ATTACHMENT_6 _Retention_notes_REDACTED.pdf
PDF 412 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ARNG Recruit Sustainment Program Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W9133L-16-R-0008
About this file
Retention Notes
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
State
Retention Notes
As of DAY MONTH YEAR
Reenlistment Statistics
Reenlistment Mission Performance Rate for FY-XX – XXX.XX% o Obligors – XXX.X% o Careerists – XXX.%
Note: Solid overall success for retention mission in FY-XX.
Reenlistment Mission Performance Rate FYTD – XXX.X% o Obligors – XXX.X% o Careerists – XXX.X%
Note: Continuing to have success with retention missions. Great job with Obligors this FY.
Retention Eligible Population – XX Soldiers within 12 months of ETS o XX retention eligible Soldiers are flagged o XX are E-4 and below – statistically the most likely to ETS
Note: Nearly 1 out of every X (XX.X%) enlisted Soldiers has an ETS date within 1 year.
90 Day Retention Alert Roster – XX Soldiers o Projected near term ETS losses are 24 in the next quarter (see note) o X Soldiers on the Expired ETS Roster o Only X Soldier within 90 Days of ETS is also on No Val Pay
Note: Projected ETS losses are XX% of 90 day alerts and XX% of Expired ETS’s
Loss Statistics
Attrition Rate – XX.X% (national average is XX.X%) o 1st Term Attrition losses – X.X% (national average is X.X%)
Note: 1st Term Losses are higher than national averages.
FYTD Losses – XX Soldiers o XX ETS losses (XX.X% of all losses) o XX losses for medical reasons (Largest loss reason) o XX losses for AWOL o XX losses for retirement o XX losses in the other misc. category.
Note: Consider analysis of other misc. loss category.
Other Indicators
Skill Level 1 DMOSQ rate is XX.X%. National average is also XX.X%.
Correlations have been found showing higher DMOSQ rate lead to higher retention rates.
E-5 vacancies are at XX.X%. National average is XX.X%. Correlations have been found showing lower vacancy rates lead to higher retention rates.
Reports Provided
Attrition Rate (by command)
1st Term Loss Rate (by command)
90 Day Retention Alert Roster (by name)
Retention Eligible Roster (by name)
Loss by Reason FYTD (by command)
Reenlistment Mission Performance (by command)
NATIONAL
Retention Notes
As of DAY MONTH YEAR
Reenlistment Statistics
Reenlistment Mission Performance Rate for FY-XX – XXX.XX% o Obligors – XXX.X% o Careerists – XXX.%
Note: Solid overall success for retention mission in FY-XX.
Reenlistment Mission Performance Rate FYTD – XXX.X% o Obligors – XXX.X% o Careerists – XXX.X%
Note: Continuing to have success with retention missions. Great job with Obligors this FY.
Retention Eligible Population – XX Soldiers within 12 months of ETS o XX retention eligible Soldiers are flagged o XX are E-4 and below – statistically the most likely to ETS
Note: Nearly 1 out of every X (XX.X%) enlisted Soldiers has an ETS date within 1 year.
90 Day Retention Alert Roster – XX Soldiers o Projected near term ETS losses are 24 in the next quarter (see note) o X Soldiers on the Expired ETS Roster o Only X Soldier within 90 Days of ETS is also on No Val Pay
Note: Projected ETS losses are XX% of 90 day alerts and XX% of Expired ETS’s
Loss Statistics
Attrition Rate – XX.X% (national average is XX.X%) o 1st Term Attrition losses – X.X% (national average is X.X%)
Note: 1st Term Losses are higher than national averages.
FYTD Losses – XX Soldiers o XX ETS losses (XX.X% of all losses) o XX losses for medical reasons (Largest loss reason) o XX losses for AWOL o XX losses for retirement o XX losses in the other misc. category.
Note: Consider analysis of other misc. loss category.
Other Indicators
Skill Level 1 DMOSQ rate is XX.X%. National average is also XX.X%.
Correlations have been found showing higher DMOSQ rate lead to higher retention rates.
E-5 vacancies are at XX.X%. National average is XX.X%. Correlations have been found showing lower vacancy rates lead to higher retention rates.
Reports Provided
Attrition Rate (by command)
1st Term Loss Rate (by command)
90 Day Retention Alert Roster (by name)
Retention Eligible Roster (by name)
Loss by Reason FYTD (by command)
Reenlistment Mission Performance (by command)
POD
Name
Careerist
Reenlistm ent
Mission
(FYTD)
Careerist
Reenlistm ents
(FYTD)
Careerist
Reenlistm ent
Mission %
(FYTD)
Obligor
Reenlistm ent
Mission
(FYTD)
Obligor
Reenlistm ents
(FYTD)
Obligor
Reenlistm ent
Mission %
(FYTD)
Total
Reenlistm ent
Mission
(FYTD)
Total
Reenlistm ents
(FYTD)
Total
Reenlistment
Mission Percent
(FYTD)
XX XXXXXX 3.57 3 84.11% 1.07 1 93.12% 4.64 4 86.20%
XX XXXXXX 2.05 2 97.59% 0.00 0 0.00% 2.05 2 97.59%
XX XXXXXX 11.23 12 106.81% 1.93 1 51.74% 13.17 13 98.73%
XX XXXXXX 0.61 1 164.12% 0.31 0 0.00% 0.92 1 108.38%
XX XXXXXX 0.71 0 0.00% 0.35 0 0.00% 1.06 0 0.00%
XX XXXXXX 2.47 3 121.69% 0.00 0 0.00% 2.47 3 121.69%
XX XXXXXX 3.54 1 28.23% 0.51 0 0.00% 4.05 1 24.67%
XX XXXXXX 0.34 0 0.00% 0.47 1 214.63% 0.80 1 124.44%
XX XXXXXX 0.38 1 264.97% 0.82 0 0.00% 1.20 1 83.37%
Reenlistment Mission Performance Rate by Command
Unit State POD UPC Soldier NameGrade DMOS ETS DateDays To ETS Yrs in Svc SFPA xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E9 00F xxxxxxx 145 34 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E4 92G xxxxxxx 135 7 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E7 42A xxxxxxx 173 13 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E6 42A xxxxxxx 44 17 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E5 42A xxxxxxx 231 9 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E6 74D xxxxxxx 353 11 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E5 88M xxxxxxx 214 9 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E7 25B xxxxxxx 38 22 N xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxx E6 42A xxxxxxx 141 12 N
Reenlistment Eligible Roster
POD
POD
Name
ETS /
Comp Svc
Loss
(FYTD)
AWOL
Loss
(FYTD)
Drug
Separatio n (FYTD)
Medically
Unfit
(FYTD)
Trans to
Oth RC
Loss
(FYTD)
Officer
Resignatio n (FYTD)
SRB / QRB
Losses
(FYTD)
xxx xxxxxx 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 xxx xxxxxx 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 xxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Losses by Reason
Name
Average
Enlisted
Strength
(12 Mo)
Enlisted
Attrition
Losses
Enlisted
Attrition
Loss Rate
Average
Officer
Strength
(12 Mo)
Officer
Attrition
Losses
Officer
Attrition
Loss Rate
Average
Total
Strength
(12 Mo)
Total
Attrition
Losses
Total
Attrition
Loss Rate xxxxxx xxxx 1.0 0 0.0% 0.0 0 0.0% 1.0 0 0.0% xxxxxx xxxx 18.7 3 16.1% 9.8 0 0.0% 28.4 3 10.6% xxxxxx xxxx 12.0 1 8.3% 6.1 0 0.0% 18.1 1 5.5% xxxxxx xxxx 63.0 9 14.3% 38.9 2 5.1% 101.9 11 10.8% xxxxxx xxxx 5.6 3 53.7% 2.0 0 0.0% 7.6 3 39.6% xxxxxx xxxx 20.5 1 4.9% 14.8 1 6.7% 35.3 2 5.7% xxxxxx xxxx 14.0 1 7.1% 1.0 0 0.0% 15.0 1 6.7% xxxxxx xxxx 21.8 1 4.6% 15.0 2 13.3% 36.8 3 8.1% xxxxxx xxxx 17.3 2 11.6% 4.5 0 0.0% 21.8 2 9.2%
Attrition Loss Rate by Command
Unit State UPC Soldier
Name
Grade Gender DMOS ETS Date Days To
ETS
Yrs in Svc On
NOVAL
Pay
SFPA
xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E6 M 42A xxxxxxx 44 17 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E7 M 25B xxxxxxx 38 22 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E6 M 25B xxxxxxx 22 18 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E6 M 25U xxxxxxx 20 11 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E5 F 68E xxxxxxx 75 12 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E6 M 12N xxxxxxx 88 16 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E5 M 12N xxxxxxx 85 13 N N xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E4 F 91B xxxxxxx 10 7 N Y xxxx xxxx xxxxxxx E4 M 91J xxxxxxx 16 8 N N
90 Day Retention Alert Roster
POD
POD
Name
Attrition
Losses
PS
Attrition
Losses
NPS
Attrition
Losses
Average
Strength
Attrition
Losses
% PS
Attrition
Losses
% NPS
Attrition
Losses xxxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 1.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% xxxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 1.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% xxxx xxxxxx 0 0 0 9.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% xxxx xxxxxx 3 0 3 20.7 14.5% 0.0% 14.5% xxxx xxxxxx 5 0 5 12.3 40.5% 0.0% 40.5% xxxx xxxxxx 5 1 4 52.4 9.5% 1.9% 7.6% xxxx xxxxxx 7 0 7 33.6 20.8% 0.0% 20.8% xxxx xxxxxx 17 2 15 262.0 6.5% 0.8% 5.7%
Total 37 3 34 393.7 9.4% 0.8% 8.6%
1st Term Loss Rate by Command
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .