Top 100 Contractors in PSC AJ11: General Science and Technology R&D Services; General Science and Technology; Basic Research, FY2023
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2023 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 36% of FY2023 PSC AJ11 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $1,770,776,128 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC AJ11
- Contractors
- 826 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Georgia TECH Research Corp $197 million, 11.0% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $197,064,128 | |||
| 2 | $159,401,425 | |||
| 3 | $62,422,194 | |||
| 4 | $40,368,884 | |||
| 5 | $40,082,425 | |||
| 6 |
Board of Governers State University System of Florida
|
$34,714,719 | ||
| 7 | $31,750,966 | |||
| 8 | $27,739,737 | |||
| 9 |
General Atomic Technologies Corporation
|
$25,879,422 | ||
| 10 | $24,242,723 | |||
| 11 | $23,105,193 | |||
| 12 | $22,466,357 | |||
| 13 | $19,969,057 | |||
| 14 | $17,512,502 | |||
| 15 | $17,340,813 | |||
| 16 | $17,081,224 | |||
| 17 | $16,756,799 | |||
| 18 |
Assurance Technology Corp
Top agencies
|
$16,723,187 | ||
| 19 | $16,187,435 | |||
| 20 | $15,491,446 | |||
| 21 | $15,405,200 | |||
| 22 | $14,787,328 | |||
| 23 | $13,948,308 | |||
| 24 | $13,373,363 | |||
| 25 | $13,053,493 | |||
| 26 |
Virginia Commonwealth University
|
$13,051,925 | ||
| 27 | $12,880,482 | |||
| 28 |
Morsecorp, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$12,846,685 | ||
| 29 | $12,280,469 | |||
| 30 | $12,208,588 | |||
| 31 |
Rebellion Defense Inc
Top agencies
|
$12,000,000 | ||
| 32 | $11,226,231 | |||
| 33 | $10,861,653 | |||
| 34 | $10,543,820 | |||
| 35 | $10,117,221 | |||
| 36 | $9,817,635 | |||
| 37 | $9,012,494 | |||
| 38 | $8,885,820 | |||
| 39 |
Edmond Scientific Company
Top agencies
|
$8,811,948 | ||
| 40 | $8,699,794 | |||
| 41 | $8,497,385 | |||
| 42 | $8,428,376 | |||
| 43 | $7,829,931 | |||
| 44 |
The University of Tulsa
Top agencies
|
$7,500,000 | ||
| 45 | $7,407,429 | |||
| 46 | $7,000,000 | |||
| 47 |
Techwerks LLC
Top agencies
|
$6,957,921 | ||
| 48 | $6,934,104 | |||
| 49 | $6,834,598 | |||
| 50 | $6,741,309 | |||
| 51 | $6,618,046 | |||
| 52 |
Lumetrics, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$6,550,000 | ||
| 53 | $6,485,637 | |||
| 54 |
ICF International, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$6,375,661 | ||
| 55 | $6,316,454 | |||
| 56 | $6,169,459 | |||
| 57 | $6,049,530 | |||
| 58 | $5,963,321 | |||
| 59 | $5,926,063 | |||
| 60 |
QED Systems LLC
Top agencies
|
$5,634,357 | ||
| 61 | $5,618,147 | |||
| 62 | $5,344,021 | |||
| 63 | $5,256,680 | |||
| 64 |
Aura Technologies, LLC
Top agencies
|
$5,074,749 | ||
| 65 | $4,949,959 | |||
| 66 | $4,925,976 | |||
| 67 |
Purvis Systems Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,895,388 | ||
| 68 | $4,868,844 | |||
| 69 | $4,867,176 | |||
| 70 | $4,802,806 | |||
| 71 |
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
|
$4,775,824 | ||
| 72 |
Goldbelt Frontier, LLC
Top agencies
|
$4,575,848 | ||
| 73 |
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,429,421 | ||
| 74 | $4,400,000 | |||
| 75 | $4,371,682 | |||
| 76 |
Eaton Corporation
Top agencies
|
$4,320,000 | ||
| 77 | $4,222,088 | |||
| 78 |
Revision Militaire Inc
Top agencies
|
$4,198,529 | ||
| 79 | $4,110,927 | |||
| 80 | $4,105,809 | |||
| 81 | $4,068,979 | |||
| 82 | $4,055,915 | |||
| 83 | $3,975,315 | |||
| 84 |
The University of Alabama System
|
$3,915,021 | ||
| 85 | $3,895,854 | |||
| 86 | $3,811,313 | |||
| 87 | $3,697,198 | |||
| 88 | $3,599,219 | |||
| 89 |
DSG TEC USA Inc.
Top agencies
|
$3,552,202 | ||
| 90 | $3,482,474 | |||
| 91 | $3,456,142 | |||
| 92 | $3,444,890 | |||
| 93 |
Universities Space Research Association
Top agencies
|
$3,436,656 | ||
| 94 | $3,381,528 | |||
| 95 | $3,379,867 | |||
| 96 | $3,285,979 | |||
| 97 |
Regents of the University of Minnesota
|
$3,175,226 | ||
| 98 | $3,168,454 | |||
| 99 | $3,165,451 | |||
| 100 | $3,148,548 |
Show 75 more
100 of 826 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $1.8 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2023 ran Oct 1, 2022 – Sep 30, 2023. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2022. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2022 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC AJ11 contractors in FY2023?
1. Georgia TECH Research Corp ($197M), 2. The Mitre Corporation ($159M), 3. State of California Controllers Office ($62.4M), 4. Envision Innovative Solutions, Inc. ($40.4M), 5. The Regents of the University of Colorado ($40.1M), 6. Board of Governers State University System of Florida ($34.7M), 7. Battelle Memorial Institute ($31.8M), 8. University System of Maryland ($27.7M), 9. General Atomic Technologies Corporation ($25.9M), 10. American Systems Corporation ($24.2M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work