Offeror_Questions_-_Government_Responses_for_RSP.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9133L-16-R-0008
About this file
Questions and Government Responses
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RSP Questions & Answers
| QUESTION | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE | REFERENCES | Date Received (email from Mr. Dedicatoria) | |
| Question 1: How do we price 0001 versus 0002? In the Microsoft Excel worksheet (Attachment 13), there are values of $0.00 for ITEMS 0002 and 0003 - should we use $0.00 for ITEMS 0002 and 0003? | All offerors are free to propose a labor mix that will meet the Technical and Management Approach Requirements of the PWS and the Solicitation. Pricing out ITEM 0003 is up to the offerors. The CMRA is a requirement of the PWS. | ITEM 0001 (RSP Services) vs ITEM 002 ( RSP Surge Requirements) | Contractors may b | |
| Question 2: What is the current and historical fill rate of contract staff? How many contract staff positions are currently vacant? | The current fill rate is 97.8% The historic fill rate is 97-98%. There are currently 7 vacant positions. All offerors are free to propose a labor mix that will meet the Technical and Management Approach Requirements of the PWS and the Solicitation. | Paragraph 1.2 Background Technical Exhibit 3 | ||
| Question 3: Is the government expecting contractors to propose contract staff levels in Technical Exhibit 3 or is the government expecting contractors to propose an optimal staffing mix and levels based upon the proposed technical and management approach? Or should contractors propose the staffing levels stated in Technical Exhibit 3? | All offerors are expected to propose an optimal staffing mix and levels based upon their proposed technical and managerial approach. The staffing levels stated in Technical Exhibit 3 represent the current staffing level and are close to the historic staffing levels of the program. All offerors are free to propose a labor mix that will meet the requirements of the PWS and the Solicitation. All offerors are free to propose a labor mix that will meet the Technical and Management Approach Requirements of the PWS and the Solicitation. Technical Exhibit 3 is provided for reference and assist offerors in the development of their proposal. | Paragraph 1.4.4 Place and Performance of Services | ||
| Question 4: What level of contract staff security clearance is required for a "Corporate Facility Security Officer? | Secret | On page 28 of 123, the solicitation document states: "It is recommend that a "Corporate Facility Security Officer" (FSO) be designated"; | ||
| Question 5: Where would the government prefer the contractor contract manager and the alternate be located (geographically)? | The Government has no preference. All offerors are free to propose a labor mix that will meet the Technical and Management Approach Requirements of the PWS and the Solicitation. | Paragraph 1.4.9 Contract Manager (CM) | ||
| Question 6: Historically, what has been the spend ($) value) in FY 2015 and FY 2014 regarding contractor travel (non-reimbursable)? | For FY14 approximately $30,000 in non-reimburseable travel was completed by the contractor. For FY15 the total was approximately $25,000. | Paragraph 1.4.12 TRAVEL - Regarding "All other travel to perform the services under this contract shall be the Contractor’s responsibility." | ||
| Question 7: Historically, what is the travel spend ($) value) in FY 2015 and FY 2014? ITEM 0004 on Attachment 13 states $80,000 for travel; is that the historical value? | See answer above. All offerors must propose the travel amounts as provided in Attachment 13. | Paragraph 1.4.12 TRAVEL - Government directed travel will be required under this contract to attend the RSP Quarterly SYNC Meetings specific in Section 5.15 only | ||
| Question 8: If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of $50,000.00 per calendar day of delay. Historically, has this penalty been applied? | No | CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT 52.211-11 Unliquidated Damages - supplies, Services, or Research and Development (SEP 2000) (a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform ther services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages of $50,000.00 per calendar day of delay. | ||
| Question 9: What is included in the maximum page count - e.g. - cover page? Table of contents? Transmittal letter? Are resumes required for the contractor's contract manager and alternate contract manager? | No, the cover page, table of contents and transmittal letter will not count against the page count. Resumes are not required, however if they are submitted, they will counted toward the page count. | Paragraph L.3.3 The following volumes of material shall be submitted | ||
| Question 10: Historically, what has the "Shipper Packet Accuracy" ratings/level been? | The "Shipper Packet Accuracy" historically for FY14 was 98.3%. The current "Shipper Packet Accuracy" rate is 99%. | Paragraph 5.0 Requirements |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .