J-_12_Wellpinit_Service_Unit_Clinic_RBM_Report_Sept_2014.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Wellpinit Service Unit Modernization Project
- Solicitation number
- 16-102-SOL-00031
About this file
J-12 Regulated Building Material report
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROVIDING
ORGANIZATIONS
WITH
HEALTH
AND
SAFETY
SOLUTIONS
ARGUS
PA
C
IFIC
TRAINING •CONSULTING
Regulated Building Materials Assessment Report
Wellpinit Service Unit -
Clinic
6203 Agency Loop Road Wellpinit, Washington
September 29, 2014
Project Title: Regulated Building Materials Assessment
Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic
6203 Agency Loop Road
Wellpinit, Washington
Prepared for: Mr. Sam Yoon
Inspection Experts, Inc.
6755 Business Parkway
Elkridge, Maryland 21075
Assessment Conducted by: Argus Pacific, Inc.
1900 W. Nickerson Street, Suite 315
Seattle, Washington 98119
Argus Pacific Project Number: 641018R
Assessment Personnel:
Mr. Peter Snider
AHERA-Accredited Building Inspector
Number 147486 (exp. 6/25/2015)
State of Washington Department of Commerce
Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor
Number 6559 (exp. 9/18/2016 )
Assessment Dates: September 9-11, 2014
Report Prepared by:
Peter Snider
Industrial Hygienist
Argus Pacific, Inc.
Report Reviewed by:
Scott Rinear
Project Manager
Argus Pacific, Inc.
Report Issue Date: September 29, 2014
Regulated Building Materials Assessment Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic September 29, 2014 Inspection Experts, Inc. Argus Pacific #641018R
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Sources of Information
2.2 Building Description
3.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT
3.1 Building Assessment
3.2 Sampling Procedures
3.3 Analytical Methodology
3.4 Asbestos Results
4.0 LEAD ASSESSMENT
4.1 Sampling Methodology
4.2 Lead Sampling Results
5.0 Radon Assessment
5.1 Sampling Methodology
5.2 Radon Sampling Results
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Asbestos
6.2 Lead
6.3 Radon
7.0 LIMITATIONS
Figures Photographs
Appendices Appendix A. Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix B. XRF Readings and Paint Chip Sample Data Appendix C. Lead Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix D. Radon Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix E. Certifications and Accreditations
Page i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Inspection Experts, Inc. retained Argus Pacific, Inc. (Argus Pacific) to conduct a renovation-level regulated building materials assessment of the Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic, located at 6203
Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. Argus Pacific’s representative, Mr. Peter Snider, conducted the assessment from September 9-11, 2014. The scope of the services provided is described in Argus Pacific Proposal Number 641018P dated August 7, 2014.
Argus Pacific assessed the building for the following regulated building materials:
Asbestos-containing materials (ACM);
Assumed asbestos-containing materials;
Lead-containing coatings (paints) ; and
Radon gas.
Sixty-one bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected and analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). Three materials were found to contain greater than one percent asbestos and three materials were assumed to contain asbestos. In addition, four materials were visually assessed and determined to be non-suspect.
One-hundred and thirty-six (136) on-site X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) readings were taken. Two of the XRF readings were above the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold of 1.0 mg/cm . Twenty-two readings had detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the
EPA/HUD threshold.
In addition to the XRF readings, Argus Pacific collected confirmation bulk paint chip samples to confirm XRF readings of paints showing no detectable concentrations of lead. Twelve confirmation paint chip samples were collected and analyzed for total lead content. Three of the
12 paint chip samples were found to contain detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold of 5,000 parts per million (ppm) by weight. Three
XRF readings, one of the white-painted interior wood window trim, one of the white-painted interior wood window sills, and one of the white-painted interior wood window casings, showed no detectable lead. However, confirmation paint chip samples were collected of these paints and the paint chip sample results did show detectable lead (below the EPA/HUD threshold). The confirmation paint chip sample results supersede the onsite XRF readings.
See Appendix B for XRF and paint chip sample results of all painted components that were sampled.
Five samples for radon were collected in the basement of the Clinic. Radon concentrations ranged from <0.5 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) to 1.1 pCi/L. Results of the radon samples were below the
EPA Indoor Guideline Action Level of 4.0 pCi/L. As per client direction, radon samples were only collected in the basement.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Inspection Experts, Inc. retained Argus Pacific, Inc. (Argus Pacific) to conduct a renovation-level regulated building materials assessment of the Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic, located at 6203
Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. Argus Pacific’s representative, Mr. Peter Snider, conducted the assessment from September 9-11, 2014. The scope of the services provided is described in Argus Pacific Proposal Number 641018P dated August 7, 2014.
Argus Pacific assessed the building for the following regulated building materials:
Asbestos-containing materials (ACM);
Assumed asbestos-containing materials;
Lead-containing coatings (paints) ; and
Radon gas.
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
This report presents the results of our regulated building materials assessment of the Wellpinit
Service Unit - Clinic, located at 6203 Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. The purpose of the assessment was to identify potential asbestos-containing material, lead-containing coatings, and radon gas (in the basement only) prior to renovation and for purposes of hazard communication and on-going management. The assessment included the interior, exterior, and roof of the east section of the Clinic building (original 1970 construction). The assessment did not include any interior or exterior areas of the building west of the original construction portion of the Clinic.
This assessment will assist Inspection Experts, Inc. with communicating the presence of lead-containing coatings and the presence, location, and quantity of ACM to employees, vendors, and contractors working in the building and to meet the requirements for an asbestos survey for the
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA) and a good faith inspection as required by
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) regulations prior to renovation or demolition. Regulations require that a complete copy of this assessment be kept in a conspicuous location on-site at all times during activities that may impact known and suspect ACM.
