos and
24 Estill. I just want to make sure that I have all of them.
1 So for Estill I have 1 through 41. And then for the
2 Galindos, I have 1 through 50.
3 MS. SKULAN: That's correct.
4 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you, Ms. Skulan.
5 And then the State Engineer in the notice of hearing
6 provided -- identified three exhibits, which I will make sure
7 is included in the record. And, when we send the record to
8 the district court, they get everything. So, even if I don't
9 identify it as an exhibit in this hearing, they're going to
10 have copies of the objections, the claims that we -- that
11 were initially filed that the State Engineer considered. So
12 the record won't be limited to just these exhibits. But, for
13 the purposes of this hearing, these are the exhibits.
14 MS. STIX: Okay. Hearing Officer, so I would
15 assume that would include, like, our witness list and summary
16 and all of that, too?
17 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Correct. The
18 pretrial -- The prehearing memorandum will be part of it. So
19 as examples.
20 MS. STIX: Okay.
21 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: By statute and in the
22 notice of hearing, I broke down how the costs for the hearing
23 would be divided. So the appearance cost for the court
24 reporter and the cost of transcribing the portion consisting
1 of comments by the State Engineer or the public at the
2 conclusion of the hearing are shared equally and then each
3 objecting party bears pro rata their share. Do you have any
4 issue with any common time, like this time, being split
5 equally between the two parties?
6 MS. STIX: No.
7 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: I just wanted to
8 confirm that. Thank you.
9 That's all I have for preliminary matters. Do
10 you have any housekeeping-type issues you want to cover
11 before we start?
12 MS. STIX: Yes. So on our exhibit list for
13 Estill, Exhibits 28 and 29 are actually 1893 as opposed to
14 1883. So that was it. I did have -- wanted to make sure
15 that our objections and all of that was entered, so we
16 already took care of that. So I think that was all of my
17 preliminary housekeeping.
18 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Okay. Well, you had
19 said you wanted to begin with Mr. Estill. Go ahead.
20 MS. STIX: Okay. So, we prepared a brief opening
21 statement, so we'll do that. Also, Ms. Skulan is going to
22 take the lead in Galindo, so when we get there, we'll switch
23 places.
24 All right. So, for the opening statement for
1 Mr. Estill. James, who goes by Jim, Estill is the holder of
2 16 vested proofs of appropriation for stock water in the
3 Buena Vista Valley adjudication. Regarding these vested
4 rights, the State Engineer's preliminary order of
5 determination, pages 49 through 65, made various findings and
6 determinations including on page 54, the State Engineer found
7 no connection between Springers and Robert Welsh, going on to
8 say that the State Engineer confirmed the chain of title from
9 Springers to Estill.
10 On page 56, the State Engineer also confirmed
11 that Mr. Estill is the authorized operator of the Copper
12 Kettle grazing allotment, relating to two of the vested
13 claims but then found that Mr. Estill was not the authorized
14 operator of the Rochester grazing allotment, which relates to
15 14 of Ms. Estill's vested claims.
16 On page 56, the State Engineer found insufficient
17 evidence to substantiate the vested claims for all the
18 surface water sources due to no connection between the
19 claimed initiator of the vested right, Mr. Welsh, and its
20 successor in interest, the Springers.
21 The State Engineer did find sufficient evidence
22 to support the one groundwater vested claim, which is V09788.
23 Because sufficient evidence was found on the groundwater
24 rights, we will not be addressing that one today.
1 The State Engineer made no findings related to
2 the scope of the surface water rights but did go through each
3 right to state what the claim was for, whether or not the
4 State Engineer visited the location and took measurements, 5 but again found no findings related to the scope and rejected
6 each of the stock water rights based on a chain of title
7 issue but not finding -- making any findings related to
8 scope.
9 The law in Nevada in Rand v. Filippini is such
10 that stock water rights on public lands do not need a chain
11 of title but rather need a chain of interest or possession.
12 In this case that is just what happened. The stock graziers
13 were utilizing the range since prior to 1881 and passed that
14 beneficial use of stock water from one public land grazier to
15 the next.
16 The evidence submitted in this adjudication and
17 presented today will show that Estill is the authorized
18 grazier with BLM for both Copper Kettle and Rochester grazing
19 allotment, that a chain of title is not required to show a
20 relation back to a predecessor's first beneficial use when
21 considering vested stock water rights on public lands, that
22 Estill's predecessors in interest began beneficially using
23 water at least as early as 1881 and that use continued to
24 present day.
1 Welsh and Springers were neighbors and both
2 grazed livestock in the Buena Vista Valley. Welsh grazing
3 land from east to west between Lovelock and the Welsh
4 spring -- or Welsh sheep camp canyon, which is today the
5 Anderson Ranch, where Mr. Estill has his home ranch. And
6 Springer grazing from north to south from Unionville down to
7 Fallon.
8 The evidence will show that even after the
9 inception of the Taylor Grazing Act and the BLM, the area
10 continued to be grazed in common by multiple permittees with
11 multiple based properties.
12 In summary, Mr. Estill is authorized to graze in
13 the Copper Kettle and Rochester allotments and should
14 received valid stock water rights for enough water for 1100
15 sheep and 385 cattle with a priority date, based on the
16 historical evidence, dating back to 1881, which has been
17 traced through Estill's chain of possession and authorization
18 and/or grazing permits to utilize the range.
19 Because of the State Engineer's findings that the
20 chain of title was unbroken between Springer and Estill, the
21 evidence presented today will focus on the chain of interest
22 and possession prior to Springer.
