W912HV22R0003-am0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PA00109 DoDEA Replace Kinnick High School, Commander Fleet Activities (CFA), Yokosuka, Japan

See continuation page(s).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 22

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Nov-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912HV22R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Oct-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Nov-2021

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE-JAPAN DISTRICT

RM 147, BLDG. 250

CAMP ZAMA

ZAMA-CITY, KANAGAWA 252-8511

JAPAN

W912HV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HV22R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

CONTINUATION PAGE (AM-0001)

DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT (continued)

A. CHANGES TO SPECIFICATIONS – The amendment mark “(AM-0001)” is shown on each page of the amended page(s).

(1) Revised Section(s) to Project Specifications. Attached hereto are the following revised section(s) to the specifications. Revised section(s) will replace like-numbered section(s) in the subject solicitation specifications unless otherwise specified. Changes are indicated by a red line in the left margin of revised areas or in red text. All portions of the revised section(s) shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

Revised Section(s) Section 00 10 00 Section 00 21 16 Section 00 22 16 Section 01 20 00 Section 26 51 00 (revised areas not indicated) Section 27 41 00 (revised areas not indicated)

B. CHANGES TO DRAWINGS (ISSUED) – The amendment mark “(AM-0001)” is shown on each sheet of the amended drawing sheet(s).

(1) Revised Sheet(s) to Drawings. Attached hereto are the following revised sheets to the drawings. Revised sheets will replace like-numbered sheets in the subject solicitation drawings. Changes are indicated in revision clouds. All portions of the revised sheet(s) shall apply whether or not changes have been indicated.

Revised Sheet(s) to Drawings:

(GENERAL)

G-010 G-011 G-012 G-013 G-014 G-015

GC101

GC102

GI132

GI140

(CIVIL)

CS101

2C-101

2CG101

(AM-0001)

2CG102

2CU101

2C-302

2CP401

2CP402

2CR401

2CR402

2CR403

2C-522

(LANDSCAPE)

L-101 L-102

LI-101

LI-102

LI-103

LI-104

(STRUCTURAL)

S-008 S-009 3S-101 3S-201 3S-301 3S-501 3S-502 S-605 S-607 S-609 S-612 S-651

(ARCHITECTURE)

3A-101 3A-102 3A-201 3A-301 3A-310 3A-311 3A-312 3A-313 3A-314 3A-315 3A-401 3A-402 3A-501 3A-502 3A-503 A-604 A-703 A-814 A-822

3AG101

(AM-0001)

(MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING)

PS-101

3P-101 3P-102 3P-401 3P-601 3P-901 3P-902 3P-903 3M-101 3M-301 3M-401 3M-402 3M-601 3M-901 3M-902

3MI601

3MP901

(ELECTRICAL AND TELECOM)

ES122

ES123

ES401

ES402

ES403

(ELECTRICAL)

1EP101

1EP107

1EP603

1EP711

1EP712

1EP716

1EP723

1EL101

1EL107

1EL701

1EL702

1EL703

1EL704

1EL711

3EP101

3EP102

3EP401

3EP601

3EP701

3EP711

3EP712

3EL101

3EL601

3EL701

4EL-101

TS122

TS401

3TC101

3TC201

3TC601

3TC602

3TC701

3TY101

TY603

(AUDIO VISUAL)

EV-001

EV-107

EV-139

(2) Added Sheet(s) to Drawings. Attached hereto are the following added sheets to the drawings.

Revised Sheet(s) to Drawings:

EV-210

EV-239

EV-408

C. The Due Date and Time for receipt of proposals remains unchanged.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 10 00

SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

CLIN DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT

0001 Replace Kinnick High School 1 Job

TOTAL PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

OPTION ITEMS

Construct New Field House (Option 1)

1 Job

TOTAL (BASE + OPTION ITEMS) CLIN SCHEDULE

NOTES TO PROPOSAL SCHEDULE:

1. Failure of the offeror to propose prices for all items in the CLIN Schedule may be cause for rejection of the proposal as nonconforming.

2. See Section 01 20 00, Subparagraph 1.3 for line item description of CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002.

3. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

4. EXERCISE OF OPTIONS. The Government reserves the right to exercise option item(s) by written notice to the Contractor, either singularly or in any combination, within one-hundred thirty-five (135) calendar days of contract award of the Base Schedule at the prices stated in the CLIN Schedule. Completion of the added option(s) shall continue at the same schedule as the Base Schedule, unless otherwise noted in Section 00 70 00, 52.211-10, COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK.

5. This project will be incrementally funded and subject to the availability of funds. Refer to

Section 00 70 00 DFARS 252.232-7007.

6. Distribute the proposal cost of the Total Proposal Schedule, CLIN No. 0001, into the categories listed in the Breakdown Table below. Offerors that fail to provide the requested information may be considered nonresponsive.

7. Breakdown may be used to assist the Contracting Officer in determination of fair and reasonable pricing. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions to be necessary, breakdown may be used as a basis for price negotiations.

Breakdown Table

a. The estimated cost for Item 1 below should include the total cost for the construction of a four (4) story Kinnick High School building excluding demolitions of buildings 1396, 4375, and 3382.

b. The estimated cost for Item 2 below should include the total cost for the construction of supporting systems, including special construction features, canopies, electrical utilities, communications utilities, water and sewer utilities, site preparation, low impact development and environmental mitigation as indicated in the Civil drawings CS-101 Volume 1. These costs are typically all costs outside 1.5 meters from the exterior of the primary facility.

c. The estimated cost for Item 3 below should include all costs associated with the work for the athletic Field at Briggs Bay, including construction of field house track and field, press box bleachers, field house,basketball courts, open play field, stairs and all related site work and supporting facilities, including paving and walks, utilities, site amenities and landscaping, as indicated in Civil drawing CS-101 Volume 1.

d. The estimated cost for Item 4 below should include all costs associated with demolition of existing building 1396 and 4375 completely to grade including concrete floor slabs, concrete surrounding walks, and concrete foundations as indicated in drawings AD-101 Volume 2.

e. The estimated cost for Item 5 below should include all costs associated with the demolition of pre-manufactured buildings 3382 completely, including concrete base and footings, steel stairs, and surrounding concrete ramp, stairs, planters, utilities and chain link equipment enclosures as indicated in drawings AD-101 Volume 2.

f. Item 6 (Field Overhead Expenses) consists of common temporary work, direct temporary work, and site management costs. Common temporary work typically consists of field trailers, laydown area preparation, temporary utilities, temporary fencing, temporary bathroom facilities, and all other temporary measures installed that will be removed at the completion of the construction. Direct temporary expenses typically consist of scaffolding, material transportation delivery, and cleaning costs. Site management costs are those individuals that are required by contract to be provided by the prime contractor to administer the project (i.e. Site

Superintendent, QC manager, and other personnel as described in the specifications).

g. The TOTAL should be the same amount as the amount in CLIN 0001 in the

Proposal Schedule.

Breakdown Table:

Item Description Estimated Cost

Construction of Primary Facilities

Construction of Supporting Systems

Construction of Athletic Fields at Briggs Bay

Demolition of Existing Buildings 1396 and 4375

Demolition of Existing Building 3382

6 Field Overhead Expenses ¥____________________

Total (Items 1 – 6)

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

ection 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

SECTION 00 21 16

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

1. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS.

Proposals shall be submitted electronically via Department of Defense Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) (https://safe.apps.mil/) to Contract Specialist: Mr. Jiro Miyairi, Jiro.Miyairi.ln@usace.army.mil and Ms. Jennifer H. Knutson, Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil by the due date and time for submission of proposals.

Physical or paper copy proposals will not be accepted.

To submit an Electronic proposal through the DoD SAFE website, Offerors shall follow the following steps:

Step 1: Send an Email no less than 48-hours prior to the closing date and time stated for receipt of proposals to Mr. Jiro Miyairi, at Jiro.Miyairi.ln@usace.army.mil and Ms. Jennifer H. Knutson at Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil requesting a secure link to upload your proposal package to the DoD SAFE website (https://safe.apps.mil/).

Step 2: Prospective Offerors who timely submit a request will receive an automated email containing a link that will take the Offeror to the DoD SAFE website where the files can be uploaded.

Step 3: Prospective Offerors shall follow the instructions on the linked webpage to upload the proposal package file. There is an optional note section that will be included in the email to the recipient selected. The recipient will receive an automated email containing any note entered and instructions for downloading the file.

The link provided is only available for one-time use and is only valid for 14 calendar days from the date and time the email is sent to the Prospective Offeror. Offerors who wish to revise or withdraw their proposal prior to the time set for receipt of proposals in the solicitation will need to promptly notify the Government POC for additional instructions.

Offerors are cautioned to log into the DoD SAFE website, using the link provided, with sufficient time to ensure the electronic proposal package is completely uploaded and time-stamped in the system prior to the date and time specified for receipt of proposals.