2.1 Sources of Information
During the course of the assessment, the following individuals and drawings provided assistance to the Argus Pacific inspectors:
Mr. Jeff Church, Federal Occupational Health
Mr. Sam Yoon, Inspection Experts Inc.
Mr. Steve Abrahamson, Facility Manager, Wellpinit Service Unit
Basic Floor Plan Drawing (provided by Client)
2.2 Building Description
The Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic (also referred to as the David C. Wynecoop Memorial Clinic or DCWMC) is located at 6203 Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. The portion of the building included in this assessment was constructed in 1970 and contains approximately 4,694 square feet of interior floor space. The building is a one-story structure with a finished basement.
The building includes office space, an exam room, storage space, restrooms, laundry/linen rooms, mechanical rooms, attic, and a fitness room.
The building is wood-frame construction with a concrete foundation. The building is heated by forced air and heat pumps located in the basement. The building interior flooring consists of glued-down carpeting, vinyl floor sheeting, and vinyl floor tiles. Interior walls consist of gypsum wallboard (no wall texture) on the main floor and textured gypsum wallboard throughout the basement and basement stairway. Ceiling materials consist of gypsum wallboard with glued-on ceiling tiles throughout the main floor and suspended ceiling tiles throughout the basement. Attic insulation consists of blown-in insulation and fiberglass batt insulation in places. Ducting is insulated with plastic-wrapped and foil-wrapped fiberglass duct insulation. Domestic water pipes are insulated with paper-wrapped fiberglass pipe insulation with plastic fittings.
The exterior consists of painted composite siding with a black asphaltic paper vapor barrier. The roof is metal and no vapor barrier was observed associated with the roof. Roof sealant associated with roof penetrations was observed but not accessible. Electrical wiring consists of thermoplastic insulation.
The area of assessment was limited to the administrative office area and basement in the east section of the building (original construction). No other portions of the building interior or exterior were included in this assessment.
3.0 ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT
3.1 Building Assessment
Mr. Snider, an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA)-accredited building inspector (Certification 147486, expiration date: 6/25/2015) from Argus Pacific, performed the sampling on September 9-11, 2014. Argus Pacific’s inspector collected 61 samples of materials identified as suspect ACM.
This assessment was conducted using a modified protocol adapted from AHERA. The protocol is as follows:
Identify suspect asbestos-containing materials.
Group materials into homogeneous sampling areas/materials.
Quantify each homogeneous material and collect representative samples. The number of samples collected of miscellaneous materials was determined by the inspector.
Samples of each material were taken to the substrate, ensuring that all components and layers of the material were included.
Sample locations are referenced on the field data forms according to sample number.
Sampling was performed by an AHERA-accredited building inspector, and the use of proper protective equipment and procedures was followed.
3.2 Sampling Procedures
This sampling was conducted using the following procedures:
1. Spread the plastic drop cloth (if needed) and set up other equipment, e.g., ladder.
2. Don protective equipment (respirator and protective clothing if needed).
3. Label sample container with its identification number and record number. Record sample location and type of material sampled on a sampling data form.
4. Moisten area where sample is to be extracted (spray the immediate area with water).
5. Extract sample using a clean knife, drill capsule, or cork boring tool to cut out or scrape off approximately one tablespoon of the material. Penetrate all layers of material.
6. Place sample in a container and tightly seal it.
7. Wipe the exterior of the container with a wet wipe to remove any material that may have adhered to it during sampling.
8. Clean tools with wet wipes and wet mop; or vacuum area with HEPA vacuum to clean all debris.
9. Discard protective clothing, wet wipes and rags, cartridge filters, and drop cloth in a labeled plastic waste bag.
3.3 Analytical Methodology
Suspect ACMs were sampled in general accordance with 40 CFR 763.86 by an Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) AHERA-accredited building inspector. Each sample was collected and stored in a heavy-duty, self-sealing plastic bag, and delivered to Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC in
Bellevue, Washington. Samples were analyzed via polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with EPA/600/R-93/116. Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC is accredited to perform PLM analysis by the National Institute of Standards and Technology National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
3.4 Asbestos Results
Table 3.4-1 provides a list of suspect homogeneous sampling area (HSA) material descriptions, material locations, and results for this sampling. Asbestos-containing materials and assumed asbestos-containing materials are shown in bold text. Refer to the attached Figure for sample locations and room number designations (as applicable). Refer to the attached photographs for
HSA pictures.