23 So, with that, we will call Mr. James Estill to
24 the stand.
1 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you very much.
2 Good morning, Mr. Estill. If you could have a seat right at
3 the end of the table. The court reporter will be taking down
4 everything you say, so make sure you speak clearly and give
5 verbal responses rather than nodding or shaking your head.
6 THE WITNESS: Okay.
7 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you. And I'll
8 have the court reporter swear you in.
9 (The witness was sworn in)
10 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Go ahead, Ms. Stix.
11 MS. STIX: Okay.
13 JAMES ESTILL
14 Called as a witness on behalf of the
15 Claimant, having been first duly sworn, 16 Was examined and testified as follows:
18 DIRECT EXAMINATION
19 By Ms. Stix:
20 Q. Good morning, Mr. Estill.
21 A. Good morning.
22 Q. Can you please tell us what your occupation is?
23 A. Cattle rancher.
24 (The court reporter interrupts)
1 THE WITNESS: E-s-t-i-l-l.
2 Q. (By Ms. Stix) How long have you been a rancher?
3 A. Most of my life with a couple of interruptions.
4 Q. Okay. And how long have you lived at what is
5 known as the Anderson Ranch?
6 A. Since 2005.
7 Q. Is Anderson Ranch sometimes referred to as Welsh
8 Sheep Camp Canyon?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. And is the Anderson Ranch in Buena Vista Valley?
11 A. Yes.
12 Q. Can you tell us how the Anderson Ranch relates to
13 Churchill County versus Pershing County?
14 A. I have two grazing allotments. One is in
15 Churchill County, known as Copper Kettle, and one is in
16 Pershing County, known as Rochester. But it's operated as
17 one unit. It's unfenced.
18 Q. Is the Anderson Ranch proper, the private
19 property, is it just south of the boundary line in Buena
20 Vista Valley?
21 A. That's correct. It's in Churchill County.
22 Q. Okay. And you briefly touched on how your cattle
23 graze between Copper Kettle and Rochester. Is there any
24 fences or pastures that separate those out?
1 A. No, no. It's one large year-round unit. It's a
2 12 month -- I have a 12-month grazing permit.
3 Q. Okay. Can you turn to what's been marked as
4 Estill 41.
5 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: And, for our staff, I'm
6 uploading that to the Teams.
7 Q. (By Ms. Stix) Can you tell us what that is?
8 A. That is my copy of my grazing permit from BLM for
9 Copper Kettle and Rochester.
10 Q. Okay. How do you move cattle around in between
11 those two allotments?
12 A. I don't. They move their selves. Occasionally
13 I'll move cattle where I think they need to be for management
14 purposes. But they're free to go back where they were or
15 anywhere else the next day. It's open range.
16 Q. So there's no fences in between the two?
17 A. Nope.
18 Q. When you purchased the property were the cattle
19 grazing in the same way?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. How did you obtain this BLM grazing permit?
22 A. When I purchased the Anderson Ranch, the BLM
23 transferred it to me.
24 Q. Did you have to sign a deed or just paperwork
1 with the BLM?
2 A. No. It was just paperwork with the BLM. As far
3 as I know, grazing allotments are not recorded in deeds.
4 Q. Were these -- Were these references to the Copper
5 Kettle and the Rochester grazing allotment on your deed?
6 A. I don't think -- I don't think the permit or
7 allotment was mentioned, just the range. The Springer range
8 was mentioned and the water rights in my deed.
9 Q. Okay. Did you file vested proofs of
10 appropriation with the Nevada Division of Water Resources in
11 the Buena Vista Valley?
12 A. Yes.
13 Q. And are those what's generally referred to as
14 Exhibits Estill 1 through 16?
15 A. Yes.
16 Q. Are all of these proofs of appropriation on
17 private land or public land or a combination?
18 A. Public land.
19 Q. Okay. Did you have any help drafting these
20 proofs of appropriation?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. And what did that consist of?
23 A. I hired water engineers to help me. Dennis
24 Gephart was his name or is his name.
1 Q. And what did you and Dennis do?
2 A. Well, we measured the water and found the
3 locations and filled out the appropriate forms and submitted
4 them to this office.
5 Q. Okay. How did you figure out the locations?
6 A. GPS. And then Dennis knows how to measure
7 from -- We GPS'd corners, known corners. And he knows how to
8 create a map with a specific location from those known
9 corners and create the location.
10 Q. And about what year was it or how many years ago
11 did you do this work?
12 A. This is just a guess. I'm going to say 2006 to
13 ten, 2010, maybe. It's been a while.
14 Q. Okay. Do you remember what kind of GPS you used?
15 A. Yes. I used a Garmin GPS and Dennis has -- he
16 had a better one, more sophisticated. I don't know what it
17 was.
18 Q. Okay. And how did you take the measurements when
19 you visited these locations?
20 A. When I did it, some of them I could only access
21 horseback, so I made a dam, had a little pipe and a container
22 and a stop watch. And I measured the water. Some of the
23 larger ones Dennis had kind of a weird dam thing that he
24 brought and used that.
1 Q. All right. In supporting these vested rights did
2 you do any of the historical research yourself?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And what did that consist of?