It is the responsibility of the Prospective Offeror to promptly notify Mr. Jiro Miyairi, at Jiro.Miyairi.ln@usace.army.mil and Ms. Jennifer H. Knutson, Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil if an email containing the link is NOT received within 48 hours of the exact time set for receipt of proposals in the solicitation.

It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure their proposal is received by the date and time for submission of proposals.

2. CONTRACTOR APPLICATIONS.

Firms which have not submitted a Contractor Application to this office are requested to go to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Japan Engineering District, Contracting Division website:

https://www.poj.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/ to download the Contractor Application.

Such firms shall be required to complete the aforementioned application and submit documents indicating they are registered with the Government of Japan to perform construction in Japan and possess both the necessary construction licenses and permits required to perform the requisite work identified in the solicitation. This documentation should be submitted with your proposal.

Interested Joint Venture (JV) partners who have individually submitted a Contractor Application previously are not required to submit a single, JV Contractor Application.

3. SUBMISSIONS OF OFFERS IN JAPANESE YEN. Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in terms of Japanese Yen, including any required bid guarantee. Offers received in other than Japanese Yen shall be rejected.

4. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. Magnitude of the Proposed Project.

The estimated price range of this work is between ¥10,000,000,000 and ¥25,000,000,000 [FAR

36.204/DFARS 236.204].

5. BIDDER INQUIRIES.

a. Prospective Offerors shall submit all questions or requests for information (RFI) regarding this solicitation through the PrjoNet website, which can be accessed at https://www.projnet.org/projnet/. The “Bidder Inquiry Module” in ProjNet will allow prospective Offerors to submit questions and/or RFI, and display previously submitted questions and/or RFI posted by other prospective Offerors. Telephonic and email questions sent directly to Government representatives will not be accepted. All questions and/or RFI shall be submitted Bidder Inquiry Module by the due date and time identified herein.

b. All questions or RFI shall be submitted within the ProjNet, Bidder Inquiry Module no later than 11:59 PM (midnight), Japan Standard Time on 31 January 2022 11 January 2022.

c. To submit and/or review questions related to this project, prospective Bidders must use a Bidder Inquiry Key and follow the instructions listed below for access.

d. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 5UZCE6-7Q9Q59

e. Prior to submitting questions or RFI, prospective Offerors are encouraged to thoroughly review the Solicitation and all attachments (i.e. specifications and drawings) and the Bidder Inquiry Module to confirm other prospective Offerors have not previously submitted the same question or RFI, in order to avoid repeat inquiries.

f. For specification questions, select “Specifications,” then list the Section, Paragraph and Page Number to correspond to your inquiry. For Plans questions, select “Plans” and list the sheet and detail number for the inquiry.

g. ProjNet Access Instructions:

(1) Go to the website: https://www.projnet.org/projnet/.

(2) At the home page, select USACE for the “Managing Agency” field.

(3) At the home page, enter your email address under the “EMAIL” field (do not enter a password in the “Regular Accounts” Section).

(4) At the home page, enter the Bidder Inquiry Key under the “KEY ACCESS” field.

(5) Read and check “I agree to the privacy & security notice.”

(6) Press Sign-in button.

(7) A page will open requesting user account information and will ask you to create a new account (if you don’t have an existing account in the system). Enter all data fields required for account creation. When you log back in, you will need to answer your security question.

(8) Press “add user” to continue.

(9) Upon completion of account creation, you will have access to the ProjNet system and project page.

(10) Review and submit questions regarding this project. The user who submits a question will receive an automated email notification that their question has been received. All questions can be viewed from this program.

(11) For specific Step-by-Step for POSTING YOUR INQUIRIES, see the Reference link in the Contract Viewer.

(12) For questions about ProjNet, please contact the Call Center help desk toll free number at 1-800-428-HELP, which operates from 8 am to 5 pm (U.S. Central Time Zone). Questions can be emailed to the helpdesk at staff@rcesupport.com.

h. The Government reserves the right to answer questions after this deadline, but is not obligated to provide a response to late questions. The Government will respond to inquiries in ProjNet. Government responses to inquiries are intended to provide clarity and may or may not result in an amendment to the solicitation. All revisions to the specifications and/or drawings will be specifically noted and incorporated into the solicitation via an amendment. Any information given a prospective Offeror concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective Offerors as an amendment to the solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting proposals or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective Offerors.

