Top 100 Contractors in PSC AJ11: General Science and Technology R&D Services; General Science and Technology; Basic Research, FY2022
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 32% of FY2022 PSC AJ11 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $1,370,598,811 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC AJ11
- Contractors
- 897 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Georgia TECH Research Corp $195 million, 14.1% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $195,326,840 | |||
| 2 | $70,591,549 | |||
| 3 | $35,563,280 | |||
| 4 | $33,967,844 | |||
| 5 |
General Atomic Technologies Corporation
|
$22,902,551 | ||
| 6 | $21,097,845 | |||
| 7 | $19,256,973 | |||
| 8 | $16,012,384 | |||
| 9 | $15,298,149 | |||
| 10 | $15,209,682 | |||
| 11 | $15,143,807 | |||
| 12 | $14,789,249 | |||
| 13 | $13,969,765 | |||
| 14 |
Board of Governers State University System of Florida
|
$13,064,583 | ||
| 15 |
Assurance Technology Corp
Top agencies
|
$12,456,335 | ||
| 16 | $12,302,169 | |||
| 17 | $12,283,185 | |||
| 18 | $11,853,307 | |||
| 19 | $11,741,407 | |||
| 20 | $11,688,952 | |||
| 21 | $11,002,139 | |||
| 22 | $10,682,360 | |||
| 23 | $10,510,081 | |||
| 24 | $10,485,885 | |||
| 25 | $9,806,921 | |||
| 26 |
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
|
$9,722,125 | ||
| 27 | $9,699,687 | |||
| 28 | $8,991,794 | |||
| 29 | $8,864,334 | |||
| 30 | $8,623,759 | |||
| 31 | $8,388,043 | |||
| 32 | $8,298,888 | |||
| 33 | $8,217,953 | |||
| 34 | $8,178,311 | |||
| 35 | $8,169,815 | |||
| 36 |
IST Research Corp.
|
$7,590,827 | ||
| 37 | $7,247,901 | |||
| 38 | $6,981,485 | |||
| 39 | $6,712,365 | |||
| 40 | $6,676,788 | |||
| 41 |
Purvis Systems Inc.
Top agencies
|
$6,602,842 | ||
| 42 | $6,585,366 | |||
| 43 |
University of Montana System
|
$6,502,097 | ||
| 44 |
Intel Federal LLC
Top agencies
|
$6,462,192 | ||
| 45 | $6,144,013 | |||
| 46 | $6,109,142 | |||
| 47 | $6,050,439 | |||
| 48 | $5,597,212 | |||
| 49 | $5,561,867 | |||
| 50 |
ICF International, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$5,495,204 | ||
| 51 | $5,264,988 | |||
| 52 | $4,849,199 | |||
| 53 |
Textron Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,772,374 | ||
| 54 |
Edmond Scientific Company
Top agencies
|
$4,690,142 | ||
| 55 | $4,676,539 | |||
| 56 |
Regents of the University of Minnesota
|
$4,671,446 | ||
| 57 | $4,658,475 | |||
| 58 |
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,618,804 | ||
| 59 | $4,469,253 | |||
| 60 | $4,466,971 | |||
| 61 | $4,420,310 | |||
| 62 |
Eaton Corporation
Top agencies
|
$4,320,000 | ||
| 63 | $4,282,683 | |||
| 64 | $4,157,004 | |||
| 65 | $3,916,881 | |||
| 66 |
The University of Alabama System
|
$3,610,904 | ||
| 67 | $3,557,007 | |||
| 68 |
Technology Service Corp
Top agencies
|
$3,536,397 | ||
| 69 | $3,528,662 | |||
| 70 | $3,460,188 | |||
| 71 | $3,387,104 | |||
| 72 | $3,362,389 | |||
| 73 | $3,257,459 | |||
| 74 | $3,244,680 | |||
| 75 |
Morsecorp, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$3,195,693 | ||
| 76 | $3,188,995 | |||
| 77 | $3,185,446 | |||
| 78 | $3,149,965 | |||
| 79 | $3,098,792 | |||
| 80 | $3,039,355 | |||
| 81 | $3,038,388 | |||
| 82 | $3,000,000 | |||
| 83 |
Hacks / Hackers
Top agencies
|
$2,999,995 | ||
| 84 | $2,952,676 | |||
| 85 | $2,934,510 | |||
| 86 | $2,877,000 | |||
| 87 | $2,832,038 | |||
| 88 | $2,818,423 | |||
| 89 |
Muon Space Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,800,000 | ||
| 90 | $2,756,937 | |||
| 91 | $2,751,192 | |||
| 92 |
RTX Corporation
Top agencies
|
$2,710,119 | ||
| 93 |
Goldbelt Frontier, LLC
Top agencies
|
$2,626,676 | ||
| 94 | $2,602,438 | |||
| 95 | $2,595,998 | |||
| 96 | $2,516,647 | |||
| 97 | $2,499,649 | |||
| 98 | $2,484,079 | |||
| 99 | $2,468,378 | |||
| 100 |
Meedan, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,459,155 |
Show 75 more
100 of 897 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $1.39 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2022 ran Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2021. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2021 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC AJ11 contractors in FY2022?
1. Georgia TECH Research Corp ($195M), 2. State of California Controllers Office ($70.6M), 3. The Regents of the University of Colorado ($35.6M), 4. The Mitre Corporation ($34M), 5. General Atomic Technologies Corporation ($22.9M), 6. Southwest Research Institute ($21.1M), 7. University of Alaska System ($19.3M), 8. American Systems Corporation ($16M), 9. Teamstaff Inc. ($15.3M), 10. Battelle Memorial Institute ($15.2M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work