09 - Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 9).docx

Solicitation: SPRHA1-26-R-4646 Date: 1 Oct 2025

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Please complete this questionnaire. Your responses are critical in evaluating the performance of this company and weigh heavily on the award decision of the KC-46 LG PBL contract. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. Please email the completed questionnaire to:

Kyle Swaner Phone: (385) 591-8732 kyle.swaner@us.af.mil

2. Explanation of codes:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

A ACCEPTABLE - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

U UNACCEPTABLE - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered, corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

NA NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to effort assessed.

UTA UNABLE TO ASSESS - The individual completing this questionnaire does not possess the background or knowledge to accurately answer. (e.g. Contracting Officer answering technical questions)

3. Please complete the following identifying information and past performance assessment:

A. Contractor:

B. CAGE Code:

C. Contract number:

D: Order Number if applicable:

E. Period of Performance:

F. Negotiated price or cost at award:

G. Current estimated contract dollar amount:

H. Describe product service performed by contractor being evaluated.

4. Circle the appropriate letter for each item on the questionnaire. Please provide supporting narrative in the spaces provided. Ensure your comments match the performance level ratings for each response.

5. Please provide the name, title, address, phone number, and email address of the person completing this questionnaire.

Phone: Email:

6. Thank you for your assistance in this source selection. If you have any questions, please call the Government Contracting Officer: Kyle Swaner at (385) 591-8732.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS (If more space is needed, write on back or attach pages)

TECHNICAL FACTOR

SUB-FACTOR ONE, Remanufacture Capability and Capacity

(a) Rate the contractor’s success in providing 767 LG MRO services.

A U NA UTA

(b) Rate the contractor’s success in having the necessary equipment, capacity, and sub-component sourcing strategies for 767 MRO support.

A U NA UTA

(c) Rate the contractor’s success in adhering to lead time requirements and guaranteeing parts availability including risk mitigation to absorb any supply inconsistencies.

A U NA UTA

(d) Rate the contractor’s success in providing forecasting, tracking cost, schedule and performance, as well as financial management and cost control procedures.

A U NA UTA

(e) Rate the contractor’s success in identifying and resolving quality deficiencies.

A U NA UTA

(f) Rate the contractor’s success in providing engineering oversight to manufacturers.

A U NA UTA

SUB-FACTOR TWO, Exchange Lead Time (ELT Shipsets)

(a) Rate the contractor’s success in meeting required turn times for 767 Shipset MRO support.

A U NA UTA

(b) Rate the contractor’s success in managing subcontractor performance as it relates to cost control, schedule slip, quality issues, and conflict resolution.

A U NA UTA

(d) Rate the contractor’s success in responding to customer concerns or issues and developing a solution.

A U NA UTA

(e) Rate the contractor’s success in providing risk management, problem resolution and tracking, and planning.

A U NA UTA

SUBFACTOR THREE, Remanufacture Turn Around Time (RTAT, Sub-Components)

(a) Rate the contractor’s success in providing delivery orders and parts on time, while adhering to originally proposed lead times.

A U NA UTA

(b) Rate the contractor’s success in performing logistics support, subcontracting, source qualification, warehousing, and transportation management.

A U NA UTA

(c) Rate the contractor’s success in performing order processing and inventory control.

A U NA UTA

GENERAL QUESTIONS

(a) Rate the integration and effectiveness of the contractor’s organizational structure to include teaming partners and sub-contractors.

A U NA UTA

(b) Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.

(c) Is there anyone else we can send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.