6. SIGNATURE ON OFFERS. Offers must be signed by an officer of the company or an individual who is authorized to sign offers for and on behalf of the company. An individual, other than an officer of the company, who signs an offer must submit evidence of his authority to sign such offer. This evidence must accompany the offer. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

7. JOINT VENTURE. In the event the offeror is a joint venture, the offer must be signed by an authorized representative of each participant in the joint venture. The joint venture as an entity shall also have an active System for Award Management registration – See FAR 52.204-7 System for Award Management. Failure to comply with this requirement will be cause for rejection of the offer.

8. OFFEROR ELIGIBILITY. This contract will be performed in its entirety in the country of Japan and is intended only for local sources. Only local sources will be considered under this solicitation. Local sources are sources (e.g. corporations, partnerships, or Joint Ventures [For a Joint Venture, the Joint Venture as an independent entity must satisfy the local source requirements or, in the alternative, each member of the Joint Venture must individually satisfy the local source requirements]) that are physically located in Japan and authorized (i.e. licensed and registered) to perform in Japan, the type of construction work specific in this solicitation.

Specifically, a prospective offeror must be duly authorized to operate and conduct business in Japan and must fully comply with all applicable laws, decrees, labor standards, and regulations of Japan during the performance of the resulting contracts. In addition, prior to award of the contracts, offerors must be registered with the Government of Japan to do construction work in Japan and possess necessary construction licenses and permits to perform work required under this solicitation. The U.S. Government will not offer “United States Official Contractor” status under Article XIV of the US-Japan Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to U.S. contractors normally resident in the United States; nor will the U.S. Government certify employees of such contractors as “Members of the Civilian Component” under Article I(b) of the SOFA.

9. JAPANESE CONSUMPTION TAX. By virtue of Article XII of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), materials, supplies, equipment and services procured for official purposes in Japan by the United States armed forces, or its authorized procurement agencies are EXEMPT from various Japanese Taxes, including Consumption Tax. The exemption from the Japanese Consumption Tax applies not only to Japanese prime contractors, but also to Japanese subcontractors or suppliers at every level regardless of the nationality of the prime contractor whether a Japanese or a Foreign firm. The instruments listed hereinafter have been agreed to by both governments of Japan and the U.S. as "Proof of Purchase by U.S. Forces in Japan.”

Standard Form 1034 Public Voucher for Purchases and Services other than Personal

DD Form 1155 Order for Supplies or Services

Standard Form 44 Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher

ENG Form 93 Payment Estimate

Therefore, Japanese Consumption Tax shall NOT be included in your bid, proposal or quote.

10. FUNDING. Funds are not presently available for this acquisition. No contract award will be made until appropriated funds are made available from which payment for contract purposes can be made.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.236-28 Preparation of Proposals--Construction OCT 1997 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.215-7008 Only One Offer JUL 2019 252.215-7010 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data

Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data

JUL 2019

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.211-2 AVAILABILITY OF SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS

LISTED IN THE ACQUISITION STREAMLINING AND STANDARDIZATION INFORMATION SYSTEM

(ASSIST) (APR 2014)

(a) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(1) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/);

(2) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/);

(3) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(b) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point (DoDSSP) by--

(1) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(2) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(3) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(End of provision)

52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)

The Government contemplates award of a Firm-Fixed-Price construction contract resulting from this solicitation.

52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)

(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from

CONTRACTING DIVISION - CONTRACTING OFFICER

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Japan District Camp Zama - Bldg 250, Room 147 Zama-City, Kanagawa 252-8511 Japan

(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) The Government will be conducting a telephonic pre-proposal conference and site visit for this project. Please see agenda below. It is encouraged that interested prime contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers attend the pre-proposal conference and site visit.

The telephonic pre-proposal conference will be held on: 19 November 2021 at 09:30 AM, Japan Standard Time.

(Teleconference number and presentation slides will be emailed prior to the preproposal conference)

The site visit will be held on: 22 November 2021, Japan Standard Time.

Offerors who would like to attend the pre-proposal conference and site visit shall email the below individuals by 8 November 2021 at 4:00 PM, Japan Standard Time. Please identify the individuals that will need to be escorted on base.

Masaaki Kido: Masaaki.Kido@usace.army.mil Nicholas Bloomer: Nicholas.M.Bloomer.civ@usace.army.mil Brandon Taira: Brandon.T.Taira.civ@usace.army.mil Jiro Miyairi: Jiro.Miyairi.ln@usace.army.mil Jennifer Knutson: Jennifer.H.Knutson.Civ@usace.army.mil

Site Visit Schedule/Agenda:

Meet Time: Specific time will be established after finalization of participants.

Meet Location: Carney Gate (Main Gate)

There will be a shuttle bus provided by USACE to shuttle participants to the Briggs Bay/Yokosuka MS project site

Time TBD: Shuttle participants from Briggs Bay/Yokosuka MS project site to existing Kinnick HS site

Time TBD: Shuttle returns to Carney Gate (Main Gate)

Additional Requirements for Non-Base Access Holders:

Meet Time: Specific time will be established after finalization of participants.

Meet location: Carney Gate (Main Gate)

1. ALL attendees must fill-in the CFAY 5512/21 Form and provide an official photo ID such as PDF of Passport or Driver's License plus "JyuminhyoTohon with Honseki-chi" issued within three (3) months (must be original) and Driver's License, "Jyumin Kihon Daicho Card with picture" or "Driver's License".

2. The POC needs to receive all forms mentioned above and copy of IDs no later than 8 November 2021 at 4:00 PM, Japan Standard Time. The POC needs to receive access request with copy if IDs via e-mail from the attendees and after review of the documents, these will be forwarded to the pass office prior to the date of access.

3. ALL attendees may park their POVs at the Off-Base public parking lots and walk to the Pass & ID office. The POC will be escorting the attendees to the Pass & ID office. A photo ID (i.e.

Passport, Driver's License plus Jyuminhyo with Honseki-chi, or Juyumin Kihon Daicho Card) will be required at the entrance gate to the Pass & ID office.

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es):

https://www.acquisition.gov/

52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

Subparagraph (c)(5) of FAR clause 52.215-1 -- Instructions to Offerors -- Competitive Acquisition, is revised to read as follows. “Offerors shall submit proposals in response to this solicitation in English, unless otherwise permitted by the solicitation, and in Japanese yen”.

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 AWARD OF CONTRACT

1.1 Contract award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. To be eligible for award, an offeror must be evaluated as “acceptable” for Factors 1 and 2. In accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.404-1 -- Proposal Analysis, price will be evaluated for fairness and reasonability. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without holding discussions; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer.

Under LPTA, best value is expected to result from the selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price, that is also fair and reasonable.

1.2 Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make an award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions, clarifications or any contact with the offerors.

However, the Government reserves the right to discuss aspects of proposals with Offerors in the competitive range, if one is determined to be necessary, upon completion of the evaluation. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposal.

2.0 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. Volume I – Technical Proposal

2.1 Factor 1 – Construction Experience

2.1.1 Evaluation of Construction Experience

a. The Government will evaluate Construction experience in completing project(s) to assess the offeror’s ability to complete the requisite work associated with this project based on the information provided by the offeror using the Construction Experience Sheet, Attachment I.

Construction Experience will be rated utilizing the Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method in Table 1 below.

b. Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the construction experience demonstrated by the Offeror.

The minimum requirements for this evaluation factor will be met if the offeror demonstrates experience as a PRIME CONTRACTOR on at least one (1) construction project which meets all of the below criteria for minimum acceptability:

(1) Criteria 1, Has a value of ¥2,000,000,000 or more,

(2) Criteria 2, Demonstrates experience in construction (new construction or renovation) of multi-functional area facility or facilities that involved multiple disciplines and trades at the same time,

(3) Criteria 3, Is completed and turned over no longer than six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation, and

(4) Criteria 4, Completed in Japan.

If a proposal does not demonstrate experience on at least one project that independently meets all the above criteria (1 through 4) then the proposal will be considered “unacceptable” and rejected.

c. Note (1):

The Government will also consider prime contractor experience of the offeror's parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm as experience attributable to the offeror for evaluation purposes if the offeror can establish that the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm will have a significant involvement in performance of this contract and describe the resources of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm that will be utilized on project that is the subject of this procurement.

If submitting a parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm’s project for experience, it is the offeror's responsibility to effectively demonstrate and describe how the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm's resources (such as workforce, management, facilities, or other resources) will significantly contribute to the execution of the project which is the subject of this procurement; failure to effectively demonstrate and describe the planned contribution of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm’s involvement in the subject project of this procurement will cause the past experience of the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firms to be considered not relevant for evaluation purposes in this procurement. Further, any project in which the parent/subsidiary/affiliate firm performed the role of a subcontractor will not be considered relevant when evaluating the experience of the offeror.

Note (2):

A Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) or Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) alone is not considered a relevant construction project, but an individual task order project against its SATOC or MATOC may be submitted if it meets applicable minimum requirements for a project set forth above.

Note (3):

If offeror identified in Block 14 is a JV, a project completed by a JV may be submitted for purposes of demonstrating prime contractor experience, so long as at least one member of the offeror JV was a member of the JV on the completed project. Offeror must demonstrate evidence that at least one member of the offeror JV was a member of the JV on the completed project, such as a signed joint venture agreement or similar documentation.

Example: Offeror for this solicitation is Joint Venture A-B. JV A-B is comprised of Company A and Company B. Past projects completed by JV A-C, comprised of Company A and Company C may be used to demonstrate prime contractor experience for this solicitation, as Company A, a member of the offeror JV, was a member of JV A-C.

Projects completed by a joint venture where the offeror was a member of the JV may be submitted for the purpose of demonstrating prime contractor experience. Offeror must demonstrate evidence of JV membership on the completed project, such as a signed joint venture agreement or similar documentation.

Example: Offeror for this solicitation is Company A. Past projects completed by JV A-C, comprised of Company A and Company C may be used to demonstrate prime contractor experience for this solicitation, as Company A, the offeror, was a member of JV A-C.

Projects completed by a member of a joint venture for this solicitation (as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement for this effort) may be submitted for the purpose of demonstrating prime contractor experience.

Example: Offeror for this solicitation is JV A-B. Past projects completed by Company A may be used to demonstrate prime contractor experience for this solicitation, as Company A is a member of the offeror JV A-B.

d. Construction Experience will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis utilizing the rating method in Table 1.

Table 1: Factor 1, Construction Experience, Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

2.2 Factor 2 – Past Performance

2.2.1 Evaluation of Past Performance

a. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the requirement outlined in the solicitation RFP. The Government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment II or Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) report), and (ii) any relevant data independently obtained by the Government. If a reference identified by the offeror does not submit a survey/questionnaire, the Government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a survey/questionnaire. The Government reserves the right to obtain or verify Offeror’s past performance information from other sources including the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

Government evaluators may contact points of contacts listed in the Past Performance Questionnaire for the projects submitted to verify your past performance on these projects.

Offeror shall encourage all customer points of contacts/reference to provide evaluation of your performance as requested. Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable rating method in Table 2 below.

b. Evaluation Criteria: Past performance will first be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s past performance is recent and relevant, or not relevant, to the effort to be acquired.

Only recent and relevant projects will be considered for this factor. Performance on a project is deemed recent and relevant if the project individually meets any of the criteria listed in the Factor 1, Construction Experience evaluation criteria (see 2.1.1). Second, the past performance evaluation will determine how well the offeror performed on recent and relevant projects.

As a minimum, the offeror shall demonstrate overall satisfactory performance (to include a showing of adequate corrective action on adverse past performance information) on recent and relevant project(s).

c. Factor 2, Past Performance, will be rated on an acceptable / unacceptable basis utilizing the rating method in Table 2.

Table 2: Factor 2, Past Performance, Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below).

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have “Unknown” or “Neutral” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “Acceptable”.

B. Volume II – Price Proposal

2.3 Factor 3 – Price

2.3.1 Evaluation of Price

2.3.2 Prices will be reviewed for minor or clerical errors. If necessary, offerors will be afforded an opportunity to resolve any such errors. Any exchanges with offerors under this subparagraph shall be for the purpose of clarification (FAR 15.306(a)) and shall not constitute negotiation as defined at FAR 15.306(d).

2.3.3 After resolution of minor clerical errors and/or mistakes, a price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine fairness, reasonableness and the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of this project.

2.3.4 The total evaluated price will be determined by using the offeror’s total price (Total Proposal Schedule). In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

2.3.5 Offerors shall ensure the data in Section 00 10 00 is complete and accurate. Failure to provide all price/cost data requested may be cause for determination of proposals as unacceptable.

2.3.6 Breakdown in Section 00 10 00 may be used to assist the Contracting Officer in determination of fair and reasonable pricing. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions to be necessary, breakdown may be used as a basis for price negotiations.

3.0 FINDINGS DEFINITIONS

3.1 Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. If award will be made without conducting discussions, offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (e.g., relevance of past performance information, and adverse past performance) or to resolve minor or clerical errors. See FAR 15.306(a).

3.2 Communications. Communications are exchanges between the Government and offerors after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(b).

3.3 Deficiency. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increased the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

3.4 Discussions. Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

3.5 Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-cost/price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission or mistake).

3.6 Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). A process used in competitive negotiated contracting where the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

--End of Section-- (End of Summary of Changes)