Top 100 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Contractors, FY2021
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2021 Agency page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 44% of FY2021 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $2,387,960,966 Net of deobligations, by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and its offices
- Contractors
- 450 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Lockheed Martin Corporation $289 million, 11.9% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $288,950,499 | |||
| 2 |
RTX Corporation
Top NAICS codes
|
$257,965,695 | ||
| 3 | $87,933,835 | |||
| 4 |
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Top NAICS codes
|
$74,977,131 | ||
| 5 | $73,715,678 | |||
| 6 |
Sri International
Top NAICS codes
|
$63,207,959 | ||
| 7 | $62,000,576 | |||
| 8 | $53,872,385 | |||
| 9 |
The Johns Hopkins University
Top NAICS codes
|
$48,110,039 | ||
| 10 | $44,547,268 | |||
| 11 | $42,432,389 | |||
| 12 |
Securigence LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$41,472,139 | ||
| 13 |
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$36,647,378 | ||
| 14 | $36,367,582 | |||
| 15 | $35,494,606 | |||
| 16 | $31,453,743 | |||
| 17 |
General Atomic Technologies Corporation
|
$31,190,595 | ||
| 18 | $27,961,046 | |||
| 19 |
Agile Defense, LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$27,536,689 | ||
| 20 | $26,881,188 | |||
| 21 | $25,139,469 | |||
| 22 | $24,855,767 | |||
| 23 | $24,733,768 | |||
| 24 | $24,123,760 | |||
| 25 | $22,236,962 | |||
| 26 | $21,652,053 | |||
| 27 |
Kudu Dynamics LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$21,395,768 | ||
| 28 |
CACI International Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$17,772,291 | ||
| 29 | $16,804,629 | |||
| 30 | $16,688,441 | |||
| 31 | $16,518,726 | |||
| 32 | $16,160,156 | |||
| 33 | $15,579,035 | |||
| 34 | $13,757,983 | |||
| 35 | $13,255,234 | |||
| 36 | $13,021,860 | |||
| 37 | $12,883,907 | |||
| 38 | $12,333,703 | |||
| 39 | $10,796,052 | |||
| 40 | $10,782,372 | |||
| 41 | $10,774,305 | |||
| 42 | $9,415,088 | |||
| 43 | $8,962,971 | |||
| 44 |
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
|
$8,847,264 | ||
| 45 | $8,656,956 | |||
| 46 | $8,568,996 | |||
| 47 |
Modernatx Inc.
|
$8,415,141 | ||
| 48 | $8,375,309 | |||
| 49 |
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
Top NAICS codes
|
$8,189,672 | ||
| 50 | $7,950,594 | |||
| 51 | $7,267,873 | |||
| 52 | $7,120,109 | |||
| 53 |
State of California Controllers Office
Top NAICS codes
|
$7,034,342 | ||
| 54 | $7,012,181 | |||
| 55 | $6,919,407 | |||
| 56 | $6,907,692 | |||
| 57 |
Carnegie-Mellon University
Top NAICS codes
|
$6,871,906 | ||
| 58 | $6,834,371 | |||
| 59 | $6,806,248 | |||
| 60 | $6,573,653 | |||
| 61 |
Four Points Technology, L.L.C.
Top NAICS codes
|
$6,537,757 | ||
| 62 |
PAE Government Services Inc.
|
$6,485,199 | ||
| 63 | $6,426,120 | |||
| 64 | $6,347,000 | |||
| 65 | $6,332,633 | |||
| 66 | $6,197,962 | |||
| 67 | $6,105,001 | |||
| 68 |
Serco North America (Holdings) Inc
|
$5,911,164 | ||
| 69 | $5,911,088 | |||
| 70 | $5,852,179 | |||
| 71 | $5,812,518 | |||
| 72 | $5,738,913 | |||
| 73 | $5,713,480 | |||
| 74 | $5,476,914 | |||
| 75 | $5,289,799 | |||
| 76 | $5,251,185 | |||
| 77 | $5,222,202 | |||
| 78 | $5,213,783 | |||
| 79 | $5,070,045 | |||
| 80 |
Gentech Associates Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$4,927,066 | ||
| 81 |
Summit2Sea Consulting, LLC
Top NAICS codes
|
$4,860,855 | ||
| 82 | $4,810,032 | |||
| 83 | $4,772,691 | |||
| 84 | $4,633,262 | |||
| 85 | $4,622,623 | |||
| 86 | $4,471,154 | |||
| 87 | $4,297,914 | |||
| 88 | $4,159,142 | |||
| 89 | $3,999,695 | |||
| 90 | $3,999,197 | |||
| 91 | $3,946,578 | |||
| 92 | $3,833,894 | |||
| 93 | $3,661,015 | |||
| 94 | $3,653,353 | |||
| 95 | $3,576,170 | |||
| 96 |
Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc.
Top NAICS codes
|
$3,549,743 | ||
| 97 | $3,530,668 | |||
| 98 | $3,417,126 | |||
| 99 | $3,243,619 | |||
| 100 | $3,149,058 |
Show 75 more
100 of 450 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $2.42 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2021 ran Oct 1, 2020 – Sep 30, 2021. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2020. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2020 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency contractors in FY2021?
1. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($289M), 2. RTX Corporation ($258M), 3. Systems & Technology Research LLC ($87.9M), 4. Northrop Grumman Corporation ($75M), 5. General Dynamics Corporation ($73.7M), 6. Sri International ($63.2M), 7. The Boeing Company ($62M), 8. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation ($53.9M), 9. The Johns Hopkins University ($48.1M), 10. L3Harris Technologies, Inc. ($44.5M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work