5 A. I got records from the Churchill County Museum, 6 Churchill County Recorder, Pershing County Recorder, and
7 Humboldt County Recorders Office. And I researched
8 newspapers, articles on microfilm. And I got documents from
9 the -- I can't remember the name of the agency. The federal
10 agency that has Cadastral, the Cadastral surveys and
11 homestead applications on the Springer homestead. And I
12 could be leaving some out. It's been a few years. And I
13 went to a lot of places.
14 Q. Okay. About how many years ago did you do all of
15 this research?
16 A. Ten.
17 Q. Did you ever hire anyone to help you do the
18 historical research?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. And who was that?
21 A. Ruth Danner from Winnemucca did research for me.
22 And, recently, Bill Price did research also.
23 Q. If you can turn to what's been marked as Estill
24 19. Is that the Danner report?
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. And how come you had her do this work after you
3 had spent so much time doing it yourself?
4 A. Because I filed vested water claims on the area
5 between White Cloud and Logan and I wanted to see if I could
6 also file on vested rights north of that area. And so I had
7 her look in to the history of the use north of Logan Spring.
8 And so that's what I asked her to do. And in her research
9 she did that and she also included some of the history down
10 to and south of Logan Spring as an additional benefit.
11 Q. Okay. Did you find her report useful?
13 Q. Okay. All right. We're going to briefly walk
14 through the vested proofs that you filed, so we're going to
15 start at what's been marked as Estill Exhibit 1. Okay. Can
16 you tell us what Exhibit 1 is?
17 A. Yeah. It's -- It's a filing we did on Hughes
18 Canyon Creek.
19 Q. Okay. And, for the record, that's V09780. Can
20 you tell us about any developments on this creek?
21 A. There is none. There is an old development at
22 the lower end of it. I think it's also -- It may be Saint
23 Claire Spring. It's a certificated right. But, the point of
24 diversion, there's a ditch about a hundred, 200 feet that
1 goes to a pond, sometimes does or doesn't have water in it, 2 depends on which way the creek is washed out.
3 Q. And, when you took the GPS location, was that at
4 the pond or where was that at?
5 A. I don't remember.
6 Q. Okay. How do you get to the Hughes Canyon Creek
7 ditch and dam where this proof is located?
8 A. There is a very rough four wheel drive road to
9 it.
10 Q. Does it go right to this location or is it
11 nearby?
12 A. It goes right to it and crosses the spring bed, 13 the water flow area.
14 Q. And did you fill out this proof or did somebody
15 else?
16 A. This looks like Dennis filled this one out.
17 Q. Okay. And, so, the measurement taken that's
18 listed in this proof, is that something that you did or
19 Dennis did?
20 A. I don't remember. I would guess Dennis did it
21 because we could drive to it.
22 Q. Okay. Were you there when the measurement was
23 taken?
24 A. Yes.
1 Q. All right. Moving on to what's been marked as
2 Estill Exhibit 2 for V-9781, can you tell us what that is?
3 A. Yes. Our proof on Taylor Spring.
4 Q. And is there any developments on this spring?
5 A. Nope.
6 Q. How do you access this spring?
7 A. By foot or horseback.
8 Q. Is there any roads nearby?
9 A. About a half mile, mile away, there's a rough
10 four wheel drive road.
11 Q. Okay. And were you present when the measurement
12 was taken that's listed in this proof?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. And, moving on to Exhibit Estill Number 3, which
15 is V-9782, can you tell us about this one?
16 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Before you answer, 17 Mr. Estill, Ms. Stix, if it helps, the State Engineer has
18 verified the accuracy of the information. We accept the
19 claims as filed for location and access and flow.
20 So, if you want, you won't have to go through
21 that for each of the claims.
22 MS. STIX: Okay. Thank you. Yes, I was not
23 clear because the preliminary order of determination made
24 statements but then made a finding only on other issues.
1 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: The only issue, and I
2 confirmed, is that possessory chain.
3 MS. STIX: Okay. So I will briefly go through
4 these a little bit. I just want to talk a little bit more
5 about some of the access and the other features.
6 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: All right. I just
7 wanted to let you know that you didn't have to belabor it.
8 MS. STIX: Thank you. Okay. Recalculating here.
9 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: I apologize for that.
10 MS. STIX: It's okay.
11 Q. (By Ms. Stix) Mr. Estill, can you turn to what's
12 been marked as Estill Exhibit 6 for V-9863 on New York Creek?
14 Q. Can you tell us about the development of this
15 spring or creek?
16 A. There's a pond at the mouth of the canyon. Water
17 runs in to the pond and overflows or runs on out.
18 MS. STIX: Hearing Officer Flatley, so on --
19 housekeeping, on some of these where the State Engineer said
20 that they made a visit but no measurement was found, would
21 you still like me to go through the measurement or are we
22 going to rely upon the measurements or the amount claimed in
23 the vested?
24 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Give me one moment.
1 All right. I had to confer, so thank you. If
2 you think there's information missing from the preliminary
3 order, then go ahead and cover it. So, if we didn't
4 include -- or if we made something that -- if we made a
5 finding contrary to what you think the evidence would
6 support, then you can compare that.
7 MS. STIX: Okay.
8 Q. (By Ms. Stix) Mr. Estill, for this vested that
9 we're speaking about, New York Creek, can you -- were you
10 present when the measurement was taken that's listed in the
11 vested proof?
12 A. Well, I don't recall, but I'm sure I was, because
13 either I did it myself or probably Dennis did this one
14 because it's -- you can drive to it.
15 Q. When you or Dennis did these measurements were
16 you guys together?
17 A. I was always with Dennis when he measured water
18 on the ranch.
19 Q. Okay. Are there any other features for this New
20 York Creek that you would like to tell us about?
21 A. Well, it's a historic water use place that's been
22 used and filed on by a lot of people for a long time. There
23 was a mine there, US Steel, they had some activity there.
24 Somebody filed to put in a stage stop and irrigate land.
1 That, as far as I could tell, was never followed up on or
2 completed. Dennis just found old maps where somebody tried
3 to do that with the water.
4 Q. Okay. Turning to Exhibit 19 at page 17. So
5 Exhibit 19 and then go to page 17 in that exhibit.
6 A. Okay.
7 Q. Did Ms. Danner include in her report information
8 about New York Canyon?
10 Q. And is it located on this page?
12 Q. Okay. And how do you access New York Creek
13 Canyon?
14 A. There's a pretty good dirt road to it from the
15 main Dago Pass Road. It's about a mile or a little more
16 maybe.
17 Q. And what is the difference between the creek and
18 the spring at this location?
19 A. The difference is the spring is where the water
20 starts and the creek is where it runs down the canyon.
21 Q. Can you tell out on the ground if there's a
22 different location for each? Because, in your vested you put
23 natural channel, but then there's some information about a
24 spring in that area.
1 A. Well, I don't recall. I would have to get my GPS
2 and a map and go right to the spot that we located as the
3 spring to find the exact spot. And then, you know, the cows
4 used to water all the way down as far as it runs in the
5 natural channel.
6 Q. Okay. Turning to what's been marked as Estill
7 Exhibit 7 for V-9884. Can you generally describe the
8 infrastructure at this location and how you access it?
9 A. Yes. It's just a couple hundred yards off the
10 Dago Pass Road and it's a large culvert is buried in the
11 ground with a pipe that comes out of it and goes to a
12 concrete water trough maybe 200 feet away, I guess.
13 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Mr. Estill, are you
14 saying Mandago Pass?
15 THE WITNESS: Dago Pass Road.
16 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Could you spell it, 17 please.
18 THE WITNESS: D-a-g-o.
19 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you.
20 Q. (By Ms. Stix) Is Dago Pass Road a paved road?
21 A. Yes. It's -- On some maps, it's also referred to
22 as McKinney Pass, I think.
23 Q. All right. We're going to move on to Kitten
24 Springs and there's multiple Kitten Springs, so we're going
1 to talk about the one at Exhibit 8, which is marked Estill 8, 2 and that's V-9943. Can you tell us about this spring and the
3 location?
4 A. Yes. It's on the Kitten Springs Road, probably
5 two or three miles from the Dago Pass Road, and there's --
6 it's got complex of three or four springs that come together
7 and flow down the natural channel.
8 Q. Is this area heavily, like, marshy and dense
9 vegetation?
10 A. Some of it is. Along the road there's willows
11 and other big bushes in that area.
12 Q. Does the water actually surface and flow
13 downstream?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Is there any evidence of historical features at
16 this location?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. Can you describe those?
19 A. Well, there's an old rock fence. And, if you
20 look around in the brush, you can find boards or pieces of a
21 stove. There's a small wire enclosure that's still visible.
22 And it was used as a -- I understand it was used as a stage
23 stop and filed on for irrigation and stock use at various
24 times in the past history. It was used quite a bit.
1 Q. Is that information in part based on some of the
2 findings in the Danner report?
4 Q. Okay. And how do you access this location?
5 A. Kitten Springs Road turn-off off the Dago Pass
6 Road.
7 Q. Has the Kitten Springs Road always been there?
8 A. For a long time, yes. It was an old stagecoach
9 route.
10 Q. Okay. All right. We're going to turn to --
11 well, a general question about the other Kitten Springs. Are
12 any of the Kitten Springs developed?
13 A. No. They may have been in the past, like many of
14 these springs, but the improvements almost always are
15 destroyed by horses.
16 Q. Are you talking about your horses or --
17 A. Nope, nope, nope. BLM's horses.
18 Q. Okay. All right. So moving on to exhibit what's
19 been marked as Estill 9 for V-9944. Can you tell us about
20 this spring and about any improvements on it?
21 A. Logan Springs is a spring complex similar to
22 Kitten Springs and the main spring is developed -- was
23 developed until the horses destroyed it. And then there's
24 several other springs along in the near vicinity that are not
1 developed.
2 Q. Okay. And how do you access the Logan Springs
3 complex?
4 A. From the Buena Vista well, you can drive about
5 halfway to them. And, there's an old road clear up to them, 6 but you can't -- it's washed out. You got to go horseback or
7 foot the last mile or half mile.
8 Q. At all of these spring locations is there water
9 on top of the ground or what does it look like where the
10 water surfaces?
11 A. Well, yes, when we measured them, there was
12 certainly always water. And, this year, there certainly is.
13 On a dry year, some of these, they don't flow a lot and can
14 dry up when we have a series of drought years.
15 Q. Okay. And, for all of these Logan Springs
16 locations that are listed in your proofs, those were done by
17 GPS or with Mr. Dennis?
18 A. I -- I probably did all of those because he
19 couldn't access them by vehicle.
20 Q. Okay. And, when you went out there with your
21 GPS, could you just ride up to the location, take a GPS, and
22 ride away?
23 A. No. I would sit there under Dennis'
24 instructions. He told me I had to stay there for a long time
1 and let it do its thing and pick up the correct location.