Table 3.4-1. Results of Bulk Sample Analyses
HSA ID, Material Description, and AHERA Classification
Material Location HSA Results
1: White joint compound and white gypsum wallboard (M)
Walls and hard lid ceiling above glued-on ceilings tiles (HSA 4) throughout main floor
Joint compound: ND Gypsum: ND
2: 4” off-white rubber cove base, yellow mastic, and residual white joint compound (M)
Cove base throughout main floor Cove base: ND Mastic: ND Joint compound: ND
3: Green/tan/black carpet mastic and residual wood debris (M)
Carpet mastic in offices, hallway, conference room, and storage rooms throughout main floor
Mastic: ND Wood: ND
4: 1’x1’ white ceiling tiles with wormhole pattern, tan soft material, brown fibrous material, and brown mastic (M)
Ceiling tiles throughout main floor Ceiling tile: ND Soft material: ND Fibrous material: ND Mastic: ND
5: Beige vinyl floor sheeting with terrazzo pattern, grey paper backing with mastic, and tan brittle material (M)
Flooring in kitchenette on main floor Vinyl: ND Paper backing with mastic: ND Brittle material: ND
6: Off-white vinyl floor sheeting with square pattern and grey paper backing with mastic (M)
Flooring in restroom on main floor Vinyl: ND Paper backing with mastic: ND
7: Grey sink undercoating (M) Sink in kitchenette on main floor ND
8: Fire doors and frames (M) Fire doors and frames throughout main floor
Assumed to contain asbestos
9: Grey blown-in attic insulation (T) Attic insulation throughout main floor ND
10: Tan paper with mastic (M) and pink fiberglass batt insulation (T)
Insulation in places throughout attic Tan paper with mastic:
ND
Fiberglass: ND* *Confirmation sample of visually negative material
11: Clear material with tread, off-white vinyl floor sheeting, grey paper backing with mastic, and white brittle material with mastic (M)
Flooring with tread dots in kitchenette storage room and east foyer on main floor
Clear material with tread: ND Off-white vinyl: ND Grey paper backing with mastic: ND White brittle material:
ND
12: 4” green rubber cove base and yellow mastic with residual joint compound (M)
Cove base in kitchenette storage room on main floor
Cove base: ND Mastic with joint compound: ND and AHERA Classification
Material Location HSA Results
13: Yellow mastic, beige vinyl floor tiles, and black mastic (M)
Vinyl floor tiles under vinyl floor sheeting (HSA 5) in kitchenette on main floor
Yellow mastic: ND Tile: ND Black mastic: 3% chrysotile
14: Grey mortar (M) Associated with concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall in electrical closet in east portion of main floor
ND
15: White joint compound and white gypsum wallboard (M)
Walls throughout basement Joint compound: ND Gypsum: ND
16: White wall texture (S), brown/grey paper, white paint, and residual tan/black mastic (M)
Texture on walls throughout basement and basement stairway
Texture: ND Paper: ND Paint: ND Mastic: ND
17: Brown carpet mastic and grey soft material (M)
Carpet mastic throughout majority of basement
Mastic: ND Soft material: ND
18: 4” pink rubber cove base, off-white mastic, and grey paper (M)
Cove base in server room in basement
Cove base: ND Mastic: ND Paper: ND
19: 4” brown rubber cove base and brown mastic (M)
Cove base in storage rooms and restroom in basement
Cove base: ND Mastic: ND
20: 4” beige rubber cove base, yellow mastic, and residual white joint compound (M)
Cove base in hallway and linen room in basement
Cove base: ND Mastic: ND Joint compound: ND
21: 4” purple rubber cove base and yellow mastic (M)
Cove base in fitness room in basement
Cove base: ND Mastic: ND
22: 4” tan rubber cove base and off-white mastic (M)
Cove base in laundry/fire riser room in basement
Cove base: ND Mastic: ND
23: 12”x12” tan vinyl floor tiles with multi-colored streaks and yellow mastic (M)
Flooring in storage room 225 in basement
Tile: 3% chrysotile Mastic: ND
24: Trace multi-color carpet, yellow carpet mastic with wood debris, off-white vinyl floor tiles, and brown mastic (M)
Flooring under carpet in storage room 232 in basement
Carpet: ND Yellow mastic with wood: ND Tile: ND Brown mastic: ND
25: Beige vinyl floor sheeting with terrazzo pattern and grey paper backing with mastic (M)
Flooring in laundry/fire riser room in basement
Vinyl: ND Paper backing with mastic: ND and AHERA Classification
Material Location HSA Results
26: Off-white vinyl floor sheeting with red lines, tan paper backing with mastic, grey vinyl floor tiles, and yellow mastic (M)
Flooring in janitor room and restroom in basement (asbestos-containing vinyl floor tiles are only present in restroom)
Vinyl: ND Paper backing with mastic: ND Tile: 2% chrysotile Mastic: ND
27: Off-white vinyl floor tiles, brown mastic, and white brittle material with mastic (M)
Flooring in stairway landings Tile: ND Mastic: ND Brittle material with mastic: ND
28: 2’x4’ white suspended ceiling tiles with wormhole and pinhole pattern (M)
Suspended ceilings throughout basement
ND
29: Plastic-wrapped fiberglass duct insulation (T)
Insulation on HVAC ducting in places throughout basement ceiling space
Visually assessed and determined to be non-suspect
30: Foil-wrapped fiberglass duct insulation (T)
Insulation on HVAC ducting in places throughout basement ceiling space
Visually assessed and determined to be non-suspect
31: Grey sealant (M) Associated with metal HVAC ducting in places throughout building
ND
32: Trace grey sealant and black vibration isolator (M)
Associated with furnace/heat pumps in mechanical room in basement
Sealant: ND Vibration isolator: ND
33: White sealant, silver foil (M), and yellow fiberglass pipe insulation (T)
Sealant in places at exposed pipe ends where fiberglass pipe insulation (HSA 43) terminates
Sealant: ND Foil: ND Fiberglass: ND* *Confirmation sample of visually negative material
34: Yellow/white sealant with mastic (M)
Fire suppression piping system sealant throughout building
ND
35: Residual white ceiling tile and brown mastic (M)
Residual mastic and ceiling tile where partition walls meet ceiling in places throughout basement
Ceiling tile: ND Mastic: ND
36: Black asphaltic paper vapor barrier (M)
Behind exterior siding throughout building
ND
37: Grey composite siding material (M)
Exterior siding throughout building ND
38: 6”x6” grey CMU with mortar (M)
Façade in lower portion of building exterior
ND
and AHERA Classification
Material Location HSA Results
39: Multi-layer black asphaltic three-tab roofing shingles, black asphaltic sealant, and black asphaltic paper vapor barrier (M)
Small section of roofing in covered portion of deck in northwest portion of building
ND (all layers)
40: Roof penetration sealant (M) Sealant associated with vent and pipe penetrations on metal roof (not accessible; assumed to be present)
Assumed to contain asbestos
41: Gaskets (M) Associated with fire suppression system piping in laundry/fire riser room (not accessible)
Assumed to contain asbestos
42: Electrical panels and thermoplastic electrical wire insulation (M)
In places throughout building Visually assessed and determined to be non-suspect
43: Paper-wrapped fiberglass pipe insulation with plastic fittings (T)
Insulation on domestic water piping throughout building
Visually assessed and determined to be non-suspect
ND: none detected, HSA: material that is uniform in color, texture, general appearance, and construction and application date, M: Miscellaneous material per AHERA, S: Surfacing material per AHERA, T: Thermal system insulation per AHERA
Table 3.4-2 provides a list of sample IDs for the quality control samples collected. The material location references the information in Table 3.4-1 for the corresponding HSA. Asbestos-containing materials are presented in bold text. It should be noted that quality control sample locations are not shown on the Figures. The sample locations are the same as the corresponding sample ID without the “Q” designation. For example, quality control sample WSU-13-01Q was collected by breaking sample WSU-13-01 in half.
Table 3.4-2. Results of Quality Control Bulk Sample Analyses
Sample ID, Material Description, and AHERA Classification
Material Location HSA Results
13: Yellow mastic, beige vinyl floor tiles, and black mastic (M)
Vinyl floor tiles under vinyl floor sheeting (HSA 5) in kitchenette on main floor
Yellow mastic: ND Tile: ND Black mastic: 4% chrysotile
ND: none detected, HSA: material that is uniform in color, texture, general appearance, and construction and application date, QC: quality control, M: Miscellaneous material per AHERA
The quality control sample results for the tan tile layer were consistent with the laboratory analytical results for the corresponding materials in the main batch of samples. The black mastic associated with beige vinyl floor tile (HSA 13) was shown to contain asbestos in both the main sample results and quality control sample results.
Additional ACMs may be present in areas not assessed or that were inaccessible or concealed.
These spaces include, but are not limited to, areas and materials outside the targeted scope of this assessment, above hard ceiling decks, electrical systems, pipe chases, spaces between wall/ceiling/door/floor cavities, interior of mechanical components, beneath foundation pads, etc.
If future maintenance, renovation, and/or demolition activities make these areas accessible, Argus
Pacific recommends that a thorough assessment of these spaces be conducted at that time to identify and confirm the presence or absence of additional ACMs. Until then, all such unidentified materials must be treated as assumed ACMs in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.
If the analytical results indicate that all the samples collected per HSA do not contain asbestos, then the HSA (material) is considered a non-ACM. However, if the analytical results of one or more of the samples collected per HSA indicate that asbestos is present in quantities of greater than one percent asbestos as defined by the EPA, all of the HSA (material) is considered to be an
ACM regardless of any other analytical results (unless a representative number of samples have been analyzed by PLM point counting as described below, and the results indicate the material contains less than one percent asbestos).
Any material that contains greater than one percent asbestos is considered an ACM and must be handled according to OSHA and EPA regulations. The EPA National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 40 CFR 61, Subparts A and M has a requirement related to assessment of suspect ACM in buildings. When the asbestos content of a friable material is visually estimated by PLM to be detectable but less than ten percent, your firm may elect to (1) assume the amount is greater than one percent and treat the material as asbestos-containing or (2) require verification of the amount by the PLM point counting technique. If the results obtained by point counting and visual estimation are different, the point count result must be used. When no asbestos is detected by PLM, point counting is not required.
4.0 LEAD ASSESSMENT
Mr. Peter Snider, a State of Washington Department of Commerce certified lead inspector
(Certificate No. 6559 Exp. 9/18/2016) from Argus Pacific, conducted the on-site X-Ray
Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) readings and confirmation bulk paint chip sampling.
Homogeneous areas of suspected lead-containing coatings (paints) were identified and sampled using an XRF throughout the interior and exterior of the Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic located at
6203 Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. Confirmation bulk paint chip samples were collected to confirm XRF readings showing no detectable concentrations of lead.
4.1 Sampling Methodology
XRF readings were collected using a NITON Xlp 300 Analyzer. The XRF was calibrated at the beginning of the day and again approximately once every four hours until the end of the day.
4.2 Lead Sampling Results
One-hundred and thirty-six (136) X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) readings were taken.
Two of the XRF readings were above the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold of 1.0 mg/cm
Twenty-two readings had detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the EPA/HUD threshold.
In addition to the XRF readings, Argus Pacific collected confirmation bulk paint chip samples to confirm XRF readings of paints showing no detectable concentrations of lead. Twelve paint chip samples were collected and analyzed for total lead content. Three of the 12 paint chip samples were found to contain detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold of 5,000 parts per million (ppm) by weight.
Three XRF readings, one of the white-painted interior wood window trim, one of the white-painted interior wood window sills, and one of the white-painted interior wood window casings, showed no detectable lead. However, confirmation paint chip samples were collected of these paints and the paint chip sample results did show detectable lead (below the EPA/HUD threshold). The results of the confirmation paint chip analyses are presented in Table 4.2-1 and also are included in Appendix B. See Appendix B for XRF data.
Table 4.2-1. Paint Chip Sample Results
Paint Number and Description Paint Location Sample Result in parts per million (ppm)
WSU-Pb1: White paint on gypsum wallboard
Confirmation sample for XRF readings of majority of interior gypsum walls throughout main floor* *does not include individual walls on main floor shown to contain detectable lead by XRF sampling; see Appendix B for individual walls shown to contain detectable lead
<58
WSU-Pb2: White paint on metal Confirmation sample for XRF readings of majority of door frames throughout main floor* *does not include individual door frames shown to contain detectable lead by XRF sampling; see Appendix B for individual door frames shown to contain detectable lead
<47
WSU-Pb3: White paint on wood Confirmation sample for XRF readings of interior window trim throughout main floor
WSU-Pb4: White paint on wood Confirmation sample for XRF readings of interior window sills throughout main floor
Table 4.2-1. Paint Chip Sample Results
Paint Number and Description Paint Location Sample Result in parts per million (ppm)
WSU-Pb5: White paint on wood Confirmation sample for XRF readings of interior window casings throughout main floor
WSU-Pb6: White paint on gypsum wallboard
Confirmation sample for XRF readings of interior gypsum walls throughout basement* *does not include individual walls basement shown to contain detectable lead by XRF sampling; see Appendix B for individual walls shown to contain detectable lead
<46
WSU-Pb7: White paint on metal Confirmation sample for XRF readings of door frames throughout basement
<48
WSU-Pb8: Brown paint on metal Confirmation sample for XRF readings of doors throughout basement
<49
WSU-Pb9: Orange paint on gypsum wallboard
Confirmation sample for XRF readings of interior gypsum walls in basement fitness room
<48
WSU-Pb10: Grey paint on composite siding
Confirmation sample for XRF readings of exterior siding throughout building
<48
WSU-Pb11: Grey paint on wood Confirmation sample for XRF readings of exterior trim throughout building
<51
WSU-Pb12: Grey paint on wood Confirmation sample for XRF readings of exterior columns
<44
<: below the reporting limit
5.0 RADON ASSESSMENT
On September 9-11, 2014, Mr. Peter Snider, an Industrial Hygienist with Argus Pacific collected samples for radon in air in portions of the basement of the Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic.
5.1 Sampling Methodology
In accordance with EPA recommendations (EPA 402-R-93-003, March 1993), Argus Pacific collected samples for radon using activated charcoal canisters. Samples were placed in occupied-space rooms approximately two feet above floor and at least two feet from perimeter walls, and the canisters were left open for a 48 hour sampling period. At the time of the sampling, doors were kept closed as was feasible other than normal entry/exit to the rooms and basement. There are no windows in the basement. It was not possible for the HVAC system to be shut down during the testing due to building occupation in other areas. At the end of the 48 hour sample period, sampling canisters were sealed and labeled as per the provided instructions, and samples were shipped to Energy Laboratories in Billings, Montana for gravimetry and radiochemical analysis by gamma spectroscopy using a sodium iodide detector in accordance with EPA Method
E520/5-87-005.
5.2 Radon Sampling Results
The following table provides the sample results for the radon samples collected from the
Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic basement. Radon samples are reported in picocuries per liter
(pCi/L). The EPA and CDC recommend further testing and/or remedial action if continuous exposure levels reach an Action Level of 4.0 pCi/L. All samples were below the Action Level of
4.0 pCi/L. See Appendix D for laboratory analytical results.
Table 5.2-1. Radon Sample Results
Sample ID Detector
ID Sample Locations Results (pCi/L)
WSU-Rn-01 1910 Basement: Fitness room; center of room; approximately 2 feet above floor
0.8
WSU-Rn-02 2309 Basement: Mechanical room; west portion of room, approximately 2 feet above floor
0.9
WSU-Rn-03 1672 Basement: Server room; north portion of room; approximately 2 feet above floor
1.1
WSU-Rn-04 1344 Basement: Laundry room; north portion of room; approximately 2 feet above floor
<0.5
WSU-Rn-05 1616 Basement: Storage room 231; west portion of room; approximately 2 feet above floor
<0.5
<: below the reporting limit
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From September 9-11, 2014, Argus Pacific conducted a renovation-level regulated building materials assessment of the Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic, located at 6203 Agency Loop Road in
Wellpinit, Washington.
6.1 Asbestos
The results of the asbestos assessment conducted at the Wellpinit Service Unit - ClinicWellpinit
Service Unit - Clinic indicate that the following building materials sampled are ACMs or are assumed to contain greater than one percent asbestos.
Table 6.1-1. ACM and Assumed ACM
HSA ID, Material Description, and AHERA Classification Material Location
HSA Quantity (approximate)
8: Fire doors and frames (M) Fire doors and frames throughout main floor
30 Each
13: Black mastic below beige vinyl floor tiles (M)
Vinyl floor tiles under non-ACM vinyl floor sheeting (HSA 5) in kitchenette on main floor
130 SF
23: 12”x12” tan vinyl floor tiles with multi-colored streaks and yellow mastic (M)
Flooring in storage room 225 in basement
55 SF
26: Grey vinyl floor tiles and non- ACM yellow mastic, below non-ACM vinyl floor sheeting (M)
Flooring in restroom in basement (the non-ACM vinyl floor sheeting top layer is also present in the basement janitor room, but the ACM vinyl floor tile is not present in the janitor room)
40 SF
40: Roof penetration sealant (M) Sealant associated with vent and pipe penetrations on metal roof (not accessible; assumed to be present)
15 Penetrations
41: Gaskets (M) Associated with fire suppression system piping in laundry/fire riser room (not accessible)
10 Each
HSA: material that is uniform in color, texture, general appearance, and construction and application date, M:
Miscellaneous material per AHERA, SF: square feet
Asbestos-related work must be performed in compliance with Federal worker protection and environmental protection regulations. See OSHA asbestos regulations and SRCAA Regulation
III, Article 4 for additional information.
6.2 Lead
See Appendix B for results of all on-site XRF testing and corresponding confirmation paint chip sample results.
One-hundred and thirty-six (136) on-site X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) readings were taken. Two of the XRF readings were above the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold of 1.0 mg/cm . Twenty-two readings had detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the
EPA/HUD threshold.
Based on XRF readings, the paint on the following components contains greater than 1.00 mg/cm lead and is considered lead-based paint according to EPA/HUD and the EPA’s Lead
Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule (RRP Rule) applies:
Interior gypsum wallboard, west wall in main floor Conference Room (white-painted)
Twenty-two XRF readings had detectable levels of lead, but at concentrations below the
EPA/HUD threshold. In addition, three paints that showed non-detect XRF readings were confirmed via confirmation paint chip sampling to have detectable lead (below the EPA/HUD threshold).
For paint with detectable lead at concentrations below the EPA/HUD “lead-based paint” threshold, Federal OSHA regulations still apply. Workers using respiratory protection and who have received proper training in the handling of lead contaminated materials must be used for any activities (manual scraping, manual/power sanding, general clean-up, demolition, and the use of a heat gun) that may impact areas where lead containing paint is present.
OSHA requires an exposure assessment be conducted during operations that may disturb the lead paint in such a way that the airborne exposure may reach or exceed the Action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m ) or the Permissible Exposure Limit of 50 µg/m
. The worker protection requirements of 29 CFR 1926.62 may apply.
Some of the coatings contained detectable levels of lead. If this building or portions of it will be demolished and disposed of, a toxicity characteristic leachate procedure (TCLP) sample that is representative of the waste stream must be collected and analyzed per the requirements of EPA
40 CFR Part 260. If the results of the TCLP analysis determine the waste to be a "hazardous waste" as defined by 40 CFR Part 260, it must be disposed of accordingly.
The lead sampling and reporting conducted as a part of this assessment may be used to meet the requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting rule (RRP). Refer to 40CFR745 for additional information.
6.3 Radon
The EPA and CDC recommend further testing and/or remedial action if continuous exposure levels reach an Action Level of 4.0 pCi/L. All samples were below the Action Level of 4.0 pCi/L.
The results of the short-term testing for radon conducted by Argus Pacific in the basement of the
Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic were all below the Action Level of 4.0 pCi/L.
It is recommended that certain “closed-building conditions” are met during sampling for radon, including keeping windows closed, limiting opening of doors to normal entry/exit, and shut down all fans, HVAC, and air systems. For the sampling conducted by Argus Pacific, all of these conditions were met except for the HVAC shut down, which was not possible at the time of the assessment due to the building being occupied.
7.0 LIMITATIONS
This report presents the results of the regulated building materials assessment of the Wellpinit
Service Unit - Clinic, located at 6203 Agency Loop Road in Wellpinit, Washington. The purpose of the assessment was to identify potential asbestos-containing material and lead-containing coatings, as well as testing for radon in the basement, prior to renovation and for purposes of hazard communication and on-going management. The assessment was limited to the interior, exterior, and roof of the east portion of the building (original 1970 construction). The assessment did not include interior or exterior areas of the building west of the original construction portion.
Regulated building material assessments are non-comprehensive and subject to many limitations, including those presented below. Our assessment has considered risks pertaining to asbestos, lead in coatings, and radon testing; however, this assessment is limited to only those locations and materials assessed. This assessment was not designed to identify all potential concerns or to eliminate all risks associated with renovation, demolition, material removal, construction, or transferring of property title. Evaluation of other risks not specifically described in the Scope of
Work have not been included; for example: structural integrity; engineering loads; electrical;
mechanical; slope stability; building settlement; and evaluation of toxic and hazardous substances in, or in contact with, soil and groundwater. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Argus Pacific has performed the services set forth in the Scope of Work in accordance with generally accepted industrial hygiene practices in the same or similar localities, related to the nature of the work accomplished, at the time the services were performed.
The regulated building materials and conditions presented in this report represent those observed on the dates we conducted the sampling. This sampling is intended for the exclusive use of
Inspection Experts, Inc. for specific application to the referenced property. This assessment does not replace nor can be used as professionally developed construction or demolition plans, specifications, or bidding documents. This report is not a legal opinion.
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
Peter Snider Scott Rinear
Industrial Hygienist Project Manager
Argus Pacific, Inc. Argus Pacific, Inc.
Figures
Figure 2 Wellpinit Service Unit – Clinic Main Floor and Basement Approximate ACM Locations
ARGUS PACIFIC INC. • 1900 W NICKERSON • SUITE 315 • SEATTLE, WA 98119 • 206.285.3373 • ARGUSPACIFIC.COM
N
NOT TO SCALE
West portion of building not included in this assessment
Fire doors and frames (assumed ACM)
HSA ID: 8
Asbestos-containing black mastic associated with non-ACM vinyl floor tiles; under non-ACM vinyl floor sheeting
HSA ID: 13
12”x12” tan/grey vinyl floor tiles;
under non-ACM vinyl floor sheeting in restroom
HSA ID: 23
Gaskets associated with fire suppression system piping in laundry/fire riser room (assumed ACM)
HSA ID: 41
LEGEND
Figure 3 Wellpinit Service Unit – Clinic Roof Approximate ACM Locations
ARGUS PACIFIC INC. • 1900 W NICKERSON • SUITE 315 • SEATTLE, WA 98119 • 206.285.3373 • ARGUSPACIFIC.COM
N
NOT TO SCALE
West portion of building roof not included in this assessment.
Roof penetration sealant; not accessible (assumed ACM)
HSA ID: 40
NOTE: Roof penetration locations shown on this drawing are approximate; ACM sealant is assumed to be present at all penetrations through the metal roof)
LEGEND
Photographs
Wellpinit Service Unit - Clinic, Wellpinit, Washington
HSA No. 1. White joint compound and white gypsum wallboard (M)
HSA No. 2. 4” off-white rubber cove base, yellow mastic, and residual white joint compound (M)
HSA No. 3. Green/tan/black carpet mastic and residual wood debris (M)
HSA No. 4. 1’x1’ white ceiling tiles with wormhole pattern, tan soft material, brown fibrous material, and brown mastic (M)
HSA No. 5. Beige vinyl floor sheeting with terrazzo pattern, grey paper backing with mastic, and tan brittle material (M)
HSA No. 6. Off-white vinyl floor sheeting with square pattern and grey paper backing with mastic (M)
HSA No. 7. Grey sink undercoating (M)
HSA No. 8. Fire doors and frames (M)
HSA No. 9. Grey blown-in attic insulation (T)
HSA No. 10. Tan paper with mastic (M) and pink fiberglass batt insulation (T)
HSA No. 11. Clear material with tread, off-white vinyl floor sheeting, grey paper backing with mastic, and white brittle material with mastic (M)
NO PHOTOGRAPH AVAILABLE
HSA No. 12. 4” green rubber cove base and yellow mastic with residual joint
HSA No. 13. Yellow mastic, beige vinyl floor tiles, and black mastic (M)
HSA No. 14. Grey mortar (M)
HSA No. 15. White joint compound and white gypsum wallboard (M)
HSA No. 16. White wall texture (S), brown/grey paper, white paint, and residual tan/black mastic (M)
HSA No. 17. Brown carpet mastic and grey soft material (M)
HSA No. 18. 4” pink rubber cove base, off-white mastic, and grey paper (M)
HSA No. 19. 4” brown rubber cove base and brown mastic (M)
HSA No. 20. 4” beige rubber cove base, yellow mastic, and residual white joint
HSA No. 21. 4” purple rubber cove base and yellow mastic (M)
HSA No. 22. 4” tan rubber cove base and off-white mastic (M)
HSA No. 23. 12”x12” tan vinyl floor tiles with multi-colored streaks and yellow mastic (M)
HSA No. 24. Trace multi-color carpet, yellow carpet mastic with wood debris, off-white vinyl floor tiles, and brown mastic (M)
HSA No. 25. Beige vinyl floor sheeting with terrazzo pattern and grey paper backing with mastic (M)
HSA No. 26. Off-white vinyl floor sheeting with red lines, tan paper backing with mastic, grey vinyl floor tiles, and yellow mastic (M)
HSA No. 27. Off-white vinyl floor tiles, brown mastic, and white brittle material with mastic (M)
HSA No. 28. 2’x4’ white suspended ceiling tiles with wormhole and pinhole pattern (M)
HSA No. 29. Plastic-wrapped fiberglass duct insulation (T)
HSA No. 30. Foil-wrapped fiberglass duct insulation (T)
HSA No. 31. Grey sealant (M)
HSA No. 32. Trace grey sealant and black vibration isolator (M)
HSA No. 33. White sealant, silver foil (M), and yellow fiberglass pipe insulation (T)
HSA No. 34. Yellow/white sealant with mastic (M)
HSA No. 35. Residual white ceiling tile and brown mastic (M)
HSA No. 36. Black asphaltic paper vapor barrier (behind exterior siding) (M)
HSA No. 37. Grey composite siding material (M)
HSA No. 38. 6”x6” grey CMU with mortar (M)
HSA No. 39. Multi-layer black asphaltic three-tab roofing shingles, black asphaltic sealant, and black asphaltic paper vapor barrier (M)
HSA No. 40. Roof penetration sealant (M)
HSA No. 41. Gaskets (M)
HSA No. 42. Electrical panels and thermoplastic electrical wire insulation (M)
HSA No. 43. Paper-wrapped fiberglass pipe insulation with plastic fittings (T)
Appendix A Asbestos Laboratory Analytical Results
Appendix B XRF Readings and Paint Chip Sample Data
XRF and Paint Chip Sample Data
Reading/Sample No. Component Substrate Color Test Location PbC Units
2 SRM 2573 Calibration #1 1.00 mg/cm2
3 SRM 2573 Calibration #2 1.10 mg/cm2
4 SRM 2573 Calibration #3 1.20 mg/cm2
5 Interior wall GWB White Receiving, west wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb1 Interior wall GWB White Receiving, west wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted GWB walls on first floor)
<58 ppm
6 Interior wall GWB White Receiving, room 212, north wall ND mg/cm2
7 Interior wall GWB White Receiving, room 212, east wall ND mg/cm2
8 Interior wall GWB White Receiving, room 212, south wall ND mg/cm2
9 Interior door frame Metal White Receiving, room 212, north wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb2 Interior door frame Metal White Receiving, room 212, north wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted door frames)
<47 ppm
10 Interior wall GWB White Mail room, room 211, west wall ND mg/cm2 11 Interior wall GWB White Mail room, room 211, north wall 0.01 mg/cm2
12 Interior wall GWB White Mail room, room 211, east wall ND mg/cm2
13 Interior wall GWB White Mail room, room 211, south wall ND mg/cm2
14 Interior door frame Metal White Mail room, room 211, north wall ND mg/cm2
15 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 210, west wall ND mg/cm2
16 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 210, north wall ND mg/cm2
17 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 210, east wall ND mg/cm2
18 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 210, south wall ND mg/cm2
19 Interior window trim Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb3 Interior window trim Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted window trim)
390 ppm
20 Interior window sill Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall ND mg/cm2 WSU-Pb4 Interior window sill Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall
(Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted window sills)
420 ppm
21 Interior window casing Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb5 Interior window casing Wood White Storage, room 210, south wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted window casings)
220 ppm
22 Interior door frame Metal White Storage, room 210, north wall ND mg/cm2
23 Interior wall GWB White CEO office, room 209, west wall ND mg/cm2
24 Interior wall GWB White CEO office, room 209, north wall ND mg/cm2
25 Interior wall GWB White CEO office, room 209, east wall ND mg/cm2
26 Interior wall GWB White CEO office, room 209, south wall ND mg/cm2
27 Interior window trim Wood White CEO office, room 209, south wall ND mg/cm2
28 Interior window sill Wood White CEO office, room 209, south wall ND mg/cm2
29 Interior window casing Wood White CEO office, room 209, south wall ND mg/cm2
30 Interior door frame Metal White CEO office, room 209, north wall 0.22 mg/cm2
31 Interior wall GWB White Break room, room 208, west wall ND mg/cm2
32 Interior wall GWB White Break room, room 208, north wall ND mg/cm2
33 Interior wall GWB White Break room, room 208, east wall ND mg/cm2
34 Interior wall GWB White Break room, room 208, south wall ND mg/cm2
35 Interior door frame Metal White Break room, room 208, north wall 0.03 mg/cm2
36 Interior wall GWB White Restroom, room 213, west wall ND mg/cm2
37 Interior wall GWB White Restroom, room 213, north wall ND mg/cm2
38 Interior wall GWB White Restroom, room 213, east wall ND mg/cm2
39 Interior wall GWB White Restroom, room 213, south wall ND mg/cm2
40 Interior door frame Metal White Restroom, room 213, north wall ND mg/cm2
41 Interior wall GWB White CHS, room 207, west wall ND mg/cm2
42 Interior wall GWB White CHS, room 207, north wall ND mg/cm2
43 Interior wall GWB White CHS, room 207, east wall ND mg/cm2
44 Interior wall GWB Pink CHS, room 207, south wall ND mg/cm2
45 Interior door frame Metal White CHS, room 207, north wall ND mg/cm2
46 Interior wall GWB White Hallway, room 200, northeast wall ND mg/cm2
47 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 204B, north wall ND mg/cm2
48 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 204B, east wall ND mg/cm2
49 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 204B, south wall ND mg/cm2
50 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 204B, west wall ND mg/cm2
51 Interior door frame Metal White Storage, room 204B, south wall ND mg/cm2
52 Interior wall GWB White CHS files, room 204, north wall ND mg/cm2
53 Interior wall GWB White CHS files, room 204, east wall ND mg/cm2
54 Interior wall GWB White CHS files, room 204, south wall ND mg/cm2
55 Interior wall GWB White CHS files, room 204, west wall ND mg/cm2
56 Interior door frame Metal White CHS files, room 204, south wall ND mg/cm2
Appendix B, Page 1
Reading/Sample No. Component Substrate Color Test Location PbC Units
57 Interior wall GWB White IT director, room 203, north wall ND mg/cm2
58 Interior wall GWB White IT director, room 203, east wall ND mg/cm2
59 Interior wall GWB White IT director, room 203, south wall 0.20 mg/cm2
60 Interior wall GWB White IT director, room 203, west wall ND mg/cm2
61 Interior wall GWB White Conference, room 202, north wall ND mg/cm2
62 Interior wall GWB White Conference, room 202, east wall ND mg/cm2
63 Interior wall GWB White Conference, room 202, south wall ND mg/cm2
64 Interior wall GWB White Conference, room 202, west wall 9.00 mg/cm2
65 Interior wall GWB White Conference, room 202, west wall 10.20 mg/cm2
66 Interior door frame Metal White Conference, room 202, south wall ND mg/cm2
67 Interior window trim Wood White Conference, room 202, north wall ND mg/cm2
68 Interior window sill Wood White Conference, room 202, north wall ND mg/cm2
69 Interior window casing Wood White Conference, room 202, north wall 0.01 mg/cm2
70 Interior wall GWB White Business office, room 201, ND mg/cm2
71 Interior wall GWB White Business office, room 201, ND mg/cm2
72 Interior wall GWB White Business office, room 201, ND mg/cm2
73 Interior wall GWB White Business office, room 201, ND mg/cm2
74 Interior door frame Metal White Business office, room 201, ND mg/cm2
75 Interior wall Concrete White File storage room, north wall 0.04 mg/cm2
76 Interior wall GWB White File storage room, east wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb6 Interior wall GWB White File storage room, east wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted GWB walls in basement)
<46 ppm
77 Interior wall GWB White File storage room, west wall ND mg/cm2
78 Interior wall GWB White File storage room, south wall ND mg/cm2
79 Interior door frame Metal White File storage room, south wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb7 Interior door frame Metal White File storage room, south wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior white-painted metal door frames)
<49 ppm
80 Interior door Metal Brown File storage room, south wall ND mg/cm2
WSU-Pb8 Interior door Metal Brown File storage room, south wall (Confirmation sample for XRF readings of predominant interior brown-painted metal door frames)
<48 ppm
81 Interior wall GWB White Server room, room 223, north wall ND mg/cm2
82 Interior wall GWB White Server room, room 223, east wall ND mg/cm2
83 Interior wall GWB White Server room, room 223, west wall ND mg/cm2
84 Interior wall GWB White Server room, room 223, south wall ND mg/cm2
85 Interior door frame Metal White Server room, room 223, south wall ND mg/cm2
86 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 225, north wall 0.01 mg/cm2
87 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 225, east wall ND mg/cm2
88 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 225, west wall 0.02 mg/cm2
89 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 225, south wall ND mg/cm2
90 Interior door frame Metal White Storage, room 225, north wall ND mg/cm2
91 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 226, north wall ND mg/cm2
92 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 226, east wall ND mg/cm2
93 Interior wall GWB White Storage, room 226, west wall ND mg/cm2
94 Interior wall Concrete White Storage, room 226, south wall 0.02 mg/cm2
95 Interior wall GWB White Janitor, room 228, north wall ND mg/cm2
96 Interior wall GWB White Janitor, room 228, east wall ND mg/cm2
97 Interior wall GWB White Janitor, room 228, west wall ND mg/cm2
98 Interior wall Concrete White Janitor, room 228, south wall 0.02 mg/cm2
99 Interior door frame Metal White Janitor, room 228, north wall ND mg/cm2
100 Interior door Metal Brown Janitor, room 228, north wall ND mg/cm2
101 Interior wall GWB White Laundry and fire riser, room 229, north wall ND mg/cm2
102 Interior wall Concrete White Laundry and fire riser, room 229, east wall 0.01 mg/cm2
103 Interior wall GWB White Laundry and fire riser, room 229, west wall 0.01 mg/cm2
105 Interior wall Concrete White Laundry and fire riser, room 229, south wall 0.01 mg/cm2
106…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .