12-Evaluation Criteria PNC2131343P1.pdf

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Lead Emission Screening – North Perry Airport (HWO)

Submit responses to all Evaluation Criteria. Vendors who fail to submit the information and/or documentation required by any Evaluation Criteria by the solicitation’s closing date and time—excluding Reference Forms—may receive no points (if applicable) for the corresponding Evaluation Criteria.

Refer to Instructions to Vendors, Section K, for additional information. Vendors should structure proposal to align in the order of the Evaluation Criteria.

Evaluation Criteria

1. Ability of Professional Personnel Maximum Points

Describe the qualifications (including any licenses or certifications) and relevant experience of Project Manager and all key staff, including Subconsultants/Subcontractors (Project Team) assigned to this Project. Include resumes for each Project Team member.

Relevant experience includes the following:

a) Successful completion of at least two contaminant screening projects—covering both soil and air screening—within the past five years. Preference will be given to firms with experience conducting lead emission assessments related to aviation gasoline (avgas) at operational general aviation airports.

b) Demonstrated experience conducting environmental assessments or emissions testing in compliance with: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).

c) Familiarity with relevant guidance and methodologies, including but not limited to: FAA Advisory Circulars, National Emissions Inventory (NEI) methodology, DEP air quality and hazardous materials standards, the Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions (EAGLE) initiative.

d) Demonstrated ability to ensure regulatory compliance and data defensibility in similar aviation-related environmental projects

Identify license and/or certification such as U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP), National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP), ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation, air quality testing license/certification such as Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH), or Certified Environmental Professional (CEP).

Provide Project Team’s Organizational Chart, identifying key staff, showing roles and/or position titles, firm name, staff names, and lines of authority.

2. Project Approach Maximum Points Describe the Prime Vendor’s Project approach, including use of Subconsultants/Subcontractors, and completion of all items from the Scope of Work

Approach should include the following:

a) Clear, tailored assessment framework reflecting the unique operations characteristics and aircraft activity at North Perry Airport.

b) proposed data collection and analysis methods that are scientifically sound, compliant with EPA standards, and appropriate for airborne and soil lead concentration assessments.

c) Benchmarking of findings against relevant regional and national datasets to provide meaningful context for results.

d) Outlines protocols for managing environmental risk and ensuring data defensibility in accordance with FAA, EPA, Florida DEP regulations.

e) Clear strategy for reliable reporting methods and results, implementation of Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocols, and ensure defensible, high-integrity data.

f) Feasible and innovative mitigation strategies that support the transition to unleaded aviation gasoline (avgas), aligned with current industry initiatives.

g) Thoughtful, inclusive and transparent communication strategy for engaging airport users, stakeholders, and the surrounding community.

3. Past Performance Maximum Points

a) Describe Prime Vendor’s experience on projects of similar nature, scope and duration, along with a detailed description of completion, both on time and within budget, for the past five years.

Provide a minimum of three references for projects described. Refer to Vendor Reference Verification Form and submit as instructed (with proposal) or within three business days after County’s request. Only provide references for non-Broward County Board of County Commissioners’ contracts. For County contracts, the County will review performance evaluations database for previous or current contracts with the County. The County considers references and performance evaluations in the evaluation of Prime Vendor’s past performance.

b) Describe the Project Team’s specific past experience(s) within the last five years in similar projects. Include project description, role of each Project Team member, and whether Prime Vendor or Subconsultant/Subconsultant); project dollar value and project length.

4. Location Maximum Points Refer to Location Certification and submit as instructed. Points shall be allocated as follows based on the Prime Vendor’s selection of one of the five options in the Location Certification Form: Option 1 (0 points); Option 2 (5 points); Option 3 (3 points); Option 4 (points range from 0-5 depending on the composition of the joint venture); and Option 5 (0 points).

5. Pricing Maximum Points Refer to Instructions to Vendors for additional instructions and Bid Table in BPRO to submit as instructed.

Total points awarded for price will be determined by applying the following formula: (Lowest proposed price/Proposer’s price) x 20 = Price Score Points will not apply to a Pricing Worksheet, if applicable to this solicitation.

TOTAL POINTS 100

Form Date 9/23/25