2 Q. Okay. We're going to talk about Logan Springs
3 number six, which is Estill Number 13, Exhibit 13, and that's
4 V-9948. Can you tell us about the flow at this spring?
5 A. .002 cubic feet a second.
6 Q. And was it pooling or was it surfacing? How did
7 you know it was that amount of water?
8 A. Well, it's been so long, I don't remember doing
9 it. But it had to be flowing in order to get the
10 measurement.
11 Q. Okay. Is this, again, one of those springs that
12 on dry years it won't surface?
13 A. It's very possible.
14 Q. And how do you access Logan number six?
15 A. Horseback or foot.
16 Q. All right. We're going to turn to Estill Number
17 15 for V-10007. Can you tell us about the developments at
18 this spring?
19 A. Yes. There's a -- There was a pond built at one
20 time. It was an old cabin there that has fallen down and
21 some holes in the ground where people -- somebody was mining
22 and remnants of a fence that was around the origin where the
23 spring comes out of the ground and the pond. But horses have
24 destroyed all the improvements and it's just -- cattle just
1 use it to water in the natural channel now.
2 Q. And this is for Cabin Springs? It's Cabin
3 Springs; correct?
4 A. This is Cabin Springs, yes.
5 Q. And how do you get there?
6 A. Off a real rough four wheel drive road you can
7 drive to it.
8 Q. Okay. Looking at Big Ben Springs, which is
9 Exhibit Estill 16 for V-10008, can you tell us about that
10 one?
11 A. It's not improved and the cattle just use it in
12 the natural channel. And I -- I've never seen any remnants
13 of improvements in the past.
14 Q. Okay. And how do you access this one?
15 A. Off that same four wheel drive road that goes to
16 Cabin Spring. But then you have to walk or ride for a mile
17 or so.
18 Q. Okay. And did you take the measurement at this
19 location?
20 A. I'm sure I did.
21 Q. Okay. Are all of the vested claims that are --
22 And I know we didn't talk about each and every one of them.
23 But, the ones that are in Exhibits 1 through 16, those are
24 all on your Copper Kettle or south Rochester allotments?
1 A. That's correct.
2 Q. Okay. Have you filed any road rights of way to
3 access many of these springs?
4 A. Yes. I filed 2477 right of ways on -- to all my
5 water in both allotments.
6 Q. Okay. Do you agree or disagree with the
7 preliminary order of determination that found that you are
8 not the authorized user of the Rochester allotment?
9 A. I disagree.
10 Q. And, that's based on that you are the permit
11 holder; correct?
12 A. That's correct.
13 Q. Okay. Do you agree or disagree that you need a
14 chain of title from Mr. -- between Mr. Welsh and Springer?
15 A. The question again?
16 Q. Poor question. So the preliminary order of
17 determination found that you didn't have a chain of title
18 between Mr. Welsh and Mr. Springer?
19 A. That's correct.
20 Q. Do you agree that you need one?
21 A. No.
22 Q. And why is that?
23 A. There may not be any place to get one, as it was
24 open range and everybody used it, and if somebody wanted to
1 use it, which many people did, you just take your livestock
2 out and use the grass and the water and work out your
3 differences with who ever is there the best way you can. And
4 that's what people did. And sometimes they were bought or
5 sold or sometimes they were traded or given away. There was
6 just no standard legal way to transfer those range or water
7 rights until as far as I know the Taylor Grazing Act.
8 Q. And, your research in to your grazing permit and
9 your BLM files, was there evidence of grazing in common with
10 multiple graziers?
12 Q. And about when did that occur?
13 A. Well, Welsh was the first name, and we have his
14 records. And then after him there was Taylor to the north
15 and the Kyle brothers and a guy named Salinas and Kennedy
16 were out there. Pitt, WC Pitt was out there. Multiple
17 users.
18 Q. Okay. Can you turn to Estill Exhibit 19 and go
19 to page 23.
20 A. Okay.
21 Q. Are these, like, pages 23 through about 38, are
22 those excerpts from your BLM grazing files?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Do they show evidence that multiple graziers were
1 out there?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. Okay. Mr. Estill, is there anything else that
4 you would like us to draw attention to for your vested
5 proofs?
6 A. Well, it's -- it's clear to me that range was
7 used constantly by many graziers, historically, and it's
8 pretty hard -- it would be very difficult not -- for those
9 waters not to be used because they're so close together and
10 there's no fences. It's open range. And today my cows could
11 be in Unionville or halfway to Fallon. And they do drift a
12 lot. And so who ever was using that range in that general
13 area would have used those -- would have had to use those
14 waters and then moving there stock in and out of the country
15 to Fallon or Unionville or Lovelock, wherever they went.
16 Obviously they had no trucks and trailers. They would have
17 had to use those waters constantly as well.
18 MS. STIX: Thank you. I would ask that Exhibits
19 1 through 16 and 19 and 41 be admitted.
20 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: They will be admitted.
21 MS. STIX: Okay.
22 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Staff from the Division
23 may have questions. I'll look down the line here.
24 Mr. Estill, just to elaborate on the last
1 question that Ms. Ure had asked before summarizing
2 everything -- Sorry. Ms. Stix. Excuse me. You had said on
3 pages 23 through 28 of Exhibit 19 that those documents show
4 evidence of multiple graziers. Can you explain how you made
5 that conclusion?
6 THE WITNESS: Well, I see their names on page 23.
7 Marvin Meyer, he had the ranch just north of me. Star Peak I
8 think it is. And then Anderson is the bottom name on there.
9 Obviously my place. Do you want me to go through each of
10 them?
11 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: No. I just wanted some
12 examples, so when someone comes back to read the transcript
13 later on, they can see why you made that statement.
14 THE WITNESS: Yeah. Well, you can see the names
15 on these documents that they were trying to establish their
16 grazing area, I assume, for the Taylor Grazing Act to draw
17 the lines for the permits the BLM wanted -- the grazing
18 service wanted to issue.
19 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: And you're familiar
20 with the names, which is why you conclude that there are
21 graziers in that area?
22 THE WITNESS: Yes. And, also, the areas that are
23 mentioned.
24 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you.
1 MS. STIX: Can I ask a follow-up?
2 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Yes.
3 Q. (By Ms. Stix) So, Mr. Estill, when you're
4 looking at Exhibit 19 on page 29.
5 A. Okay.
6 Q. And the paragraph does it say to graze in common
7 on federal range?
8 A. On page 29?
9 Q. Yes. The narrative in the second half, the
10 bottom half of the page.
11 A. Oh, yes. To graze in common on federal range, 12 correct.
13 Q. And is Buena Vista Valley indicated on that?
15 MS. STIX: Can I ask one more additional
16 question?
17 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Yes, you may.
18 Q. (By Ms. Stix) Mr. Estill, can you turn to
19 Exhibit Number 18.
20 A. Okay.
21 Q. Can you tell us where this came from?
22 A. This is a summary of Robert Welsh's possessory
23 claim taxes he paid. And I got this information from Mary
24 Korkeall at the Churchill County Museum.
1 Q. And when did you receive that information from
2 her?
3 A. I don't remember. Probably 2,000 -- I don't
4 know -- seven, eight, nine. I can't remember.
5 Q. And does this summary talk about Mr. Welsh as
6 well as Mr. Springer?
7 A. Yes.
8 Q. And are the books referenced here from the
9 Churchill County Museum books?
10 A. Yes. I have photocopies of -- They're very large
11 pages. And she photocopied them for me. And I believe
12 Mr. Price went and looked at them recently.
13 Q. Okay.
14 A. And, I think they're still there, I'm sure.
15 MS. STIX: All right. Could we admit Exhibit 18
16 as well?
17 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Yes.
18 MS. STIX: All right. We have no further
19 questions.
20 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Thank you. If any come
21 to you after our questions, we'll come back to you.
22 Mr. McCrum, go ahead.
23 ///
24 ///
1 EXAMINATION
2 By Mr. McCrum:
3 Q. Good morning, Mr. Estill. How are you today?
4 A. Good. Good morning.
5 Q. Good, good. I just have a quick question about
6 the flow rates on the requested vested rights that you filed
7 with our office. Are those flow rates based off of your
8 measurements or are they based off of measurements from
9 people in the past that you have -- that you acquired that?
10 A. All of these vested rights I'm sure were mine or
11 Dennis, my agent.
12 Q. Okay.
13 A. We didn't -- I don't think we used any previous
14 information we found on flow rates.
15 Q. And the measurements that you requested in your
16 vested claims are based off of your flow rates then?
18 MR. MCCRUM: Okay. Thank you.
19 MR. HENSON: I have a question for you, Counsel.
20 I don't disagree with you. I would just like you to
21 elaborate on Rand Property and Filippini, that you mentioned
22 that possession and/or chain of possession is adequate. If
23 you could just elaborate on that a little further, I think it
24 would be helpful.
1 MS. STIX: Yes. So the trial brief that we
2 submitted on stock water chain of interest also talks about
3 the Rand v. Filippini case. So, in that case, the Nevada
4 Supreme Court basically found that there's really no way to
5 do a chain of title through deed documents for water rights
6 that were first or claims that were first used on public land
7 and so they found that the chain of interest was sufficient
8 and that was based on if one person was out there grazing
9 cattle and then the next person grazing cattle. So it's
10 based on the grazing and the actual beneficial use of it, 11 which was later through Taylor Grazing Act, development of
12 BLM, and through the adjudication of the grazing allotment.
13 And now the BLM transfers those grazing permits
14 administratively in their office, so you go in and sign
15 forms.
16 Most of the time those -- the BLM permits are not
17 stated in deeds and a lot of people still don't identify the
18 water rights because, as we know, they transfer by an
19 appurtenance. And so really the only way to show the prior
20 existing use without, you know -- not trying to circumvent
21 title or deed documents necessarily, but there is none, 22 because it was public land and you just didn't need any.
23 So that's kind of the gist of the Filippini case.
24 We provided a copy of the Supreme Court's opinion attached to
1 our trial memorandum.
2 MR. HENSON: Okay. Perfect. Thank you.
3 Appreciate it.
4 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Okay. I don't think we
5 have anything else. Do you have any further questions now?
6 MS. STIX: I don't.
7 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: All right.
8 MS. STIX: Mr. Estill, thank you.
9 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Mr. Estill, thank you
10 for your time this morning.
11 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
12 MS. STIX: Okay. We will call Mr. William Price
13 to the stand.
14 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Good morning, 15 Mr. Price.
16 THE WITNESS: Good morning.
17 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Could you state and
18 spell your name for the record, please.
19 THE WITNESS: My name is William F. Price, 20 W-i-l-l-i-a-m. F as in Frances. And P-r-i-c-e.
21 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: All right. Thank you, 22 Mr. Price. And I'll have the court reporter swear you in.
23 (The witness was sworn in)
24 MS. STIX: Go ahead and have a seat. Can we go
1 off the record for a second?
2 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Yeah. Do you want to
3 take a break?
4 MS. STIX: Sure.
5 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Okay. Ten. We'll come
6 back in ten minutes.
7 (Recess was taken)
8 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: We'll be back on the
9 record. Thank you, Mr. Price. And, Ms. Stix, go ahead.
10 MS. STIX: All right.
12 WILLIAM PRICE
13 Called as a witness on behalf of the
14 Claimant, having been first duly sworn, 15 Was examined and testified as follows:
17 DIRECT EXAMINATION
18 By Ms. Stix:
19 Q. Good morning, Mr. Price. Can you please -- I
20 would just remind you that even though we took a break you're
21 still under oath.
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. Can you tell us what your occupation is?
24 A. I'm a professional --
1 (The court reporter interrupts)
2 A. I'm a professional land man and I'm also a
3 professional land surveyor and a Nevada state water rights
4 surveyor.
5 Q. And, is your curriculum vitae at Exhibit Estill
6 Number 17?
8 Q. Okay. Have you been qualified as an expert
9 before the Nevada State Engineer?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. Was that in the Pony Canyon adjudication?
13 Q. And the Diamond Valley adjudication?
15 MS. STIX: Without going through his CV, can
16 we -- I move to qualify him as an expert in water rights, 17 land and water rights surveying and mapping, historical land
18 research and property and water title.
19 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: I've been moving away
20 from qualifying experts, but we'll allow his testimony on
21 those areas, of course.
22 MS. STIX: Okay. Thank you.
23 Q. (By Ms. Stix) All right. Mr. Price, were you
24 hired by Mr. Estill related to the Buena Vista Valley
1 adjudication?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And what were you hired to do?
4 A. He asked me to do whatever research is necessary
5 to respond to the results from the -- the determinations with
6 respect to his water rights in the preliminary order of
7 determination in the Buena Vista Valley.
8 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Mr. Price, I couldn't
9 even understand what you said. Did you get it?
10 THE COURT REPORTER: I got it.
11 HEARING OFFICER FLATLEY: Okay. I'm sorry. Just
12 make sure you're speaking to the court reporter.
13 MS. STIX: You don't have to look at me. You can
14 look at her.
15 THE WITNESS: Thank you.
16 Q. (By Ms. Stix) What sources of information did
17 you look at?
18 A. I looked at census records. I looked at tax
19 records from both Humboldt and Churchill County. I read
20 newspaper articles. I believe the -- all the sources are in
21 my report, but I don't have access to that.
22 Q. That's fine. How come you didn't look at
23 Pershing County?
24 A. Pershing County was created in 1918. And the
1 period of my research was between the inception of the State
2 of Nevada, essentially, and 1915. So it was three years --
3 created three years after my research period. And, during
4 all of that time, it was part of Humboldt County, the land
5 was part of Humboldt County.
6 Q. Okay. Did you generally look at the vested --
7 Mr. Estill's vested proofs of appropriation that are in
8 Exhibits 1 through 16?
10 Q. Are the locations of these vested proofs
11 generally depicted on Exhibit Estill 39? And you can go
12 ahead and turn to that.
14 Q. And can you explain Exhibit 39 and did you create
15 it?
16 A. Yes. If you look at page one of Exhibit 39, 17 there is a green polygon, and that is the boundary of Buena
18 Vista Valley that was obtained from digital polygons that are
19 available from the Nevada State Engineer's office. And on --
20 over that polygon on a Google Earth image, I superimposed the
21 locations of the vested rights that are reflected in Exhibits
22 1 through 16 and I also added a couple of extra pins to the
23 north to indicate where Unionville and Kyle Hot Springs are.
24 Q. Okay. Did you prepare a report in this matter?
2 Q. And is that report marked Estill Exhibit 40?
4 Q. Okay. And, Mr. Price, if you would like to take
5 that out of the binder and set it to the side, that might
6 speed things up when you're flipping back and forth.
7 A. May I set the maps aside -- out too?
8 Q. That's fine. And, while we're going to go
9 through them later, does your report generally rely upon the
10 exhibits marked as Exhibits Estill 20 through 39?
11 A. I also relied on Exhibit 18. So the correct
12 answer is Exhibit 18 and 20 through 39.
13 Q. Okay. Do you have any changes to your report?
14 A. No.
15 Q. Are all -- Scratch that. For the purposes of
16 this case, when I talk about Mr. Estill's vested proofs, I'm
17 going to assume that we're all talking about those vested
18 proofs in Buena Vista Valley. Are you okay with that?
20 Q. Okay. Are all of Mr. Estill's vested proofs in
21 Buena Vista on public land?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. In your report you mention a grazier. What is a
24 grazier? And that's g-r-a-z-i-e-r.
1 A. Thank you. A grazier is a person who owns the
2 livestock they graze. And, that's in contrast to a grazer, 3 who that is the actual livestock itself. And it's an
4 important concept both in terms of describing -- why you're
5 describing the livestock and why you're describing the
6 grazier. And, even in the grazing services correspondence, 7 they always sign it regional grazier or state grazier or
8 whatever. It was a very important term to make that
9 distinction.
10 Q. Okay. Do you know who is the authorized grazier
11 in the Rochester and Copper Kettle allotment today?
13 Q. And who is that?
14 A. Me Estill, Mr. James Estill.
15 Q. Okay. Can you tell us historically how public
16 land grazing permits transferred?
17 A. Public land grazing permits didn't exist before
18 the Taylor Grazing Act. And that was passed in about 1935.
19 I've actually seen historical research where the grazing
20 service, which is the agency that administered that, did --
21 started doing interviews about 1928 in anticipation of the
22 passage of the Taylor Grazing Act.
23 Before that time, the public lands were open and
24 available to anyone, any grazier that could bring their
1 livestock anywhere and try to graze there. And it was a very
2 contested issue having to do with those privileges. But they
3 were transferred from person to person usually out on the
4 public range itself. But sometimes by a show of force.
5 Q. And how are grazing permits transferred today
6 under the Bureau of Land Management?
7 A. Through application and administrative approval
8 on the part of the Bureau of Land Management.
9 Q. Okay. Using Exhibit 39, can you tell us where
10 the Anderson Ranch is located in relation to the Buena Vista
11 Valley?
12 A. Yes. Looking at page one of Exhibit 39. And one
13 of the icons at the very southern end of the Buena Vista
14 Valley is 309782, Welsh Spring, which is just inside Buena
15 Vista Valley. The Anderson Ranch is about a mile and a half
16 south of there outside of the perimeter of Buena Vista
17 Valley.
18 Q. South of the pin for Welsh Springs or south of, 19 say, the number seven on the map?
20 A. South of the perimeter, green perimeter.
21 Q. Okay. And is Lovelock on this map as well?
22 A. Lovelock, yes. There's no pin for Lovelock, but
23 it's located due west of Buena Vista Valley, right along
24 Interstate 80. In fact, there's -- the label for Antelope
1 Spring, V09884, Antelope Spring passes right through the
2 Lovelock valley.
3 Q. So it's the green area along I-80 to the west of
4 Buena Vista Valley?
5 A. Yes.
6 Q. Okay. All right. Using Exhibit 39, can you
7 generally explain how the Springers ran their livestock?
8 A. Yes. The Springers came in to Unionville before
9 1880 and they had residences in Unionville proper and they
10 also acquired about the same time Kyle Hot Springs. That was
11 one of their bases of operation. The other base of operation
12 was down in the Fallon area, somewhere between Stillwater and
13 Fallon, which shows on the southern portion of this map. The
14 white area between Buena Vista Valley and the Fallon
15 Stillwater area is what they called the Humboldt sink we call
16 it today. And this is where the 40-mile desert was that the
17 immigrants came through when they were leaving Lovelock.
18 Q. Okay. And then can you generally explain how the
19 Welshes ran their livestock?
20 A. The Welshes had residential lots in Lovelock and
21 they also had a farm property just to the north of Lovelock, 22 which would have been up in that green area just to the north
23 of I-80 there. And then they would have run from there to
24 the east in to Buena Vista Valley. Well, it says they would
1 have gone southeast to what the Welsh Canyon was south of the
2 Buena Vista Valley and they filter from there north and range
3 that entire area in the vicinity of what's now called the
4 Anderson Ranch.
5 Q. Okay. So is Welsh Canyon Creek the same as the
6 Anderson Ranch --
8 Q. -- in the historical documents?
10 Q. Okay. In your opinion, were Springer and Welsh
11 grazing in the Buena Vista Valley at the same time?
13 Q. Okay. So, to understand the basis for your
14 opinion, we're going to walk through a timeline. Can you
15 please turn to Exhibit Estill 25. And this is starting in
16 1880. So can you tell us what Exhibit Estill 25 shows us?
17 A. Estill 25, page one, is the 19 -- Excuse me --
18 the 1880 census sheet for part of the -- I'm trying to figure
19 out if they called it a town site or a district. But they
20 just said -- At the top it says Unionville upper town. And
21 it was conducted on the -- The people were enumerated on the
22 20th day of June 1880. And the top line of the page shows
23 the Springer family, Josiah Springer was the head of the
24 household and he was a teamster. There was someone there
1 keeping house. EP Springer, I don't know who that was. Ah, 2 I do know who that is. I just figured that out. And then
3 the children below that, RFM, Alice. You can almost read
4 some of their names. There were nine children. There were
5 four daughters and five sons.
6 Q. Okay. So this was in Unionville?
7 A. In Unionville, yes.
8 Q. Okay. So then looking at Exhibits Estill 26 and
9 27, can you tell us what was going on in 1881?
10 A. Exhibit Estill 26 are taxes that were paid in
11 1881. These books are in large ledgers and there's two parts
12 to them. So, in order to find out who paid what, you look at
13 the left-hand side of the ledger. But the right-hand side of
14 the ledger will tell you when they paid it. This was in
15 1881.
16 Most of these have the county at the top, but
17 this one does not. But this was from Churchill County
18 records. And you'll see at the top of the page, page one in
19 other words, the Springer and Bailey paid taxes on the lower
20 sink ranch with 500 cattle, some horses and some hogs.
21 Q. Okay. And then what about Exhibit 27?
22 A. Exhibit 27, again 1881, again Churchill County
23 records, shows at the bottom of page 40 that Robert Welsh
24 paid tax on a possessory claim with improvements, six horses, 1 one cow, 1,900 sheep, and a wagon.
2 Q. So, in 1881, Mr. Springer and Welsh were both
3 paying taxes in Churchill County?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Okay. Now, looking at Exhibits 28 and 29, can
6 you tell us what was going on a few years later in 1893?
7 A. Yes. This is page 84 from the assessment book
8 from Churchill County…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .